I’m struggling at modeling a certain use case of mine with Draft.js.
I’m highlighting certain words/phrases in the editor with a composite decorator by using a regex strategy.
What I’m trying to archive is: if a user clicks on a decorated word, I want to toggle it’s state and store it somehow.
How would I do this? Any clues?
At a higher level, it’s basically a way to ignore certain decorated words, even if they match the regex strategy
I thought that maybe entities could help me do the job here, they would allow me to store such meta information (ex: ignore) on the decorated word, right?
When I faced the similar issue I used the store of the rendered component for storing a condition.
You used a functional component here:
renderAnnotation(type){
return (props)=> {
return (<span className={type} onClick={this.ignoreDecoratedWord.bind(this, props)}>{props.children}</span>);
};
}
You can change it and use standard react component:
renderAnnotation(type){
return (props)=> {
return (<HighlightedWord type={type} {...props} />);
};
}
The HighlightedWord component is:
class HighlightedWord extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = { enable: true }
}
toggleStatus = () => {
this.setState({ enable: !this.state.enable });
}
render() {
return (
<span className={this.state.enable ? this.props.type : ''} onClick={this.toggleStatus}>{this.props.children}</span>
)
}
}
We toggle the highlighting status after the click event.
Check this demo.
Related
I have a requirement to allow filter only when filter text is more than three characters. Is there any way to put some validation logic somewhere?
Looked at the ag-grid custom filter document but don't know which way is best to accomplish this with minimal coding. Looked at onFloatingFilterChanged in IFloatingFilterParams, onFloatingFilterChanged in Custom Floating Filter, and isFilterActive in IFilterComp but documentations are all fuzzy and there's no specific example for this purpose.
Anyone tried to implement this?
What's the best way to accomplish this?
Solved this with custom floating filter component with onFloatingFilterChanged implementation following the example
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
minChars: props.minChars ? props.minChars : DEFAULT_MIN_CHARS,
};
this.onFloatingFilterChanged = change => {
const { minChars } = this.state;
if(change && change.model && (!change.model.filter || change.model.filter.length >= minChars)) {
return props.onFloatingFilterChanged(change);
}
return false;
};
}
I'm trying to create a custom form control in Angular (v5). The custom control is essentially a wrapper around an Angular Material component, but with some extra stuff going on.
I've read various tutorials on implementing ControlValueAccessor, but I can't find anything that accounts for writing a component to wrap an existing component.
Ideally, I want a custom component that displays the Angular Material component (with some extra bindings and stuff going on), but to be able to pass in validation from the parent form (e.g. required) and have the Angular Material components handle that.
Example:
Outer component, containing a form and using custom component
<form [formGroup]="myForm">
<div formArrayName="things">
<div *ngFor="let thing of things; let i = index;">
<app-my-custom-control [formControlName]="i"></app-my-custom-control>
</div>
</div>
</form>
Custom component template
Essentially my custom form component just wraps an Angular Material drop-down with autocomplete. I could do this without creating a custom component, but it seems to make sense to do it this way as all the code for handling filtering etc. can live within that component class, rather than being in the container class (which doesn't need to care about the implementation of this).
<mat-form-field>
<input matInput placeholder="Thing" aria-label="Thing" [matAutocomplete]="thingInput">
<mat-autocomplete #thingInput="matAutocomplete">
<mat-option *ngFor="let option of filteredOptions | async" [value]="option">
{{ option }}
</mat-option>
</mat-autocomplete>
</mat-form-field>
So, on the input changing, that value should be used as the form value.
Things I've tried
I've tried a few ways of doing this, all with their own pitfalls:
Simple event binding
Bind to keyup and blur events on the input, and then notify the parent of the change (i.e. call the function that Angular passes into registerOnChange as part of implementing ControlValueAccessor).
That sort of works, but on selecting a value from the dropdown it seems the change events don't fire and you end up in an inconsistent state.
It also doesn't account for validation (e.g. if it's "required", when a value isn;t set the form control will correctly be invalid, but the Angular Material component won't show as such).
Nested form
This is a bit closer. I've created a new form within the custom component class, which has a single control. In the component template, I pass in that form control to the Angular Material component. In the class, I subscribe to valueChanges of that and then propagate the changes back to the parent (via the function passed into registerOnChange).
This sort of works, but feels messy and like there should be a better way.
It also means that any validation applied to my custom form control (by the container component) is ignored, as I've created a new "inner form" that lacks the original validation.
