IdentityServer3 Entity Framework migrate from v2 MembershipProvider - entity-framework

We use IdentityServer v2 in a production environment for over 2 years now. We'd like to move to v3 ou even 4, but I don't really see how we could migrate users account which are actually in a MembershipProvider DB to the new schema defined in the project IdentityServer3.EntityFramework. The problem is that I have no clue on how I could accomplish that. Anyone has ever done this ?
I don't see a scenario where I can add Scopes or Clients either. I guess that I have to create Scope object in code and save it to context, but since I'm not a pro in EF, I'm not really sure about the best practices. Can anyone point me to a sample ? The one in GitHub project doesn't seem to add Scopes or Clients, it just manage the schema with Migration (unless I'm mistaken).
EDIT : I got the sample working so I figured out the adding part in the Factory class. The Migration configuration part is explained here. There's a comment block in the ClientConfiguration Seed method where it shows how to use the AddOrUpdate extension. The Configuration class extends DbMigrationsConfiguration so you use it when you run the Update-Database command as the ConfigurationTypeName parameter.
So only question left is : how to update from MembershipProvider ?

Related

trouble scaffolding entity framework based controller in ASP.Net Core 2.0

I'm using Visual Studio 2017, v15.3.1 and am trying to follow a tutorial about creating some WebAPI endpoints with Entity Framework, as outlined here
In my case I'm using the good old Northwind SQL database instead of the author's blogging example, which I don't think should be an issue?
At any rate, when I get to the bit where I'm supposed to create a controller, I right-click the controllers folder in my solution, select 'API Controller with actions, using Entity Framework' and choose my EF model class (Orders, Employees, it doesn't seem to matter) and the Data Context which I generated successfully earlier in the tutorial.
When I select Add there's an attempt to scaffold, but I'm then told in a popup: There was an error running the selected code generator: 'No parameterless constructor defined for this object'.
I've looked at this error message online and others have had similar problems, but nothing they tried quite matches my scenario, and their solutions haven't fixed this issue.
My generated EF model classes do have parameterless constructors defined, so I'm not sure what the error is referring to?

add scaffolded item wizard cannot resolve data model class

everyone.
I'm trying to create new Scaffolded item for simple ASP.NET Wep API application which should be based on domain object class and DbContext derivative in separate assembly. The assembly is in the solution, target app has a reference to it (and manually created code which invokes the classes from my lib is build up without any errors) and, obviously, the classes I've mentioned have access modifier public.
The problem is wizard for creating new scaffolded item cannot see my model classes. (By the way, when the model classes were in another ASP.NET MVC5 app the wizard worked well.) I'm using Visual Studio 2013 Update5.
How to fix this? Any workaround would be helpful too!
Sorry for disturbing.
the origin of the problem seems to be that I've move my data model classes from ASP.NET MVC app into my class library in wrong way.
I've not just cut/paste them, but copy-paste, cut-paste (confirmed replacement).
this is the only thing which could cause the problem (although I still don't know the details).
Never the less I've started from the beginning again and cut/past the data model files initially - everything seems to work fine now.

