Kubernetes at CNCF - contribution, CLA [closed] - kubernetes

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Excuse me for this non-programming question here. Please redirect me to the right board if this is not the right place for this.
I would be interested in the conditions of contribution now that k8s becomes a hosted project in CNCF, and IP is transferred to CNCF. Can we get detailed information about the new conditions, if any? Do we have to accept other CLA than Google CLA, considering also the corporate CLA use case?
Thank you!

I'm the chair of the Technical Oversight Committee for CNCF.
We are responsible for projects & practices, operating within the CNCF charter. The IP policy is clause 11 of the charter, and can be found here - https://cncf.io/governance Let me know if you have questions, for example in case any of this language needs clarifying. As Brian Grant said above, some details are still being figured out. Overall we want to make sure every CNCF project feels that we are helping them be more successful, and this strongly influences our thinking on matters like contributions.
-- alexis

There isn't yet an answer to your question. It is up to CNCF to decide how they are going to handle contributions once the Kubernetes IP has been fully transferred.

Related

Marklogic or MongoDB [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I would to know which one choose MarkLogic vs MongoDB, I know its properties but in term of learning which one is more acceptable to choose? I have chosen MarkLogic but I think it's difficult to learn because it has a lot of documentation and it hasn't much comunity developers.
I have to choose one option for project our company and my boss is worried about MarkLogic's curve learning.
Help me which one choose.
Disclosure: I work for MarkLogic.
You mention your concern about learning how to work with MarkLogic. We have a MarkLogic University team that has excellent training resources. Take a look at their Developer Track courses. These courses are free and are available with in-person, via-Internet, or self-paced formats. Once you've learned the basics, you can follow that up with tutorials, the technical blog, On Demand videos, guides, and maybe a local Meetup, based on your needs. Our community may not be as big, but those who work with MarkLogic tend to be very helpful. You can post specific technical questions here on Stack Overflow.
The bigger question is what do you need from your database? For that, I'll join #Tamas in referring to his article comparing the two.

VS Code -- Are there user/support forums or an IRC channel? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 months ago.
Improve this question
There seem to be multiple places to ask questions, report bugs, feature requests, etc. Here, Github, MSDN. It's kind of all over the place. Are there any README documents that I'm missing that discuss support options?
Here's a rough guide of which communications channel to use:
For issues / feature requests, please file a GitHub issue: https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/new
For general "how to" questions, StackOverflow is probably your best bet
For other discussions, try https://gitter.im/Microsoft/vscode or Twitter
The IRC channel on Freenode is ##vs-code.
there appear to be 3 separate VSCode support channels on freenode, i ordered them by apparent population:
irc://irc.freenode.net/#VSCode (24 people connected as of writing)
irc://irc.freenode.net/##vs-code (22 people connected as of writing)
irc://irc.freenode.net/##VSCode (10 people connected as of writing)
as of writing means: 2019-05-26T12:40:21+00:00 (ISO 8601)
Today the answer to this question is #vscode on the liberachat network (because freenode.net is dead).

Gantt Chart for GitHub [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
We've been using GitHub for 6-months now and have more/less figured out "best practices" with regards on how to put in tasks, milestones, etc. However, from a management point of view, there are a few features that are lacking. For instance, Gantt Chart capabilities found in solutions such as RedMine, or even overlaying on top of a calendar tasks/milestone markers, roadmaps, etc.
Is there some sort of "add on" or 3rd party website that can hook into GitHub and generate these for me? Since we've already integrated so much within GitHub, I'd like to stay on it, but if a migration to another system is possible with the functionality we require, I may be willing to transfer.
Any advice/help would be greatly appreciated!
I started a project which does exactly that :
https://github.com/neyric/gh-issues-gantt
It only handles issue durations in days, but we found it to be easier to maintain and quite accurate for our usage.

Engineering Change Order Forms [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
What have others used when a customer wants a particular feature and they have required a signed document detailing the feature and expectations for that feature? Are there any 'engineering change forms' available to use?
We are going to move towards this with our customers to reduce confusion and meet the customer's overall expectation during the requirements process. Email communication is too disjointed and has led to miscommunication during delivery.
I'd suggest to just make it up as you go along. As you allude to, anything on paper is going to be better than what you have with email now.
As long as you include a description of the feature, the impact it will have on the schedule, a date, and a dotted line to sign on then that should be enough information.
In fact making it too long and involved will make you wish for the simplicity of just a plain email trail ;-)

Are there any competitors to Atlassians Fisheye? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for alternatives to view my source code repository and run metrics on it.
Have you looked at Review Board? It's an open source tool that is used on google code and is picking up some steam in general. I ended up not using it for my particular project because it didn't provide a user-friendly way to do post-commit reviews. I imagine the web interface has improved dramatically since I evaluated it last year.
If Review Board doesn't match your requirements, consider posting more detail on what your looking for so we can have a better chance of pointing you in the right direction
You should checkout ZebraPlan.
From my experience, ZebraPlan is a much better and easier alternative to Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible. ZebraPlan has a built-in code review feature that allows you to easily connect to your source code repository. Keep in mind that you can’t validate code with Fisheye, but you can with ZebraPlan. You will definitely save time and money using ZebraPlan. Fisheye charges $800/month for 10 users and unlimited repos and ZebraPlan charges $43/month for 10 users and unlimited repos.
Here’s a short video that showcases ZebraPlan’s “Code Review” feature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gxg_d-5vuw
I hope this helps!