I am using ag-grid in my application. I would like to use the same instance of the grid options with two grid on the same page. ag-grid only renders one of the grids and leaves the other one empty.
This plnkr shows the issue
http://plnkr.co/edit/4rRNRGbUoy8QhAhGadpQ?p=preview
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.8/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://www.ag-grid.com/dist/ag-grid.js?ignore=notused24"></script>
<script src="script.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-app="example" ng-controller="exampleCtrl">
<button ng-click="loadData()">Load Data</button>
<button ng-click="showPopup()">Toggle Docked</button>
<div ng-show="docked">
<h2>Docked</h2>
<div ag-grid="gridOptions" class="ag-fresh" style="height: 100%;"></div>
</div>
<div ng-show="docked">
<h2>UnDocked</h2>
<div ag-grid="gridOptions" class="ag-fresh" style="height:100%;"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I'm not sure ag-grid supports this.
Maybe you can create a second angular controller and duplicate your gridoptions there?
EDIT: From https://www.ag-grid.com/javascript-grid-master-slave/ :
Using a master/slave relationship, you can have 2 grids with synced columns-- column changes in one grid will be reflected in the other.
To have one grid act as the 'slave' to another, use the slaveGrids option in the master's gridOptions:
gridOptionsSlave = {
// some grid options here
};
gridOptionsMaster = {
// some grid options here
slaveGrids: [gridOptionsSlave]
}
Note that pivot functionality does not work with the master/slave relationship, as the relationship depends on both grids having the same columns.
/j
Related
Bootstrap newbie here.
I'm trying to bootstrapify an old page but I can't seem to figure out how to stop my image from overflowing to the next column. I have a row with two columns- with the left side containing a picture. As soon as I reduce the window width, my image will start overflowing to the right column and will eventually collapse on top of the right column. I would like for the left column width to remain static or collapse to the top of the right column until the image can no longer fit in the left column.
I've tried adding the image-responsive class to the image but that will only change my image dimensions and I would prefer the image to keep its dimensions. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Here is my code: https://www.codeply.com/go/fb14u8fsSc
Is it something like the one below you are looking for?
A couple of notes though:
It might be because of your simplified codeply example, but you use <div class="row"><div class="col-md-12">…X…</div></div>, which is the equivalent of …X…. That simplifies things.
We are talking about Bootstrap 4 here (you also use that in your codeply), but the .img-responsive class is from Bootstrap 3. That class is called .img-fluid in Bootstrap 4.
Regarding inline-style margins, I would suggest to use the spacing utility classes instead.
<div class="container-fluid" style="position: fixed">
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
<div class="card my-3">
<div class="card-header"></div>
<div class="card-body">
Insert name here<br/>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/188x225/000/fff" class="XXXimg-fluid" alt=""/>
</div>
<div class="card-footer"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-9">
<div class="card text-xs-center mt-3">
<div class="card-header"></div>
<div class="card-body"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.0.0-beta.2/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
I am working on a set of Polymer elements (buttons in this particular case) some of which should re-use the same HTML snippet. A structure for a custom button is as follows:
...
<link rel="import" href="button-base.html" id="content">
<link rel="import" href="styles.html">
<link rel="import" href="behavior.html">
<dom-module id="dg-button">
<template>
<style include="button-styles"></style>
<!-- HERE I want the content of button-base.html -->
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'custom-button',
behaviors: [DG.ButtonBehavior]
});
</script>
</dom-module>
Styles and behavior work as they should.
The problem is: I am not sure how to get content of button-base.html into the specified place of the local DOM without defining button-base as yet another element and then using it as <button-base></button-base>.
The reasons I want to avoid converting it to the new element are:
I want the content of button-base to be a first-class citizen of the custom-button element's local DOM so that all the methods defined in the behavior would still apply using just this.myMethod() for buttons that do not import button-base and rather use custom local DOM.
I need to be able to declaratively set properties on this new custom-button so that they get reflected on DOM elements within button-base.html automatically.
For example, the content of the button-base.html is as follows:
<link rel="import" href="../bower_components/polymer/polymer.html">
<link rel="import" href="../bower_components/paper-button/paper-button.html">
<paper-button id="internalButton" raised$="[[raised]]">
<span id="defaultContent">
<content></content>
</span>
</paper-button>
I would like to set raised on my custom-button in a way that it gets mapped to paper-button automatically without proxying all of the possible attributes through a new element (in case I define base-button as a new element and import it as <base-button></base-button> in custom-button).
Any ideas on how to make this import work?
