I have two dataframes with the following columns:
df1.columns
// Array(ts, id, X1, X2)
and
df2.columns
// Array(ts, id, Y1, Y2)
After I do
val df_combined = df1.join(df2, Seq(ts,id))
I end up with the following columns: Array(ts, id, X1, X2, ts, id, Y1, Y2). I could expect that the common columns would be dropped. Is there something that additional that needs to be done?
The simple answer (from the Databricks FAQ on this matter) is to perform the join where the joined columns are expressed as an array of strings (or one string) instead of a predicate.
Below is an example adapted from the Databricks FAQ but with two join columns in order to answer the original poster's question.
Here is the left dataframe:
val llist = Seq(("bob", "b", "2015-01-13", 4), ("alice", "a", "2015-04-23",10))
val left = llist.toDF("firstname","lastname","date","duration")
left.show()
/*
+---------+--------+----------+--------+
|firstname|lastname| date|duration|
+---------+--------+----------+--------+
| bob| b|2015-01-13| 4|
| alice| a|2015-04-23| 10|
+---------+--------+----------+--------+
*/
Here is the right dataframe:
val right = Seq(("alice", "a", 100),("bob", "b", 23)).toDF("firstname","lastname","upload")
right.show()
/*
+---------+--------+------+
|firstname|lastname|upload|
+---------+--------+------+
| alice| a| 100|
| bob| b| 23|
+---------+--------+------+
*/
Here is an incorrect solution, where the join columns are defined as the predicate left("firstname")===right("firstname") && left("lastname")===right("lastname").
The incorrect result is that the firstname and lastname columns are duplicated in the joined data frame:
left.join(right, left("firstname")===right("firstname") &&
left("lastname")===right("lastname")).show
/*
+---------+--------+----------+--------+---------+--------+------+
|firstname|lastname| date|duration|firstname|lastname|upload|
+---------+--------+----------+--------+---------+--------+------+
| bob| b|2015-01-13| 4| bob| b| 23|
| alice| a|2015-04-23| 10| alice| a| 100|
+---------+--------+----------+--------+---------+--------+------+
*/
The correct solution is to define the join columns as an array of strings Seq("firstname", "lastname"). The output data frame does not have duplicated columns:
left.join(right, Seq("firstname", "lastname")).show
/*
+---------+--------+----------+--------+------+
|firstname|lastname| date|duration|upload|
+---------+--------+----------+--------+------+
| bob| b|2015-01-13| 4| 23|
| alice| a|2015-04-23| 10| 100|
+---------+--------+----------+--------+------+
*/
This is an expected behavior. DataFrame.join method is equivalent to SQL join like this
SELECT * FROM a JOIN b ON joinExprs
If you want to ignore duplicate columns just drop them or select columns of interest afterwards. If you want to disambiguate you can use access these using parent DataFrames:
val a: DataFrame = ???
val b: DataFrame = ???
val joinExprs: Column = ???
a.join(b, joinExprs).select(a("id"), b("foo"))
// drop equivalent
a.alias("a").join(b.alias("b"), joinExprs).drop(b("id")).drop(a("foo"))
or use aliases:
// As for now aliases don't work with drop
a.alias("a").join(b.alias("b"), joinExprs).select($"a.id", $"b.foo")
For equi-joins there exist a special shortcut syntax which takes either a sequence of strings:
val usingColumns: Seq[String] = ???
a.join(b, usingColumns)
or as single string
val usingColumn: String = ???
a.join(b, usingColumn)
which keep only one copy of columns used in a join condition.
I have been stuck with this for a while, and only recently I came up with a solution what is quite easy.
