What is the correct way to merge two branches of a Github project with Pycharm?
Suppose there is a branch in a Github project called master and I clone the repo with Pycharm. After that, I create a new branch dev by using Pycharm. The new branch is then shown correctly on Github and some commits are made to the branch.
Now, I want to merge the changes from the dev branch to the master branch.
For ordinary git (not Github) projects, I would checkout to the local master in Pycharm, click on dev in the local branch and select the merge context menu. As a result, dev would be merged to master such that it can be safely deleted.Though, even after I merge the local master with the remote master branch, no changes are shown on Github and both branches still exist.
I also tried to close Pycharm, do a pull request on Github, merge the branches there and restart Pycharm. Unfortunately, Pycharm doesn't even recognize that the remote dev branch has been deleted.
My subpar solution has been as follows:
Pycharm: Merge local dev to local master, delete local dev, merge local
master with remote master
Github: Create PR, merge branches, delete dev
Pycharm: Delete remote dev
Now, if I rebase onto the remote master in Pycharm, I get the correct merged branch. Unfortunately though, using the compare context menu, Pycharm still shows that the remote master compared to the local master doesn't have the commits from dev. Although a rebase from the remote master contains all the commits from dev...
Sadly, there's also no Pycharm manual for merging branches with Github (for normal git there is). Any idea?
The solution is to manually push your branch merge as it seems that pycharm doesn't do this, but it thinks it has.
I've noticed the same issue and it seems that the merge is not pushed from the local copy. In a command shell I checkout the master branch of my project and it tells me that I am ahead of online repository, so to resolve this I issue the git push command and then when I check github it has been uploaded.
(tf36) E:\git\alpha-zero-theputernerd>git checkout master
Already on 'master'
A src/alpha_zero/env/env_inherit_from.py
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 3 commits.
(use "git push" to publish your local commits)
(tf36) E:\git\alpha-zero-theputernerd>git push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
To https://github.com/theputernerd/alpha-zero-theputernerd.git
bb60325..37c3c9d master -> master
Related
I'm new to Github and I have a branch that I want to merge with the master. I couldn't merge it via git command line, its very complicated.
I tried to merge it on Github site following below documentation:
Merging a pull request on GitHub
But I got the following message:
There isn’t anything to compare!
Here's the project:
https://github.com/SumayahAlharbi/erecords
What does 4 commits behind master mean?
Update
Please check below pictures:
I thought I did the merging successfully but nothing changes!
What does 4 commits behind master mean?
It means that the master branch has 4 commits which are not present in your branch currently. You need to rebase your branch and then create a New Pull
Request which will be needed to be reviewed and finally approved so
that your branch can be merged with the master.
There isn’t anything to compare!
Check the difference between the master and your branch. Click the Compare icon in Git hub or run this
command from your local branch in Git Bash : git diff --name-only master_branch.
I just checked your repo. The changes of ExportFeature branch are already merged into the master branch, and then the merge is reverted. That's why now if you raise a pull request to merge ExportFeature into master, you would get There isn’t anything to compare!.
See the latest commits on ExportFeature which are already present in the master branch.
The reason you are seeing 4 commits behind master on ExportFeature branch is since the master branch has 4 more commits than the ExportFeature branch. If you see the total commits on ExportFeature branch, it's 7, whereas the total number of commits on the master branch is 11. If you need to do any more changes on the ExportFeature branch, you would need to get the latest changes from the master branch by running the command git pull origin master when your current branch is ExportFeature on your local git terminal.
I've forked a version of this
https://github.com/googlesamples/android-topeka
a few days ago.
I'm making changes to it in Android Studio. Now changes have been committed to the original project at
https://github.com/googlesamples/android-topeka
I want to merge my changes I've been making locally with that version. But at the same time I want to keep my version private?
How can I COMPARE my changes locally with the master?
Typically, your workflow in GitHub will go something like this:
git pull origin master
# work work work
git commit -m 'I made some changes to android-topeka'
git pull origin master
# resolve merge conflicts
git push origin master
The general strategy is to commit your local changes, then git pull the remote to bring in any changes which other developers might have made to the android-topeka repository since you last pulled. Once you have resolved the merge conflicts (if any), then you can fast-forward the branch on GitHub by doing a git push.
Note that origin points to https://github.com/googlesamples/android-topeka in your case. I also assume that your local branch is called master, as I only see one master branch under the android-topeka project on GitHub.
The repository I'm using has a branch called next. When I cloned the repository initially, it set up my default branch as master. I've switched my default branch to next online, and I've checked out the next branch (using -t and -b options) on my local clone. Typing git branch shows I have two branches checked out (master and next), and next is the active branch.
All fine and dandy, but there are files which exist in branch that do not exist in master. I had assumed that when I fetched upstream and checked out the new branch, that the missing files would appear in my local repo... However, they do not.
You could try running:
git reset --hard HEAD
If you don't have any local changes (which would get clobbered).
I'm using Egit on Eclipse Mac and PC to sync a project that has three branches:
master
dev
rendersystem
I've created the project on the Mac and when I created the two branches dev and rendersystem I've used revs/heads/master as the Source ref and as Pull strategy I've used Merge.
Now I've switched to my PC and imported the project with Egit incl. all three branches. But if I change to dev or rendersystem branch it tells me that these branches are remotely tracked (in Branches dialog, Remote Tracking /origin/dev and /orginin/rendersystem).
If I check out dev or rendersystem branch and change my code, then commit it and try to push it to Github, it doesn't push the dev or rendersystem branches, only the master it pushed.
My question is now: How do I change the dev and rendersystem branches so that they are in a state where I can push them to Github from my Mac and PC?
Sorry if this question sounds confusing, but Git is one hell of confusing for beginners.
Remote tracking branches are read-only in git, as they represent remote changes. A Fetch will only update these remote tracking branches. A Pull first executes a Fetch, and then merges the changes with a locally editable branch.
On the source computer there was no need to create this branch, as it was initialized locally, and pushing the branch can create the remote branch.
You can create a local branch from the remote branches by Right clicking on the Remote branch in the Git Repositories view, and selecting Create branch... After that, your branch would be writable.
I am trying to get the hang of merging branches with the GitHub for Mac GUI. I'm not sure if it's me or the client at this point....
I have a repo with master, staging, production branches. I created a file in master called test.txt. I then added a test line to it. I committed and synced in the master. I merged from master to staging using the gui, then hit merge. I also re-clicked "branches in sync" to re-sync them. The new line shows up in GitHub under master, but not under staging. In my local repo, it shows both in sync with that latest commit.
My plan was to edit in master, merge to staging to deploy and test, rinse, lather & repeat until it's good, then merge to production (at this point all should be in sync).
Am I doing something wrong?
That looks like GitHub for Mac issue 3:
Merging branches does not recognize new changes to sync
It seems that when merging the receiving branch does not recognize that new changes can be synced with Github
Steps performed
add and checkout "experimental" branch
add/commit to experimental branch
merge experimental branch into master
master displays button "Branch in Sync" even though it is no longer in sync - pressing button does nothing
How to fix
add a new commit directly in master
"Sync Branch" appears and can sync to Github
The OP skinnygeek1010 reports:
I've found a nice workaround:
To merge master with staging, merge with the GUI.
When it's finished, switch to staging and then go to the drop down menu: Repository > Synchronize (Cmd S).
The merge will instantly show up on GitHub (won't work if you Sync in master though)