Don't use ControlValueAccessor at all, and instead just pass in the form
As the title says... I tried not doing this the "proper" way, and instead added a binding to the parent form. I then create a form control within the custom component as part of that parent form.
This works for handling value updates, and to an extent validation (but it has to be created as part of the component, not the parent form), but this just feels wrong.
Summary
What's the proper way of handling this? It feels like I'm just stumbling through different anti-patterns, but I can't find anything in the docs to suggest that this is even supported.
Edit:
I've added a helper for doing just this an angular utilities library I've started: s-ng-utils. Using that you can extend WrappedFormControlSuperclass and write:
#Component({
selector: 'my-wrapper',
template: '<input [formControl]="formControl">',
providers: [provideValueAccessor(MyWrapper)],
})
export class MyWrapper extends WrappedFormControlSuperclass<string> {
// ...
}
See some more documentation here.
One solution is to get the #ViewChild() corresponding to the inner form components ControlValueAccessor, and delegating to it in your own component. For example:
#Component({
selector: 'my-wrapper',
template: '<input ngDefaultControl>',
providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: forwardRef(() => NumberInputComponent),
multi: true,
},
],
})
export class MyWrapper implements ControlValueAccessor {
#ViewChild(DefaultValueAccessor) private valueAccessor: DefaultValueAccessor;
writeValue(obj: any) {
this.valueAccessor.writeValue(obj);
}
registerOnChange(fn: any) {
this.valueAccessor.registerOnChange(fn);
}
registerOnTouched(fn: any) {
this.valueAccessor.registerOnTouched(fn);
}
setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean) {
this.valueAccessor.setDisabledState(isDisabled);
}
}
The ngDefaultControl in the template above is to manually trigger angular to attach its normal DefaultValueAccessor to the input. This happens automatically if you use <input ngModel>, but we don't want the ngModel here, just the value accessor. You'll need to change DefaultValueAccessor above to whatever the value accessor is for the material dropdown - I'm not familiar with Material myself.
I'm a bit late to the party but here is what I did with wrapping a component which might accept formControlName, formControl, or ngModel
#Component({
selector: 'app-input',
template: '<input [formControl]="control">',
styleUrls: ['./app-input.component.scss']
})
export class AppInputComponent implements OnInit, ControlValueAccessor {
constructor(#Optional() #Self() public ngControl: NgControl) {
if (this.ngControl != null) {
// Setting the value accessor directly (instead of using the providers) to avoid running into a circular import.
this.ngControl.valueAccessor = this;
}
}
control: FormControl;
// These are just to make Angular happy. Not needed since the control is passed to the child input
writeValue(obj: any): void { }
registerOnChange(fn: (_: any) => void): void { }
registerOnTouched(fn: any): void { }
ngOnInit() {
if (this.ngControl instanceof FormControlName) {
const formGroupDirective = this.ngControl.formDirective as FormGroupDirective;
if (formGroupDirective) {
this.control = formGroupDirective.form.controls[this.ngControl.name] as FormControl;
}
} else if (this.ngControl instanceof FormControlDirective) {
this.control = this.ngControl.control;
} else if (this.ngControl instanceof NgModel) {
this.control = this.ngControl.control;
this.control.valueChanges.subscribe(x => this.ngControl.viewToModelUpdate(this.control.value));
} else if (!this.ngControl) {
this.control = new FormControl();
}
}
}
Obviously, don't forget to unsubscribe from this.control.valueChanges
I have actually been wrapping my head around this for a while and I figured out a good solution that is very similar (or the same) as Eric's.
The thing he forgot to account for, is that you can't use the #ViewChild valueAccessor until the view has actually loaded (See #ViewChild docs)
Here is the solution: (I am giving you my example which is wrapping a core angular select directive with NgModel, since you are using a custom formControl, you will need to target that formControl's valueAccessor class)
#Component({
selector: 'my-country-select',
templateUrl: './country-select.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./country-select.component.scss'],
providers: [{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: CountrySelectComponent,
multi: true
}]
})
export class CountrySelectComponent implements ControlValueAccessor, OnInit, AfterViewInit, OnChanges {
#ViewChild(SelectControlValueAccessor) private valueAccessor: SelectControlValueAccessor;
private country: number;
private formControlChanged: any;
private formControlTouched: any;
public ngAfterViewInit(): void {
this.valueAccessor.registerOnChange(this.formControlChanged);
this.valueAccessor.registerOnTouched(this.formControlTouched);
}
public registerOnChange(fn: any): void {
this.formControlChanged = fn;
}
public registerOnTouched(fn: any): void {
this.formControlTouched = fn;
}
public writeValue(newCountryId: number): void {
this.country = newCountryId;
}
public setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean): void {
this.valueAccessor.setDisabledState(isDisabled);
}
}
NgForm is providing an easy way to manage your forms without injecting any data in a HTML form. Input data must be injected at the component level not in a classic html tag.
