I have a user document like:
{
_id: "s0m3Id",
_skills: ["skill1", "skill2"],
}
Now I want to unwind this document by the _skills field and add a score for each skill. So my aggregate looks like:
{
'$unwind': {'path': '$_skills', 'preserveNullAndEmptyArrays': true},
},
{
'$project': {
'_skills':
'label': '$_skills',
'skill_score': 1
},
}
},
Sometimes the _skills field can be empty, however in this case I still want the user document to flow through the aggregation - hence the preserveNullAndEmptyArrays parameter. However, the problem I'm having is that it will project a skill_score (though with no label) onto documents which had empty _skills array fields. Thus, when I go to $group the documents later on, those documents now have a non-empty _skills array, containing a single object, namely {skill_score: 1}. This is not what I want - I want documents which had empty (or non-existent) _skills fields to not have any skill_score projected onto them.
So how can I conditionally project a field based on the existence of another field? Using $exists does not help, because that is intended for querying, not for boolean expressions.
Updated
This aggregation will set the value of skill_score to 0 if _skills does not exist, then use $redact to remove the subdocument having skill_score equals to 0:
db.project_if.aggregate([
{
$unwind: {
path: '$_skills',
preserveNullAndEmptyArrays: true,
}
},
{
$project: {
_skills: {
label: '$_skills',
skill_score: {
$cond: {
if: {
$eq: ['$_skills', undefined]
},
then: 0,
else: 1,
}
}
}
}
},
{
$redact: {
$cond: {
if: { $eq: [ "$skill_score", 0 ] },
then: '$$PRUNE',
else: '$$DESCEND'
}
}
}
]);
Result would be like:
[
{ "_id" : '', "_skills" : { "label" : "skill1", "skill_score" : 1 } },
{ "_id" : '', "_skills" : { "label" : "skill2", "skill_score" : 1 } },
{ "_id" : '' },
]
Related
I have the following collection
{
"_id" : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray" : [
{
userId : ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point : 5
},
{
userId : ObjectId("613ca5e48dbe673802c2d521"),
point : 2
},
]
}
These are my questions
I want to push into myarray if userId doesn't exist, it should be appended to myarray. If userId exists, it should be updated to point.
I found this
db.collection.update({
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId" : ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
}, {
$set: { "myarray.$.point": 10 }
})
But if userId doesn't exist, nothing happens.
and
db.collection.update({
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")
}, {
$push: {
"myarray": {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
})
But if userId object already exists, it will push again.
What is the best way to do this in MongoDB?
Try this
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{ $pull: {"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")}}
)
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{ $push: {"myarray": {
userId:ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}}
)
Explination:
in the first statment $pull removes the element with userId= ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035") from the array on the document where _id = ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")
In the second one $push inserts
this object { userId:ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"), point: 10 } in the same array.
The accepted answer by Flying Fisher is that the existing record will first be deleted, and then it will be pushed again.
A safer approach (common sense) would be to try to update the record first, and if that did not find a match, insert it, like so:
// first try to overwrite existing value
var result = db.collection.update(
{
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
},
{
$set: {"myarray.$.point": {point: 10}}
}
);
// you probably need to modify the following if-statement to some async callback
// checking depending on your server-side code and mongodb-driver
if(!result.nMatched)
{
// record not found, so create a new entry
// this can be done using $addToSet:
db.collection.update(
{
_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")
},
{
$addToSet: {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
}
);
// OR (the equivalent) using $push:
db.collection.update(
{
_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId": {$ne: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"}}
},
{
$push: {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
}
);
}
This should also give (common sense, untested) an increase in performance, if in most cases the record already exists, only the first query will be executed.
There is a option called update documents with aggregation pipeline starting from MongoDB v4.2,
check condition $cond if userId in myarray.userId or not
if yes then $map to iterate loop of myarray array and check condition if userId match then merge with new document using $mergeObjects
if no then $concatArrays to concat new object and myarray
let _id = ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408");
let updateDoc = {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
};
db.collection.update(
{ _id: _id },
[{
$set: {
myarray: {
$cond: [
{ $in: [updateDoc.userId, "$myarray.userId"] },
{
$map: {
input: "$myarray",
in: {
$mergeObjects: [
"$$this",
{
$cond: [
{ $eq: ["$$this.userId", updateDoc.userId] },
updateDoc,
{}
]
}
]
}
}
},
{ $concatArrays: ["$myarray", [updateDoc]] }
]
}
}
}]
)
Playground
Unfortunately "upsert" operation is not possible on embedded array. Operators simply do not exist so that this is not possible in a single statement.Hence you must perform two update operations in order to do what you want. Also the order of application for these two updates is important to get desired result.