Say a is
scala> val a = Seq(("a", 1), ("b", 2)).toDF("key", "vala")
a: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [key: string, vala: int]
scala> a.show
+---+----+
|key|vala|
+---+----+
| a| 1|
| b| 2|
+---+----+
and
scala> val b = Seq(("a", 1)).toDF("key", "valb")
b: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [key: string, valb: int]
scala> b.show
+---+----+
|key|valb|
+---+----+
| a| 1|
+---+----+
and I can do this to select only the value in dataframe a:
scala> a.join(b, a("key") === b("key"), "left").select(a.columns.map(a(_)) : _*).show
+---+----+
|key|vala|
+---+----+
| a| 1|
| b| 2|
+---+----+
You can simply use this
df1.join(df2, Seq("ts","id"),"TYPE-OF-JOIN")
Here TYPE-OF-JOIN can be
left
right
inner
fullouter
For example, I have two dataframes like this:
// df1
word count1
w1 10
w2 15
w3 20
// df2
word count2
w1 100
w2 150
w5 200
If you do fullouter join then the result looks like this
df1.join(df2, Seq("word"),"fullouter").show()
word count1 count2
w1 10 100
w2 15 150
w3 20 null
w5 null 200
try this,
val df_combined = df1.join(df2, df1("ts") === df2("ts") && df1("id") === df2("id")).drop(df2("ts")).drop(df2("id"))
This is a normal behavior from SQL, what I am doing for this:
Drop or Rename source columns
Do the join
Drop renamed column if any
Here I am replacing "fullname" column:
Some code in Java:
this
.sqlContext
.read()
.parquet(String.format("hdfs:///user/blablacar/data/year=%d/month=%d/day=%d", year, month, day))
.drop("fullname")
.registerTempTable("data_original");
this
.sqlContext
.read()
.parquet(String.format("hdfs:///user/blablacar/data_v2/year=%d/month=%d/day=%d", year, month, day))
.registerTempTable("data_v2");
this
.sqlContext
.sql(etlQuery)
.repartition(1)
.write()
.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite)
.parquet(outputPath);
Where the query is:
SELECT
d.*,
concat_ws('_', product_name, product_module, name) AS fullname
FROM
{table_source} d
LEFT OUTER JOIN
{table_updates} u ON u.id = d.id
This is something you can do only with Spark I believe (drop column from list), very very helpful!
Inner Join is default join in spark, Below is simple syntax for it.
leftDF.join(rightDF,"Common Col Nam")
For Other join you can follow the below syntax
leftDF.join(rightDF,Seq("Common Columns comma seperated","join type")
If columns Name are not common then
leftDF.join(rightDF,leftDF.col("x")===rightDF.col("y),"join type")
Best practice is to make column name different in both the DF before joining them and drop accordingly.
df1.columns =[id, age, income]
df2.column=[id, age_group]
df1.join(df2, on=df1.id== df2.id,how='inner').write.saveAsTable('table_name')
will return an error while error for duplicate columns
Try this instead try this:
df2_id_renamed = df2.withColumnRenamed('id','id_2')
df1.join(df2_id_renamed, on=df1.id== df2_id_renamed.id_2,how='inner').drop('id_2')
If anyone is using spark-SQL and wants to achieve the same thing then you can use USING clause in join query.
val spark = SparkSession.builder().master("local[*]").getOrCreate()
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("ERROR")
import spark.implicits._
val df1 = List((1, 4, 3), (5, 2, 4), (7, 4, 5)).toDF("c1", "c2", "C3")
val df2 = List((1, 4, 3), (5, 2, 4), (7, 4, 10)).toDF("c1", "c2", "C4")
df1.createOrReplaceTempView("table1")
df2.createOrReplaceTempView("table2")
spark.sql("select * from table1 inner join table2 using (c1, c2)").show(false)
/*
+---+---+---+---+
|c1 |c2 |C3 |C4 |
+---+---+---+---+
|1 |4 |3 |3 |
|5 |2 |4 |4 |
|7 |4 |5 |10 |
+---+---+---+---+
*/
After I've joined multiple tables together, I run them through a simple function to rename columns in the DF if it encounters duplicates. Alternatively, you could drop these duplicate columns too.
