I have a differential equation that is as follows:
%d/dt [x;y] = [m11 m12;m11 m12][x;y]
mat = #(t) sin(cos(w*t))
m11 = mat(t) + 5 ;
m12 = 5;
m21 = -m12 ;
m22 = -m11 ;
So I have that my matrix is specifically dependent on t. For some reason, I am having a super difficult time solving this with ode45. My thoughts were to do as follows ( I want to solve for x,y at a time T that was defined):
t = linspace(0,T,100) ; % Arbitrary 100
x0 = (1 0); %Init cond
[tf,xf] = ode45(#ddt,t,x0)
function xprime = ddt(t,x)
ddt = [m11*x(1)+m12*x(2) ; m12*x(1)+m12*x(2) ]
end
The first error I get is that
Undefined function or variable 'M11'.
Is there a cleaner way I could be doing this ?
I'm assuming you're running this within a script, which means that your function ddt is a local function instead of a nested function. That means it doesn't have access to your matrix variables m11, etc. Another issue is that you will want to be evaluating your matrix variables at the specific value of t within ddt, which your current code doesn't do.
Here's an alternative way to set things up that should work for you:
% Define constants:
w = 1;
T = 10;
t = linspace(0, T, 100);
x0 = [1 0];
% Define anonymous functions:
fcn = #(t) sin(cos(w*t));
M = {#(t) fcn(t)+5, 5; -5 #(t) -fcn(t)-5};
ddt = #(t, x) [M{1, 1}(t)*x(1)+M{2, 1}*x(2); M{1, 2}*x(1)+M{2, 2}(t)*x(2)];
% Solve equations:
[tf, xf] = ode45(ddt, t, x0);
One glaring error is that the return value of function ddt is xprime, not ddt. Then as mentioned in the previous answer, mm1 at the time of definition should give an error as t is not defined. But even if there is a t value available at definition, it is not the same t the procedure ddt is called with.
mat = #(t) sin(cos(w*t))
function xprime = ddt(t,x)
a = mat(t) + 5 ;
b = 5;
ddt = [ a, b; -b, -a]*x
end
should work also as inner procedure.
Related
Hi i've been asked to solve SIR model using fsolve command in MATLAB, and Euler 3 point backward. I'm really confused on how to proceed, please help. This is what i have so far. I created a function for 3BDF scheme but i'm not sure how to proceed with fsolve and solve the system of nonlinear ODEs. The SIR model is shown as and 3BDF scheme is formulated as
clc
clear all
gamma=1/7;
beta=1/3;
ode1= #(R,S,I) -(beta*I*S)/(S+I+R);
ode2= #(R,S,I) (beta*I*S)/(S+I+R)-I*gamma;
ode3= #(I) gamma*I;
f(t,[S,I,R]) = [-(beta*I*S)/(S+I+R); (beta*I*S)/(S+I+R)-I*gamma; gamma*I];
R0=0;
I0=10;
S0=8e6;
odes={ode1;ode2;ode3}
fun = #root2d;
x0 = [0,0];
x = fsolve(fun,x0)
function [xs,yb] = ThreePointBDF(f,x0, xmax, h, y0)
% This function should return the numerical solution of y at x = xmax.
% (It should not return the entire time history of y.)
% TO BE COMPLETED
xs=x0:h:xmax;
y=zeros(1,length(xs));
y(1)=y0;
yb(1)=y0+f(x0,y0)*h;
for i=1:length(xs)-1
R =R0;
y1(i+1,:) = fsolve(#(u) u-2*h/3*f(t(i+1),u) - R, y1(i-1,:)+2*h*F(i,:))
S = S0;
y2(i+1,:) = fsolve(#(u) u-2*h/3*f(t(i+1),u) - S, y2(i-1,:)+2*h*F(i,:))
I= I0;
y3(i+1,:) = fsolve(#(u) u-2*h/3*f(t(i+1),u) - I, y3(i-1,:)+2*h*F(i,:))
end
end
You have an implicit equation
y(i+1) - 2*h/3*f(t(i+1),y(i+1)) = G = (4*y(i) - y(i-1))/3
where the right-side term G is constant in the call to fsolve, that is, during the solution of the implicit step equation.
