How to use a custom template when extending the L.Control function? - leaflet

When creating Leaflet maps, I currently programmatically add my menus and legends by extending the L.Control like so:
var overlaysMenuCtrl = L.Control.extend({
onAdd: function(map){
var container = L.DomUtil.create('div', 'legend');
container.innerHTML = '<div id="mainMenu"><ul><li>blah</li></ul>';
return container;
}
});
The problem is that my custom menus are massive and I hate having to write the innerHTML code like that.
Is there a way to use some kind of template from another file and write the code there and then call the variable like so:
container.innerHTML = myMenuTemplate;
Then, the template could be like:
<div>
<ul>
<li>A list item</li>
<li>and so on...</li>
</ul>
</div>
The problem is that if I do the above method, I have to minify and remove line breaks/white space/etc in the code and makes it rather tedious everytime I make updates. Thanks for any tips!

I would suggest Mustache for javascript
The script is available on CDN
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mustache.js/2.2.1/mustache.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
You can easily find some tutorials.
Here is an example with your data
EDIT:
Templates are useful to separate views and data.
If you don't really need templating but only an easy way to write your menus, you can just write them in invisible html elements that you access with
document.getElementById('menu1').innerHTML

Related

TinyMCE - preserve style and function of selected element

I have decided to 'enhance' a textarea in a form with TinyMCE... however, doing so has interrupted the styling and jQuery functionality of the original element, as TinyMCE wraps that element in an iframe and a few divs. What I'd love to be able to do is to get the TinyMCE functionality (preserving text formatting, etc.) but not lose the styling and functions that I had associated with the original textarea. I looked through the TinyMCE documentation, but couldn't seem to find anything about this. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to accomplish this?
My form features the textarea like so:
<head>
<script>tinymce.init( { selector: 'textarea' } );</script>
</head>
<div class="form-element">
<div class="label-container">
<label for="body">Post</label><span class="warning">Please fill out this field</span>
</div>
<textarea id="body" class="input-field" name="body"></textarea>
</div>
but adding TinyMCE breaks the label/textarea relationship.
Also, jQuery functionality is broken, such as this validation script:
$("form").submit(function(e){
tinyMCE.triggerSave();
var inputFields = $(".input-field");
var proceed = true;
for(var i = 0; i < inputFields.length; i++){
if($(inputFields[i]).val() == ""){
$(inputFields[i]).css("border", "solid 3px #E86F3A");
$(inputFields[i]).prev().find(".warning").show();
var proceed = false;
e.preventDefault();
}
else{
$(inputFields[i]).css("border", "none");
$(inputFields[i]).prev().find(".warning").hide();
};
};
//OTHER STUFF...
});
since the textarea.input-field is no longer picked up in the inputFields variable.
So, in a nutshell, I'm looking for the TinyMCE wrapper to 'inherit' the styling and functionality of the element that it is attached to. Possible?
As you have correctly surmised when you invoke TinyMCE on a <textarea> the original <textarea> is no longer visible on the page and its replaced by an <iframe> and series of <div> elements.
If you want to keep the underlying <textarea> in sync you can use the tinymce.triggerSave() method. This will update all of the underlying <textarea> elements with the current value of the appropriate instance of TinyMCE.
You can do this when someone tries to save/submit the content or you can try to perform this when certain editor events happen (https://www.tinymce.com/docs/advanced/events/#editorevents). Unless you need real time accuracy of the contents of the <textarea> its far easier to call the triggerSave() method right before you perform you jQuery validation.
Note: Putting a border on the <textarea> won't have any impact on TinyMCE as you no longer see the underlying <textarea>. You can certainly try to add CSS to the editor's HTML in real time. The outer border of TinyMCE 4.4 has these classes attached:
class="mce-tinymce mce-container mce-panel"
...but do note that these classes could change over time so if you upgrade TinyMCE check to make sure your CSS still works before upgrading.

Meteor Handlebars templates: switching from text to input

One part of my meteor application is a semi-collaborative table where users can edit different rows at the same time. When a user is editing a row, the static text values need to switch to input boxes so that the values can be edited and then saved. I would like a template/helper to do this, essentially I want:
<td>
{{#if iAmEditing}}
{{foo}}
{{else}}
<input type="text" name="foo" value="{{foo}}">
</td>
except that there are several columns with different values of "foo" and I don't want to copy and paste this several times. What's the right way to approach this with templates and helpers?
Another approach might be to use the HTML5 contenteditable attribute. Either way, what is the right way to template these values with handlebars?
You should be able to integrate with Bootstrap Editable
For reference, an answer to the original question...
As of today, handlebars partials can't accept anything other than a context argument, but helpers can. Hence. you can define a helper that sets up the context for the template:
Coffeescript:
Handlebars.registerHelper "eventCell", (context, field, editable) ->
return new Handlebars.SafeString(
Template._eventCell
_id: context._id
field: field
value: context[field]
editable: editable
)
Template:
<template name="_eventCell">
<td><div data-ref="{{field}}" class="{{#if editable}}editable{{/if}}">
{{value}}
</div></td>
</template>
Then, I just use the following to render each field:
{{eventCell this "province" iAmEditing}}
I ended up integrating with bootstrap editable, so the template is a little different than my original question. Also, I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it, but it's a lot cleaner than what I had before.
meteor-editable is a new project implementing something like x-editable, but nicely integrated with Meteor reactivity. Unfortunately inline editing is not supported yet (you have to use a popover the way it's set up now).

Knockout.js: Multiple ViewModel bindings on a page or a part of a page

I am wondering if it is possible to use Knockout.js's ko.applyBindings() multiple times to bind different ViewModels to one part of a page. For example, let's say I had this:
<div id="foo">...</div>
...
ko.applyBindings(new PageViewModel());
ko.applyBindings(new PartialViewModel(), $('#foo')[0]);
I am now applying two ViewModel bindings to <div id="foo>. Is this legal?
You do not want to call ko.applyBindings multiple times on the same elements. Best case, the elements will be doing more work than necessary when updating, worse case you will have multiple event handlers firing for the same element.
There are several options for handling this type of thing that are detailed here: Example of knockoutjs pattern for multi-view applications
If you really need an "island" in the middle of your content that you want to call apply bindings on later, then you can use the technique described here: http://www.knockmeout.net/2012/05/quick-tip-skip-binding.html
This is a common road block that comes when implementing JqueryMobile-SPA.
The method : ko.applyBindings(viewmode,root dom element) accepts two arguments. The second argument comes helpful when you have multiple VM's in your page.
for example :
ko.applyBindings(model1, document.getElementById("view1"));
ko.applyBindings(model2, document.getElementById("view2"));
where view1 and view2 are the root dom element for that model. For a JqueryMobile-SPA this will be the page ids for corresponding model.
The best way to do this would be use the "with" binding construct in the div that you want the partial view model to be bound. You can find it in this fiddle
<div data-bind="with: model">
<p data-bind="text: name"></p>
</div>
<div data-bind="with: anothermodel">
<p data-bind="text: name"></p>
</div>​
var model = {
name: ko.observable('somename'),
}
var anothermodel = {
name: ko.observable('someanothername'),
}
ko.applyBindings(model);​
Also check out the "with" binding documentation on the Knockout site, to look at an AJAX callback - partial binding scenario.
My english is very bad.... =)
I use Sammy to load partial views, and Knockout to bind the Model, I try use ko.cleanNode but clean all my bindings, all DOM nodes has changed when has a bind, a property __ko__ is aggregated, then i removed that property with this code, and works !!, '#main' is my node.
var dom = dom || $("#main")[0];
for (var i in dom) {
if (i.substr(0, 6) == "__ko__") {
delete (dom[i]);
break;
}
}
after use Ggle translator:
I use Sammy for the load of partial views, and Knockout for the bind the Model, I try to use ko.cleanNode but clean all my bindings, all DOM nodes has changed when they has a bind, a property ko is aggregated, then i removed that property with this code, and works !!, '#main' is my node.

Jquery Selector Multiple Classes (this)

I have a page that lists content that are contained in a div with a class ad-container. in that container there is a hidden div with the class ad-contact. on the hover of the ad class i want to animate the display of ad-info. since there are multiple ads on a paticular page, i want only the ad-info of the currently hovered ad-container to slide in. my problem is that since there are more than 10 ads a page when you hover over any of the ads, all of the ads-contact divs slideDown and not the one you are hovering over.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.ad-container').hover(
function(){
$(".ad-contact").slideDown(1000);
},
function(){
$(".ad-contact").slideUp(1000);
});
});
i think, (this) is used here but im not sure. and this would really shed the light for me.
<div class="ad-container">
<div class="ad-title">title<span class="ad-title-img">(pic)</span></div>
<div class="ad-description">texttext</div>
<div class="ad-contact" style="display:none">contact poster</div>
<div class="ad-sellerinfo" style="display:none">* Verified ***-****<br />
Paid Member</div>
</div>
The jQuery constructor accepts a 2nd parameter which can be used to override the context of the selection. Something like this should work:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.ad-container').hover(
function(){
$(".ad-contact", this).slideDown(1000);
},
function(){
$(".ad-contact", this).slideUp(1000);
});
});
Also, worth mentioning, $(".ad-contact", this) is internally converted into: $(this).find(".ad-contact") so you can use this one instead, it might be slightly faster.
You could use the .children() selector:
$(this).children(".ad-contact").slideDown(1000);
This way you will only act on the class ad-contact if its a child of the object in context (which is the object currently being hovered)
See a working demo here
You should use event to handle this,
First you need like
ad-container.hover(function(event){
event.target.children();
})
and then this.show().delay(1000).hide();
the code sample provide may not work when copy paste you have to write your own code in editor.

Div as Ajax.ActionLink

Is it possible to create Ajax.ActionLink which has instead of text, the whole DIV?
I'd like to map div on Ajax.ActionLink
I don't think that this will work using the standard MVC Ajax scripts. I believe that the MVC javascript is created to use an <a> element by default. On a different note, embedding a div tag within an <a> is not valid XHTML. What are you trying to achieve?
Using Jquery is probably the easiet way you want to go. As an example:
<div onclick="SomeAjaxFunction()">some div content</div>
function SomeAjaxFunction()
{
$.get('<%= Url.Action("SomeAction", "InSomeController") %>', function(data) {
$('.result').html(data); // assuming a partial view
alert('Load was performed.');
});
}
However, if you are dead set on using MS Ajax, to work with divs, you need to possibly look at the Sys.Mvc.MvcHelpers._asyncRequest function and do some of your own re-wrapping to make it usable. I have not tried or tested this, so use at your own risk. (Stick with the Jquery, there is far better help and support available.)