I want to modify GtkFileChooser to view just a specific dir.
Is there any configuration to apply this limitation?
Or if I must manipulate the source code of GTK+, where should I modify?
There is currently no API, and no effort is being spent in trying to sandbox the file selection widget — sandboxing the whole application is, instead, a much bigger priority, see for instance Flatpak and Bubblewrap.
Modifying the GtkFileChooserWidget is not for the faint of heart; you'll have to change the way the widget determines the current directory, and navigates through the parent directories, both from a user interaction standpoint and from an API standpoint.
You'll need to modify:
gtkfilechooserwidget.c — the main file selection widget
gtkfilesystemmodel.c — a GtkTreeModel implementation mapping the file system
gtkpathbar.c — the path bar at the top of the file selection widget
gtkplacessidebar.c — the side bar at the left of the file selection widget
This is probably on of the most complex sites inside the GTK+ code base, alongside with GtkTreeView, GtkMenu, and GtkTextView.
Related
In the SAPUI5 control explorer in the busy dialog section there is mention of a sap.m.sample.BusyDialogLight.C control. Essentially this is an unframed dialog with the busy indicator 3-blue blobs image over it. I intend to use this whilst long JSON fetches are running.
My version of OpenUI5 which is v1.40.10 does not have a file or folder with that name in the sap.m.* folders. It only has sap.m.BusyDialog.js which I read (dbg version) and see no obvious mention of a light model.
So can anyone tell me if there is actually a BusyDialogLight control and how to define it?
This is just the controller which handles the view. The name used there is the same as in the view's controllerName attribute. And light is in this context just the BusyDialog without text and buttons.
Firefox addon. I'm porting an existing addon to a restartless one. I have a panel with a lot of UI elements (mostly boxes/description and images) in it, and it is very convenient for me to define the panel elements in an XUL overlay file. I will have lots of bloated js code if I don't.
The panel element (parent) itself is created in code dynamically, and then I use loadOverlay, wait for the 'merged' event and then append the panel element's children from the overlayed document. I also make sure that the elements are cleaned up upon a remove.
However, using overlays will most probably won't pass an AMO review. And some of the reasons I think are :
In most cases overlay elements will cause problems while removing (eg: toolbar buttons remembering their positions etc.)
There are problems with attaching js/css files in an overlay file.
loadOverlay is buggy (496320, 330458)
And here are my inferences :
loadOverlay() API itself is not deprecated - in fact it is 'not frozen and may change later' - which means possibly it will be use-able in future.
The bug that a second overlay load fails, is not applicable in my case, as I don't initialize without an overlay merge.
Using static overlay for preference windows etc. is perfectly acceptable as of now.
The panel in my case behaves a lot like a preference window (which is brought up on demand and cleaned up upon addon removal)
I don't have any js/css attached to the overlay, nor any event listeners for the elements. The overlay is only used to define boxes and description text - nothing more.
So considering these, is it acceptable to use overlays and loadOverlay() for a restartless addon ? If not, is there an alternative ?
About overlays, by checking source code of restartless addon that extend existing addon (like ehh), I see the overlay.xul is auto merged with the existing addon's. So it shouldn't be a problem to use overlay.
GWT screens are composed of a hierarchy of Widgets each implemented by various application classes. In order to maintain (add/change) these screens it is required to understand its structure, namely to discover which screen element is rendered by which Widget implementation.
Currently, I am trying to read the "suspected" class source while peeking at the DOM structure of the screen.
I am looking for a tool, or method, to aid with discovering which Widget class renders a specific screen element.
Such a tool would monitor the mouse position on screen and provide the class name of the hovered element (for example, in a tooltip).
Alternatively, I would be happy to find a programming method that allows adding a generic mouse event handler, most desirable to the RootPanel, further displaying the class name of currently hovered element.
Unfortunately AFAIK ,as of now there is no such tool for GWT( will be more happy if any ) .
As on browser side there is no such information available related to class files of java available since it compiled to javascript.
So , what's the fix??
Though very common and tradational.
1)Proper naming conventions
2)Proper package structure
3)Documentation etc ...
Check out the GWT-Instrumental project for an example of how this can be achieved. This is not a new project and may need to be updated to be properly useful in some cases, but seems to work with GWT 2.4 and GWT 2.5.1 projects just fine. The Inspector bookmarklet/instructions can be found at http://gwt-instrumental.googlecode.com/svn/latest/inspectorwidget/index.html.
This isn't doing exactly what you are describing, but could be modified fairly simply. What it does do is this:
When launched (or refreshed), look at every element on the page to see what widget might be references, and what css classes it has, what id it has, and what DOM events are sunk on it.
