In the older examples of the AutoComplete filter, as soon as you typed in a letter the filtering was applied reducing the numbers of rows shown. For example, if I typed the letter "x", only rows with that column containing the letter "x" would be displayed.
{ column_number : 1, filter_type: "auto_complete" },
In the newer examples, the AutoComplete filter does not do this. I want the original functionality for my web page - how do I achieve this? Is there an option I need to pass to the AutoComplete plugin via the filter_plugin_options parameter? Or is there a different filter I should be using?
I can't recall that aytocomplete ever worked this way, you need to use the filter_type: 'text' instead, see the fourth column in the following showcase page
IMO triggering the filter on each keyboard type fits better the text filter rather then autocomplete
Related
A EPi find question coming up, We have WebProducts and WebVariants and when showing a simple product listing on the category page I'm showing the following result correctly
If a WebProduct doesn't have any variants - show the WebProduct on the result
If a WebProduct has variants - show the WebVariants and hide the WebProduct
But when I'm trying to use the same functionality for the site-search it gets complicated.
The WebProduct has a property named Brand while the WebVariants doesn't have that property. So when I search for "My brand" and I get a hit on a WebProduct that has WebVariants, it won't show the WebProduct because point 2 is true in that case.
I on the other hand don't want to show the product, but I want to get the variants for that product... It might sound confusing :grimacing:
I'll add a code snippet of the code that makes point 1 and 2 to work.
.SearchAndFilterFor(q)
.Filter(x =>
(x.MatchType(typeof(WebVariant))) |
(x.MatchType(typeof(WebProduct)) & ((WebProduct)x).HasVariants().Match(false)))```
I would say that you have a couple of options to choose from.
Either:
1: Change the way your variants are indexed so that they include some of the key info (in this case brand) that they currently lack and as such, appear in the search results.
OR
2: Just do the search for WebProduct and then loop through those results afterward to do the processing for ones that do/don't have variants.
Is it possible to add a session in cq:dialog which renders whatever data is supplied in the fields and previews it out in real time. In the simplest of scenarios, I need to add two numbers and when I enter both the numbers the cq:dialog should preview it's output as 4. There should be two sessions in the the cq:dialog, like two columns, the left one to enter value to the fields and the right to display the rendered output. How to achieve this? Is it possible to?
You can make use of "event handlers". Adobe docs has a simple example using JQuery that you can customize for your requirement.
https://helpx.adobe.com/experience-manager/using/creating-touchui-events.html
What's the correct XPath syntax to check if an option element is currently selected, or just to get the selected option element from a select element, on an open page with which the user, and JavaScript, may have interacted? Is this even possible with XPath, or does it lack the ability to look at DOM properties?
I can't find any documentation on this, and have (speculatively) tried:
//option[#selected=true]
//option[#selected="selected"]
//option[#selected]
but none of these work; they simply don't match any elements.
(In case it matters, I've tried this both using the $x function in the Chrome developer console, and using the find_elements_by_xpath method in Selenium for Python.)
Short answer: it's not possible.
Longer answer: XPath can look at HTML attributes, but it can't look at DOM properties. Selecting an <option> element in a <select> changes the selected property of the <option> to true, and also changes the value property of its parent <select> element, but it doesn't affect the attributes of either, so it is invisible to XPath.
To find <option> elements that have the selected attribute set, which is often how a page author might determine which option is initially selected, you can use //option[#selected]. But this does not find the currently selected <option>; changes that the user makes to the selection are invisible to XPath. There's no guarantee it will even find the initially selected option, since it's possible that the page author didn't put the selected attribute on any elements and either let the browser select the first option by default or had some JavaScript select the initial option via the selected property.
The multiple other answers here claiming that a selector like //option[#selected] can detect selection changes made by the user after the page loads are simply completely wrong.
Of course, if you're able to use CSS selectors instead of XPath selectors, then option:checked will do the job.
The problem could be the " (double quotes).
//select/option[#selected='selected'] - Will match the selected option, i am using this successfully.
//select/option[#selected='selected' and #value='specific value'] - Will only match the selected option if it has a 'specific value', i'm also using this.
If you are still having trouble, it could be an entirely different problem, perhaps there is no option node. I hope this helps.
I think we can use a knowledge from #Mark's answer and account that. Let's just find a node which HAS desired attribute:
tree.xpath('//select/option[#selected]/text()')[0].strip()
I tried "//option[#selected=''] and it has worked for me.
it is able to highlight the selected option within Page objects model.
I would try //option[#selected='true']
i.e. driver.findElements(By.xpath("//option[#selected='true']")).getText();
I've created a simple form containing two selectbox elements. I also have a button which dynamically adds these selectboxes at the user's discretion. The selectbox options will be quite long, so I've applied the jQuery Chosen plugin to be more useful.
Everything works fine until a new element is dynamically added using jQuery clone. I am unable to select any options in my new element selectboxes, and they also carry the prior results.
In searching the forum, others have 'reset' Chosen after a selection, by calling: $("#form_field").trigger("liszt:updated"); . I tried this as well, but it will just clear all the selections (which I don't want) and continue to freeze the dropdown action.
Anyone have experience with using Chosen (or any other autocomplete-type selectbox enhancement) with dynamic elements?
Found a solution that works - albeit without using the Chosen plugin.
I changed my dynamically created form elements by replacing the selectboxes with input fields tied to a basic jQueryUI autocomplete plugin. Here is a link to their implementation : http://jqueryui.com/autocomplete/#default.
The main difference is that the select "options" in this case, were listed as the source from which the box would look for autocomplete options. My list was 70 items long, so the initial setup took some time.
The jQuery text was generically as follows:
$("input#search").autocomplete({
source: [item1, item2, item3, item 4, ... item5]);
When using the Add or Edit form from the pager I'm wondering how a simple static label can be added in the form without it creating any additional columns in it's affect on colNames[]'s and colModel[]'s. For example I have a quite simple typical Add form which opens from the pager containing a few label's and form elements: Name, Email, Web Site, etc., and then the lower section of the form has a few drop down menus containing the number 1 through 10 with the idea being to ask the user to pick a value between 1 and 10 to put a value on the importance to them about the product or service which is listed beside it. Just above this section I want to add some text only to give a brief instruction asking the user to "Choose the importance of the following products and services using the scale: [1=Low interest --- 10=Very high interest]". I cannot figure out how to get a text label inserted in the form without having to define a column with a formoption{} etc which is not needed for just some descriptive text. I know about the "bottominfo: 'some text'" for adding text to the bottom of the form but I need to insert some text similar to that mid-way (or other positions) in the form without it affecting the tabular structure of the grid. Is this even possible? TIA.
You can modify Edit or Add forms inside of afterShowForm. The ids of the form fields are like "tr_Name". There consist from "tr_" prefix and the corresponding column name.
I modified the code example from my old answer so that in the Add dialod there exist an additional line with the bold text "Additional Information:". In the "Edit" dialog (like one want in the original question) the input field for one column is disabled. You can see the example live here. I hope that a working code example can say more as a lot of words.