I trying to do some logic if my inputed form email matches one found in the database.
How do I make the comparison if the findBy’Field” returns the whole collection instead of just the field I want to compare to? I'd think it should be done without using a foreach loop as that would kinda defeat the purpose of using my findBy method.
An Example:
$formEmail = $form->get('email')->getData();
existingEmail = $em->getRepository(‘UserBundle:User’)->findOneByEmail($formEmail);
// or existingEmail = $em->getRepository(‘UserBundle:User’)->findByEmail($formEmail);
if ($formEmail == $loggedEmail){
//perform some logic here
}
try this
$formEmail = $form->get('email')->getData();
$existingEmail = $em->getRepository('UserBundle:User')->findOneByEmail($formEmail);
if ($existingEmail){
//found
}else{
//not found
}
Related
Below is the code written by my collegue who doesnt work in the firm anymore. I am inserting records in object with data loader and I can see success message but I do not see any records in my object. I am not able to understand what below trigger is doing.Please someone help me understand as I am new to salesforce.
trigger DataLoggingTrigger on QMBDataLogging__c (after insert) {
Map<string,Schema.RecordTypeInfo> recordTypeInfo = Schema.SObjectType.QMB_Initial_Letter__c.getRecordTypeInfosByName();
List<QMBDataLogging__c> logList = (List<QMBDataLogging__c>)Trigger.new;
List<Sobject> sobjList = (List<Sobject>)Type.forName('List<'+'QMB_Initial_Letter__c'+'>').newInstance();
Map<string, QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c> QMBLetteTypeToVfPage = QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c.getAll();
Map<String,QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c> mapofLetterTypeRec = new Map<String,QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c>();
set<Id>processdIds = new set<Id>();
for(string key : QMBLetteTypeToVfPage.keyset())
{
if(!mapofLetterTypeRec.containsKey(key)) mapofLetterTypeRec.put(QMBLetteTypeToVfPage.get(Key).Letter_Type__c, QMBLetteTypeToVfPage.get(Key));
}
for(QMBDataLogging__c log : logList)
{
Sobject logRecord = (sobject)log;
Sobject QMBLetterRecord = new QMB_Initial_Letter__c();
if(mapofLetterTypeRec.containskey(log.Field1__c))
{
string recordTypeId = recordTypeInfo.get(mapofLetterTypeRec.get(log.Field1__c).RecordType__c).isAvailable() ? recordTypeInfo.get(mapofLetterTypeRec.get(log.Field1__c).RecordType__c).getRecordTypeId() : recordTypeInfo.get('Master').getRecordTypeId();
string fieldApiNames = mapofLetterTypeRec.containskey(log.Field1__c) ? mapofLetterTypeRec.get(log.Field1__c).FieldAPINames__c : '';
//QMBLetterRecord.put('Letter_Type__c',log.Name);
QMBLetterRecord.put('RecordTypeId',tgh);
processdIds.add(log.Id);
if(string.isNotBlank(fieldApiNames) && fieldApiNames.contains(','))
{
Integer i = 1;
for(string fieldApiName : fieldApiNames.split(','))
{
string logFieldApiName = 'Field'+i+'__c';
fieldApiName = fieldApiName.trim();
system.debug('fieldApiName=='+fieldApiName);
Schema.DisplayType fielddataType = getFieldType('QMB_Initial_Letter__c',fieldApiName);
if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.Date)
{
Date dateValue = Date.parse(string.valueof(logRecord.get(logFieldApiName)));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,dateValue);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.DOUBLE)
{
string value = (string)logRecord.get(logFieldApiName);
Double dec = Double.valueOf(value.replace(',',''));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,dec);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.CURRENCY)
{
Decimal decimalValue = Decimal.valueOf((string)logRecord.get(logFieldApiName));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,decimalValue);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.INTEGER)
{
string value = (string)logRecord.get(logFieldApiName);
Integer integerValue = Integer.valueOf(value.replace(',',''));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,integerValue);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.DATETIME)
{
DateTime dateTimeValue = DateTime.valueOf(logRecord.get(logFieldApiName));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,dateTimeValue);
}
else
{
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,logRecord.get(logFieldApiName));
}
i++;
}
}
}
sobjList.add(QMBLetterRecord);
}
if(!sobjList.isEmpty())
{
insert sobjList;
if(!processdIds.isEmpty()) DeleteDoAsLoggingRecords.deleteTheProcessRecords(processdIds);
}
Public static Schema.DisplayType getFieldType(string objectName,string fieldName)
{
SObjectType r = ((SObject)(Type.forName('Schema.'+objectName).newInstance())).getSObjectType();
DescribeSObjectResult d = r.getDescribe();
return(d.fields.getMap().get(fieldName).getDescribe().getType());
}
}
You might be looking in the wrong place. Check if there's an unit test written for this thing (there should be one, especially if it's deployed to production), it should help you understand how it's supposed to be used.
