Please refer My previous question .
With respect to the this answer for my question, I could do with one filed.
I Could not able to do with multiple fields.
http://$solr_host:8983/solr/magazines/select&q=sport+education&df=title&q.op=OR - this is working for one field. How can I do it for multiple field.
What is the right way to achieve my objective. Thank you in advance.
Use Dismax/eDismax with qf (Query Fields) Parameter.
example:
http://$solr_host:8983/solr/magazines/select&q=sport+education&defType=edismax&qf=title name&q.op=OR
Check this here
Related
I'm looking for a way to visualize all the available values for one specific tag ("pair" in the picture)
I understand that I can manually create individually, but I'm not sure if there's a better for this
Thanks in advance
You can group by the tag of interest.
So, here you can insert "tag(pair)" to the GROUP BY part. Remove it from the where clause as well.
I have a table in a word document that has three colums and all fields are mailmerge fields from an external IT system.
There are three columns displaying the fields:
Charge Description
Charge Value (£)
Eiligible? (yes/no)
I am trying to create a field that adds up all eligibale charges so that only charge values that show a "yes" in the eligigble field are included. Does anyone know if this is possible? I have tried creating a formula but can't get it to work. Also, I would assume at some point an if statment is required so that it only includes the eligible charge.
Has anyone done anything similar before and if so, would they mind sharing how it was achieved?
Many thanks
You can do some things with expression fields (created in Word with CTRL-F9). This will look like {} and you can insert the expression. eg {{MERGFIELD charge} + {MERGEFIELD charge2}}. Since however you want to check multiple values and then create an expression, its probably easier to use a macro. The macro would contain your logic, then set the fields in the document accordingly.
Here are two external links since I can't reproduce a useful amount the content here because it's a verbose answer to a potentially deep question:
Expression Fields
Merge fields
I hope that helps.
I am new to cassandra (started learning on my own interest few days back) and looking for help for the below problem.
I have a Cassandra table "User" and a ListColumn "interests extends ListColumn[String]".
Now, I want to fetch all users with an interest, say "playing".
like: select from user where interests.contains("playing")!
I scanned through the ListColumn api but not able to find any. Also, searched in google but no such helpful posts.
Any help guys please... Thanks in Advance :)
So there is contains among operators and here is an example how to use it. It looks like that it should work as any other operator, so just go for database.userTable.select.where(_.interests contains "playing").fetch() - of course, depending on your conventions.
This is possible with a secondary index on a collection column, which only works with a Set column, and not with a List.
Bottom line:
object interests extends SetColumn[String](this) with Index[Set[String]]
And then you can execute the following:
select.where(_.interests contains "test").fetch()
You can also use multiple restrictions if you allow filtering.
select.where(_.interests contains "test")
.and(_.interests contains "test2")
.allowFiltering()
.fetch()
The above will only match if both interests are found in a record.
how can i write this query on sphinx select * from vehicle_details where make LIKE "%john%" OR id IN (1,2,3,4), can anyone help me? I've search a lot and i can't find the answer. please help
Well if you really want to use sphinx, could perhaps make id into a fake keyword, so can use it in the MATCH, eg
sql_query = SELECT id, CONCAT('id',id) as _id, make, description FROM ...
Now you have a id based keyword you can match on.
SELECT * FROM index WHERE MATCH('(#make *john*) | (#_id id1|id2|id3|id4)')
But do read up on sphinx keyword matching, as sphinx by default only matches whole words, you need to enable part word matching with wildcards, (eg with min_infix_len) so you can get close to a simple LIKE %..% match (which doesnt take into account words)
Actually pretty hard to do, becuase you mixing a string search (the LIKE which will be a MATCH) - with an attribute filter.
Would suggest two seperate queries, one to sphinx for the text filter. And the IN filter just do directly in database (mysql?). Merge the results in the application.
I have a large table which inserts data into the database. The problem is when the user edits the table I have to:
run the query
use lots of lines like value="<cfoutput>getData.firstname#</cfoutput> in the input boxes.
Is there a way to bind the form input boxes to the database via a cfc or cfm file?
Many Thanks,
R
Query objects include the columnList, which is a comma-delimited list of returned columns.
If security and readability aren't an issue, you can always loop over this. However, it basically removes your opportunity to do things like locking certain columns, reduces your ability to do any validation, and means you either just label the form boxes with the column names or you find a way to store labels for each column.
You can then do an insert/update/whatever with them.
I don't recommend this, as it would be nearly impossible to secure, but it might get you where you are going.
If you are using CF 9 you can use the ORM (Object Relation Management) functionality (via CFCs)
as described in this online chapter
https://www.packtpub.com/sites/default/files/0249-chapter-4-ORM-Database-Interaction.pdf
(starting on page 6 of the pdf)
Take a look at <cfgrid>, it will be the easiest if you're editing table and it can fire 1 update per row.
For security against XSS, you should use <input value="#xmlFormat(getData.firstname)#">, minimize # of <cfoutput> tags. XmlFormat() not needed if you use <cfinput>.
If you are looking for an easy way to not have to specify all the column names in the insert query cfinsert will try to map all the form names you submit to the database column names.
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/9.0/CFMLRef/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbec22c24-7c78.html
This is indeed a very good question. I have no doubt that the answers given so far are helpful. I was faced with the same problem, only my table does not have that many fields though.
Per the docs EntityNew() the syntax shows that you can include the data when instantiating the object:
artistObj = entityNew("Artists",{FirstName="Tom",LastName="Ron"});
instead of having to instantiate and then add the data field by field. In my case all I had to do is:
artistObj = entityNew( "Artists", FORM );
EntitySave( artistObj );
ORMFlush();
NOTE
It does appear from your question that you may be running insert or update queries. When using ORM you do not need to do that. But I may be mistaken.