I have a dataframe in Spark using scala that has a column that I need split.
scala> test.show
+-------------+
|columnToSplit|
+-------------+
| a.b.c|
| d.e.f|
+-------------+
I need this column split out to look like this:
+--------------+
|col1|col2|col3|
| a| b| c|
| d| e| f|
+--------------+
I'm using Spark 2.0.0
Thanks
Try:
import sparkObject.spark.implicits._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.split
df.withColumn("_tmp", split($"columnToSplit", "\\.")).select(
$"_tmp".getItem(0).as("col1"),
$"_tmp".getItem(1).as("col2"),
$"_tmp".getItem(2).as("col3")
)
The important point to note here is that the sparkObject is the SparkSession object you might have already initialized. So, the (1) import statement has to be compulsorily put inline within the code, not before the class definition.
To do this programmatically, you can create a sequence of expressions with (0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s"col$i")) (assume you need 3 columns as result) and then apply it to select with : _* syntax:
df.withColumn("temp", split(col("columnToSplit"), "\\.")).select(
(0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s"col$i")): _*
).show
+----+----+----+
|col0|col1|col2|
+----+----+----+
| a| b| c|
| d| e| f|
+----+----+----+
To keep all columns:
df.withColumn("temp", split(col("columnToSplit"), "\\.")).select(
col("*") +: (0 until 3).map(i => col("temp").getItem(i).as(s"col$i")): _*
).show
+-------------+---------+----+----+----+
|columnToSplit| temp|col0|col1|col2|
+-------------+---------+----+----+----+
| a.b.c|[a, b, c]| a| b| c|
| d.e.f|[d, e, f]| d| e| f|
+-------------+---------+----+----+----+
If you are using pyspark, use a list comprehension to replace the map in scala:
df = spark.createDataFrame([['a.b.c'], ['d.e.f']], ['columnToSplit'])
from pyspark.sql.functions import col, split
(df.withColumn('temp', split('columnToSplit', '\\.'))
.select(*(col('temp').getItem(i).alias(f'col{i}') for i in range(3))
).show()
+----+----+----+
|col0|col1|col2|
+----+----+----+
| a| b| c|
| d| e| f|
+----+----+----+
A solution which avoids the select part. This is helpful when you just want to append the new columns:
case class Message(others: String, text: String)
val r1 = Message("foo1", "a.b.c")
val r2 = Message("foo2", "d.e.f")
val records = Seq(r1, r2)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(records)
df.withColumn("col1", split(col("text"), "\\.").getItem(0))
.withColumn("col2", split(col("text"), "\\.").getItem(1))
.withColumn("col3", split(col("text"), "\\.").getItem(2))
.show(false)
+------+-----+----+----+----+
|others|text |col1|col2|col3|
+------+-----+----+----+----+
|foo1 |a.b.c|a |b |c |
|foo2 |d.e.f|d |e |f |
+------+-----+----+----+----+
Update: I highly recommend to use Psidom's implementation to avoid splitting three times.
This appends columns to the original DataFrame and doesn't use select, and only splits once using a temporary column:
import spark.implicits._
df.withColumn("_tmp", split($"columnToSplit", "\\."))
.withColumn("col1", $"_tmp".getItem(0))
.withColumn("col2", $"_tmp".getItem(1))
.withColumn("col3", $"_tmp".getItem(2))
.drop("_tmp")
This expands on Psidom's answer and shows how to do the split dynamically, without hardcoding the number of columns. This answer runs a query to calculate the number of columns.
val df = Seq(
"a.b.c",
"d.e.f"
).toDF("my_str")
.withColumn("letters", split(col("my_str"), "\\."))
val numCols = df
.withColumn("letters_size", size($"letters"))
.agg(max($"letters_size"))
.head()
.getInt(0)
df
.select(
(0 until numCols).map(i => $"letters".getItem(i).as(s"col$i")): _*
)
.show()
We can write using for with yield in Scala :-
If your number of columns exceeds just add it to desired column and play with it. :)
val aDF = Seq("Deepak.Singh.Delhi").toDF("name")
val desiredColumn = Seq("name","Lname","City")
val colsize = desiredColumn.size
val columList = for (i <- 0 until colsize) yield split(col("name"),".").getItem(i).alias(desiredColumn(i))
aDF.select(columList: _ *).show(false)
Output:-
+------+------+-----+--+
|name |Lname |city |
+-----+------+-----+---+
|Deepak|Singh |Delhi|
+---+------+-----+-----+
If you don't need name column then, drop the column and just use withColumn.