<form #myForm="ngForm" (ngSubmit)="onSubmit(myForm)>...</form>
Other way is to create a form component where all the data model is binded using ngModel ;)
We have a template-based form that uses the various Angular Material controls (matInput, mat-select, etc). We want to create a 'read-only' type view for some users. My immediate thought was to simply check a user's privileges and then loop through all form controls and set them to disable if need be.
This appears to work for text input type controls but is not working for selects and checkboxes. Plus this grays-out the controls which isn't necessarily what we want.
Any ideas on how to best accomplish this? Perhaps somehow disable keyboard and mouse input within the form might be what we want but I have no idea how to go about this.
I think it is possible, but you will have to check all control types, for example MatInput exposes readonly property, it allows us to create simple directive which will switch readonly state for entire form:
import {Directive, ContentChildren, QueryList, AfterContentInit, Input} from '#angular/core';
import {NgModel} from '#angular/forms';
#Directive({
selector: 'form[readonly]'
})
export class FormReadonlyDirective implements AfterContentInit
{
#ContentChildren(NgModel)
public inputs:QueryList<NgModel>;
private controls:any[];
private _readonly:boolean = false;
public ngAfterContentInit():void
{
this.controls = this.getControls();
this.inputs.changes.subscribe(() =>
{
this.setReadonly(this.readonly);
});
this.setReadonly(this.readonly);
}
#Input()
public get readonly():boolean
{
return this._readonly;
}
public set readonly(value:boolean)
{
this._readonly = value != null && value !== false && `${value}` !== 'false';
this.setReadonly(value);
}
private setReadonly(value:boolean):void
{
if(this.controls != null)
{
this.controls.forEach(control =>
{
//todo: check
control.readonly = value;
});
}
}
private getControls():any[]
{
return this.inputs.map(control => control.valueAccessor);
}
}
Not tested, but you get the idea.
How do you handle Angular 2 forms in unidirectional data flow? Especially with validation between several parent/child components?
I am using ngrx/store and model driven forms with form builder.. Is it possible to do something similar like form reducer in React and make it as a part of Store?
Do you have some articles about it?
I have created a library called ngrx-forms that does exactly what you want. You can get it on npm via:
npm install ngrx-forms --save
I recommend checking out the full README on the github page, but below you can find some examples of what you need to do to get the library up and running once installed.
Import the module:
import { StoreModule } from '#ngrx/store';
import { NgrxFormsModule } from 'ngrx-forms';
import { reducers } from './reducer';
#NgModule({
declarations: [
AppComponent,
],
imports: [
NgrxFormsModule,
StoreModule.forRoot(reducers),
],
providers: [],
bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppModule { }
Add a group state somewhere in your state tree via createFormGroupState and call the formGroupReducer inside your reducer:
import { Action } from '#ngrx/store';
import { FormGroupState, createFormGroupState, formGroupReducer } from 'ngrx-forms';
export interface MyFormValue {
someTextInput: string;
someCheckbox: boolean;
nested: {
someNumber: number;
};
}
const FORM_ID = 'some globally unique string';
const initialFormState = createFormGroupState<MyFormValue>(FORM_ID, {
someTextInput: '',
someCheckbox: false,
nested: {
someNumber: 0,
},
});
export interface AppState {
someOtherField: string;
myForm: FormGroupState<MyFormValue>;
}
const initialState: AppState = {
someOtherField: '',
myForm: initialFormState,
};
export function appReducer(state = initialState, action: Action): AppState {
const myForm = formGroupReducer(state.myForm, action);
if (myForm !== state.myForm) {
state = { ...state, myForm };
}
switch (action.type) {
case 'some action type':
// modify state
return state;
default: {
return state;
}
}
}
Expose the form state inside your component:
import { Component } from '#angular/core';
import { Store } from '#ngrx/store';
import { FormGroupState } from 'ngrx-forms';
import { Observable } from 'rxjs/Observable';
import { MyFormValue } from './reducer';
#Component({
selector: 'my-component',
templateUrl: './my-component.html',
})
export class MyComponent {
formState$: Observable<FormGroupState<MyFormValue>>;
constructor(private store: Store<AppState>) {
this.formState$ = store.select(s => s.myForm);
}
}
Set the control states in your template:
<form novalidate [ngrxFormState]="(formState$ | async)">
<input type="text"
[ngrxFormControlState]="(formState$ | async).controls.someTextInput">
<input type="checkbox"
[ngrxFormControlState]="(formState$ | async).controls.someCheckbox">
<input type="number"
[ngrxFormControlState]="(formState$ | async).controls.nested.controls.someNumber">
</form>
This is a fairly old question, but I couldn't find a great solution in my own quest for working with ngrx + reactive forms in Angular. As a result, I'll post my research here with hope that it may help someone else. My solution can be broken down into two parts, and I pray you (oh weathered soul) find it applicable to your problem:
1) Monitor the form element/s (for example, "keyup" event for a typical text input), and update the State from that event. This strategy comes straight out of the book search component in the ngrx example app. We can now successfully populate the State as our form changes. Awesome! 50% done!