Where Names is a table with columns ['Id', 'Name', 'DateId', 'Description'] and Dates is a table with columns ['Id', 'Date', 'Description'], the columns Id and Description will be duplicated after being joined.
Names = sparkSession.sql("SELECT * FROM Names")
Dates = sparkSession.sql("SELECT * FROM Dates")
NamesAndDates = Names.join(Dates, Names.DateId == Dates.Id, "inner")
NamesAndDates = deDupeDfCols(NamesAndDates, '_')
NamesAndDates.saveAsTable("...", format="parquet", mode="overwrite", path="...")
Where deDupeDfCols is defined as:
def deDupeDfCols(df, separator=''):
newcols = []
for col in df.columns:
if col not in newcols:
newcols.append(col)
else:
for i in range(2, 1000):
if (col + separator + str(i)) not in newcols:
newcols.append(col + separator + str(i))
break
return df.toDF(*newcols)
The resulting data frame will contain columns ['Id', 'Name', 'DateId', 'Description', 'Id2', 'Date', 'Description2'].
Apologies this answer is in Python - I'm not familiar with Scala, but this was the question that came up when I Googled this problem and I'm sure Scala code isn't too different.
Related
Hi Stackoverflow,
I want to remove all rows in a dataframe where column A matches any of the distinct values in column B. I would expect this code block to do exactly that, but it seems to remove values where column B is null as well, which is weird since the filter should only consider column A anyway. How can I fix this code to perform the expected behavior, which is remove all rows in a dataframe where column A matches any of the distinct values in column B.
import spark.implicits._
val df = Seq(
(scala.math.BigDecimal(1) , null),
(scala.math.BigDecimal(2), scala.math.BigDecimal(1)),
(scala.math.BigDecimal(3), scala.math.BigDecimal(4)),
(scala.math.BigDecimal(4), null),
(scala.math.BigDecimal(5), null),
(scala.math.BigDecimal(6), null)
).toDF("A", "B")
// correct, has 1, 4
val to_remove = df
.filter(
df.col("B").isNotNull
).select(
df("B")
).distinct()
// incorrect, returns 2, 3 instead of 2, 3, 5, 6
val final = df.filter(!df.col("A").isin(to_remove.col("B")))
// 4 != 2
assert(4 === final.collect().length)
isin function accepts a list. However, in your code, you're passing Dataset[Row]. As per documentation https://spark.apache.org/docs/1.6.0/api/scala/index.html#org.apache.spark.sql.Column#isin%28scala.collection.Seq%29
it's declared as
def isin(list: Any*): Column
You first need to extract the values into Sequence and then use that in isin function. Please, note that this may have performance implications.
scala> val to_remove = df.filter(df.col("B").isNotNull).select(df("B")).distinct().collect.map(_.getDecimal(0))
to_remove: Array[java.math.BigDecimal] = Array(1.000000000000000000, 4.000000000000000000)
scala> val finaldf = df.filter(!df.col("A").isin(to_remove:_*))
finaldf: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = [A: decimal(38,18), B: decimal(38,18)]
scala> finaldf.show
+--------------------+--------------------+
| A| B|
+--------------------+--------------------+
|2.000000000000000000|1.000000000000000000|
|3.000000000000000000|4.000000000000000000|
|5.000000000000000000| null|
|6.000000000000000000| null|
+--------------------+--------------------+
Change filter condition !df.col("A").isin(to_remove.col("B")) to !df.col("A").isin(to_remove.collect.map(_.getDecimal(0)):_*)
Check below code.
val finaldf = df
.filter(!df
.col("A")
.isin(to_remove.map(_.getDecimal(0)).collect:_*)
)
scala> finaldf.show
+--------------------+--------------------+
| A| B|
+--------------------+--------------------+
|2.000000000000000000|1.000000000000000000|
|3.000000000000000000|4.000000000000000000|
|5.000000000000000000| null|
|6.000000000000000000| null|
+--------------------+--------------------+
This is probably a duplicate, but somehow I have been searching for a long time already:
I want to get the number of nulls per Row in a Spark dataframe. I.e.
col1 col2 col3
null 1 a
1 2 b
2 3 null
Should in the end be:
col1 col2 col3 number_of_null
null 1 a 1
1 2 b 0
2 3 null 1
In a general fashion, I want to get the number of times a certain string or number appears in a spark dataframe row.