You're inserting records of QMBDataLogging__c but then it seems they're immediately deleted in DeleteDoAsLoggingRecords.deleteTheProcessRecords(processdIds). Whether whatever this thing was supposed to do succeeds or not.
This seems to be some poor man's CSV parser or generic "upload anything"... that takes data stored in QMBDataLogging__c and creates QMB_Initial_Letter__c out of it.
QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c.getAll() suggests you could go to Setup -> Custom Settings, try to find this thing and examine. Maybe it has some values in production but in your sandbox it's empty and that's why essentially nothing works? Or maybe some values that are there are outdated?
There's some comparison if what you upload into Field1__c can be matched to what's in that custom setting. I guess you load some kind of subtype of your QMB_Initial_Letter__c in there. Record Type name and list of fields to read from your log record is also fetched from custom setting based on that match.
Then this thing takes what you pasted, looks at the list of fields in from the custom setting and parses it.
Let's say the custom setting contains something like
Name = XYZ, FieldAPINames__c = 'Name,SomePicklist__c,SomeDate__c,IsActive__c'
This thing will look at first record you inserted, let's say you have the CSV like that
Field1__c,Field2__c,Field3__c,Field4__c
XYZ,Closed,2022-09-15,true
This thing will try to parse and map it so eventually you create record that a "normal" apex code would express as
new QMB_Initial_Letter__c(
Name = 'XYZ',
SomePicklist__c = 'Closed',
SomeDate__c = Date.parse('2022-09-15'),
IsActive__c = true
);
It's pretty fragile, as you probably already know. And because parsing CSV is an art - I expect it to absolutely crash and burn when text with commas in it shows up (some text,"text, with commas in it, should be quoted",more text).
In theory admin can change mapping in setup - but then they'd need to add new field anyway to the loaded file. Overcomplicated. I guess somebody did it to solve issue with Record Type Ids - but there are better ways to achieve that and still have normal CSV file with normal columns and strong type matching, not just chucking everything in as strings.
In theory this lets you have "jagged" csv files (row 1 having 5 fields, row 2 having different record type and 17 fields? no problem)
Your call whether it's salvageable or you'd rather ditch it and try normal loading of QMB_Initial_Letter__c records. (get back to your business people and ask for requirements?) If you do have variable number of columns at source - you'd need to standardise it or group the data so only 1 "type" of records (well, whatever's in that "Field1__c") goes into each file.
Via a logic hook I'm trying to update fields of my products, after an invoice has been saved.
What I understand so far is, that I need to get the invoice related AOS_Products_Quotes and from there I could get the products, update the required fields and save the products. Does that sound about right?
The logic hook is being triggered but relationships won't load.
function decrement_stocks ( $bean, $event, $arguments) {
//$bean->product_value_c = $bean->$product_unit_price * $bean->product_qty;
$file = 'custom/modules/AOS_Invoices/decrement.txt';
// Get the Invoice ID:
$sInvoiceID = $bean->id;
$oInvoice = new AOS_Invoices();
$oInvoice->retrieve($sInvoiceID);
$oInvoice->load_relationship('aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes');
$aProductQuotes = $oInvoice->aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes->getBeans();
/*
$aLineItemslist = array();
foreach ($oInvoice->aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes->getBeans() as $lineitem) {
$aLineItemslist[$lineitem->id] = $lineitem;
}
*/
$sBean = var_export($bean, true);
$sInvoice = var_export($oInvoice, true);
$sProductQuotes = var_export($aProductQuotes, true);
$current = $sProductQuotes . "\n\n\n------\n\n\n" . $sInvoice . "\n\n\n------\n\n\n" . $sBean;
file_put_contents($file, $current);
}
The invoice is being retrieved just fine. But either load_relationship isn't doing anything ($sInvoice isn't changing with or without it) and $aProductQuotes is Null.