Example:
Without using the select statement.
Lets assume we have a dataframe having a set of columns and we want to split a column having column name as name
import spark.implicits._
val columns = Seq("name","age","address")
val data = Seq(("Amit.Mehta", 25, "1 Main st, Newark, NJ, 92537"),
("Rituraj.Mehta", 28,"3456 Walnut st, Newark, NJ, 94732"))
var dfFromData = spark.createDataFrame(data).toDF(columns:_*)
dfFromData.printSchema()
val newDF = dfFromData.map(f=>{
val nameSplit = f.getAs[String](0).split("\\.").map(_.trim)
(nameSplit(0),nameSplit(1),f.getAs[Int](1),f.getAs[String](2))
})
val finalDF = newDF.toDF("First Name","Last Name", "Age","Address")
finalDF.printSchema()
finalDF.show(false)
output:
Related
I would like to create a Map column which counts the number of occurrences.
For instance:
+---+----+
| b| a|
+---+----+
| 1| b|
| 2|null|
| 1| a|
| 1| a|
+---+----+
would result in
+---+--------------------+
| b| res|
+---+--------------------+
| 1|[a -> 2.0, b -> 1.0]|
| 2| []|
+---+--------------------+
For the moment, in Spark 2.4.6, I was able to make it using udaf.
While bumping to Spark3 I was wondering if I could get rid of this udaf (I tried using the new method aggregate without success)
Is there an efficient way to do it?
(For the efficiency part, I am able to test easily)
Here a Spark 3 solution:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
df.groupBy($"b",$"a").count()
.groupBy($"b")
.agg(
map_from_entries(
collect_list(
when($"a".isNotNull,struct($"a",$"count"))
)
).as("res")
)
.show()
gives:
+---+----------------+
| b| res|
+---+----------------+
| 1|[b -> 1, a -> 2]|
| 2| []|
+---+----------------+
Here the solution using Aggregator:
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.ExpressionEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Aggregator
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.Encoder
val countOcc = new Aggregator[String, Map[String,Int], Map[String,Int]] with Serializable {
def zero: Map[String,Int] = Map.empty.withDefaultValue(0)
def reduce(b: Map[String,Int], a: String) = if(a!=null) b + (a -> (b(a) + 1)) else b
def merge(b1: Map[String,Int], b2: Map[String,Int]) = {
val keys = b1.keys.toSet.union(b2.keys.toSet)
keys.map{ k => (k -> (b1(k) + b2(k))) }.toMap
}
def finish(b: Map[String,Int]) = b
def bufferEncoder: Encoder[Map[String,Int]] = implicitly(ExpressionEncoder[Map[String,Int]])
def outputEncoder: Encoder[Map[String, Int]] = implicitly(ExpressionEncoder[Map[String, Int]])
}
val countOccUDAF = udaf(countOcc)
df
.groupBy($"b")
.agg(countOccUDAF($"a").as("res"))
.show()
gives:
+---+----------------+
| b| res|
+---+----------------+
| 1|[b -> 1, a -> 2]|
| 2| []|
+---+----------------+
You could always use collect_list with UDF, but only if you groupings are not too lage:
val udf_histo = udf((x:Seq[String]) => x.groupBy(identity).mapValues(_.size))
df.groupBy($"b")
.agg(
collect_list($"a").as("as")
)
.select($"b",udf_histo($"as").as("res"))
.show()
gives:
+---+----------------+
| b| res|
+---+----------------+
| 1|[b -> 1, a -> 2]|
| 2| []|
+---+----------------+
This should be faster than UDAF: Spark custom aggregation : collect_list+UDF vs UDAF
We can achieve this is spark 2.4
//GET THE COUNTS
val groupedCountDf = originalDf.groupBy("b","a").count
//CREATE MAPS FOR EVERY COUNT | EMPTY MAP FOR NULL KEY
//AGGREGATE THEM AS ARRAY
val dfWithArrayOfMaps = groupedCountDf
.withColumn("newMap", when($"a".isNotNull, map($"a",$"count")).otherwise(map()))
.groupBy("b").agg(collect_list($"newMap") as "multimap")
//EXPRESSION TO CONVERT ARRAY[MAP] -> MAP
val mapConcatExpr = expr("aggregate(multimap, map(), (k, v) -> map_concat(k, v))")
val finalDf = dfWithArrayOfMaps.select($"b", mapConcatExpr.as("merged_data"))
Here a solution with a single groupBy and a slightly complex sql expression. This solution works for Spark 2.4+
df.groupBy("b")
.agg(expr("sort_array(collect_set(a)) as set"),
expr("sort_array(collect_list(a)) as list"))
.withColumn("res",
expr("map_from_arrays(set,transform(set, x -> size(filter(list, y -> y=x))))"))
.show()
Output:
+---+------+---------+----------------+
| b| set| list| res|
+---+------+---------+----------------+
| 1|[a, b]|[a, a, b]|[a -> 2, b -> 1]|
| 2| []| []| []|
+---+------+---------+----------------+
The idea is to collect the data from column a twice: one time into a set and one time into a list. Then with the help of transform for each element of the set the number of occurences of the particular element in the list is counted. Finally, the set and the number of elements are combined with map_from_arrays.