I.e.
col1 col2 col3 number_of_ABC
ABC 1 a 1
1 2 b 0
2 ABC ABC 2
I am using Pyspark 2.3.0 and prefer a solution that does not involve SQL syntax. For some reason, I seem not to be able to google this. :/
EDIT: Assume that I have so many columns that I can't list them all.
EDIT2: I explicitely dont want to have a pandas solution.
EDIT3: The solution explained with sums or means does not work as it throws errors:
(data type mismatch: differing types in '((`log_time` IS NULL) + 0)' (boolean and int))
...
isnull(log_time#10) + 0) + isnull(log#11))
In Scala:
val df = List(
("ABC", "1", "a"),
("1", "2", "b"),
("2", "ABC", "ABC")
).toDF("col1", "col2", "col3")
val expected = "ABC"
val complexColumn: Column = df.schema.fieldNames.map(c => when(col(c) === lit(expected), 1).otherwise(0)).reduce((a, b) => a + b)
df.withColumn("countABC", complexColumn).show(false)
Output:
+----+----+----+--------+
|col1|col2|col3|countABC|
+----+----+----+--------+
|ABC |1 |a |1 |
|1 |2 |b |0 |
|2 |ABC |ABC |2 |
+----+----+----+--------+
As stated in pasha701's answer, I resort to map and reduce. Note that I am working on Spark 1.6.x and Python 2.7
Taking your DataFrame as df (and as is)
dfvals = [
(None, "1", "a"),
("1", "2", "b"),
("2", None, None)
]
df = sqlc.createDataFrame(dfvals, ['col1', 'col2', 'col3'])
new_df = df.withColumn('null_cnt', reduce(lambda x, y: x + y,
map(lambda x: func.when(func.isnull(func.col(x)) == 'true', 1).otherwise(0),
df.schema.names)))
Check if the value is Null and assign 1 or 0. Add the result to get the count.
new_df.show()
+----+----+----+--------+
|col1|col2|col3|null_cnt|
+----+----+----+--------+
|null| 1| a| 1|
| 1| 2| b| 0|
| 2|null|null| 2|
+----+----+----+--------+
I have created the below method which takes two Dataframes; lhs & rhs and their respective first and second columns as input. The method should return the result of a left join between these two frames using the two columns provided for each dataframe (ignoring their case sensitivity).
The problem I am facing is that it is doing more of an inner join. It is is returning 3 times the number of the rows that is in the lhs data frame (due to duplicate values in rhs), but as it is a left join the duplication and number of rows in rhs dataframe should not matter.
def leftJoinCaseInsensitive(lhs: DataFrame, rhs: DataFrame, leftTableColumn: String, rightTableColumn: String, leftTableColumn1: String, rightTableColumn1: String): DataFrame = {
val joined: DataFrame = lhs.join(rhs, upper(lhs.col(leftTableColumn)) === upper(rhs.col(rightTableColumn)) && upper(lhs.col(leftTableColumn1)) === upper(rhs.col(rightTableColumn1)), "left");
return joined
}
If there are duplicate values in rhs, then it is normal for lhs to get replicated. If a joining values in joining columns from lhs row matches with multiple rhs rows then joined dataframe should have multiple rows from lhs matching the rows from rhs.