I haven't found any solutions based on a one atomic query. Instead there are 3 ways based on a sequence of two queries:
always $pull (to remove the item from array), then $push (to add the updated item to array)
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{ $pull: {"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")}}
)
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{
$push: {
"myarray": {
userId:ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
}
)
try to $set (to update the item in array if exists), then get the result and check if the updating operation successed or if a $push needs (to insert the item)
var result = db.collection.update(
{
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
},
{
$set: {"myarray.$.point": {point: 10}}
}
);
if(!result.nMatched){
db.collection.update({_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{
$addToSet: {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
);
always $addToSet (to add the item if not exists), then always $set to update the item in array
db.collection.update({_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
myarray: { $not: { $elemMatch: {userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")} } } },
{
$addToSet : {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
},
{ multi: false, upsert: false});
db.collection.update({
_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myArray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
},
{ $set : { myArray.$.point: 10 } },
{ multi: false, upsert: false});
1st and 2nd way are unsafe, so transaction must be established to avoid two concurrent requests could push the same item generating a duplicate.
3rd way is safer. the $addToSet adds only if the item doesn't exist, otherwise nothing happens. In case of two concurrent requests, only one of them adds the missing item to the array.
Possible solution with aggregation pipeline:
db.collection.update(
{ _id },
[
{
$set: {
myarray: { $filter: {
input: '$myarray',
as: 'myarray',
cond: { $ne: ['$$myarray.userId', ObjectId('570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035')] },
} },
},
},
{
$set: {
myarray: {
$concatArrays: [
'$myarray',
[{ userId: ObjectId('570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035'), point: 10 },
],
],
},
},
},
],
);
We use 2 stages:
filter myarray (= remove element if userId exist)
concat filtered myarray with new element;
When you want update or insert value in array try it
Object in db
key:name,
key1:name1,
arr:[
{
val:1,
val2:1
}
]
Query
var query = {
$inc:{
"arr.0.val": 2,
"arr.0.val2": 2
}
}
.updateOne( { "key": name }, query, { upsert: true }
key:name,
key1:name1,
arr:[
{
val:3,
val2:3
}
]
In MongoDB 3.6 it is now possible to upsert elements in an array.
array update and create don't mix in under one query, if you care much about atomicity then there's this solution:
normalise your schema to,
{
"_id" : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
userId : ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point : 5
}
You could use a variation of the .forEach/.updateOne method I currently use in mongosh CLI to do things like that. In the .forEach, you might be able to set all of your if/then conditions that you mentioned.
Example of .forEach/.updateOne:
let medications = db.medications.aggregate([
{$match: {patient_id: {$exists: true}}}
]).toArray();
medications.forEach(med => {
try {
db.patients.updateOne({patient_id: med.patient_id},
{$push: {medications: med}}
)
} catch {
console.log("Didn't find match for patient_id. Could not add this med to a patient.")
}
})
This may not be the most "MongoDB way" to do it, but it definitely works and gives you the freedom of javascript to do things within the .forEach.
When I run this command :
db.runCommand(
{
aggregate:"myColl",
pipeline:[
{
$group:{
_id:{os_name:"$os_name",os_version:"$os_version"},
"events.login":{$sum:"$events.login"},
count:{$sum:NumberInt(1)}}
}
],
cursor:{}
}
)
I receive the error:
The field name 'events.login' cannot contain '.'
How can i do to keep the '.' in the returned field name (ie: events.login)
It's not quiet clear what you're trying to do, So look at these :
Error :
The field name 'events.login' cannot contain '.'
