I'm trying to create a dictionary of types (all types conforming to CKRecordType). This wouldn't be a dictionary of different types of objects, but an actual dictionary of different objects' types (i.e. I want to match all of the keys I'm using to save in a CKRecord field to the type of CKRecordValue that field stores). Is this possible in Swift? All of the types are named types, but I'm not sure how I'd refer to them (is there a 'type' type).
I'm looking for something like this: Dictionary<String, Type> or Dictionary<String, TypeIdentifier> or Dictionary<String, CKRecordValue.conformingTypes> etc...
EDIT
This is the code I'm currently using (in a protocol):
static var dictionaryOfKeysAndAssociatedValueTypes: Dictionary<String, CKRecordType.Type> { get }
or
static var dictionaryOfKeysAndAssociatedValueTypes: [String: CKRecordType.Type] { get }
which generates a "Use of undeclared type 'CKRecordType'" with Xcode 7.3
There is indeed a way to do this: your conformingTypes actually exists, and it's called Type:
Dictionary<String, CKRecordValue.Type>
or
[String: CKRecordValue.Type]
Related
I have an array of strings and a CoreData object with a bunch of variables stored in it; the strings represent each stored variable. I want to show the value of each of the variables in a list. However, I cannot find a way to fetch all variables from a coredata object, and so instead I'm trying to use the following code.
ListView: View{
//I call this view from another one and pass in the object.
let object: Object
//I have a bunch of strings for each variable, this is just a few of them
let strings = ["first_name", "_last_name", "middle_initial" ...]
var body: some View{
List{
ForEach(strings){ str in
//Want to pass in string here as property name
object.str
//This doesn't work because string cannot be directly passed in as property name - this is the essence of my question.
}
}
}
}
So as you can see, I just want to pass in the string name as a member name for the CoreData object. When I try the code above, I get the following errors: Value of type 'Object' has no member 'name' and Expected member name following '.'. Please tell me how to pass in the string as a property name.
CoreData is heavily based on KVC (Key-Value Coding) so you can use key paths which is much more reliable than string literals.
let paths : [KeyPath<Object,String>] = [\.first_name, \.last_name, \.middle_initial]
...
ForEach(paths, id: \.self){ path in
Text(object[keyPath: path]))
}
Swift is a strongly typed language, and iterating in a python/javascript like approach is less common and less recommended.
Having said that, to my best knowledge you have three ways to tackle this issue.
First, I'd suggest encoding the CoreData model into a dictionary [String: Any] or [String: String] - then you can keep the same approach you wanted - iterate over the property names array and get them as follow:
let dic = object.asDictionary()
ForEach(strings){ str in
//Want to pass in string here as property name
let propertyValue = dic[str]
//This doesn't work because string cannot be directly passed in as property name - this is the essence of my question.
}
Make sure to comply with Encodable and to have this extension
extension Encodable {
func asDictionary() throws -> [String: Any] {
let data = try JSONEncoder().encode(self)
guard let dictionary = try JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: .allowFragments) as? [String: Any] else {
throw NSError()
}
return dictionary
}
Second, you can hard coded the properties and if/else/switch over them in the loop
ForEach(strings){ str in
//Want to pass in string here as property name
switch str {
case "first_name":
// Do what is needed
}
}
Third, and last, You can read and use a technique called reflection, which is the closest thing to what you want to achieve
link1
link2
Let's say I have the following class:
class User: NSObject {
var name = "Fred"
var age = 24
var email = "fred#freddy.com"
var married = false
}
I want to be able to write a generic function that takes in a list of KeyPaths for a known class type, read the values and print to screen. The problem is, the I can't get the following code to compile as the type of the KeyPath's Value is not known, and will be different for each time. What do I have to do to make this work generically?
Consider the following:
struct KeyPathProperties<T> {
var name: String
var relatedKeyPaths: [KeyPath<T, Any>]
}
extension KeyPath where Root == User {
var properties: KeyPathProperties<Root> {
switch self {
case \Root.name:
return KeyPathProperties(name: "name", relatedKeyPaths: [\Root.age, \Root.email])
default:
fatalError("Unknown key path")
}
}
}
This line fails to compile:
return KeyPathProperties(name: "name", relatedKeyPaths: [\Root.age, \Root.email])
with this error:
Cannot convert value of type 'KeyPath<User, Int>' to expected element type 'KeyPath<User, Any>'
This is what I wish to be able to do, for instance:
let myUser = User()
var keyPathProps = KeyPathProperties(name: "name", relatedKeyPaths: [\User.age, \User.email])
for keyPath in props.relatedKeyPaths {
print("Value: \(myUser[keyPath: keyPath])")
}
The above won't compile of course. Essentially I want to store keyPaths in an array at runtime, so I can generically at some point in time get values out of the User. I need to know if I can re-write the above in some way where the compiler can safely and correctly determine the type of the keyPath's value at runtime.
This is a conceptual use case for a much more complex architectural issue I'm trying to solve with hopefully less code.
MORE INFORMATION:
At runtime I wish to keep track of the properties that get modified - these properties are held in a modifiedProps array in each object / instance. At some point at runtime, I wish to be able to enumerate over this array of KeyPaths and print their values like so:
for modifiedKeyPath in self.modifiedProps {
print ("\(self[keyPath: modifiedKeyPath])"
}
In short - I need to be able to capture the generic type of the KeyPath within KeyPathProperties. How do I achieve this?
SIDE NOTE: I can already easily achieve this by using Swift 3 style string based KeyPaths (by adding #objc to the class properties). I can store an array of keyPaths as strings and later do:
let someKeyPath = #keyPath(User.email)
...
myUser.value(forKeyPath: someKeyPath)
I just cannot do this with Swift 4 KeyPaths generically.
