I'm developing some C++ code with VSCode+VIM extension. From time to time I need to do this while reading code: say I'm inside a long function and I want to know who called it. The first step to do is to move cursor directly under function's name so that I can invoke some keystrokes to show references.
What I'm current using is to press "[" key twice which will bring me to the opening bracket of the function. Since I have to follow some coding standard, the typical scenario is like this:
ReturnType ClassName::FunctionName(
ParamType1 param1,
ParamType2 param2,
ParamType3 param3)
{ // <-- Cursor here
......
}
Then I need to press "k" several times to move cursor under "ReturnType", depending on how many parameters are there. Next, I still have to press "w" 3 times to eventually move cursor from "ReturnType", to "FunctionName".
As you can see, this is a little painful here. I've tried easy motion approach with VSCode VIM extension, this makes my life a little easier, but I'm looking for a even better one.
Any VIM trick or VSCode extension can do this decently?
Any help will be appreciated, thanks!
To avoid having to press k a variable number of times it's possible to make use of the fact that the ) is right on the line above, and use % to go to the matching (. The complete key sequence is [[b%b.
However the first b will go to the ( if there's nothing between the parentheses. [[ge%b can be used instead.
If there's something between ) and { (such as a const qualifier) [[?)<cr>%b would work (this solution is complex and perhaps only useful in a key binding?)
[[?(<cr>b works too as long as there's no parameter that contains an open parentheses (such as in FunctionName(int (*function_pointer)(int, int)) { ... })
Related
I want to map two dot/period key presses to Tab key in AutoHotkey script. I tried to map similarly as its shown for remapping semicolon key - on AutoHotkey forums, but it doesn't work. I tried following:
1. `..`::Tab
2. ..::Tab
AutoHotkey gives an error
.
I tried searching on AutoHotkey Remap docs, but couldn't figure it out. The period key is the one with the greater than mark and not the number keypad period key. See this: Dot/period key
Addition info/context in response to reply by user 0x464e:
Basically, I am trying to expand Emmet style abbreviations in devtools style sub-panel since the chrome devtools team wont implement it.
I am not a fast typist, so it's a pain to type complete property names. For example, if I want to type margin-top, (see the image), Chrome autocomplete brings up margin, margin-block margin-block-end etc.
Now, for margin-top, you need to at least type margin-t to get the autocomplete to show that property.
This is the case for many very common CSS properties like margins, paddings, etc., so autocomplete isn't great.
On the other hand, if I just type mt and have Autohotkey expand to margin-top, it's much much faster, saves me much time and keeps me sane.
Basically, I have setup some hotstring in .ahk script and they work too.
However, if I press mt followed by a Tab key press, Chrome's autocomplete takes over and hotstring fails, (try once to see the problem). Instead, currently I press spacebar, or . (period) to trigger the hotstring. It works, but the problem is it leaves a space or a dot with the expanded text. [see this].
So, that's the actual reason I wanted a double period key trigger to replace Tab.
It would be great if the hotstring trigger would work with a double period key, but doesn't leave the trigger character itself and then have send Tab so as to jump to the value input of the just expanded property.
You're not really looking for a traditional remap, which is why you didn't find it from the documentation.
Remapping is just simply remapping one key to another, but you're not trying to do that. You're trying to make some action do another action.
Anyway, what you're asking is doable, but there's loads of different ways it can be achieved with difficulties varying from simple to extremely advanced & complicated.
You'll need to specify things more clearly before this can be answered properly.
Biggest questions that pop into my head right away are at least:
Should this work everywhere, or just in text input fields?
How should the original functionality of . be preserved, if at all.
(What should happen after the initial . keypress?)
Should there be some timeout between the keypresses?
Etc, this is just what I could think of right away, but surely there's more.
Anyway, for now I can give a simple implementation with a hotstring:
:*?:..::{Tab}
So this is a hotstring with the * and ? options.
I'm guessing these would probably be pretty good options for this.