It's because as in $group stage when it creates a new field on each document for a given name, You'll not be able to create it like this : "events.login" means cannot create a sub-doc it has to be an object to a top level field events basically you can not use . notation, So to make it work you need to have one more stage like this :
db.collection.aggregate([{
$group: {
_id: { os_name: "$os_name", os_version: "$os_version" },
"events": { $sum: "$events.login" },
count: { $sum: NumberInt(1) }
}
}, { $addFields: { 'events.login': '$events' } }])
Test : MongoDB-Playground
If in a case you need to update login field inside events field & to retain all other fields inside events, try below query which would get last document in iteration of each _id (this will last document inserted to DB on that _id criteria) & append login to it :
db.collection.aggregate([{
$group: {
_id: { os_name: "$os_name", os_version: "$os_version" },
"login": { $sum: "$events.login" }, 'events': { $last: '$events' },
count: { $sum: NumberInt(1) }
}
}, { $addFields: { 'events.login': '$login' } }, { $project: { login: 0 } }])
Test : MongoDB-Playground
Consider the following.
I have documents in which I save versions of fields.
Fields in the original document can null and I only save fields that actually changed.
For example:
{
_id : abc,
state : 'NEW',
field2 : 'WILL NOT CHANGE',
field3 : null,
lastChange : 1236547
changes : [
{
state : 'WORKING',
field3 : 'SOMETHING'
},
{
state : 'DONE'
}
]
}
In my aggregation pipeline I build the latest version of the document by merging all versions with the document root. This means I avoid complex querys in which I search the changes array and find the latest version of every field I want to find and I benefit from the side effect that the pipeline will return the latest document version as a document. The pipeline below ends at the point where my problem is. In the application there are more stages following that do counting and grouping etc.
Mongoose: meldungs.aggregate([
{
'$match': {
'$and': [{
lastChange: {
'$ne': null
}
},
{
lastChange: {
'$gte': ISODate('2017-03-01T23:00:00.000Z')
}
},
{
lastChange: {
'$lt': ISODate('2017-03-02T22:59:59.999Z')
}
}]
}
},
{
'$replaceRoot': {
newRoot: {
'$arrayToObject': {
'$reduce': {
input: '$changes',
initialValue: {
'$filter': {
input: {
'$objectToArray': '$$ROOT'
},
as: 'field',
cond: {
'$and': [
{ $ne : [ '$$field.v', null ] },
{ $ne : [ '$$field.k', '_id' ] }
]
}
}
},
in: {
'$concatArrays': ['$$value',
{
'$filter': {
input: {
'$objectToArray': '$$this.changes'
},
as: 'field',
cond: {
$ne : [ '$$field.v', null ]
}
}
}]
}
}
}
}
}
},
{
'$match': {
state: { '$eq': 'DONE' }
}
],
{})
This is working great and the new document looks as expected:
{
state : 'DONE',
field2 : 'WILL NOT CHANGE',
field3 : 'SOMETHING',
lastChange : 1236547
}
My problem ist that the matching stage that follows the merge/reduce fails to 'query' the new document. Instead the old field values seem to be used.
state: { '$eq': 'DONE' } // should return the document, but doesn't
state: { '$eq': 'NEW' } // should NOT return the document but does
My best guess is that this has something to do with pipeline optimization? Meaning the optimizer moves the $match statement into the first stage, or something like that.
Does anybody had this problem as well and knows a solution?
Udpate 1
After more testing it seems that using $$ROOT as the initialValue of the reduce is part of the problem. If I use an empty array as the initialValue I can $match the reduced fields correctly.
I have the following collection
{
"_id" : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray" : [
{
userId : ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point : 5
},
{
userId : ObjectId("613ca5e48dbe673802c2d521"),
point : 2
},
]
}
These are my questions
I want to push into myarray if userId doesn't exist, it should be appended to myarray. If userId exists, it should be updated to point.
I found this
db.collection.update({
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId" : ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
}, {
$set: { "myarray.$.point": 10 }
})
But if userId doesn't exist, nothing happens.
and
db.collection.update({
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")
}, {
$push: {
"myarray": {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
})
But if userId object already exists, it will push again.
What is the best way to do this in MongoDB?
Try this
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{ $pull: {"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")}}
)
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{ $push: {"myarray": {
userId:ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}}
)
Explination:
in the first statment $pull removes the element with userId= ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035") from the array on the document where _id = ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")
In the second one $push inserts
this object { userId:ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"), point: 10 } in the same array.
The accepted answer by Flying Fisher is that the existing record will first be deleted, and then it will be pushed again.