I have a polymer element <my-element> with a computed property myProperty. I need to bind myProperty to another place in the HTML page, so I can't put it inside a dom-bind template
Here's what I mean
<html>
<body>
<div>
<my-element my-property="{{myProperty}}"></my-element>
</div>
<!--somewhere deep inside another part of the document-->
<div>
<h4>myProperty = </h4><span>[[myProperty]]</span>
<div>
</body>
</html>
I cannot wrap my-element and the usage of [[myProperty]] in a dom-bind template as this would result in nearly the entire document being enclosed in this. Attempting to use the bind as it is results in myProperty = [[myProperty]] being displayed, not the value of [[myProperty]].
Is there some way to have behaviour similar to data binding but usable across the whole HTML document? (In the future there might also be a case where [[myProperty]] is used inside an attribute such as <my-second-element my-property="[[myProperty]]">). Or if both occurences are wrapped individually in dom-bind templates is there some way to make the bind global?
Thanks in advance
Not sure why you wouldn't be able to do like this:
<head>
...
<script src="bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-lite.js"></script>
...
</head>
<html>
<body>
<template is="dom-bind" id="app">
<div>
<my-element my-property="{{myProperty}}"></my-element>
</div>
<!--somewhere deep inside another part of the document-->
<div>
<h4>myProperty = </h4><span>[[myProperty]]</span>
<div>
</template>
</body>
</html>
This is totally doable. If myProperty changes inside my-element it would also change in "this" html-document. There also wouldn't be a problem adding your second element:
<my-second-element my-property="[[myProperty]]">
Unless you're missing to tell us some specific behavior that you want, this should be what you want. :)
I am using the documentation at http://purecss.io/grids/
and basically copying the example code to create a grid of thirds
<div class="pure-u-1 pure-u-md-1-3"> ... </div>
<div class="pure-u-1 pure-u-md-1-3"> ... </div>
<div class="pure-u-1 pure-u-md-1-3"> ... </div>
However it is simply not displaying as the documentation explains - as 3 columns of equal thirds: http://jsfiddle.net/a7rnzn5f/1/
What am i not understanding ?
It's likely that you don't have the reference to the responsive part of the purecss grids.
From the link you provided:
Since media queries cannot be over-written, we do not include the grid
system as part of pure.css. You'll have to pull it in as a separate
CSS file. You can do this by adding the following tag to your
page.
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://yui.yahooapis.com/pure/0.6.0/grids-responsive-old-ie-min.css">
<![endif]-->
<!--[if gt IE 8]><!-->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://yui.yahooapis.com/pure/0.6.0/grids-responsive-min.css">
<!--<![endif]-->
Add that, and you should be good to go!
EDIT: I'm sorry, I didn't notice your fiddle. It looks like you did just the inverse. It doesn't look like you're including the base reference to purecss. I updated your fiddle with the reference below and it seems to work.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://yui.yahooapis.com/pure/0.6.0/pure-min.css">
I've my markups as
<div id="home" class="current">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div id="scroller">
<ul id="thelist" class="plastic"><!-- li items --></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
<!-- Events Details -->
<div id="events">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div id="scroller"> <!-- stuffsss --></div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
For iScroll (http://cubiq.org/iscroll) to work, I need the #scroller as ID (as per the javascript Code I'm using to initialize iScroll.
//for iScroll
var myScroll = new iScroll('scroller', {desktopCompatibility:true});
// Load iScroll when DOM content is ready.
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', loaded, false);
But since I can't have two different elements with the same ID (please notice I've got two elements with same id scroller in my markup above), some conflicts are there and the iScroll isn't working properly.
I want to be able to implement the iScroll on the markup by changing the id as classes. I tried to change them into classes and see if it works but I couldnt get it right.
Can anyone help me change the codes so that it works by implementing classes instead of the the id??
Rob is right, but you can change your code to scroller classes as you said.
Then initialise your scrollers within unique wrappers like this:
var scroll1, scroll2;
function loaded() {
scroll1 = new iScroll('wrapper1');
scroll2 = new iScroll('wrapper2');
}
I'm not totally clear on what you are trying to achieve but if you want two parts of your page to scroll I would suggest changing the IDs to be unique and instantiate two iScrolls with the different IDs.
I am sure you have figured it out, but for other users still struggling with similar layout (multiple scrollers) and want to make them work. Here is the answer from other thread
https://stackoverflow.com/a/7584694/1232232
but for this to work you need to assign ID's to your classed (div containers)
like
<div id="home" class="current">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div id="wrapper-1" class="scrollable">
<div class="scroller">
<ul class="thelist" class="plastic"><!-- li items --></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
<div id="home2" class="current">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div id="wrapper-1" class="scrollable">
<div class="scroller">
<ul class="thelist" class="plastic"><!-- li items --></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
Note: Remember not to assign same ID to multiple elements, always use classes for that purpose.