When expanded, renders a firebug-like tree of the DOM elements in the body, along with the details mentioned above
When the user hovers over a element in the tree, draws a yellow overlay on where that item is drawn on the page so you can find it.
GWT's Editor framework is really handy and it can not only be used for editing POJOs but also for read-only display.
However I am not entirely sure what the best practice is for doing inline edits.
Let's assume I have a PersonProxy and I have one Presenter-View pair for displaying and editing the PersonProxy. This Presenter-View should by default display the PersonProxy in read-only mode and if the user presses on a edit button it should allow the user to edit the PersonProxy object.
The solution I came up with was to create two Editors (PersonEditEditor and PersonDisplayEditor) that both added via UiBinder to the View. The PersonEditEditor contains
ValueBoxEditorDecorators and the PersonDisplayEditor contains normal Labels.
Initially I display the PersonDisplayEditor and hide PersonEditEditor.
In the View I create two RequestFactoryEditorDriver for each Editor and make it accessable from the Presenter via the View interface. I also define a setState() method in the View interface.
When the Presenter is displayed for the first time I call PersonDisplayDriver.display() and setState(DISPLAYING).
When the user clicks on the Edit button I call PersonEditDriver.edit() and setState(EDITING) from my Presenter.
setState(EDITING) will hide the PersonDisplayEditor and make the PersonEditEditor visible.
I am not sure if this is the best approach. If not what's the recommended approach for doing inline edits? What's the best way to do unit-testing on the Editors?
If you can afford developing 2 distinct views, then go with it, it gives you the most flexibility.
What we did in our app, where we couldn't afford the cost of developing and maintaining two views, was to bake the two states down into our editors, e.g. a custom component that can be either a label or a text box (in most cases, we simply set the text box to read-only and applied some styling to hide the box borders).
To detect which mode we're in, because we use RequestFactoryEditorDriver (like you do), we have our editors implement HasRequestContext: receiving a null value here means the driver's display() method was used, so we're in read-only mode. An alternative would be to use an EditorVisitor along with some HasReadOnly interface (which BTW is exactly what RequestFactoryEditorDriver does to pass the RequestContext down to HasRequestContext editors).
Yes,Presenter-View pair should be. But Here two ways to achieve this feature if you like to go with:
1) Integrate Edit/View code design in one ui.xml i.e.Edit code in EDitHorizonatlPanel and View code in ViewHorizontalPanel.The panel has different id. By using id, show/hide panel with display method. if getView().setState() ==Displaying then show ViewHorizontalPanel and if getView().setState()==Editing then show EditHorizontalPanel.
2) Instead of using labels, Use textboxes only. set Enable property is false when you need it in view mode otherwise true
You have created two Presenter/view but I think if Edit/View function has similar code so no need to rewrite similar code again and again for view purpose.
If a big project has so many Edit/View function and you will create such type of multiple View/Presenter than your project size become so huge unnecessary.
I think that whatever I have suggest that might be not good approach but a way should be find out which help to avoid code replication.
I am trying to create GTK Widget like shows in following Images
Is it possible to create it in GTK+ under C,
I tried using GtkExpander but it is not working out ...
Can any one Help....
Stripping the arrow is quite trivial. Just append the following code to you $HOME/.gtkrc-2.0 (or create it if not found):
style "pradeep" {
GtkExpander::expander-size = 0
GtkExpander::expander-spacing = 0
}
widget "*.GtkExpander" style "pradeep"
This is done by customizing the appearance using resource files. You can get the same result programmatically by changing the GtkExpander style properties.
Furthermore, you can connect your own callback to its "activate" signal and switch the background color of the widget whenever is active or not. And a lot more...
Just remember someone loves to have a consistent user interface.
If what you want is to duplicate the look, then there are two very inefficient solutions to the problem:
Write your own GTK theme engine (see Murrine or Clearlooks).
Replace your entire program by a GtkDrawingArea widget and use Cairo to draw exactly the look you want. You'll be on your own then, though, so you'll have to write all your widget placement algorithms, buttons, expanders, menus, and whatnot, from scratch.
GTK isn't really meant for this sort of thing. The whole point of GTK is that you design your user interface with the standard widgets, and they just work with whatever theme, language, or accessibility technologies your users need to use. If you design your own look and there's no way to change it, then someone with color blindness or poor eyesight won't be able to use it. Or the text will get all misaligned if someone uses your application in another language. Or at the very least, maybe someone just likes a black desktop with white lettering, and your application will stick out and look really ugly on that user's computer. If you really need to make it look exactly that way, then probably GTK isn't the right tool for you.