So what this does, is it presses backspace twice and sends a Tab if you type ...
This should be fine for text editors, but it leaves much to be desired (the points I listed above aren't considered since I can't know what you're looking for. This is just what a default simple hotstring can offer).
Looks to me like you don't actually want the additional mapping of .. to Tab, but instead just want to update your existing hotstrings to activate immediately (without waiting for an EndChar) when the hotstring is followed by ..
Normally, you might look to the Ending Characters option to create this functionality, but since you want multiple characters to trigger this, we need to look to other options.
I will be using the example of ::mt::margin-top for my sample implementation. Extend any changes I make to these to the rest of your hotstrings in the script you screenshotted.
Here are the changes I am making to this example:
Add your .. to the end of each of your hotstrings triggers. For example ::mt::margin-top becomes ::mt..::margin-top. However, at this present, this still requires some sort of ending character to be pressed in order to proc. Let's fix that in the next step
Add the Asterisk Modifier to the hotstring. From the docs:
* (asterisk): An ending character (e.g. Space, ., or Enter) is not required to trigger the hotstring.
Final code for ::mt::margin-top example:
:*:mt..::margin-top
And extend this * insertion and .. appendation to each of your hotstrings.
Hope this helped! Lmk if you need any more help or changes.
I'm learning Vim for few days and I have a question when coding with vim.
Let say I'm creating an object like this
const person = {
name: "Tu<my pointer after u character>"
}
What is the best way to move my pointer from after u character to after the double quote so I can keep writing my object
Another case is if I finish create object like this
const person = {
name: "Tu<my pointer after u character>"
}
How do I get my pointer to the line after the close curly bracket to keep writing code.
Some people say that I can escape the insert mode and using shift + A to go end of line but it takes 4 buttons to do that?
Thanks for answering my question.
Indeed the way to do it is to escape insert mode and use A to
[A]ppend stuff to the end of the line. To jump to the } in your code, there
are many many options, and which to use depends on the situation and user
preference, but I tend to use something like 3j to move 3 lines down (or
however many I need to move). And by putting the following in my vimrc:
set number
set relativenumber
I always know what number of lines I want to move.
Vim seems a bit weird for about 2 weeks (for me at least, when I started coding
in Vim) but after that it becomes automatic that if I finish inserting text for
any reason, I instinctively hit Esc. Many (most?) vim users remap
the some other key like CapsLock to act like Esc, since the Esc key on
modern keyboards is in an awkward position (unlike in the early days).
Once the 'modal' nature of vim becomes natural for you, things will fall into
place.
Oh, and it really helps if you learn to touch type 100% (i.e. never need to
look at the keyboard - even for numbers, punctuation, 'weird symbols' etc.)
Good luck!
In the first case, press <Right> or <End>, just like in any editor.
In the second case, press <Down> to move the caret after the }, then press <CR> (to open a new line) or <Down> (to move the caret to the line after the }), just like in any editor.
Going back to normal mode just for that is silly.
Note that you wouldn't have to deal with this without whatever you installed that closes quotes automatically.
I am currently writing my bachelor's thesis in Libreoffice Writer. To make the working process easier I wondered if there is a way to get writer to automatically add an closed bracket when I type an open one. This would be useful, because I have to quote many times and I do this by writing the quote in "..." followed by the last name of the Author e.g. (STEPHEN 2005: 44).
To keep my writing flow going on I would find it easier if I don't have to hop with my fingers so many times to simply write the source of my quote.
So, is there a way to make libreoffice add the second bracket in the moment I enter the first one and then move the cursor back into the brackets so I can continue writing?
Regards, Mario
You can set up AutoCorrect Options in the Tools menu to add in parenthesis. As a test I set up ppp to change to (). However the cursor does not end up inside.
To do this in a single key press, you would need to set up a custom shortcut key (Tools -> Customize, Keyboard tab) to call a macro. The macro would be pretty simple and could be created by recording it. This would allow you to move the cursor to end up inside, as you requested.