Note that this is for the vector valued system y'(t)=f(t,y(t)) where
f(t,[S,I,R]) = [-(beta*I*S)/(S+I+R); (beta*I*S)/(S+I+R)-I*gamma; gamma*I];
To solve this write
G = (4*y(i,:) - y(i-1,:))/3
y(i+1,:) = fsolve(#(u) u-2*h/3*f(t(i+1),u) - G, y(i-1,:)+2*h*F(i,:))
where a midpoint step is used to get an order 2 approximation as initial guess, F(i,:)=f(t(i),y(i,:)). Add solver options for error tolerances as necessary, you want the error in the implicit equation smaller than the truncation error O(h^3) of the step. One can also keep only a short array of function values, then one has to be careful for the correspondence of the position in the short array to the time index.
Using all that and a reference solution by a higher order standard solver produces the following error graphs for the components
where one can see that the first order error of the constant first step results in a first order global error, while with a second order error in the first step using the Euler method results in a clear second order global error.
Implement the method in general terms
from scipy.optimize import fsolve
def BDF2(f,t,y0,y1):
N, h = len(t)-1, t[1]-t[0];
y = (N+1)*[np.asarray(y0)];
y[1] = y1;
for i in range(1,N):
t1, G = t[i+1], (4*y[i]-y[i-1])/3
y[i+1] = fsolve(lambda u: u-2*h/3*f(t1,u)-G, y[i-1]+2*h*f(t[i],y[i]), xtol=1e-3*h**3)
return np.vstack(y)
Set up the model to be solved
gamma=1/7;
beta=1/3;
print beta, gamma
y0 = np.array([8e6, 10, 0])
P = sum(y0); y0 = y0/P
def f(t,y): S,I,R = y; trns = beta*S*I/(S+I+R); recv=gamma*I; return np.array([-trns, trns-recv, recv])
Compute a reference solution and method solutions for the two initialization variants
from scipy.integrate import odeint
tg = np.linspace(0,120,25*128)
yg = odeint(f,y0,tg,atol=1e-12, rtol=1e-14, tfirst=True)
M = 16; # 8,4
t = tg[::M];
h = t[1]-t[0];
y1 = BDF2(f,t,y0,y0)
e1 = y1-yg[::M]
y2 = BDF2(f,t,y0,y0+h*f(0,y0))
e2 = y2-yg[::M]
Plot the errors, computation as above, but embedded in the plot commands, could be separated in principle by first computing a list of solutions
fig,ax = plt.subplots(3,2,figsize=(12,6))
for M in [16, 8, 4]:
t = tg[::M];
h = t[1]-t[0];
y = BDF2(f,t,y0,y0)
e = (y-yg[::M])
for k in range(3): ax[k,0].plot(t,e[:,k],'-o', ms=1, lw=0.5, label = "h=%.3f"%h)
y = BDF2(f,t,y0,y0+h*f(0,y0))
e = (y-yg[::M])
for k in range(3): ax[k,1].plot(t,e[:,k],'-o', ms=1, lw=0.5, label = "h=%.3f"%h)
for k in range(3):
for j in range(2): ax[k,j].set_ylabel(["$e_S$","$e_I$","$e_R$"][k]); ax[k,j].legend(); ax[k,j].grid()
ax[0,0].set_title("Errors: first step constant");
ax[0,1].set_title("Errors: first step Euler")
I'm trying to solve a system of ordinary differential equations in MATLAB.
I have a simple equation:
dy = -k/M *x - c/M *y+ F/M.
This is defined in my ode function test2.m, dependant on the values X and t. I want to trig 'F' with a signal, generated by my custom function squaresignal.m. The output hereof, is the variable u, spanding from 0 to 1, as it is a smooth heaviside function. - Think square wave. The inputs in squaresignal.m, is t and f.
u=squaresignal(t,f)
These values are to be used inside my function test2, in order to enable or disable variable 'F' with the value u==1 (enable). Disable for all other values.