2) The angular reactive forms guide demonstrates creating the form group in the constructor. I have seen some other people do it inside ngOnInit, but this is too late in the lifecycle for our needs (I tried, I failed). Now that we have our form group established, setup ngOnChanges to capture any changes pushed from the state, and then update the form group using patchValue. For example:
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges) {
if (changes.valueICareAbout1) {
this.myForm.patchValue({
valueICareAbout1: changes.valueICareAbout1.currentValue
});
}
if (changes.valueICareAbout2) {
this.myForm.patchValue({
valueICareAbout2: changes.valueICareAbout2.currentValue
});
}
}
In the applications I built with Angular 2, the following guideline seemed to work well:
Parent components pass data down to children via data binding. Child components request data changes by emitting output events to parent components. It is the parent components responsibility to act accordingly.
In a hierarchical component structure, data changes are handled by the lowest component that depends on the data. If there's another component higher up or a sibling that depends on the same data item, pass changes up by emitting events and leave the handling to a higher component.
This scheme works well because, for any data that is relevant to more than one component, there is a single component responsible for performing changes. Changes bubble down automatically. Components are reusable, and changes in the component tree can be easily adapted.
With regard to validation, any component in the ladder between the lowest component emitting a data change request up to the highest component that finally handles the change, any component can effectively cancel the change by not passing it higher up. In most applications, I'd opt for validating data changes at the origin of the change though.
Naturally, child components can still have internal state and need not communicate changes - unless changes are relevant to the parent component.
Form data is inherently a very local state, especially for Angular since ngModel binds to local component variables. The top devs that I know recommend keeping the data for the form localized to that component (ie just use ngModel with local variables). This is because un-submitted form data is almost never shared by various components across your whole application. When the user submits the form then you can dispatch an action with a payload containing the form data to a parent component, to the store, or even to an ngrx/effect to be posted to a server.
I'd like to use headroom.js with React. Headroom.js docs say:
At it's most basic headroom.js simply adds and removes CSS classes from an element in response to a scroll event.
Would it be fine to use it directly with elements controlled by React? I know that React fails badly when the DOM structure is mutated, but modifying just attributes should be fine. Is this really so? Could you show me some place in official documentation saying that it's recommended or not?
Side note: I know about react-headroom, but I'd like to use the original headroom.js instead.
EDIT: I just tried it, and it seems to work. I still don't know if it will be a good idea on the long run.
If React tries to reconcile any of the attributes you change, things will break. Here's an example:
class Application extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {
classes: ["blue", "bold"]
}
}
componentDidMount() {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log("modifying state");
this.setState({
classes: this.state.classes.concat(["big"])
});
}, 2000)
}
render() {
return (
<div id="test" className={this.state.classes.join(" ")}>Hello!</div>
)
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Application />, document.getElementById("app"), () => {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log("Adding a class manually");
const el = document.getElementById("test");
if (el.classList)
el.classList.add("grayBg");
else
el.className += ' grayBg';
}, 1000)
});
And here's the demo: https://jsbin.com/fadubo/edit?js,output
We start off with a component that has the classes blue and bold based on its state. After a second, we add the grayBg class without using React. After another second, the component sets its state so that the component has the classes blue, bold, and big, and the grayBg class is lost.
Since the DOM reconciliation strategy is a black box, it's difficult to say, "Okay, my use case will work as long as React doesn't define any classes." For example, React might decide it's better to use innerHTML to apply a large list of changes rather than setting attributes individually.
In general, if you need to do manual DOM manipulation of a React component, the best strategy is to wrap the manual operation or plugin in its own component that it can 100% control. See this post on Wrapping DOM Libs for one such example.