The error tells you what your misconception is:
Cannot convert value of type 'KeyPath<User, Int>'
to expected element type 'KeyPath<User, Any>'
You seem to think that you can use a KeyPath<User, Int> where a KeyPath<User, Any> is expected, ostensibly on the grounds that an Int is an Any. But that's not true. These are generic types, and generic types are not covariant — that is, there is no substitution principle for generics based on their parameterized types. The two types are effectively unrelated.
If you need an array of key paths regardless of their parameterized types, you would need an array of PartialKeyPath or AnyKeyPath. It seems that in your use case the root object is the same throughout, so presumably you want PartialKeyPath.
I am working on an application and I am relatively new to Swift where I am trying to initialize answerKeys with the keys of answer variable with the following code but it is showing an error.
Cannot assign value of type 'Dictionary<IntPoint, String>.Keys' to type 'LazyMapCollection<Dictionary<IntPoint, String>, IntPoint>' (aka 'LazyMapSequence<Dictionary<IntPoint, String>, IntPoint>')
I have gone through the documentation but couldn't fix this.
var answer:[IntPoint:String] = [:]
var answerKeys:LazyMapCollection<Dictionary<IntPoint,String>,IntPoint>
init() {
answerKeys = answer.keys
}
It may be that Dictionary.keys returned a LazyMapCollection in earlier Swift versions. In Swift 5 it is Dictionary<Key, Value>.Keys as can be seen from the documentation, in your case
var answerKeys: Dictionary<IntPoint, String>.Keys
But note that you can always access answer.keys in your code instead of assigning this to a separate property.
I made the json parser in swift language.
But, many of people are using like below.
let jsonParsed = JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: [])
guard let jsonDict = jsonParsed as? Dictionary<String, AnyObject> else { return }
...
Then, I wonder the type of jsonParsed. The JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with:options:) function reference describes that the result type is just Any.
I know the type is Dictionary because JSON. The KEY is String type but, VALUE is AnyObject? How about Any?
I know the difference between AnyObject and Any. Any also includes value type, function type.
Number is also value type in swift: Int, Float, Double...
Is that impossible return type is value type?
Json can be array also. This is valid josn
[
"1",
"2",
"3"
]
You can use this site to verify [https://jsoneditoronline.org/][1].
When you give fragmentsallowed option in the function json result can be Int,Float or any other primitive data type.
So it is not possible to return type in compile time. At run time it is possible. But return type is decided at run time.
I want to store a more specialized type in a Dictionary of type [String:SomeClass]. Here is some sample code illustrating my problem (also available to play with at https://swiftlang.ng.bluemix.net/#/repl/579756cf9966ba6275fc794a):
class Thing<T> {}
protocol Flavor {}
class Vanilla: Flavor {}
var dict = [String:Thing<Flavor>]()
dict["foo"] = Thing<Vanilla>()
It produces the error ERROR at line 9, col 28: cannot assign value of type 'Thing<Vanilla>' to type 'Thing<Any>?'.
I've tried casting Thing<Vanilla>() as Thing<Flavor> but that produces the error cannot convert value of type 'Thing<Vanilla>' to type 'Thing<Flavor>' in coercion.
I've also tried to define the Dictionary as type [String:Thing<Any>] but that doesn't change anything either.
How do I create a collection of different Things without resorting to plain [String:AnyObject]?
I should also mention that the class Thing is not defined by me (in fact it's about BoltsSwift Tasks), so the solution to create a base class of Thing without a type parameter doesn't work.
A Thing<Vanilla> is not a Thing<Flavor>. Thing is not covariant. There is no way in Swift to express that Thing is covariant. There are good reasons for this. If what you were asking for were allowed without careful rules around it, I would be allowed to write the following code:
func addElement(array: inout [Any], object: Any) {
array.append(object)
}
var intArray: [Int] = [1]
addElement(array: &intArray, object: "Stuff")
Int is a subtype of Any, so if [Int] were a subtype of [Any], I could use this function to append strings to an int array. That breaks the type system. Don't do that.
Depending on your exact situation, there are two solutions. If it is a value type, then repackage it:
let thing = Thing<Vanilla>(value: Vanilla())
dict["foo"] = Thing(value: thing.value)
If it is a reference type, box it with a type eraser. For example:
// struct unless you have to make this a class to fit into the system,
// but then it may be a bit more complicated
struct AnyThing {
let _value: () -> Flavor
var value: Flavor { return _value() }
init<T: Flavor>(thing: Thing<T>) {
_value = { return thing.value }
}
}
var dict = [String:AnyThing]()
dict["foo"] = AnyThing(thing: Thing<Vanilla>(value: Vanilla()))
The specifics of the type eraser may be different depending on your underlying type.
BTW: The diagnostics around this have gotten pretty good. If you try to call my addElement above in Xcode 9, you get this:
Cannot pass immutable value as inout argument: implicit conversion from '[Int]' to '[Any]' requires a temporary
What this is telling you is that Swift is willing to pass [Int] where you ask for [Any] as a special-case for Arrays (though this special treatment isn't extended to other generic types). But it will only allow it by making a temporary (immutable) copy of the array. (This is another example where it can be hard to reason about Swift performance. In situations that look like "casting" in other languages, Swift might make a copy. Or it might not. It's hard to be certain.)
One way to solve this is adding an initialiser to Thing and creating a Thing<Flavor> that will hold a Vanilla object.
It will look something like:
class Thing<T> {
init(thing : T) {
}
}
protocol Flavor {}
class Vanilla: Flavor {}
var dict = [String:Thing<Flavor>]()
dict["foo"] = Thing<Flavor>(thing: Vanilla())