kubelet was unhealthy after install k8s from Rancher catalog - kubernetes

Have three hosts to run Rancher cluster.
Rancher: 1.6.10
Kubernetes: 1.7.7
Install k8s from catalog on master host.
Set orchestration=true and etcd=true labels to two Rancher agent hosts.
After the k8s stack finished, only the kubelet went wrong. Unhealthy with 0 containers.
Why?

The question has been debugged in the comment section.
Kubernetes Mantra
I have added some additional point to keep it in mind to debug the Kubelet.
The K8s cluster is made of Masters and Workers Node which has several components. Kubelet is one the component which needs to take care properly.
Let's begin by saying that Master node manages or orchestrate the cluster state and Workers node run the pods.However, Without Kubelet It does not work Since It will be part of each node whether it's a Master or Worker.
Performance of the cluster certainly depends on the kubelet.
We can use the following command to check its status and activity or logs.As It is deployed as system-service by systemd.
systemctl status kubelet
journalctl -xeu kubele

Related

Node networking issue with Openshift

I am running my services on an open shift cluster with all the nodes in ready status.
I found few microservice pods are having networking issues on selected nodes but they are up and running.
But when they are running on other nodes they are fine.
Also what can be the reason behind the pod is showing stickiness even after the restart pod is deployed on the same node again and again also there is no toleration-taint scenerio.

Controlling pods kubelet vs. controller in control plane

I'm a little confused, I've been ramping up on Kubernetes and I've been reading about all the different objects ReplicaSet, Deployment, Service, Pods etc.
In the documentation it mentions that the kubelet manages liveness and readiness checks which are defined in our ReplicaSet manifests.
Reference: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/
If this is the case does the kubelet also manage the replicas? Or does that stay with the controller?
Or do I have it all wrong and it's the kubelet that is creating and managing all these resources on a pod?
Thanks in advance.
Basically kubelet is called "node agent" that runs on each node. It get notified through kube apiserver, then it start the container through container runtime, it works in terms of Pod Spec. It ensures the containers described in the Pod Specs are running and healthy.
The flow of kubelet tasks is like: kube apiserver <--> kubelet <--> CRI
To ensure whether the pod is running healthy it uses liveness probe, if it gets an error it restarts the pod.
kubelet does not maintain replicas, replicas are maintained by replicaset. As k8s doc said: A ReplicaSet's purpose is to maintain a stable set of replica Pods running at any given time. As such, it is often used to guarantee the availability of a specified number of identical Pods.
See more of ReplicaSet
For more info you can see: kubelet
When starting your journey with Kubernetes it is important to understand its main components for both Control Planes and Worker Nodes.
Based on your question we will focus on two of them:
kube-controller-manager:
Logically, each controller is a separate process, but to reduce
complexity, they are all compiled into a single binary and run in a
single process.
Some types of these controllers are:
Node controller: Responsible for noticing and responding when nodes go down.
Job controller: Watches for Job objects that represent one-off tasks, then creates Pods to run those tasks to completion.
Endpoints controller: Populates the Endpoints object (that is, joins Services & Pods).
Service Account & Token controllers: Create default accounts and API access tokens for new namespaces.
kubelet:
An agent that runs on each node in the cluster. It makes sure that
containers are running in a Pod.
The kubelet takes a set of PodSpecs that are provided through various
mechanisms and ensures that the containers described in those PodSpecs
are running and healthy. The kubelet doesn't manage containers which
were not created by Kubernetes.
So answering your question:
If this is the case does the kubelet also manage the replicas? Or does
that stay with the controller?
No, replication can be managed by the Replication Controller, a ReplicaSet or a more recommended Deployment. Kubelet runs on Nodes and makes sure that the Pods are running according too their PodSpecs.
You can find synopsis for kubelet and kube-controller-manager in the linked docs.
EDIT:
There is one exception however in a form of Static Pods:
Static Pods are managed directly by the kubelet daemon on a specific
node, without the API server observing them. Unlike Pods that are
managed by the control plane (for example, a Deployment); instead, the
kubelet watches each static Pod (and restarts it if it fails).
Note that it does not apply to multiple replicas.