A safer approach (common sense) would be to try to update the record first, and if that did not find a match, insert it, like so:
// first try to overwrite existing value
var result = db.collection.update(
{
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
},
{
$set: {"myarray.$.point": {point: 10}}
}
);
// you probably need to modify the following if-statement to some async callback
// checking depending on your server-side code and mongodb-driver
if(!result.nMatched)
{
// record not found, so create a new entry
// this can be done using $addToSet:
db.collection.update(
{
_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")
},
{
$addToSet: {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
}
);
// OR (the equivalent) using $push:
db.collection.update(
{
_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId": {$ne: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"}}
},
{
$push: {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
}
);
}
This should also give (common sense, untested) an increase in performance, if in most cases the record already exists, only the first query will be executed.
There is a option called update documents with aggregation pipeline starting from MongoDB v4.2,
check condition $cond if userId in myarray.userId or not
if yes then $map to iterate loop of myarray array and check condition if userId match then merge with new document using $mergeObjects
if no then $concatArrays to concat new object and myarray
let _id = ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408");
let updateDoc = {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
};
db.collection.update(
{ _id: _id },
[{
$set: {
myarray: {
$cond: [
{ $in: [updateDoc.userId, "$myarray.userId"] },
{
$map: {
input: "$myarray",
in: {
$mergeObjects: [
"$$this",
{
$cond: [
{ $eq: ["$$this.userId", updateDoc.userId] },
updateDoc,
{}
]
}
]
}
}
},
{ $concatArrays: ["$myarray", [updateDoc]] }
]
}
}
}]
)
Playground
Unfortunately "upsert" operation is not possible on embedded array. Operators simply do not exist so that this is not possible in a single statement.Hence you must perform two update operations in order to do what you want. Also the order of application for these two updates is important to get desired result.
I haven't found any solutions based on a one atomic query. Instead there are 3 ways based on a sequence of two queries:
always $pull (to remove the item from array), then $push (to add the updated item to array)
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{ $pull: {"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")}}
)
db.collection.update(
{ _id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{
$push: {
"myarray": {
userId:ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
}
)
try to $set (to update the item in array if exists), then get the result and check if the updating operation successed or if a $push needs (to insert the item)
var result = db.collection.update(
{
_id : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myarray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
},
{
$set: {"myarray.$.point": {point: 10}}
}
);
if(!result.nMatched){
db.collection.update({_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
{
$addToSet: {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
);
always $addToSet (to add the item if not exists), then always $set to update the item in array
db.collection.update({_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408")},
myarray: { $not: { $elemMatch: {userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")} } } },
{
$addToSet : {
myarray: {
userId: ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point: 10
}
}
},
{ multi: false, upsert: false});
db.collection.update({
_id: ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
"myArray.userId": ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035")
},
{ $set : { myArray.$.point: 10 } },
{ multi: false, upsert: false});
1st and 2nd way are unsafe, so transaction must be established to avoid two concurrent requests could push the same item generating a duplicate.
3rd way is safer. the $addToSet adds only if the item doesn't exist, otherwise nothing happens. In case of two concurrent requests, only one of them adds the missing item to the array.
Possible solution with aggregation pipeline:
db.collection.update(
{ _id },
[
{
$set: {
myarray: { $filter: {
input: '$myarray',
as: 'myarray',
cond: { $ne: ['$$myarray.userId', ObjectId('570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035')] },
} },
},
},
{
$set: {
myarray: {
$concatArrays: [
'$myarray',
[{ userId: ObjectId('570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035'), point: 10 },
],
],
},
},
},
],
);
We use 2 stages:
filter myarray (= remove element if userId exist)
concat filtered myarray with new element;
When you want update or insert value in array try it
Object in db
key:name,
key1:name1,
arr:[
{
val:1,
val2:1
}
]
Query
var query = {
$inc:{
"arr.0.val": 2,
"arr.0.val2": 2
}
}
.updateOne( { "key": name }, query, { upsert: true }
key:name,
key1:name1,
arr:[
{
val:3,
val2:3
}
]
In MongoDB 3.6 it is now possible to upsert elements in an array.
array update and create don't mix in under one query, if you care much about atomicity then there's this solution:
normalise your schema to,
{
"_id" : ObjectId("57315ba4846dd82425ca2408"),
userId : ObjectId("570ca5e48dbe673802c2d035"),
point : 5
}
You could use a variation of the .forEach/.updateOne method I currently use in mongosh CLI to do things like that. In the .forEach, you might be able to set all of your if/then conditions that you mentioned.