My ode function test2.m reads:
function dX = test2(t ,X, u)
x = X (1) ;
y = X (2) ;
M = 10;
k = 50;
c = 10;
F = 300;
if u == 1
F = F;
else
F = 0,
end
dx = y ;
dy = -k/M *x - c/M *y+ F/M ;
dX = [ dx dy ]';
end
And my runscript reads:
clc
clear all
tstart = 0;
tend = 10;
tsteps = 0.01;
tspan = [0 10];
t = [tstart:tsteps:tend];
f = 2;
u = squaresignal(t,f)
for ii = 1:length(u)
options=odeset('maxstep',tsteps,'outputfcn',#odeplot);
[t,X]=ode15s(#(t,X)test2(t,X,u(ii)),[tstart tend],[0 0],u);
end
figure (1);
plot(t,X(:,1))
figure (2);
plot(t,X(:,2));
However, the for-loop does not seem to do it's magic. I still only get F=0, instead of F=F, at times when u==1. And i know, that u is equal to one at some times, because the output of squaresignal.m is visible to me.
So the real question is this. How do i properly pass my variable u, to my function test2.m, and use it there to trig F? Is it possible that the squaresignal.m should be inside the odefunction test2.m instead?
Here's an example where I pass a variable coeff to the differential equation:
function [T,Q] = main()
t_span = [0 10];
q0 = [0.1; 0.2]; % initial state
ode_options = odeset(); % currently no options... You could add some here
coeff = 0.3; % The parameter we wish to pass to the differential eq.
[T,Q] = ode15s(#(t,q)diffeq(t,q,coeff),t_span,q0, ode_options);
end
function dq = diffeq(t,q,coeff)
% Preallocate vector dq
dq = zeros(length(q),1);
% Update dq:
dq(1) = q(2);
dq(2) = -coeff*sin(q(1));
end
EDIT:
Could this be the problem?
tstart = 0;
tend = 10;
tsteps = 0.01;
tspan = [0 10];
t = [tstart:tsteps:tend];
f = 2;
u = squaresignal(t,f)
Here you create a time vector t which has nothing to do with the time vector returned by the ODE solver! This means that at first we have t[2]=0.01 but once you ran your ODE solver, t[2] can be anything. So yes, if you want to load an external signal source depending on time, then you need to call your squaresignal.m from within the differential equation and pass the solver's current time t! Your code should look like this (note that I'm passing f now as an additional argument to the diffeq):
function dX = test2(t ,X, f)
x = X (1) ;
y = X (2) ;
M = 10;
k = 50;
c = 10;
F = 300;
u = squaresignal(t,f)
if u == 1
F = F;
else
F = 0,
end
dx = y ;
dy = -k/M *x - c/M *y+ F/M ;
dX = [ dx dy ]';
end
Note however that matlab's ODE solvers do not like at all what you're doing here. You are drastically (i.e. non-smoothly) changing the dynamics of your system. What you should do is to use one of the following:
a) events if you want to trigger some behaviour (like termination) depending on the integrated variable x or
b) If you want to trigger the behaviour based on the time t, you should segment your integration into different parts where the differential equation does not vary during one segment. You can then resume your integration by using the current state and time as x0 and t0 for the next run of ode15s. Of course this only works of you're external signal source u is something simple like a step funcion or square wave. In case of the square wave you would only integrate for a timespan during which the wave does not jump. And then exactly at the time of the jump you start another integration with altered differential equations.
I am trying to compute the value of this integral using Matlab
Here the other parameters have been defined or computed in the earlier part of the program as follows
N = 2;
sigma = [0.01 0.1];
l = [15];
meu = 4*pi*10^(-7);
f = logspace ( 1, 6, 500);
w=2*pi.*f;
for j = 1 : length(f)
q2(j)= sqrt(sqrt(-1)*2*pi*f(j)*meu*sigma(2));
q1(j)= sqrt(sqrt(-1)*2*pi*f(j)*meu*sigma(1));
C2(j)= 1/(q2(j));
C1(j)= (q1(j)*C2(j) + tanh(q1(j)*l))/(q1(j)*(1+q1(j)*C2(j)*tanh(q1(j)*l)));
Z(j) = sqrt(-1)*2*pi*f(j)*C1(j);
Apprho(j) = meu*(1/(2*pi*f(j))*(abs(Z(j))^2));
Phi(j) = atan(imag(Z(j))/real(Z(j)));
end
%integration part
c1=w./(2*pi);
rho0=1;
fun = #(x) log(Apprho(x)/rho0)/(x.^2-w^2);
c2= integral(fun,0,Inf);
phin=pi/4-c1.*c2;
I am getting an error like this
could anyone help and tell me where i am going wrong.thanks in advance
Define Apprho in a separate *.m function file, instead of storing it in an array:
function [ result ] = Apprho(x)
%
% Calculate f and Z based on input argument x
%
% ...