However I cannot say if this approach is really faster than a UDAF.
I have a dataframe like this.
+---+---+---+---+
| M| c2| c3| d1|
+---+---+---+---+
| 1|2_1|4_3|1_2|
| 2|3_4|4_5|1_2|
+---+---+---+---+
I have to transform this df should look like below. Here, c_max = max(c2,c3) after splitting with _.ie, all the columns (c2 and c3) have to be splitted with _ and then getting the max.
In the actual scenario, I have 50 columns ie, c2,c3....c50 and need to take the max from this.
+---+---+---+---+------+
| M| c2| c3| d1|c_Max |
+---+---+---+---+------+
| 1|2_1|4_3|1_2| 4 |
| 2|3_4|4_5|1_2| 5 |
+---+---+---+---+------+
Here is one way using expr and build-in array functions for Spark >= 2.4.0:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{expr, array_max, array}
val df = Seq(
(1, "2_1", "3_4", "1_2"),
(2, "3_4", "4_5", "1_2")
).toDF("M", "c2", "c3", "d1")
// get max c for each c column
val c_cols = df.columns.filter(_.startsWith("c")).map{ c =>
expr(s"array_max(cast(split(${c}, '_') as array<int>))")
}
df.withColumn("max_c", array_max(array(c_cols:_*))).show
Output:
+---+---+---+---+-----+
| M| c2| c3| d1|max_c|
+---+---+---+---+-----+
| 1|2_1|3_4|1_2| 4|
| 2|3_4|4_5|1_2| 5|
+---+---+---+---+-----+
For older versions use the next code:
val c_cols = df.columns.filter(_.startsWith("c")).map{ c =>
val c_ar = split(col(c), "_").cast("array<int>")
when(c_ar.getItem(0) > c_ar.getItem(1), c_ar.getItem(0)).otherwise(c_ar.getItem(1))
}
df.withColumn("max_c", greatest(c_cols:_*)).show
Use greatest function:
val df = Seq((1, "2_1", "3_4", "1_2"),(2, "3_4", "4_5", "1_2"),
).toDF("M", "c2", "c3", "d1")
// get all `c` columns and split by `_` to get the values after the underscore
val c_cols = df.columns.filter(_.startsWith("c"))
.flatMap{
c => Seq(split(col(c), "_").getItem(0).cast("int"),
split(col(c), "_").getItem(1).cast("int")
)
}
// apply greatest func
val c_max = greatest(c_cols: _*)
// add new column
df.withColumn("c_Max", c_max).show()
Gives:
+---+---+---+---+-----+
| M| c2| c3| d1|c_Max|
+---+---+---+---+-----+
| 1|2_1|3_4|1_2| 4|
| 2|3_4|4_5|1_2| 5|
+---+---+---+---+-----+
In spark >= 2.4.0, you can use the array_max function and get some code that would work even with columns containing more than 2 values. The idea is to start by concatenating all the columns (concat column). For that, I use concat_ws on an array of all the columns I want to concat, that I obtain with array(cols.map(col) :_*). Then I split the resulting string to get a big array of strings containing all the values of all the columns. I cast it to an array of ints and I call array_max on it.
val cols = (2 to 50).map("c"+_)
val result = df
.withColumn("concat", concat_ws("_", array(cols.map(col) :_*)))
.withColumn("array_of_ints", split('concat, "_").cast(ArrayType(IntegerType)))
.withColumn("c_max", array_max('array_of_ints))
.drop("concat", "array_of_ints")
In spark < 2.4, you can define array_max yourself like this:
val array_max = udf((s : Seq[Int]) => s.max)
The previous code does not need to be modified. Note however that UDFs can be slower than predefined spark SQL functions.
I have a column named root and need to filter dataframe based on the different values of a root column.