Example of .forEach/.updateOne:
let medications = db.medications.aggregate([
{$match: {patient_id: {$exists: true}}}
]).toArray();
medications.forEach(med => {
try {
db.patients.updateOne({patient_id: med.patient_id},
{$push: {medications: med}}
)
} catch {
console.log("Didn't find match for patient_id. Could not add this med to a patient.")
}
})
This may not be the most "MongoDB way" to do it, but it definitely works and gives you the freedom of javascript to do things within the .forEach.
I have the following documents:
[{
"_id":1,
"name":"john",
"position":1
},
{"_id":2,
"name":"bob",
"position":2
},
{"_id":3,
"name":"tom",
"position":3
}]
In the UI a user can change position of items(eg moving Bob to first position, john gets position 2, tom - position 3).
Is there any way to update all positions in all documents at once?
You can not update two documents at once with a MongoDB query. You will always have to do that in two queries. You can of course set a value of a field to the same value, or increment with the same number, but you can not do two distinct updates in MongoDB with the same query.
You can use db.collection.bulkWrite() to perform multiple operations in bulk. It has been available since 3.2.
It is possible to perform operations out of order to increase performance.
From mongodb 4.2 you can do using pipeline in update using $set operator
there are many ways possible now due to many operators in aggregation pipeline though I am providing one of them
exports.updateDisplayOrder = async keyValPairArr => {
try {
let data = await ContestModel.collection.update(
{ _id: { $in: keyValPairArr.map(o => o.id) } },
[{
$set: {
displayOrder: {
$let: {
vars: { obj: { $arrayElemAt: [{ $filter: { input: keyValPairArr, as: "kvpa", cond: { $eq: ["$$kvpa.id", "$_id"] } } }, 0] } },
in:"$$obj.displayOrder"
}
}
}
}],
{ runValidators: true, multi: true }
)
return data;
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
}
example key val pair is: [{"id":"5e7643d436963c21f14582ee","displayOrder":9}, {"id":"5e7643e736963c21f14582ef","displayOrder":4}]
Since MongoDB 4.2 update can accept aggregation pipeline as second argument, allowing modification of multiple documents based on their data.
See https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/method/db.collection.update/#modify-a-field-using-the-values-of-the-other-fields-in-the-document
Excerpt from documentation:
Modify a Field Using the Values of the Other Fields in the Document
Create a members collection with the following documents:
db.members.insertMany([
{ "_id" : 1, "member" : "abc123", "status" : "A", "points" : 2, "misc1" : "note to self: confirm status", "misc2" : "Need to activate", "lastUpdate" : ISODate("2019-01-01T00:00:00Z") },
{ "_id" : 2, "member" : "xyz123", "status" : "A", "points" : 60, "misc1" : "reminder: ping me at 100pts", "misc2" : "Some random comment", "lastUpdate" : ISODate("2019-01-01T00:00:00Z") }
])
Assume that instead of separate misc1 and misc2 fields, you want to gather these into a new comments field. The following update operation uses an aggregation pipeline to:
add the new comments field and set the lastUpdate field.
remove the misc1 and misc2 fields for all documents in the collection.
db.members.update(
{ },
[
{ $set: { status: "Modified", comments: [ "$misc1", "$misc2" ], lastUpdate: "$$NOW" } },
{ $unset: [ "misc1", "misc2" ] }
],
{ multi: true }
)
Suppose after updating your position your array will looks like
const objectToUpdate = [{
"_id":1,
"name":"john",
"position":2
},
{
"_id":2,
"name":"bob",
"position":1
},
{
"_id":3,
"name":"tom",
"position":3
}].map( eachObj => {
return {
updateOne: {
filter: { _id: eachObj._id },
update: { name: eachObj.name, position: eachObj.position }
}
}
})
YourModelName.bulkWrite(objectToUpdate,
{ ordered: false }
).then((result) => {
console.log(result);
}).catch(err=>{
console.log(err.result.result.writeErrors[0].err.op.q);
})
It will update all position with different value.
Note : I have used here ordered : false for better performance.