for example
lhs dataframe
+--------+--------+--------+
|col1left|col2left|col3left|
+--------+--------+--------+
|a |1 |leftside|
+--------+--------+--------+
And
rhs dataframe
+---------+---------+---------+
|col1right|col2right|col3right|
+---------+---------+---------+
|a |1 |rightside|
|a |1 |rightside|
+---------+---------+---------+
Then it is normal to have left join as
left joined lhs with rhs
+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
|col1left|col2left|col3left|col1right|col2right|col3right|
+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
|a |1 |leftside|a |1 |rightside|
|a |1 |leftside|a |1 |rightside|
+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
You can have more information here
but as it is a left join the duplication and number of rows in rhs
dataframe should not matter
Not true. Your leftJoinCaseInsensitive method looks good to me. A left join would still produce more rows than the left table's if the right table has duplicated key column(s), as shown below:
val dfR = Seq(
(1, "a", "x"),
(1, "a", "y"),
(2, "b", "z")
).toDF("k1", "k2", "val")
val dfL = Seq(
(1, "a", "u"),
(2, "b", "v"),
(3, "c", "w")
).toDF("k1", "k2", "val")
leftJoinCaseInsensitive(dfL, dfR, "k1", "k1", "k2", "k2")
res1.show
+---+---+---+----+----+----+
| k1| k2|val| k1| k2| val|
+---+---+---+----+----+----+
| 1| a| u| 1| a| y|
| 1| a| u| 1| a| x|
| 2| b| v| 2| b| z|
| 3| c| w|null|null|null|
+---+---+---+----+----+----+
I have a spark dataframe for which I need to filter nulls and spaces for a particular column.
Lets say dataframe has two columns. col2 has both nulls and also blanks.
col1 col2
1 abc
2 null
3 null
4
5 def
I want to apply a filter out the records which have col2 as nulls or blanks.
Can any one please help on this.
Version:
Spark1.6.2
Scala 2.10
The standard logical operators are defined on Spark Columns:
scala> val myDF = Seq((1, "abc"),(2,null),(3,null),(4, ""),(5,"def")).toDF("col1", "col2")
myDF: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [col1: int, col2: string]
scala> myDF.show
+----+----+
|col1|col2|
+----+----+
| 1| abc|
| 2|null|
| 3|null|
| 4| |
| 5| def|
+----+----+
scala> myDF.filter(($"col2" =!= "") && ($"col2".isNotNull)).show
+----+----+
|col1|col2|
+----+----+
| 1| abc|
| 5| def|
+----+----+
Note: depending on your Spark version you will need !== or =!= (the latter is the more current option).
If you had n conditions to be met I would probably use a list to reduce the boolean columns together:
val conds = List(myDF("a").contains("x"), myDF("b") =!= "y", myDF("c") > 2)
val filtered = myDF.filter(conds.reduce(_&&_))
I have a dataframe in Spark using scala that has a column that I need split.
scala> test.show
+-------------+
|columnToSplit|
+-------------+
| a.b.c|
| d.e.f|
+-------------+
I need this column split out to look like this:
+--------------+
|col1|col2|col3|
| a| b| c|
| d| e| f|
+--------------+
I'm using Spark 2.0.0
Thanks
Try:
import sparkObject.spark.implicits._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.split
df.withColumn("_tmp", split($"columnToSplit", "\\.")).select(
$"_tmp".getItem(0).as("col1"),
$"_tmp".getItem(1).as("col2"),
$"_tmp".getItem(2).as("col3")
)
The important point to note here is that the sparkObject is the SparkSession object you might have already initialized. So, the (1) import statement has to be compulsorily put inline within the code, not before the class definition.
To do this programmatically, you can create a sequence of expressions with (0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s"col$i")) (assume you need 3 columns as result) and then apply it to select with : _* syntax:
df.withColumn("temp", split(col("columnToSplit"), "\\.")).select(
(0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s"col$i")): _*
).show
+----+----+----+
|col0|col1|col2|
+----+----+----+
| a| b| c|
| d| e| f|
+----+----+----+
To keep all columns:
df.withColumn("temp", split(col("columnToSplit"), "\\.")).select(
col("*") +: (0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s"col$i")): _*
).show
+-------------+---------+----+----+----+
|columnToSplit| temp|col0|col1|col2|
+-------------+---------+----+----+----+
| a.b.c|[a, b, c]| a| b| c|
| d.e.f|[d, e, f]| d| e| f|
+-------------+---------+----+----+----+
If you are using pyspark, use a list comprehension to replace the map in scala:
df = spark.createDataFrame([['a.b.c'], ['d.e.f']], ['columnToSplit'])
from pyspark.sql.functions import col, split
(df.withColumn('temp', split('columnToSplit', '\\.'))