%
meu = 4*pi*10^(-7);
result = meu*(1/(2*pi*f)*(abs(Z)^2));
end
How you calculate f and Z is up to you.
MATLAB's integral works by calling the function (in this case, Apprho) repeatedly at many different x values. The x values called by integral don't necessarily correspond to the 1: length(f) values used in your original code, which is why you received errors.
Following code throws out an error.
syms z positive;
syms n;
syms m;
N = 10;
Ms = 10;
Es = 1;
pd = 0.9;
pd_dash = 1-pd;
pf = 0.1;
pf_dash = 1-pf;
pr = 0.1;
qr = 1-pr;
p = 0.005
pi = pf_dash*p;
pb = pd_dash*p;
qi = 1-pi;
qb = 1-pb;
sm = symsum( z^((n+1)*Es), n, 0, N-1 );
temp_sum = symsum(z^((n+m+1)*Es)*qr^(n+m)*pr, m, 0, N-1);
z=1; %assume a value of z
x = eval(sm); %works fine
y = eval(temp_sum);
% Error:The expression to the left of the equals sign is not a valid target for an assignment.
Please suggest a way to resolve this.
The problem that I suspect is: the temp_sum comes out to be in piecewise(...) which eval is not capable of evaluating.
What you actually did:
Create a symbolic expression
Create a variable z which is unused
Call a undocumented function sym/eval
I assume you wanted to:
Create a symbolic expression
Substitute z with 1: temp_sum=subs(temp_sum,z,1)
get the result. Here I don't know what you really have because I don't know which variables are symbolic unknowns and which constants. Try simplify(temp_sum). If you substituted all unknowns it should return a number.
I've got at State System, with "forced" inputs at bounds. My SS equation is: zp = A*z * B. (A is a square matrix, and B colunm)
If B is a step (along the time of experience), there is no problem, because I can use
tevent = 2;
tmax= 5*tevent;
n =100;
dT = n/tmax;
t = linspace(0,tmax,n);
u0 = 1 * ones(size(z'));
B = zeros(nz,n);
B(1,1)= utop(1)';
A = eye(nz,nz);
[tt,u]=ode23('SS',t,u0);
and SS is:
function zp = SS(t,z)
global A B
zp = A*z + B;
end
My problem is when I applied a slop, So B will be time dependent.
utop_init= 20;
utop_final = 50;
utop(1)=utop_init;
utop(tevent * dT)=utop_final;
for k = 2: tevent*dT -1
utop(k) = utop(k-1) +(( utop(tevent * dT) - utop(1))/(tevent * dT));
end
for k = (tevent * dT) +1 :(tmax*dT)
utop(k) = utop(k-1);
end
global A B
B = zeros(nz,1);
B(1,1:n) = utop(:)';
A = eye(nz,nz);
I wrote a new equation (to trying to solve), the problem, but I can't adjust "time step", and I don't get a u with 22x100 (which is the objective).
for k = 2 : n
u=solveSS(t,k,u0);
end
SolveSS has the code:
function [ u ] = solveSS( t,k,u0)
tspan = [t(k-1) t(k)];
[t,u] = ode15s(#SS,tspan,u0);
function zp = SS(t,z)
global A B
zp = A*z + B(:,k-1);
end
end
I hope that you can help!
You should define a function B that is continuously varying with t and pass it as a function handle. This way you will allow the ODE solver to adjust time steps efficiently (your use of ode15s, a stiff ODE solver, suggests that variable time stepping is even more crucial)
The form of your code will be something like this:
function [ u ] = solveSS( t,k,u0)
tspan = [t(k-1) t(k)];
[t,u] = ode15s(#SS,tspan,u0,#B);
function y = B(x)
%% insert B calculation
end
function zp = SS(t,z,B)
global A
zp = A*z + B(t);
end
end