How to handle Multiple DOM elements with iScroll (while using jQTouch) - jqtouch

I've my markups as
<div id="home" class="current">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div id="scroller">
<ul id="thelist" class="plastic"><!-- li items --></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
<!-- Events Details -->
<div id="events">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div id="scroller"> <!-- stuffsss --></div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
For iScroll (http://cubiq.org/iscroll) to work, I need the #scroller as ID (as per the javascript Code I'm using to initialize iScroll.
//for iScroll
var myScroll = new iScroll('scroller', {desktopCompatibility:true});
// Load iScroll when DOM content is ready.
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', loaded, false);
But since I can't have two different elements with the same ID (please notice I've got two elements with same id scroller in my markup above), some conflicts are there and the iScroll isn't working properly.
I want to be able to implement the iScroll on the markup by changing the id as classes. I tried to change them into classes and see if it works but I couldnt get it right.
Can anyone help me change the codes so that it works by implementing classes instead of the the id??

Rob is right, but you can change your code to scroller classes as you said.
Then initialise your scrollers within unique wrappers like this:
var scroll1, scroll2;
function loaded() {
scroll1 = new iScroll('wrapper1');
scroll2 = new iScroll('wrapper2');
}

I'm not totally clear on what you are trying to achieve but if you want two parts of your page to scroll I would suggest changing the IDs to be unique and instantiate two iScrolls with the different IDs.

I am sure you have figured it out, but for other users still struggling with similar layout (multiple scrollers) and want to make them work. Here is the answer from other thread
https://stackoverflow.com/a/7584694/1232232
but for this to work you need to assign ID's to your classed (div containers)
like
<div id="home" class="current">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div id="wrapper-1" class="scrollable">
<div class="scroller">
<ul class="thelist" class="plastic"><!-- li items --></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
<div id="home2" class="current">
<div class="header">iScroll</div>
<div id="wrapper-1" class="scrollable">
<div class="scroller">
<ul class="thelist" class="plastic"><!-- li items --></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
Note: Remember not to assign same ID to multiple elements, always use classes for that purpose.

Related

remove tag and add additional css class to data-sly-resource

Here's my code and I want to add another css class toggleable-content to the existing code:
<sly data-sly-resource="${'item' # resourceType='components/header'}"></sly>
This code would look something like this:
<section aria-label="aria label">
<ul class="row">
<li class="col">
<div class="body px-3">
<h2 class="h3">
body
</h2>
<p>body text</p>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
I want to remove section tag and add another css class toggleable-content to the <ul> tag. Below is what I'd like to achieve:
<ul class="row toggleable-content">
<li class="col">
<div class="body px-3">
<h2 class="h3">
body
</h2>
<p>body text</p>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
I was wondering how to use slightly to achieve the above? I tried something below but it doesn't work:
<sly data-sly-resource="${'item' # resourceType='components/header', cssClassName='toggleable-content'}"></sly>
Assuming the section markup is managed by the included resource (components/header) then you cannot do it directly. Indirectly, with AEM, you can pass a parameter (through request attributes) and retrieve it in the components/header model, then add the section conditionally (using data-sly-unwrap for example).
Or you re-organize your code and switch from resource inclusion to template calling and pass the parameter directly using data-sly-call.

Remove ce-wrappers of fluid cObject

I masked(mask-extension) a couple of plug-ins. When the image is generated in the template, it is always wrapped in following divs:
<div id="c63" class="frame frame-default frame-type-image frame-layout-0">
<div class="ce-image ce-center ce-above">
<div class="ce-gallery" data-ce-columns="1" data-ce-images="1">
<div class="ce-outer">
<div class="ce-inner">
<div class="ce-row">
<div class="ce-column">
<figure class="image"><img class="image-embed-item"
src="fileadmin/user_upload/bla" width="975"
height="678" alt=""></figure>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Is there any way to remove all those wrappers? I simply want to have the image.
Sidenotes:
1. f:image does not work, I cannot access the proper uid for it to show. (This is perhaps an issue with mask)
2. I cannot find the tt_content.stdWrap.innerWrap > in my typoScript, as I do not know where mask puts it. It is neither in the netup.ts nor in the NewContentElementWizard.ts
You need to overwrite the fluid_styled_content partial in Resources/Private/Partials/Media/Gallery.html.
How to overwrite, you can read here: https://docs.typo3.org/typo3cms/extensions/fluid_styled_content/8.7/Configuration/OverridingFluidTemplates/