Suppose I have a values in root are parent,child or sub-child and I want to apply these filters dynamically through a variable.
val x = ("parent,child,sub-child").split(",")
x.map(eachvalue <- {
var df1 = df.filter(col("root").contains(eachvalue))
}
But when I am doing it, it always overwriting the DF1 instead, I want to apply all the 3 filters and get the result.
May be in future I may extend the list to any number of filter values and the code should work.
Thanks,
Bab
You should apply the subsequent filters to the result of the previous filter, not on df:
val x = ("parent,child,sub-child").split(",")
var df1 = df
x.map(eachvalue <- {
df1 = df1.filter(col("root").contains(eachvalue))
}
df1 after the map operation will have all filters applied to it.
Let's see an example with spark shell. Hope it helps you.
scala> import spark.implicits._
import spark.implicits._
scala> val df0 =
spark.sparkContext.parallelize(List(1,2,1,3,3,2,1)).toDF("number")
df0: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [number: int]
scala> val list = List(1,2,3)
list: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3)
scala> val dfFiltered = for (number <- list) yield { df0.filter($"number" === number)}
dfFiltered: List[org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row]] = List([number: int], [number: int], [number: int])
scala> dfFiltered(0).show
+------+
|number|
+------+
| 1|
| 1|
| 1|
+------+
scala> dfFiltered(1).show
+------+
|number|
+------+
| 2|
| 2|
+------+
scala> dfFiltered(2).show
+------+
|number|
+------+
| 3|
| 3|
+------+
AFAIK isin can be used in this case below is the example.
import spark.implicits._
val colorStringArr = "red,yellow,blue".split(",")
val colorDF =
List(
"red",
"yellow",
"purple"
).toDF("color")
// to derive a column using a list
colorDF.withColumn(
"is_primary_color",
col("color").isin(colorStringArr: _*)
).show()
println( "if you don't want derived column and directly want to filter using a list with isin then .. ")
colorDF.filter(col("color").isin(colorStringArr: _*)).show
Result :
+------+----------------+
| color|is_primary_color|
+------+----------------+
| red| true|
|yellow| true|
|purple| false|
+------+----------------+
if you don't want derived column and directly want to filter using a list with isin then ....
+------+
| color|
+------+
| red|
|yellow|
+------+
One more way using array_contains and swapping the arguments.
scala> val x = ("parent,child,sub-child").split(",")
x: Array[String] = Array(parent, child, sub-child)
scala> val df = Seq(("parent"),("grand-parent"),("child"),("sub-child"),("cousin")).toDF("root")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [root: string]
scala> df.show
+------------+
| root|
+------------+
| parent|
|grand-parent|
| child|
| sub-child|
| cousin|
+------------+
scala> df.withColumn("check", array_contains(lit(x),'root)).show
+------------+-----+
| root|check|
+------------+-----+
| parent| true|
|grand-parent|false|
| child| true|
| sub-child| true|
| cousin|false|
+------------+-----+
scala>
Here are my two cents
val filters = List(1,2,3)
val data = List(5,1,2,1,3,3,2,1,4)
val colName = "number"
val df = spark.
sparkContext.
parallelize(data).
toDF(colName).
filter(
r => filters.contains(r.getAs[Int](colName))
)
df.show()
which results in
+------+
|number|
+------+
| 1|
| 2|
| 1|
| 3|
| 3|
| 2|
| 1|
+------+
I'm trying to add a new column to a DataFrame. The value of this column is the value of another column whose name depends on other columns from the same DataFrame.
For instance, given this:
+---+---+----+----+
| A| B| A_1| B_2|
+---+---+----+----+
| A| 1| 0.1| 0.3|
| B| 2| 0.2| 0.4|
+---+---+----+----+
I'd like to obtain this:
+---+---+----+----+----+
| A| B| A_1| B_2| C|
+---+---+----+----+----+
| A| 1| 0.1| 0.3| 0.1|
| B| 2| 0.2| 0.4| 0.4|
+---+---+----+----+----+
That is, I added column C whose value came from either column A_1 or B_2. The name of the source column A_1 comes from concatenating the value of columns A and B.
I know that I can add a new column based on another and a constant like this:
df.withColumn("C", $"B" + 1)
I also know that the name of the column can come from a variable like this:
val name = "A_1"
df.withColumn("C", col(name) + 1)
However, what I'd like to do is something like this:
df.withColumn("C", col(s"${col("A")}_${col("B")}"))
Which doesn't work.
NOTE: I'm coding in Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.2.