Instead of maintaining the references manually, for scholarly writing I recommend you use a tool such as Zotero. It has a plugin for LibreOffice. In my experience, maintaining the references manually will eventually lead to mistakes. Zotero reference stylesheets allow you to use a consistent citation style, something your professors will appreciate.
When we're using ctags in vim and want to go to particular definition of variable or function we press ctrl + ], when we want to go back we press ctrl + T.
When we want to autocomplete a name of a variable we press ctrl + N and from a little violet window we can choose the right word.
Is it possible to improve go to definition so that we won't jump in the document, but only the little window with the function or variable definition will appear?
thank you
You want a way to see the function's signature without actually jumping to its definition?
I know about two plugins supposed to provide exactly this feature:
EchoFunc,
Tag Signature Balloons
The last time I tried echofunc it didn't work for JavaScript, at least for me, but it worked well for the few PHP files I've tested it with. I didn't try the other one because it's GVim-only and I use the CLI version almost as often as the GUI version.
But you can also use TagList and/or TagBar: two very useful plugins providing great code navigation based on ctags. Both will display the signature of the tag under your cursor if you hit <Space>.
total Emacs noob here. So right now I'm working on a fairly big LaTeX project in Emacs in which there are couple of places where I need to index some words, using the makeidx package. Because I also wanted indexed words to be bold, I created my own command \ind{} which would make the argument go bold and indexed. But right now I'm dissatisifed with this command so I'd like to change every instance of \ind{whatever} in my text by \textbf{whatever}\index{whatever by default}.
The thing is I know exactly what I want :
Go through the text, look for any instance of \ind{ and replace by \textbf{ using search-and-replace
Save the argument of \ind ("whatever" in this case) in memory
Ask me the user what should the argument of \index be. By default (by striking enter), it should be the first argument, but I can also change my mind and enter something different ("whatever by default" in this case). If there's no input (only a space " " for example) stop the program.
Write down \index{, the new argument and }.
Go to next occurance in the text.
But, alas!, I know not how to achieve this, so I need someone's help. If it should take too much time to explain how to do such a thing, would you please send me some tutorial about writing my own functions?
I hope I'm being clear, and thanks for your patience!
This approach seems vaguely unorthodox to me, but it works and seems sufficient for a one-off job...
In the replacement text for replace-regexp and query-replace-regexp (C-M-%), one newer escape sequence is \,(...), where ... can be any Lisp expression. There's a Lisp function read-from-minibuffer which reads arbitrary text typed by the user, with an optional default. Therefore:
C-M-%: Start query-replace-regexp.
\\ind{\([^}]+?\)}: The pattern to search for.
\\textbf{\1}\\index{\,(read-from-minibuffer "index content? " \1)}: The replacement text. The user will be prompted for the text to put in the braces following the \index{} element, using the original text between the braces following the \ind{} element as a default.
Note that when using query-replace-regexp, you'll have to confirm each choice by typing y after each. Use M-x replace-regexp if you want to avoid this step.
Vlad give you the LaTeX answer to your problem. An Emacs solution is the key-macro: start with
C-x (
to define a new macro, then do one step of your change, say:
C-s \ind{
<left>ex
Then copy and paste the argument in the \textbf macro... You have to be careful to move in a way that will be repeatable. Once the standard modification is done, you let the cursor after the whatever by default and end the definition by
C-x )
now C-x e will call the macro you just define, letting your cursor at the correct place to change the part you want to change You can also repeat the e to call the macro several time at once.
Why not just redefine the \ind so that it can get an optional argument?
For example:
\newcommand{\ind}[2][]{%
\def\first{#1}%
\ifx\first\empty
\textbf{#2}\index{#2}%
\else
\textbf{#2}\index{#1}%
\fi
}
This way you can use \ind{whatever} or \ind[whatever-else]{whatever}.