External access to Magento instances

I've started investigating alternatives to my project and a few questions came out that I couldn't answer by myself.
The problem is: I want to create a web page able to access multiple Magento instances installed in the same server. Currently, I have one Magento instance per client and this project will access several Magneto instances to export reports from each one (for example).
The alternatives I thought til this moment are:
Have another Magento instance, create a new module within it that changes its 'database target' before triggering operations/queries;
Questions until this moment:
Can I 'change the database target' of a Magento instance?
How can I access data from a Magento instance without appeal to SOAP/REST?
I want to re-use some components (grids, tabs, forms..) from Magento, that's why I'm not considering an independent project (Zend, for instance) that can access this code from another projects. Does it make sense?
Any other idea?
==Edited==
Thanks by the tips and sorry by my ignorance. The comments let me believe that I'm able to execute something like this:
// File myScript.php
require '/home/DOMAIN1/app/Mage.php';
Mage::app('default');
// get some products from DOMAIN1
require '/home/DOMAIN2/app/Mage.php';
Mage::app('default');
// get some products from DOMAIN2
Is it right? Can I execute require twice (and override things from first require)?
==Edited2==
I'm still trying to connect to several Magento instances from a single third party file. Is there any tip? I'm facing several/different errors at this moment.
The only thing I know is that I can still rely on SOAP to get the information I need, but this will be expensive.
Thanks!
The easiest way would be to include Mage.php from each shop instance. You would need to use namespaces or some other trickery to be able to load more then one.
Or if that doesn't work - make your own API in a separate file to get what you want from one shop, and combine the results in the PHP-file that calls the API.
Here's a sample on how to use Magento functionality outside of Magento:
require 'app/Mage.php';
if (!Mage::isInstalled()) {
echo "Application is not installed yet, please complete install wizard first.";
exit;
}
Mage::app()->setCurrentStore(Mage_Core_Model_App::ADMIN_STORE_ID);
// your custom code here, for example, get the product model..
$productModel = Mage::getModel('catalog/product');

How to disable code-first feature in EF (MVC4 Visual Studio 2012)

How to disable code-first feature in EF (Visual Studio 2012)
I am using Visual Studio 2012, MVC4 (Internet application template).
I want to use EF, but not with its code-first feature. I would want the application to error out, rather than create or modify my database based on my code. (i just can not live with this feeling of my database being changed behind the scenes ... i want the application to use the exact db i have created ... and if there is any thing that has to be changed, i'll do it my self)
is this possible with the new Ef (VS2012)?
i have seen many people asking this, but so far i am unable to find the answer.
You can use Code First and ensure that your database never gets updated or overwritten when you change your model by setting the database initializer to null:
Database.SetInitializer<MyDbContext>(null);
It's a static method of the Database class and should be called at the beginning of your application, for example in global.asax or in a static constructor of your context class. Doing this you have to change model class and database schema manually so that they match.
You can also use the Reverse Engineer feature to create a Code First model from an existing database. It is explained here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/jj200620
Or if you don't want to use Code First at all and work with a model designer you can use the Database First approach, explained here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/jj206878
An overview about all the possible options is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/ee712907.aspx

IoC, MVC4 Web API & HttpParameterBinding/ParameterBindingAttribute

I'm using ASP.Net MVC 4 RTM Web API. I have a controller action with a parameter that I'd like to populate via custom model binding. To achieve this, I created a class that derives from System.Web.Http.Controllers.HttpParameterBinding that sets the value of this parameter. I then created an attribute class that derives from System.Web.Http.ParameterBindingAttribute which I use to decorate the parameter on my controller action.
This is all working great, my HttpParameterBinding class is populating the action parameter correctly. The problem I have is that my custom parameter binding class has a dependency that I'd like resolved via my IoC container (Unity). Is there a way to override how Web API creates HttpParameterBinding instances so that I can build up my custom binding class dependency from Unity? I was able to do something similar for a filter attribute by creating a custom filter provider that uses Unity's BuildUp method to populate dependencies, however I'm not seeing anything similar for Web API's HttpParameterBindings.
In general: to use IoC / Unity in the Web API you need to set it up seperately.
Try downloading the nuget package Unity.WebApi and see if that helps!
Take a look at this article: Parameter Binding in WebAPI
It walks through a couple different options from Converters to Binders to BinderProviders. It sounds like you may be able to write a custom ModelBinderProvider which knows how to provide your dependency. If that isn't high enough in the chain you can look at replacing the default IActionValueBinder service. It's a DefaultActionValueBinder instance, which you can extend or simply re-implement.
I also highly recommend downloading the WebAPI source code, as it's been an incredible help for these issues as I've run into them. Here's the WebAPI source code. I recommend downloading it so you can open it in VS for easy navigation.
Feel free to check out FlitBit too (It's very modular, don't let the number of packages scare you off)! I'm working on a WebAPI package for supporting FlitBit, specifically FlitBit.IoC and FlitBit.Dto. I'll add an update if I work out my IoC issue, since it's very similar to yours.