i wanted to ask how can i paste two commands together in one line?
It should be like instead of this:
PROMPT "HELLO"
WAIT SECONDS=10
They should be considered as one:
PROMPT "HELLO" || WAIT SECONDS=10
It is to create multiple result line after an if statemenent in iMacros, but since the if statement is done in one line, i need to put several commands in one line...
The if statement has be done! I only need to know how to put these two commands into one line!
Thank you
Generally speaking I would strongly recommend using the JavaScript Scripting Interface, but here suggest a certain workaround for two commands (or more if adjusted):
' set "P" or "W" here
SET C "P"
SET C EVAL("var c = '{{C}}'; switch (c) {case 'P': s = 'UFJPTVBUJTIwJTIySEVMTE8lMjI='; break; case 'W': s = 'V0FJVCUyMFNFQ09ORFMlM0QxMA=='; break;}")
URL GOTO=javascript:(function()<SP>{try{var<SP>e_m64<SP>=<SP>"{{C}}",<SP>n64<SP>=<SP>"bWFjcm8uaWlt";if(!/^(?:chrome|https?|file)/.test(location)){alert('iMacros:<SP>Open<SP>webpage<SP>to<SP>run<SP>a<SP>macro.');return;}var<SP>macro<SP>=<SP>{};macro.source<SP>=<SP>decodeURIComponent(atob(e_m64));macro.name<SP>=<SP>decodeURIComponent(atob(n64));var<SP>evt<SP>=<SP>document.createEvent("CustomEvent");evt.initCustomEvent("iMacrosRunMacro",<SP>true,<SP>true,<SP>macro);window.dispatchEvent(evt);}catch(e){alert('iMacros<SP>Bookmarklet<SP>error:<SP>'+e.toString());}})<SP>();
Related
I'm developing some C++ code with VSCode+VIM extension. From time to time I need to do this while reading code: say I'm inside a long function and I want to know who called it. The first step to do is to move cursor directly under function's name so that I can invoke some keystrokes to show references.
What I'm current using is to press "[" key twice which will bring me to the opening bracket of the function. Since I have to follow some coding standard, the typical scenario is like this:
ReturnType ClassName::FunctionName(
ParamType1 param1,
ParamType2 param2,
ParamType3 param3)
{ // <-- Cursor here
......
}
Then I need to press "k" several times to move cursor under "ReturnType", depending on how many parameters are there. Next, I still have to press "w" 3 times to eventually move cursor from "ReturnType", to "FunctionName".
As you can see, this is a little painful here. I've tried easy motion approach with VSCode VIM extension, this makes my life a little easier, but I'm looking for a even better one.
Any VIM trick or VSCode extension can do this decently?
Any help will be appreciated, thanks!
To avoid having to press k a variable number of times it's possible to make use of the fact that the ) is right on the line above, and use % to go to the matching (. The complete key sequence is [[b%b.
However the first b will go to the ( if there's nothing between the parentheses. [[ge%b can be used instead.
If there's something between ) and { (such as a const qualifier) [[?)<cr>%b would work (this solution is complex and perhaps only useful in a key binding?)
[[?(<cr>b works too as long as there's no parameter that contains an open parentheses (such as in FunctionName(int (*function_pointer)(int, int)) { ... })
I use simple NPP_Exec commands in N++ which work fine for macros. Eg.:
NPP_MENUCOMMAND Macro/Action1
NPP_MENUCOMMAND Encoding/Convert to ANSI
NPP_SAVE
But how can I run a specific macro several times?
I have tried NPP_MENUCOMMAND Macro/Run but then I still have to manually select the macro I need and set it to "Run until the end of line" in the pop-up window.
You can use the NppExec plugin for simple loops like this:
:REPEAT
SCI_SENDMSG SCI_GETCURRENTPOS
set pos1 = $(MSG_RESULT)
// put your Macro invocation here instead of the linedown:
SCI_SENDMSG SCI_LINEDOWN
SCI_SENDMSG SCI_GETCURRENTPOS
set pos2 = $(MSG_RESULT)
// if the linedown (or your macro) doesnot give another pos, we have reached the end
if $(pos1) == $(pos2) goto END
// else loop
goto REPEAT
:END
it stores the current position
then it does something that advances the position (in this example a linedown, you would put your Macro invocation there, make sure it changes the cursor position)
then the position is compared with the stored position; we have reached the end, if the position has not changed;
in this case we leave the loop
I just found a simple and easy solution for that. I did not use command lines but it might work as well:
Make sure the macro ends with a Ctrl-Tab key
From Settings -> Preferences -> MISC, disable the doc switcher.