Kubernetes Nginx Ingress controller Readiness Probe failed

I am trying to setup my very first Kubernetes cluster and it seems to have setup fine until nginx-ingress controller.
Here is my cluster information:
Nodes: three RHEL7 and one RHEL8 nodes
Master is running on RHEL7
Kubernetes server version: 1.19.1
Networking used: flannel
coredns is running fine.
selinux and firewall are disabled on all nodes
Here are my all pods running in kube-system
I then followed instructions on following page to install nginx ingress controller: https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/installation/installation-with-manifests/
Instead of deployment, I decided to use daemon-set since I am going to have only few nodes running in my kubernetes cluster.
After following the instructions, pod on my RHEL8 is constantly failing with the following error:
Readiness probe failed: Get "http://10.244.3.2:8081/nginx-ready": dial
tcp 10.244.3.2:8081: connect: connection refused Back-off restarting
failed container
Here is the screenshot shows that RHEL7 pods are working just fine and RHEL8 is failing:
All nodes are setup exactly the same way and there is no difference.
I am very new to Kubernetes and don't know much internals of it. Can someone please point me on how can I debug and fix this issue? I am really willing to learn from issues like this.
This is how I provisioned RHEL7 and RHEL8 nodes
Installed docker version: 19.03.12, build 48a66213fe
Disabled firewalld
Disabled swap
Disabled SELinux
To enable iptables to see bridged traffic, set net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 1 and net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1
Added hosts entry for all the nodes involved in Kubernetes cluster so that they can find each other without hitting DNS
Added IP address of all nodes in Kubernetes cluster on /etc/environment for no_proxy so that it doesn't hit corporate proxy
Verified docker driver to be "systemd" and NOT "cgroupfs"
Reboot server
Install kubectl, kubeadm, kubelet as per kubernetes guide here at: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/tools/install-kubectl/
Start and enable kubelet service
Initialize master by executing the following:
kubeadm init --pod-network-cidr=10.244.0.0/16 --service-cidr=10.96.0.0/12
Apply node-selector patch for mixed OS scheduling
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Microsoft/SDN/master/Kubernetes/flannel/l2bridge/manifests/node-selector-patch.yml
kubectl patch ds/kube-proxy --patch "$(cat node-selector-patch.yml)" -n=kube-system
Apply flannel CNI
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreos/flannel/master/Documentation/kube-flannel.yml
Modify net-conf.json section of kube-flannel.yml for a type "host-gw"
kubectl apply -f kube-flannel.yml
Apply node selector patch
kubectl patch ds/kube-flannel-ds-amd64 --patch "$(cat node-selector-patch.yml)" -n=kube-system
Thanks
According to kubernetes documentation the list of supported host operating systems is as follows:
Ubuntu 16.04+
Debian 9+
CentOS 7
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7
Fedora 25+
HypriotOS v1.0.1+
Flatcar Container Linux (tested with 2512.3.0)
This article mentioned that there are network issues on RHEL 8:
(2020/02/11 Update: After installation, I keep facing pod network issue which is like deployed pod is unable to reach external network
or pods deployed in different workers are unable to ping each other
even I can see all nodes (master, worker1 and worker2) are ready via
kubectl get nodes. After checking through the Kubernetes.io official website, I observed the nfstables backend is not compatible with the
current kubeadm packages. Please refer the following link in “Ensure
iptables tooling does not use the nfstables backend”.
The simplest solution here is to reinstall the node on supported operating system.

Kubernetes node without master

Cluster consists of one master and one worker node. If the master is down and worker is restarted no workloads (deployments) are started on boot. How and if it is possible to make worker resume last state without master?
Kubernetes 1.18.3
On worker node are installed: kubelet, kubectl, kubeadm
Ideally you should have more than one(typically a odd number like 3 or 5) node serving as master and accessible from worker nodes via a LoadBalancer.
The state is stored in ETCD which is accessed by worker nodes via the API Server. So without master nodes running there is no way for workers to know the desired state.
Although it's not recommended you but can use static pod as potential solution here.Static Pods are managed directly by the kubelet daemon on a specific node, without the API server observing them.Unlike Pods that are managed by the control plane (for example, a Deployment ), instead the kubelet watches each static Pod (and restarts it if it crashes).
The caveat of using static pod is since those pods are not dependent on API Server Hence static Pods cannot be managed with kubectl or other Kubernetes API clients.

How kube-apiserver knows where is kubelet service/process running in worker node?

I have bootstraped (kubernetes the hard way by kelseyhightower) a k8s cluster in virtual box with 2 master(s) and 2 worker(s) and 1 LB for 2 master's kube-apiserver. BTW, kubelet is not running in master, only in worker node.
Now cluster is up and running but I am not able to understand how kube-apiserver on master is connecting to kubelet to fetch the node's metric data etc.
Could you please let me in details?
Kubernetes API server is not aware of Kubelets but Kubelets are aware of Kubernetes API server. Kubelet registers the node and reports metrics to Kubernetes API Server which gets persisted into ETCD key value store. Kubelets use a kubeconfig file to communicate with Kubernetes API Server. This kubeconfig file has the endpoint of Kubernetes API server.The communication between Kubelet and Kubernetes API Server is secure with mutual TLS.
In Kubernetes the Hard Way Kubernetes control plane components - API Server, Scheduler, Controller Manager are run as systems unit and that's why there is no Kubelet running on the control plane nodes and if you perform kubectl get nodes command you would not see the master nodes listed as there is no Kubelet to register the master nodes.
A more standard way to deploy Kubernetes control plane components - API Server, Scheduler, Controller Manager is using Kubelet and not systemd units and that's how Kubeadm deploys Kubernetes control plane.
Official documentation on Master to Cluster communication.