I'm working on SuiteCRM 7.8.3 and tried it on 7.9.1 as well without success. What am I doing wrong?
I'm not familiar with SuiteCRM specifics, however I'd always suggest to check:
Return value of retrieve(): bean or null?
If null, then no bean with the given ID was found.
In such case $oInvoice would stay empty (Your comment suggests that's not the case here though)
Return value of load_relationship(): true (success) or false (failure, check logs)
And I do wonder, why don't you use $bean?
Instead you seem to receive another copy/reference of $bean (and calling it $oInvoice)? Why?
Or did you mean to receive a different type bean that is somehow connected to $bean?
Then its surely doesn't have the same id as $bean, unless you specifically coded it that way.
I am looking for a way to conditionally combine Set operations. At the moment I have been unable to increment onto the updatedefinitions without having them consecutively dotted one after the other.
eg. instead of:
Builders<BsonDocument>.Update.Set("someElement.Length", b.Length)
.Set("someElement.Path", b.Path)
I am trying to get find a way to use something in the vain of:
var update = Builders<BsonDocument>.Update;
bool hasChanged = false;
if (a.Length != b.Length)
{
hasChanged = true;
update.Set("someElement.Length", b.Length)
}
if (a.Path != b.Path)
{
hasChanged = true;
update.Set("someElement.Path", b.Path)
}
if (hasChanged)
await someCollection.UpdateOneAsync(Builders<someModel>.Filter.Eq("_id", a.Id), update);
Is there a way of doing this or am I chasing a pie in the sky? I dont want to replace the entire document, and am looking to only update fields that have changed.
UpdateDefinition is an immutable object, so chaining operations on them keeps creating a new one each time. To do it conditionally, you need assign the result back to itself, just like LINQ.
update = update.Set(...);
If you maintain a collection of your conditionally created UpdateDefinitions, you can pass that collection into the Combine operator to create your final UpdateDefinition.
You can find an example on this similar question: C# MongoDB Driver - How to use UpdateDefinitionBuilder?
I'm trying to copy (duplicate) a record in ServiceNow table of incidents, but can not make this string work: gr.sys_id[key] = current.getValue(glideElement.getName());
The goal is to copy all fields values except sys_id.
Take a look at the UI Action Insert & Stay which is kind of a Duplicate Script.
You can use the same functionality in your Business rule or any other server side script:
doInsertAndStay();
function doInsertAndStay() {
var saveMe = current;
if (typeof current.number != 'undefined' && current.number){
current.number = ""; // generate a new number
}
current.insert();
action.setRedirectURL(saveMe);
}
The GlideRecord function insert() duplicates a record and of course a new sys_id is used for the new record. As far as I know you are not able to define the sys_id by your self.
I have a doubts in writing a for loop in Objective C way. I can do the same loop in traditional C for loop, However I am trying to learn Objective C. Here is my question.
listdata is a mutable array holding objects of ofi_vc_modal_ab_user_info objects, I want to compare each email of list data with email until list data count and find its position and if found I want to delete the object from list data.
for (ofi_vc_modal_ab_user_info *loc_obj in listData)
{
if (strcasecmp(loc_obj->email, email) == 0) {
// What need to do here.
}
}
How to proceed here... thanks for your helps :)
you can just use C's for.
in fact, it's an error to mutate the collection you iterate over when using for (e in collection).
BOOL foundObject = NO;
ofi_vc_modal_ab_user_info *loc_found_obj = nil;
for (ofi_vc_modal_ab_user_info *loc_obj in listData)
{
if (strcasecmp(loc_obj->email, email) == 0) {
// Set your flag here
loc_found_obj = loc_obj;
foundObject = YES;
break;
}
}
if(foundObject) {
// Do your stuffs as object is found
// Your found object is in loc_found_obj
[listData removeObject:loc_found_obj];
}
I hope below code explains what you want. Please explain bit more if you need more help.
EDIT : If you are using NSMutableArray then you do not need index of the object. you can directly delete object as mentioned in my edited code.