Open all files to be edited.
Use the "Run macro multiple times" dialog, and enter the number of files you have just opened.
Execute
Save all
I did not create this, found it here:https://sourceforge.net/p/notepad-plus/discussion/331754/thread/469ffec9/ , but it worked like a charm for me. I could edit 400 documents in less than 2 min.
I found another way to achieve this. Inspired by Wagner Fontes's answer, we can do the following:
Step 1: Record your Macro
Step 2 (Important): Before you finish the Macro, type the "Ctrl + Tab" as the last record in the Macro. This hotkey means moving to the next opening text file.
Step 3: Save the Marco.
Because of the Step 2, Notepad will move to the next text file after running the macro once. In this method, "Run a Macro Multiple Times" makes "Multiple Files".
I am working on porting Google Cloud SDK command line auto completion feature to fish shell. When I have an unambiguous reply with multiple arguments:
A) Either the command is completed with all those arguments BUT spaces gets escaped (\ ) when I specify the function call in the complete command inside ''s or ""s, like: > complete ... -a '(__fun)'
B) or if I don't do that (just: -a (__fun)), then only the first argument of the reply gets into the completion and all the other arguments "get lost"
Is it possible to reply with multiple arguments at once in fish completion?
Could be done in a number of ways. You will have to hack it a bit, though, since as ridiculous_fish says it's not designed for this.
Easiest would be to ship your own wrapper function that can take the escaped output and pass it on in a way that works. Not very pretty, though, and would screw with autosuggestions unless you also go back and modify the history lines.
Here's something semi-hacky/semi-elegant I would propose:
If you have looked up a "sequence" of args you'd want to complete at once, at first invocation put the trailing args as the description to the first one. Once that one has been locked in, remove all other options but the first in this "description queue", keep going through it and it will simply be a matter of quickly pressing tab-tab-tab-tab.
Completions don't have to be perfect, they're mostly a lil help on the way until you have enough history lines that autosuggestions take over, imo.
total Emacs noob here. So right now I'm working on a fairly big LaTeX project in Emacs in which there are couple of places where I need to index some words, using the makeidx package. Because I also wanted indexed words to be bold, I created my own command \ind{} which would make the argument go bold and indexed. But right now I'm dissatisifed with this command so I'd like to change every instance of \ind{whatever} in my text by \textbf{whatever}\index{whatever by default}.
The thing is I know exactly what I want :
Go through the text, look for any instance of \ind{ and replace by \textbf{ using search-and-replace
Save the argument of \ind ("whatever" in this case) in memory
Ask me the user what should the argument of \index be. By default (by striking enter), it should be the first argument, but I can also change my mind and enter something different ("whatever by default" in this case). If there's no input (only a space " " for example) stop the program.
Write down \index{, the new argument and }.
Go to next occurance in the text.
But, alas!, I know not how to achieve this, so I need someone's help. If it should take too much time to explain how to do such a thing, would you please send me some tutorial about writing my own functions?
I hope I'm being clear, and thanks for your patience!
This approach seems vaguely unorthodox to me, but it works and seems sufficient for a one-off job...
In the replacement text for replace-regexp and query-replace-regexp (C-M-%), one newer escape sequence is \,(...), where ... can be any Lisp expression. There's a Lisp function read-from-minibuffer which reads arbitrary text typed by the user, with an optional default. Therefore:
C-M-%: Start query-replace-regexp.
\\ind{\([^}]+?\)}: The pattern to search for.
\\textbf{\1}\\index{\,(read-from-minibuffer "index content? " \1)}: The replacement text. The user will be prompted for the text to put in the braces following the \index{} element, using the original text between the braces following the \ind{} element as a default.
Note that when using query-replace-regexp, you'll have to confirm each choice by typing y after each. Use M-x replace-regexp if you want to avoid this step.
Vlad give you the LaTeX answer to your problem. An Emacs solution is the key-macro: start with
C-x (
to define a new macro, then do one step of your change, say:
C-s \ind{
<left>ex
Then copy and paste the argument in the \textbf macro... You have to be careful to move in a way that will be repeatable. Once the standard modification is done, you let the cursor after the whatever by default and end the definition by
C-x )
now C-x e will call the macro you just define, letting your cursor at the correct place to change the part you want to change You can also repeat the e to call the macro several time at once.
