I have the following form with html
<h1>ng-dirty Test</h1>
<form [formGroup]="myForm">
<input required [(ngModel)]='myVar' formControlName="myVar" />
</form>
myForm.controls.myVar.dirty: {{myForm.controls.myVar.dirty}}
<br/>
my value 1
my value 2
my value 3
When I enter a value manually into the input field, I see ng-dirty is set as a class.
However, when I click the links to set the value, I do not see ng-dirty is changing.
https://plnkr.co/edit/C3Y4pE?p=preview
Does anyone know what the reason is?
Related
I am putting a slider on my web form for users to enter how much they would like to rate a certain thing.
I am using Vue.js and I am not sure how to set up a v-model on this and how to get user's entered value.
<div v-else class="form-group">
<form action="">
<label for="formControlRange">Please drag the slider to decide how much you want to rate between 1 and 10</label>
<input type="range" class="form-control-range" id="formControlRange">
</form>
<div>
You just have to add the v-model attribute to your range input:
<input type="range" class="form-control-range" id="formControlRange" v-model="value">
And define value (however you want to name it) in your component.
...
data: {
value: 50 //initial value
}
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/q0Lmv196/
I am testing the following form in my html :
<form wicket:id="form">
<input type="text" wicket:id="input"/>
<input type="submit"/>
</form>
The default value is null and in my test I tried to change it to something and check if I have really changed the field as following:
formTester.setValue(formTester.getForm().get("input"), "randomText");
Assert.assertEquals("randomText", formTester.getTextComponentValue("input"));
However the test is not successful because the field expected <[randomText]> but was: [].Any ideas why the setting doesn't work?
You need to call FormTester#submit() after setting the values of the FormComponents.
Building a CMS with node, mongoDB & angularjs. I have an edit form with inputs that I want to bind to the $scope so their values are populated with existing data. Ex:
<form ng-submit="editArticle(article._id, article)" class="edit-form">
<label for="hed">Hed: <input type="text" name="hed" ng-model="article.hed" value="{{article.hed}}" /></label>
<label for="dek">Dek: <input type="text" name="dek" ng-model="article.dek" placeholder="{{article.dek}}" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Save Changes"></input>
</form>
This appropriately fills in the input values with the current data from my mongo database. However, I would like to bind to a new form scope, so it doesn't try to pass in every value in the article scope, just the new scope within the form. (Article scope currently consists of every field in the article document in Mongo. If I pass all of this data in, I get an error about invalid schema because it is trying to pass in the __v field as well.)
So ideally I want to do this:
<form ng-submit="editArticle(article._id, form)" class="edit-form">
<label for="hed">Hed: <input type="text" name="hed" ng-model="form.hed" value="{{article.hed}}" /></label>
<label for="dek">Dek: <input type="text" name="dek" ng-model="form.dek" placeholder="{{article.dek}}" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Save Changes"></input>
</form>
So on submit, it only passes form.hed and form.dek to my database. However, now these input fields are blank because they're not bound to the original article data. The user would have to re-fill in each of the fields with the original values. Is there a way to bind to multiple models orrrr bind to a current model, but on submit only send the updated form data?
EDIT:
It looks like I have to add the ng-change attribute to each field, to populate the input fields with the original scope, then on change, set the form scope equal to the changed value. Eg.
<form ng-submit="editArticle(article._id, form)" class="edit-form">
<label for="hed">Hed: <input type="text" name="hed" ng-change(form.article = article.hed) ng-model="article.hed" /></label>
<label for="dek">Dek: <input type="text" name="dek" ng-change(form.dek = article.dek) ng-model="article.dek" placeholder="{{article.dek}}" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Save Changes"></input>
</form>
Not sure how thrilled I am about this solution, but it works. If anyone knows a more efficient way to accomplish this please let me know!
Do a copy of the original object (or part of it) upon receiving it from DB and bind your from to it.
Coping objects before edit is a very good pattern since it allows you to easily provide additional functionality like revert edits and disable save buttons if no edit was made.
I would like to do multiple rows selection. Rows are display through strut2 tag s:iterator, how can I get the selection information, which should contains a list of selected "id"
<s:form action='Selection'>
<s:iterator value="transInfos">
<input type='hidden' name=id value='<s:property value="id" />' />
<s:checkbox name="selected"/>
<s:property value="name" />
</s:iterator>
<s:submit value="Selection" />
</s:form>
One option which seems to me is to create a hidden field in your form like
<s:form action="selection">
<input type='hidden' name="selectedId" value=""/>
</s:form>
you can add a on-click event to your check-box and if it get checked you can add the value t a variable and set in the hidden field,each new addition should be added as new values in comma separated way like in end hidden field should be like
<input type='hidden' name="selectedId" value="1,2,3,4"/>
moment you submit the form you can parse the form value and can split it based on the separator ","
other option is to name the check-box with same name so moment it will get submitted the values of the checked one will be submitted as a collection, choice is all yours and you need to decide which way to go
I'm glad I can answer this question myself.
The answer is quite simple.
<s:form action="..." >
<s:iterator value="transInfos">
<input type="checkbox" name="transIds" value='<s:property value="transID" />'/>
</s:iterator>
<s:submit value="Select"/>
</s:form>
the value of checkbox is what you want to pass to the action, all the selected checkboxes will pass their values as a list to the action.
We have the following code in which we are getting errors in the w3c validator for "Any input descendant of a label element with a for attribute must have an ID value that matches that for attribute." and "The label element may contain at most one input, button, select, textarea, or keygen descendant." Is this something that should just be ignored by the validator (as it is seeminlgly correct) or should it be changed to appease the w3c? Note this is html5 doctype.
<fieldset>
<label for="user_is_subscribed">
<input type="hidden" value="0" name="user[is_subscribed]">
<input type="checkbox" value="1" name="user[is_subscribed]" id="user_is_subscribed">
Newsletter Signup
</label>
<span class="checkLabel">We will never spam or give away your information</span>
</fieldset>
Thank in advance!
Labels should contain at most one input element. Move the hidden input out of the label. Also, when an input is a descendant of a label, the for attribute is superfluous.
<fieldset>
<input type="hidden" value="0" name="user[is_subscribed]">
<label>
<input type="checkbox" value="1" name="user[is_subscribed]" id="user_is_subscribed">
Newsletter Signup
</label>
<span class="checkLabel">We will never spam or give away your information</span>
</fieldset>
Is this something that should just be ignored by the validator
No
(as it is seeminlgly correct)
It isn't
or should it be changed
Yes
to appease the w3c?
No. It should be changed because it is wrong, and browsers have to error correct to figure out which element the label is associated with.
The label isn't labeling the hidden input, move it elsewhere.