You can achieve your requirement by writing a udf function. I am suggesting udf, as your requirement is to process dataframe row by row contradicting to inbuilt functions which functions column by column.
But before that you would need array of column names
val columns = df.columns
Then write a udf function as
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
def getValue = udf((A: String, B: String, array: mutable.WrappedArray[String]) => array(columns.indexOf(A+"_"+B)))
where
A is the first column value
B is the second column value
array is the Array of all the columns values
Now just call the udf function using withColumn api
df.withColumn("C", getValue($"A", $"B", array(columns.map(col): _*))).show(false)
You should get your desired output dataframe.
You can select from a map. Define map which translates name to column value:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, concat_ws, lit, map}
val dataMap = map(
df.columns.diff(Seq("A", "B")).flatMap(c => lit(c) :: col(c) :: Nil): _*
)
df.select(dataMap).show(false)
+---------------------------+
|map(A_1, A_1, B_2, B_2) |
+---------------------------+
|Map(A_1 -> 0.1, B_2 -> 0.3)|
|Map(A_1 -> 0.2, B_2 -> 0.4)|
+---------------------------+
and select from it with apply:
df.withColumn("C", dataMap(concat_ws("_", $"A", $"B"))).show
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| B|A_1|B_2| C|
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| 1|0.1|0.3|0.1|
| B| 2|0.2|0.4|0.4|
+---+---+---+---+---+
You can also try mapping, but I suspect it won't perform well with very wide data:
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
val outputEncoder = RowEncoder(df.schema.add(StructField("C", DoubleType)))
df.map(row => {
val a = row.getAs[String]("A")
val b = row.getAs[String]("B")
val key = s"${a}_${b}"
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq :+ row.getAs[Double](key))
})(outputEncoder).show
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| B|A_1|B_2| C|
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| 1|0.1|0.3|0.1|
| B| 2|0.2|0.4|0.4|
+---+---+---+---+---+
and in general I wouldn't recommend this approach.
If data comes from csv you might consider skipping default csv reader and use custom logic to push column selection directly into parsing process. With pseudocode:
spark.read.text(...).map { line => {
val a = ??? // parse A
val b = ??? // parse B
val c = ??? // find c, based on a and b
(a, b, c)
}}
I am trying to take my input data:
A B C
--------------
4 blah 2
2 3
56 foo 3
And add a column to the end based on whether B is empty or not:
A B C D
--------------------
4 blah 2 1
2 3 0
56 foo 3 1
I can do this easily by registering the input dataframe as a temp table, then typing up a SQL query.
But I'd really like to know how to do this with just Scala methods and not having to type out a SQL query within Scala.
I've tried .withColumn, but I can't get that to do what I want.
Try withColumn with the function when as follows:
val sqlContext = new SQLContext(sc)
import sqlContext.implicits._ // for `toDF` and $""
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._ // for `when`
val df = sc.parallelize(Seq((4, "blah", 2), (2, "", 3), (56, "foo", 3), (100, null, 5)))
.toDF("A", "B", "C")
val newDf = df.withColumn("D", when($"B".isNull or $"B" === "", 0).otherwise(1))
newDf.show() shows
+---+----+---+---+
| A| B| C| D|
+---+----+---+---+
| 4|blah| 2| 1|
| 2| | 3| 0|
| 56| foo| 3| 1|
|100|null| 5| 0|
+---+----+---+---+
I added the (100, null, 5) row for testing the isNull case.
I tried this code with Spark 1.6.0 but as commented in the code of when, it works on the versions after 1.4.0.
My bad, I had missed one part of the question.
Best, cleanest way is to use a UDF.
Explanation within the code.
// create some example data...BY DataFrame
// note, third record has an empty string
case class Stuff(a:String,b:Int)
val d= sc.parallelize(Seq( ("a",1),("b",2),
("",3) ,("d",4)).map { x => Stuff(x._1,x._2) }).toDF
// now the good stuff.
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.udf
// function that returns 0 is string empty
val func = udf( (s:String) => if(s.isEmpty) 0 else 1 )
// create new dataframe with added column named "notempty"
val r = d.select( $"a", $"b", func($"a").as("notempty") )
scala> r.show
+---+---+--------+
| a| b|notempty|
+---+---+--------+
| a| 1| 1111|
| b| 2| 1111|
| | 3| 0|
| d| 4| 1111|
+---+---+--------+
How about something like this?
val newDF = df.filter($"B" === "").take(1) match {
case Array() => df
case _ => df.withColumn("D", $"B" === "")
}
Using take(1) should have a minimal hit