I have a wiring diagram drawn in visio that contains many wires (lines) spread over several pages. To follow a certain wire, I often have to jump around multiple pages. The wires always have the same text/label even when propagated to different pages. Normally, I use the find-in-files and type in the specific label I'm hunting for.
It would be even better if I could just click on the wire when it goes off page and a hyperlink would take my to the appropriate place on the appropriate page.
I know how to create hyperlinks manually, but there are a lot of signals and I'd like to somehow automate this, hinged by the fact that the source/destination share a common label.
Is this possible?
If you have rules, where the corresponding shape (link) resides, then you can set up the hyperlink via a SETF(Getref(... formula.
Otherwise, you could use VBA to find the corresponding shape by parsing the whole document and inserting the hyperlink automatically.
HTH,Y.
Related
I have a requirement from my customer where I need to make the footer of the website dynamic in terms of adding sublayouts in footer placeholders via page editor by the Content Author.
The footer shall consist of:
One content slot - to which any sublayout/sublayouts like grid component or rich text can be added.
I want to add a new placeholder 'ContentSlotPH' to my footer which picks up its presentation details and data from a common page at "/sitecore/Content/Common/Footers/FooterContent/" ( where I have added my sublayouts like grid/richtext for the footer); and shall apply to all the pages of the website where the footer is present.
I want this change to be visible on the fly so that in future if the presentation details on FooterContent page change, new presentation and data gets applied to the ContentSlotPH of the footer.
Can someone help me in implementing this?
This functionality is not available out of the box unfortunately, the only way to achieve it with standard features (as Anton mentions in the comments) is to set them as presentation details on the standard values of a base template.
Unfortunately, this is not user friendly or editable through the Experience Editor (out of the box). It would also mean giving Content Editors write access to the templates and standard values, something that is normally locked down since making a mistake could cause exceptions especially on a production system.
Instead you could look to utilise Sitecore Placeholder Fallback. This will allow you to set up the headers/footers on a top level page and then any children will fallback to use the renderings in the placeholder from a parent item if they have not been set.
We have tried to approach this problem by using components that have presentation details on them. We call these Content Blocks, but other accelerators have different names for them with similar functionality. Essentially, this becomes a 'page inside a page'. You add your component to the template and reference a central datasource which has your footer datasource (including presentation details).
This allows for authors to have access to edit the footer by editing the footer component datasource without accessing template details.
Check out my Sitecore Base Layouts project:
http://www.awareweb.com/resources/video?vid=7d52fef2a67c453fa38dd092bd9ae7e2&
https://github.com/BenGGolden/Sitecore.BaseLayouts
Here's the issue, I build a special book reader/browser (For holy quran), my code behind loads the page and constructs how it should look. and then it should bind that look to a some kind of data-bindable custom control to view it properly. the problem is, the look differs from page to page, so I cannot bind to a certain control or wrap panel.
here's how it generally looks:
The decorative border top of the page is always there at any page, it indicates the part and chapter the viewer is in.
If you're starting a new chapter it have additional image under that decorative border or anywhere in the page (there can be multiple chapters in the same page) something like this
or this:
The normal text is not an issue, it's just a special font, however, I put each individual word in its own text block for reasons of user selection by word.
The issue here is, given the previous information, and knowing how random it is to place the decoration picture or the amount of words (text blocks) per page. how can I bind that to some kind of view to separate the view from the VM and Engine that builds the page.
my past solution was to actually build everything in the VM in a wrappanel built inside a scrollviewer having lots of textblocks and images according to the page. but that's naiive solution. I want to rebuild that in a more professional separated way. I also want to do this for Windows RT beside Windows phone so I need to reuse the code behind in a Portable class library.
I think all you need to do is slightly adjust your current design. So perhaps have a VM that represents the entire content, and that would have a Collection of say Pages or Sections. A second VM would represent the Page/Section, allowing you to create a property for the WrapPanel content (i.e. the words) and another property for the Header and or other things.
In the View you would have the scrollviewer and bind to the main VM collection. Then create another View or DataTemplate that represents the Page/Section.
You should be able to do this is a strict MVVM sense quite easily and it will be dynamic based on the content.
You could even cater for advanced scenarios where each section has a different template/view.
I have used bootstrap3 for RWD and customized my breadcrumb. But, it's not fitting in mobile size.
How can I make it responsive?
Attached screenshot of the problem.
Thanks
I have created a snippet on bootsnipp that may fit your needs.
http://bootsnipp.com/snippets/featured/responsive-breadcrumbs
You can configure this breadcrumb to
display only the last n elements. Ellipses are added at the beginning of the list if elements are hidden.
set a maximum size for each elements. Ellipses are added after the label if it's too long.
By setting breakpoints you can set the number of elements to display and their maximum size for different screen sizes and hence make sure there won't be any overflow.
