I am reading thru AEM WCM and had a question that once after creating page in lower environments and publish where to check that look and feel? Is there any url to check? or will check in AEM only?
can anyone give example format url?
TKs
Have a look at the Adobe Authroing documentation, understand the concept and architecture of the AEM. As AEM is on the REST based concept implementation your page content path will be the page url (if you don't have any sling internal redirects or Dispatcher level url hiding implementations).
Just to explain you taking an geometrixx website OOTB example.
Working at author end in local instance at port 4502:
Example if you have created a test page under /content/geometrixx/en/toolbar/
the test page url will be http://localhost:4502/cf#/content/geometrixx/en/toolbar/testpage.html
preview mode can be tested appending wcmmode=disabled at the end of your url as shown below
http://localhost:4502/cf#/content/geometrixx/en/toolbar/testpage.html?wcmmode=disabled
from side kick preview option
If you have published the page (assuming your publish instance is
running at 4503 on local)
your page path will be http://localhost:4503/content/geometrixx/en/toolbar/testpage.html
If you are using touch UI then you can see the preview mode by:
Edit link: http://localhost:4502/editor.html/content/geometrixx/en/toolbar/testpage.html
Preview Link:
http://localhost:4502/content/geometrixx/en/toolbar/testpage.html?wcmmode=disabled
You should have a Replication Agent and configuration setup there to publish the pages. There is a default agent comes with AEM where you can publish the changes from author to publish environment.
Related
I deployed a gatsby blog I made to github pages. The first page links to a blog article. Nothing shows up when the link is clicked. But if I type the url in manually (Same url that is linked) I see the page for half a second before it dissapears to a blank page.
Helpful information
Everything in the network tab is status code 200
The HTML is returned in the get request, it is visible in the response
head tag is on the page correctly, body tag is missing the html
No console errors
Works perfectly on development server (localhost)
Domain is hosted with domain.com
Using createpage gatsby plugin to generate article page
It works when I deploy on netlify to a random url so maybe something to do with my domain or the gh-pages deployment
After looking at your GitHub code, I think you have a problem here: (Wrong URL: /blog/blog/why-gatsby), also your master code does not match code with the gh-pages (I know it's generated files from gatsby build but other stuff). Also, why are you creating a static query in the index.js component? You can do that with a regular page query.
Your gatsby site starts from https://www.ragith.com/blog/ and that's why you have that kind of a problem. When gatsby look into pages, there's only blog.js inside of it.
I.E:
pages/blog.js
Link problem
<a class="article-card-link" href="/blog/blog/why-gatsby"><section><article><h2 class="article-title">Why Gatsby js ?</h2><p class="article-date">May 09, 2020</p><p class="article-excerpt">In a world with so many JavaScript frameworks such as React, Vue, heck even Next, why Gatsby? The short answer is, none of those frameworks are the target market of Gatsby. Gatsby is a static website generator. Great! Wait, who cares? Well a lot of my clients and so will yours…</p>READ MORE</article></section></a>
Is there a build in way to create a site map page. I'm not looking for a sitemap.xml generator, that we have, but a page that will list all the page named and a link.
My GoogleFu keeps bringing up the sitemap.xml generation.
Check the foundation component under '/libs/foundation/components/sitemap' you could port this functionality into a custom component for your site
I am working on linkchecker and want to know that when AEM saves the URLs in /var/linkchecker and on what basis?
If i am opening a link,then it saves it,or it has a polling like it traverse the complete content and put it in /var/linkchecker.
Which java class help to store valid or invalid links in its storage directory?
LinkChecker is based on an eventHandler for /content (and child) nodes on creates and updates. All content is parsed and links are validated against allowed protocols and (configurable) external site links.
External Links
All the validation is done asynchronously in the background and the HTML is updated based on verification results.
/var/linkchecker is the cache for external links. The results based on simple GET requests to external links in order to optimise the process. The HTTP 200/30x response means that the links are valid. AEM looks at this cache before requesting a validation of the external link in order to optimize the page processing. This also means that the link validation is NOT real time and the delay is proportional to the load on your server.
All the links that have been checked can be seen via the /etc/linkchecker.html screen where you can request for revalidation and refresh the status of the links.
You can configure the frequency of this background check via the Day CQ Link Checker Service configuration under /system/console/configMgr. The default interval is 5 seconds (scheduler.period parameter).
Under the config manager /system/console/configMgr you will find a lot of other Day CQ Link * configurations that control this feature.