.select(*(col('temp').getItem(i).alias(f'col{i}') for i in range(3))
).show()
+----+----+----+
|col0|col1|col2|
+----+----+----+
| a| b| c|
| d| e| f|
+----+----+----+
A solution which avoids the select part. This is helpful when you just want to append the new columns:
case class Message(others: String, text: String)
val r1 = Message("foo1", "a.b.c")
val r2 = Message("foo2", "d.e.f")
val records = Seq(r1, r2)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(records)
df.withColumn("col1", split(col("text"), "\\.").getItem(0))
.withColumn("col2", split(col("text"), "\\.").getItem(1))
.withColumn("col3", split(col("text"), "\\.").getItem(2))
.show(false)
+------+-----+----+----+----+
|others|text |col1|col2|col3|
+------+-----+----+----+----+
|foo1 |a.b.c|a |b |c |
|foo2 |d.e.f|d |e |f |
+------+-----+----+----+----+
Update: I highly recommend to use Psidom's implementation to avoid splitting three times.
This appends columns to the original DataFrame and doesn't use select, and only splits once using a temporary column:
import spark.implicits._
df.withColumn("_tmp", split($"columnToSplit", "\\."))
.withColumn("col1", $"_tmp".getItem(0))
.withColumn("col2", $"_tmp".getItem(1))
.withColumn("col3", $"_tmp".getItem(2))
.drop("_tmp")
This expands on Psidom's answer and shows how to do the split dynamically, without hardcoding the number of columns. This answer runs a query to calculate the number of columns.
val df = Seq(
"a.b.c",
"d.e.f"
).toDF("my_str")
.withColumn("letters", split(col("my_str"), "\\."))
val numCols = df
.withColumn("letters_size", size($"letters"))
.agg(max($"letters_size"))
.head()
.getInt(0)
df
.select(
(0 until numCols).map(i => $"letters".getItem(i).as(s"col$i")): _*
)
.show()
We can write using for with yield in Scala :-
If your number of columns exceeds just add it to desired column and play with it. :)
val aDF = Seq("Deepak.Singh.Delhi").toDF("name")
val desiredColumn = Seq("name","Lname","City")
val colsize = desiredColumn.size
val columList = for (i <- 0 until colsize) yield split(col("name"),".").getItem(i).alias(desiredColumn(i))
aDF.select(columList: _ *).show(false)
Output:-
+------+------+-----+--+
|name |Lname |city |
+-----+------+-----+---+
|Deepak|Singh |Delhi|
+---+------+-----+-----+
If you don't need name column then, drop the column and just use withColumn.
Example:
Without using the select statement.
Lets assume we have a dataframe having a set of columns and we want to split a column having column name as name
import spark.implicits._
val columns = Seq("name","age","address")
val data = Seq(("Amit.Mehta", 25, "1 Main st, Newark, NJ, 92537"),
("Rituraj.Mehta", 28,"3456 Walnut st, Newark, NJ, 94732"))
var dfFromData = spark.createDataFrame(data).toDF(columns:_*)
dfFromData.printSchema()
val newDF = dfFromData.map(f=>{
val nameSplit = f.getAs[String](0).split("\\.").map(_.trim)
(nameSplit(0),nameSplit(1),f.getAs[Int](1),f.getAs[String](2))
})
val finalDF = newDF.toDF("First Name","Last Name", "Age","Address")
finalDF.printSchema()
finalDF.show(false)
output: