Odoo 9 qweb inheritance - dom

In opportunity kanban view I want to remove certain element. It is a span in web_kanban template with t-name="Kanban.Group". I followed this thread How to inherit a template with no ID in Odoo? and related documentation.
I put this
<t t-extend="KanbanView.Group">
<t t-jquery="span.o_kanban_config" t-operation="replace"></t>
</t>
in opportunities kanban template and I also made it a separate xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<odoo>
<template>
<t t-extend="KanbanView.Group">
<t t-jquery="span.o_kanban_config" t-operation="replace"></t>
</t>
</template>
</odoo>
(in this case I appended its name to module's manifest - in 'qweb' list). None of these approaches worked.
Contrary to what I have read about template inheritance, I also tried to use <t t-extend="web_kanban.template">, just in case Odoo needs the modules name just like when inheriting classic views...
Did I do something wrong or miss something? Is there a better/more suitable way to update template?
SOLVED
Finally it works.
I created a separate xml. As I decided to have folding arrows I put this code in it:
<template>
<t t-extend="KanbanView.Group">
<t t-jquery=".o_kanban_config.dropdown" t-operation="inner">
<a class="o_kanban_toggle_fold" href="#"><i class="fa fa-arrows-h"/></a>
</t>
</t>
</template>
I added a declaration to openerp.py manifest:
'qweb':[
'views/updated_kanban.xml',
],
Now only a folding arrow is displayed, no other options (Edit, duplicate etc.).

OInherting Kanban is regular view and has to be inherited like regular views inheritance and this link is the example of the Kanban view inheritance. Kanban view contain qweb but its not actual qWeb template so follow view inheritance document here

Related

Conditional processing within a Sightly/HTL component dependent upon position within a page

I've recently begun as an Ops dev on an AEM project, and we have a component (a table, that has a title, some copy and a field where the author can author some HTML to represent the contents of a table, with and elements. This, for whatever reason, has to sit within a component, called ArticleContainer. The title should have an H1 tag if the table is at the top of the page, and an H2 tag if it's anywhere lower down. I've tried using data-sly-test thus:
<sly data-sly-test.topOfPage="${table.firstPosition==true}">
<h1 data-sly-test="${table.headerCopy}" class="heading fontH2 headingLinear headingThick">
<span class="tableHeadingWrapper">${table.headerCopy # context='html'}</span>
</h1>
</sly>
<sly data-sly-test="${!topOfPage}">
<h2 data-sly-test="${table.headerCopy}" class="heading fontH2 headingLinear headingThick">
<span class="tableHeadingWrapper">${table.headerCopy # context='html'}</span>
</h2>
</sly>
Now, this kind of processing has worked elsewhere where the component doesn't sit within a container, but it seems that if it's in a container it always picks up the non-topOfPage condition. I assume there might be a way to maybe do the test within the container component & pass it down into the table component? How would one go about this, or if it's not possible, is there another method by which one might achieve this?
There are two things here:
What does table.firstPosition return? You should be able to debug this in your Sling Model or POJO and probably need to adjust the logic to account for intermediary containers.
HTL/Sightly has a data-sly-element that allows you to change the HTML element based on an expression, you could make your code shorter (and easier to maintain):
<h1 data-sly-test="${table.headerCopy}" data-sly-element="${table.firstPosition ? 'h1' : 'h2'}" class="heading fontH2 headingLinear headingThick">
<span class="tableHeadingWrapper">${table.headerCopy # context='html'}</span>
</h1>

TYPO3 : send data from extension to the backend layout

I made an extension which display some data and I need to send them to my Layout.
In my file list.html I made a left column with some data, but finally I need this column in my layout.
there is some code :
Layouts/MyLayout.html
<f:render partial="Structure/Header" arguments="{_all}"/>
<f:render partial="Menus/Main" arguments="{_all}"/>
<!--the left column should be here -->
<f:render section="default" />
List.html
<f:layout name="Default"/>
<f:section name="main">
<aside>
<h2>Title</h2>
<ul>
<f:for each="{Mydata}" as="data">
<li>{data.title}</li>
</f:for>
</ul>
</aside>
</f:section>
That's why I would need to retrieve my extension data in my layout. It is possible to get I ?
If it's not possible, it is possible to get in list.html the name of the actual backend layout with some typoscript ?
There are multiple options to handle whether there are data for an additional column in layout.
first:
Even if in FLUID the files are stored in three folder (Layouts/, Partials/, Templates/) you are not forced to use it in that way. Meaning: you also can decide the layout in the template files.
In the default layout you just render a mainsection (from the template file). And in the different templates you decide whether a side column exist.
second:
extension data can be provided in multiple ways:
You can do the rendering completely in typoscript - or you use a content element with a plugin. The later would be more transparent for editors.
In your case you can provide a different BackEnd layout where editors can put a plugin in the additional column for that special 'layout'.
The rendering only occurs if that 'layout' is selected and a plugin is stored in that column.

Declarative support questions

I am trying to add an htmlview (which is using declarative support according to SAP's docs) to an index page that is also using declarative support. Using data-sap-ui-type="ui.MyView" makes me to ask two questions:
Is there any equivalent to sap.ui.localResources in declarative support?
data-ui-type is not adding the view.html suffix to the view that should be laoded. Is there a special pattern for MVC in declarative support or is there currently no way to implement it?
Kind regards,
Nico
find some basic samples here:
https://openui5.hana.ondemand.com/#docs/guide/MVC.html
First of all I believe that you always have to set sap.ui.localResources in code.
As you can see instanciating a HTMLView from an HTMLView goes like this:
<div data-sap-ui-type="sap.ui.core.mvc.HTMLView" id="MyHTMLView" data-view-name="example.mvc.test2"></div>
This will load example.mvc.test2.view.html and place it into your parent view.
Generally speaking the JS API translates into HTMLViews like this:
new sap.ui.AnyControl("myId", {
aLittleProperty: "10",
property: false,
press: functionInMyController,
morePress: a.static.myFunction,
defaultAggregation: [
new sap.ui.OtherControl("otherId1"),
new sap.ui.OtherControl("otherId2")
],
anotherAggregation: new sap.ui.OtherControl("otherId3")
}).addStyleClass("myClass");
<div data-sap-ui-type="sap.ui.AnyControl"
id="myId"
class="myClass"
data-a-little-property="10",
data-property="false"
data-press="functionInMyController"
data-more-press="a.static.myFunction">
<div data-sap-ui-type="sap.ui.OtherControl" id="otherId1"></div>
<div data-sap-ui-type="sap.ui.OtherControl" id="otherId2"></div>
<div data-sap-ui-aggregation="anotherAggregation">
<div data-sap-ui-type="sap.ui.OtherControl" id="otherId3"></div>
</div>
</div>
Note that:
The id and CSS classes are set with the regular HTML attributes
Property names translate from camelCase to lower-case separated with "-" (due to the fact that HTML is not case-sensitive)
No matter what type the property is you of course have to put it in quotes in HTML
Whatever you put directly inside a HTML-defined control is considered to belong into it's default aggregation
BR
Chris

Umbraco - Displaying a specific image within a macro for-each child of certain node

Umbraco newbie here. I've researched a tonne but can't seem to find what I' looking for.
I have a site with a slider on the homepage, the slider is sitting in a macro which is using a for-each (of a nodes children) with a final goal to display the 'heroImage' image from that doctype. I cant post images as a newbie to this site, but heres my content structure:
HOME
PORTFOLIO
- First Item
- Another Item
ABOUT
CONTACT US
Home, Portfolio, ABOUT and CONTACT US are "Landing Pages" document types, and the children under Portfolio (First Item and Another Item) are "Portfolio Entries" document types. Below is the code on "Landing Page" calling the Slideshow macro.
Portfolio Entry has fields:
heroImage
images
body
Slideshow macro obviously being the highlight there. Easy enough. Heres my macro code where you'll see I'm trying to display the heroImage of the node in question for each 'for-each'.
<xsl:template match="/">
<!-- slider -->
<div id="slideshow">
<div id="slider" class="nivoSlider">
<xsl:for-each select="umbraco.library:GetXmlNodeById(1081)/*[#isDoc and position() < 4]">
<xsl:variable name="mediaId" select="umbraco.library:GetMedia(#id, 'false')/data [#alias = 'umbracoFile']" />
<xsl:if test="$mediaId > 0">
<xsl:variable name="mediaNode" select="umbraco.library:GetMedia($mediaId, 0)" />
<xsl:if test="count($mediaNode/data) > 0 and string($mediaNode/data[#alias='umbracoFile']) != ''">
<img src="{$mediaNode/data[#alias='umbracoFile']}" alt="[image]" />
</xsl:if>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</div>
</div>
<!-- data-transition="slideInLeft" -->
<script type="text/javascript">
$(window).load(function() {
$('#slider').nivoSlider();
});
</script>
</xsl:template>
I feel like im so close, and ran out of search queries as most of the solutions I found were dependant on the imageId being passed onto the macro from the other side of the macro which wouldn't work.
Hope Ive explained this enough and thanks in advance for your help!
First of all, it looks like you're hardcoding the parent node id. In the code you just provided, it seems to only be getting the children of the node with id 1081. From reading what you just posted, it would seem that on all landing pages, you want to display their individual portfolio entries.
Either way, I would stay away from hardcoding IDs. If the node id changes in any way(user deletes the node, it gets exported as a package to the live environment, etc), your code will stop working. I'd just use $currentPage instead.
Judging by your filter, I imagine you only want the first 3 items to show in the slider. The code seems correct, but you seem to be using the old schema and its associated xpath. If you're using a newer version of Umbraco, the way you reference node data in xslt would have changed. I would guess that you've found many code examples and tried merging them together, without realising they wouldn't call the same schema.
This wiki link will provide more information, and hopefully fix your problem if you're using the wrong xpath.

Sharepoint 2007 - Custom List provisioning - are List Forms needed at deployment?

I have a feature which is provisioning 1 document library and 2 custom lists. A folder is included for each list containing the schema.xml for that list. Each folder also contains the associated forms (AllItems, DispForm, EditForm, NewForm, etc.). Everything deploys/works correctly but it seems a little redundant having the same forms copied into each list's folder. There is nothing special about these lists - the are basically a default doc library/generic list with additional fields provided through new content types (derived from Item/Document).
As far as I can tell these forms are pretty generic. Are there pre-installed forms that I can reference from my list so I don't have to deploy all of these extra files? Is there any reason I would not want to do this?
Update - moving xml in comment to original question for readability:
<Forms>
<Form Type="DisplayForm" Url="Forms/DispForm.aspx" WebPartZoneID="Main"/>
<Form Type="EditForm" Url="Forms/EditForm.aspx" WebPartZoneID="Main"/>
<Form Type="NewForm" Url="Forms/Upload.aspx" WebPartZoneID="Main"/>
<Form Type="NewFormDialog" Path="EditDlg.htm">
....
There are virtual defaults that are used if you don't specify a concrete page.
All lists use these template defaults unless you use a tool like SharePoint designer to customize the page. Then the template is used to create the concrete page and you can customize the look for a particular list without affecting others.
For my custom definitions, I use
<List>
...
<MetaData>
...
<Forms>
<Form Type="DisplayForm" Url="DispForm.aspx" SetupPath="pages\form.aspx" WebPartZoneID="Main" />
<Form Type="EditForm" Url="EditForm.aspx" SetupPath="pages\form.aspx" WebPartZoneID="Main" />
<Form Type="NewForm" Url="NewForm.aspx" SetupPath="pages\form.aspx" WebPartZoneID="Main" />
</Forms>
</MetaData>
</List>
If you have no reason to customize the out of the box version of these forms, you can use the virtual form and not deploy copies.