For example, Day CQ Link Checker Transformer contains config for all the elements that need to be transformed by the link checker.
Similarly Day CQ Link Checker Info Storage Service configures the link cache.
Internal Links
Internal links are ignored unless they used FQDN and external urls (which is not normally the case on author). The only exception is in a multi-tenant environment where page from one site links to another site and all the mapping information is stored in sling mappings.
I have the need to create a page in the Alfresco Share context that should be accessible without authentication. When using the page framework it seems pretty straight forward since you can add <authentication>none</authentication> to the page definition.
When using aikau the page definitions is gone and I'm left with the get.desc.xml-webscript file which does to my knowledge does not support the authentication element. Anyone having an idea?
It looks like you are accessing your webscript through the auth-page url:
http://<ip>:<port>/<context>/page/ap/ws/<webscript>
Please note that ap in the URL stands for the authenticated page defined under the directory:
/<project-name>/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/surf-config/pages/auth-page.xml
This section :
<config evaluator="string-compare" condition="UriTemplate">
<uri-templates>
<uri-template id="remote-node-page">/{pageid}/p/{pagename}/{store_type}/{store_id}/{id}</uri-template>
<uri-template id="remote-site-page">/site/{site}/{pageid}/p/{pagename}</uri-template>
<uri-template id="remote-page">/{pageid}/p/{pagename}</uri-template>
<uri-template id="sitepage">/site/{site}/{pageid}/ws/{webscript}</uri-template>
<uri-template id="userpage">/user/{userid}/{pageid}/ws/{webscript}</uri-template>
<uri-template id="page">/{pageid}/ws/{webscript}</uri-template> <!-- this template matches your URI which means the resolution of which page/webscript would be accessed will rely fully on it -->
</uri-templates>
</config>
of your
/<project-name>/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/surf.xml
Defines page/webscript resolution policy based on URI-templates. For further infos on how to set/exploit page uri templates please visit this tutorial
The auth-page has authentication set USER as shown here which would result in asking for authentication before even trying to resolve the webscript
So if you want to access some aikau page in un-authenticated mode (as a guest user) you should be using the noauth-page like this:
http://<ip>:<port>/<context>/page/na/ws/<webscript>
FYI: You do not have to set your webscript authentication at all as it defaults to none when the authentication tag is not present
It's worth being aware that you can create your own template pages for Aikau. You aren't limited to the pages that are defined in either Share or clients created via the Aikau Maven Archetype (see https://github.com/Alfresco/Aikau/blob/master/tutorial/chapters/Tutorial1.md).
In Share for example you have 4 templates available out-of-the-box:
dp (Dynamic Page - what you should use in most cases)
hdp (Hybrid Dynamic Page - where the header and footer and rendered above and below the page)
rp (Remote Page - accesses a page stored on the Alfresco Repository)
hrp (Hybrid Remote Page) - accesses a remote page stored on the Alfresco Repository and renders it between the standard header and footer.
In clients created by the Aikau Maven Archetype you have:
- na (Not Authenticated) - renders a page but doesn't require a user to be authenticated
- ap (Aikau Page) - renders a page for authenticated users.
Aikau pages make use of URI templates to reduce the amount of Surf objects that are required to build a page - however you always have the option of building your own pages.
See the examples in the archetype project for reference, the no-authentication page is defined here
Both this page and the standard authenticated page both re-use the standard template type which ultimately maps to the standard page FreeMarker template
However, if you want to build your own pages and templates you can - you're not limited to using what is provided by default.
I am having a site as http://www.test.com running in Joomla 1.5 . We are planning to have a microsite like
http://www.sub.test.com which has to have separate homepage with different contents .
Is that is possible with the following idea
Making a export of all the tables in my joomla and replacing jos with suband again importing them into the same Joomla database.
Writing a PHP script of identifying whether the Url tat i have entered in the browser is
http://www.test.com OR
http://www.sub.test.com
If test.com, then the $dbprefix would be jos OR if sub.test.com then the $dbprefix would be sub.
Will the above idea for creating a microsite is the correct one.
Just as another option, you could contain both sites in the exact same instance with a different template assigned to the micro site.
Set up a content category for the micro site, detect the request URL (most likely in the WebServer - best location, or in a DNS setting with a forward URL)
Assign all content items in the category with the new Template.
We regularly do this for a site that wants a blog site alongside the main website, but want a different look and feel.