You are going to have to code that yourself. Without your specific code, no one will be able to give you specific answers. That being said, here is how I would get set up to add custom code to my Bootstrap website.
Using less
First, create a new .less file - this file will be your new primary style sheet. In that file, import in the bootstrap.less file. Compile that file and link it in your HTML files. You should now have an exact copy of the out-of-the-box Bootstrap CSS, with access to all of the Bootstrap variables.
To make any additions, add them to that file underneath the import statement. So in your case, I would grab the variables for the media queries and breadcrumbs (found in variables.less), and customize the style of the breadcrumbs at smaller screens.
Note that Bootstrap is mobile first, which means that the default styles will be applied at the smaller screen, and you override for larger.
Not using less
If you are not comfortable using less, I would say this is a great opportunity to start. That being said, if you want to do it the old fashioned way, then just create a second style sheet that you link in, add it underneath the Bootstrap sheet, and code away.
I want to have a header component that is shared across multiple page rendering components. The header component has a text label. How do I make the value of this text label available to all page components.
Do I have to make the path in the <cq:include> to a common format?
Design mode, if properly understood, can work quite well. However, it doesn't replicate content in the same manner as page activation, and thus can be confusing for your authors. Also, the sharing model is limited to the exact page type - which may or may not be the granularity you desire.
From CQ5's Best Practices (https://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/current/developing/developing_guidelines_bestpractices.html), they strongly encourage the paragraph system (iparsys to inherit/share). iparsys named the same can be shared across different page templates (while design mode will only apply to a single template type).
I can archive that by creating a design dialog that is similar to dialog (http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/5-6/developing/components.html#Dialogs) under the header component. You add the text label field to design dialog. And to enter value for the field, you switch the page to the design mode and click on Edit button on the top of the component. The entered value will be available to all pages that contain the header component.
Note: design dialog will be named as design_dialog
This functionality is now offered in ACS AEM Commons as Shared Component Properties - http://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/shared-component-properties.html
Supports standard content activation and internationalization (values stored below the homepage) and anything else you would expect from content.
If the component is baked in the template(i,e page rendering component), yes you can make the <cq:include> path attribute to point to some common place where the data for this is stored and all the pages irrespective of , type of the template can get the values configured.
You can create header component and then include it using <cq:include> in base template/page. This base template/page will be inherited by all other templates. This way the header once configured in base page is availble through out different templates/page components.
If the goal is to share "across multiple page rendering components" the design dialog will only help if the page share the same rendering component.
If you want to have the header component displayed in a page and all its subpages, then you should use iparsys.
If you just want to reuse the properties of that header component, then it needs to have a fixed path (cq:include in a page component) and then you can reference the properties you need in other page rendering components. I would not suggest that approach since it breaks the idea of having a component. Everything becomes tightly coupled.
What you could also do is save those properties at the page level (some top parent page) and then use InheritanceValueMap in the subpages to read those properties.
I have a data entry form. Its properly tab indexed etc. and there are three dropdown menus which automatically unfurl with the on enter event.
No matter how much advice i give to users about using the tab key and keboard and checking what they just input.
they still insist on using the mouse to select values from the dropdown menus
the problem is that in their haste they often make mistakes as a result of using the mouse.
I would like to be able to force users to input into these fields using the keyboard.
the drop down is neccessary for users see the appropriate values for the field because the values will vary based on previous selections.
I have already tried experimenting with onclick events but to no avail.
Is there a way I can do this?
i am using access 2007 many of the users have access 2003.
Based on your comments, I would take one of two different approaches.
If your users are really comfortable with the codes AND know which ones they should use based on their previous selections, then just use text boxes instead of combo boxes. You can still put some validation code in either the Form_BeforeUpdate event or the individual control's _BeforeUpdate event.
If the users are not that comfortable, then I would suggest you have the first field in the combo boxes be the description of the code, not the code itself. So instead of choosing from 101, 102, 103 they are instead choosing from "Small", "Medium", "Large" or whatever those codes actually apply to. If you still wanted to display the codes themselves, you could do that with a separate disabled text box.
Now to answer your actual question. For the record, I highly recommend against using this approach. The simplest way I can thing of to prevent your users from using the mouse to select the combo box, would be to add a Transparent button covering the combo box.
To do this, draw a regular command button over the combo. Set Transparent = Yes, Visible = Yes, Enabled = Yes, Tab Stop = No.
When users click on the combo now, they will actually be clicking on the Transparent button and nothing will happen. The ONLY way they will be able to get into the control is by tabbing from a neighboring control or using a hotkey (via '&' in attached label).
Once they enter the control via Tab and your code forces a dropdown, they will still be able to choose an option using the mouse. But by forcing them to use the keyboard initially, it will make it much more likely that they just stick with the keyboard.
Again--I can't stress this enough--I think this is a terrible, horrible, no-good idea. Please don't use this approach. But you asked a technical question and this site is all about giving technical answers, so there you go...