We have five Wildfly (8.2.0-Final) servers running in different machines on the same network. When I start them, by default they come under a single cluster.
But I don't want this to happen. I want each of them act as a standalone server. I believe in JBoss-5 we can achieve this by passing -g option which would create a separate partition and thus a separate cluster.
Is there any similar option for WildFly? Please suggest. I don't want to run them in a cluster.
Thanks in advance.
If you do not want JBoss Wildfly to start in a cluster, use the non-HA standalone profiles such as standalone.xml or standalone-full.xml if you require messaging/JMS.
Hope it helps.
If you are particular to start with clustering mode and exclude clustering of two instance, change the jgroups address (udp/tcp) while starting
Related
We are using Jboss 7 App Server and we are trying run multiple server nodes on a single box and also on other box *basically 2 boxes which will have 2 each nodes of Jboss servers running).
My question is to have multiple nodes of Jboss Servers on a single box in Standalone mode. Should I have to copy server folder twice with port offsets?
Or is it ok to start servers just via port offset without having to copying server folder?
What is the best practice to have multiple server nodes running on the same box? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Just create multiple copies of standalone directory(Example: standalone_PROD,standalone_SIT) so that we will have separate log files and deployment directories for each instance. And use below option while starting server instance:
-Djboss.server.base.dir=/path/to/standalone_SIT <-- Location of standalone dir
-Djboss.socket.binding.port-offset=10 <-- PortOffset to avoid port conflict
We have had two instances of jboss on the same computer over several years. Both instances were in the same domain. Each instance had its own port and of course lay in its own path. Our experiences were good.
You can have as many standalone instances you want on a machine, depending upon the resources available.
All you need to do is copy over the same folder twice and make changes in all the ports to be used in the standalone mode. Also If you are setting any parameters make sure they are according to the memory available on the machine.
I have 2 instances of Jboss servers running on eg: 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2.
I have implemented Jboss load balancing, but am not sure how to achieve server failover. I do not have a webserver to monitor the heartbeat and hence using mod_cluster is out the question. Is there any way I can achieve failover using only the two available servers?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
JBoss clustering automatically provides JNDI and EJB failover and also HTTP session replication.
If your JBoss AS nodes are in a cluster then the failover should just work.
The Documentation refers to an older version of JBoss (5.1) but it has clear descriptions of how JBoss clustering works.
You could spun up another instance to server as your domain controller, and the two instances you already have will be your hosts. Then you could go through the domain controller, and it will do the work for you. However, I haven't seen instances going down to often, it usually servers that do, and it looks like you are using just one server (i might be wrong) for both instances, so i would consider splitting it up.
We're attempting to add standalone zookeeper servers into the zk ensemble ran by fuse fabric (as either followers or observers). However, it looks like fabric has pretty tight control over the zk configuration and I haven't been able to find any documentation relating to adding hardcoded server configuration params to the dynamic ones used by fabric. Anyone else try this or have some idea of where to look?
I'm interested in using Celery for an app I'm working on. It all seems pretty straight forward, but I'm a little confused about what I need to do if I have multiple load balanced application servers. All of the documentation assumes that the broker will be on the same server as the application. Currently, all of my application servers sit behind an Amazon ELB and tasks need to be able to come from any one of them.
This is what I assume I need to do:
Run a broker server on a separate instance
Configure each application instance to connect to that broker server
Each application instance will also be be a celery working (running
celeryd)?
My only beef with that is: What happens if my broker instance dies? Can I run 2 broker instances some how so I'm safe if one goes under?
Any tips or information on what to do in a setup like mine would be greatly appreciated. I'm sure I'm missing something or not understanding something.
For future reference, for those who do prefer to stick with RabbitMQ...
You can create a RabbitMQ cluster from 2 or more instances. Add those instances to your ELB and point your celeryd workers at the ELB. Just make sure you connect the right ports and you should be all set. Don't forget to allow your RabbitMQ machines to talk among themselves to run the cluster. This works very well for me in production.
One exception here: if you need to schedule tasks, you need a celerybeat process. For some reason, I wasn't able to connect the celerybeat to the ELB and had to connect it to one of the instances directly. I opened an issue about it and it is supposed to be resolved (didn't test it yet). Keep in mind that celerybeat by itself can only exist once, so that's already a single point of failure.
You are correct in all points.
How to make reliable broker: make clustered rabbitmq installation, as described here:
http://www.rabbitmq.com/clustering.html
Celery beat also doesn't have to be a single point of failure if you run it on every worker node with:
https://github.com/ybrs/single-beat
my test bed is 2 server which all run service based on jboss-4.0.3sp1, they are configured as cluster and has HA-JNDI online between 2 nodes.
due to some framework change, i need to shutdown the service on one node, how could we shutdown HA-JNDI?
i can not update cluster-service.xml to remove HA JDNI definition, that will cause application start-up error.
thanks,
Emre
Here is from JBoss Clustering documentation:
java.naming.provider.url JNDI setting can now
accept a list of urls separated by a comma. Example:
java.naming.provier.url=server1:1100,server2:1100,server3:1100,server4:1100
When initialising, the JNP client code will try to get in touch with each
server from the list, one after the other, stopping as soon as one server
has been reached.
So set it to server that is up.
I hope it is helps.