Bootstrap 4 - Image overflows from column when the window is resized

Bootstrap newbie here.
I'm trying to bootstrapify an old page but I can't seem to figure out how to stop my image from overflowing to the next column. I have a row with two columns- with the left side containing a picture. As soon as I reduce the window width, my image will start overflowing to the right column and will eventually collapse on top of the right column. I would like for the left column width to remain static or collapse to the top of the right column until the image can no longer fit in the left column.
I've tried adding the image-responsive class to the image but that will only change my image dimensions and I would prefer the image to keep its dimensions. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Here is my code: https://www.codeply.com/go/fb14u8fsSc
Is it something like the one below you are looking for?
A couple of notes though:
It might be because of your simplified codeply example, but you use <div class="row"><div class="col-md-12">…X…</div></div>, which is the equivalent of …X…. That simplifies things.
We are talking about Bootstrap 4 here (you also use that in your codeply), but the .img-responsive class is from Bootstrap 3. That class is called .img-fluid in Bootstrap 4.
Regarding inline-style margins, I would suggest to use the spacing utility classes instead.
<div class="container-fluid" style="position: fixed">
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
<div class="card my-3">
<div class="card-header"></div>
<div class="card-body">
Insert name here<br/>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/188x225/000/fff" class="XXXimg-fluid" alt=""/>
</div>
<div class="card-footer"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-9">
<div class="card text-xs-center mt-3">
<div class="card-header"></div>
<div class="card-body"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.0.0-beta.2/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>

append div to specific place inside divs block with jquery

for sure its the easiest thing...
i need to append a certain div to a specific place inside a div block and after a specific div.
this is my code:
<div class="header">
<div class="logo">
<div class="ulWrap">
<div class="apple-logo">
<div class="android-logo">
<div class="mmBtn"></div>
<div class="mmBtnC"></div>
</div>
i need to insert a new div right after the:
<div class="logo">
i tried:
$('the div i want to append').eq(0).appendTo('.header');
but it appended it after the last div.
try after():
$('.logo').after('<div>some new div</div>');

How to prevent an element from appearing under a parent schema?

I have some slightly awkward markup and need to reference some elements from a separate container, and prevent those elements from appearing under the parent in their hierarchy. How can I do this?
Here's my (simplified) markup:
<body itemscope itemtype='https://schema.org/AboutPage'>
<div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/ProfessionalService">
<ul>
<li><img id="photo-emp1" itemprop="image" src="..."/></li>
<li><img id="photo-emp2" itemprop="image" src="..."/></li>
<li><img id="photo-emp3" itemprop="image" src="..."/></li>
<li><img id="photo-emp4" itemprop="image" src="..."/></li>
</ul>
<div id="tab-emp1" itemprop="employee" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"
itemref="photo-emp1">
<h1 itemprop="name">John Doe</h1>
<h2 itemprop="jobTitle">Vice President, Finance</h2>
<div itemprop="description">John is...</div>
</div>
<div id="tab-emp2" itemprop="employee" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"
itemref="photo-emp2">
<h1 itemprop="name">Jane Roe</h1>
<h2 itemprop="jobTitle">Vice President, Operations</h2>
<div itemprop="description">Jane is...</div>
</div>
...
</div>
</body>
The structure is required for a tab control, so I can't rearrange the markup.
The itemref attribute on the Person correctly drags the image 'under' the https://schema.org/Person node.
However, the image elements ALSO appear as properties under the https://schema.org/ProfessionalService node, which is not correct or desired.
How can I keep the image elements in their current location, reference them under Person, but prevent them from appearing under ProfessionalService?
Just add the itemscope attribute to the ul element. You'll get an extra, disconnected, item, but the images will no longer be part of the ProfessionalService item.