Why not just redefine the \ind so that it can get an optional argument?
For example:
\newcommand{\ind}[2][]{%
\def\first{#1}%
\ifx\first\empty
\textbf{#2}\index{#2}%
\else
\textbf{#2}\index{#1}%
\fi
}
This way you can use \ind{whatever} or \ind[whatever-else]{whatever}.
I know there is a way to list mappings via :map (or :imap, :cmap, etc.), but I can't find a way to list macros I have stored in my vimrc file (as in let #a = 'blahblah').
Is there a way to do this without having to manually looking inside it (via :split [myvimrcfile] or whatever way)?
Also, if it is possible, is there a way to attach some sort of documentation that would display with the macro to explain what it is for? I have a handful that I use quite a bit, but about 6 weeks apart. It would be nice to just quickly list them along with a comment that tells me what the macro does (or even just a name so I make sure I use the right one).
Thanks
In vim, the macros are just stored in registers. You can recall the content of any register and execute it as a macro (which is what the # does). To see a list of what is in your registers, use :reg.
You can see the contents of all the registers using the
:reg
command. Or an argument string like this
:reg ahx
will show you the contents of registers a, h, and x.
That way you can at least see what sequence of commands will be run and hopefully that will be clear enough for you to tell one from another.
The registers simply contain text. You can paste the command sequence in as text or you can copy text into a register and then run it as a command, depending on how you access the register.
I have not found any direct way to edit the contents of a register, but you can paste it into the file, edit it, and then save it back to the same register.
IHTH.
As /u/jheddings wrote the macros are stored as registers and what counts is the assignment of the code to the register (usually done in the vimrc files with let #a=blahblah
To ease the way to display the macros you defined in your vimrc file (in my case it is in the ~/.vimrc path) you can use this vim function:
function! ShowMacros()
10new
exe 'r!' . 'grep -B 1 -E "^\s*let #" ~/.vimrc'
call cursor(1,1)
endfunction
What it does:
10new - open a new vim window with ten lines size
exe ... - execute a command and put in the window
call ... - go to the first line first column
You can execute this function by tipping in the normal mode
:call ShowMacros
You could additionally create a key mapping or a command to fasten the way to call the function:
:cnoremap sm call ShowMacros()<CR>
command! sm call ShowMacros()`
This is the original post where I wrote the function similar to the above.
The OP asked, "is there a way to attach some sort of documentation that would display with the macro to explain what it is for?"
I have found VI / VIM macros extremely obtuse to understand even a week after I've written them, so I heartily support the idea of documentation. I have a suggestion for that, in two parts.
First is the process of documenting the macro in your .vimrc. I've developed the following .vimrc comment format that helps me understand, a week or a year or more later, what a macro is supposed to be doing. E.g.:
"
"= GENERIC CLIPBOARD YANK <F2>y (Y for Yank)
"= Yank the entire contents of the file into the clipboard; quit without saving.
"
"define F2 followed by y to be:
"| Go to line 1.
"| | From there, into the * buffer (system clipboard),
"| | | yank to the end of the file.
"| | | | Go to sleep for 1 second (to allow the clipboard to be updated).
"| | | | | Quit without saving the file.
"| | | | | |
map #2y 1G"*yG1gs:q!<CR>
"-------"-"-"-"--"------
Second, I am imagining that Jakub's ShowMacros() function above could be modified to grep a specific set of Help lines for each macro that would be in the file along with the definition, much the way the above command-line breakdown is attached to the definition, that would provide the needed User Help.
I've flagged two lines above with "= at the beginning of each, so that they can become the User Help. Then Jakub's grep command would search for "^\"= ". Here's the command I used. I'm not sure if the -E for Extended Regular Expressions is needed and the -B 1 is a nice touch to include one line previous to a matching sequence, so here I have an explicitly empty comment line.
In my vimrc, I only needed one backslash, for the initial parsing of the definitions. Here's the line, replacing the one in Jakub's function definition above:
exe 'r!' . 'grep -B 1 -E "^\"= " ~/.vimrc'
Thanks to Jakub's hint, I now can generate help from my .vimrc in pretty much exactly the way the OP is asking for. I've been using vi since 1983, so I'm pretty stoked.
Thanks Jakub!
IHTH,
August