I add the same ImperativeExpression to DirectToolItem and DirectMenuItem, but my #Evaluate method in class for expression was called only for DirectMenuItem. So I can't manage the visibility of DirectToolItem by ImperativeExpression. This is bug or I need to send some event to update visibility? Something like UIEvents.REQUEST_ENABLEMENT_UPDATE_TOPIC?
Unfortunately the visible-when expression for a tool item does not currently work at all. Eclipse bug 494663 describes the problem.
Related
I am trying to click on a menu dropdown. The dropdown appears when the mouse pointer is on a menu element. The workaround can be by clicking on the menu element aslo but that sometimes is giving error due to wait time being large or small depending on the speed of site.Thus, I want to use ActionChains move_to_element for this. But it is not working no errors nothing but not working.
my $driver = Selenium::Chrome->new(binary=>"D:\\chromedriver_win32\\chromedriver.exe");
my $action_chains = Selenium::ActionChains->new(driver => $driver);
$elem = $driver->find_element(".//*[\#id='navl']/li[3]/a");
$action_chains->move_to_element($elem);
$driver->pause(5000);
$driver->find_element_by_xpath(".//*[\#id='navl']/li[3]/ul/li[1]/a")->click;
$driver->pause(50000);
$driver->shutdown_binary;
I am not sure if it is of any help - there are many questions about Selenium actions and action chains and many suggestions - I struggled with a similar problem, using Python Selenium bindings though.
First of all in the code above, it could be that there is no final perform() method called after move_to_element
Secondly - and that thing was my own problem and the source of lots of bafflement on my side - i discovered that in my case, after a single perform(), i couldn't reuse the same ActionChains object - there was no error or complaint, but something was not happening right. After I created a new ActionChains object, the subsequent new chain of actions and the final perform() worked as expected.
Using grails mail plugin 1.0.7.
https://jira.grails.org/browse/GPMAIL-36 states that it's possible to change plguin configuration since 1.0.1 at runtime. Sadly it does not explains how to achieve it.
I want to be able to change the username at runtime to be able to use different mail accounts.
Thanks.
Based on this code, you should be able to change the configuration at runtime and the mail plugin will automagically re-deploy and update mail sender based on your changes.
Example:
Holders.config.grails.mail.username = 'foo'
Holders.config.grails.mail.password = 'bar'
sendMail {
to "foo#bar.com"
from "bar#foo.com"
subject "Hi"
body "This is an email"
}
Update:
It would appear that changing the configuration in this manner does not, in fact, fire the onConfigChange event. Per this, you can fire the event manually. Something like this:
Holders.pluginManager.getGrailsPlugin('mail').notifyOfEvent(GrailsPlugin.EVENT_ON_CONFIG_CHANGE, Holders.config)
I've realized this can be done accessing the mailSender bean from the context and updating it like is explained here
Changing mail configuration in runtime
However if #rmlan solution finally works it may be a much cleaner solution.
Actually thr rmlan solution works with the following fix. Since the onConfigChange compares hashCode of existing config map and new one, so if you set new configs in original configuration (Holders.config.grails.mail), then both configs are same and it never pass the condition to apply new changes, so a new structure should be created and pass it to notifyOfEvent method to mark the change as different hashCodes.
def mailConfig = [ grails: [ mail: [:] ] ]
mailConfig.grails.mail.host = newHost
mailConfig.grails.mail.port = newPort
Holders.pluginManager.getGrailsPlugin('mail').
notifyOfEvent(GrailsPlugin.EVENT_ON_CONFIG_CHANGE, mailConfig)
Still using async-mail and this one make the below exception
No qualifying bean of type [grails.plugin.mail.MailService] is defined: expected single matching bean but found 2: nonAsynchronousMailService,mailService
that is thrown because of the following part of onConfigChange
event.ctx.getBean(MailService.class).setPoolSize(mailConfig.poolSize?:null)
Commenting it let it works as a workaround, but making sendMail of mail plugin is called, not async-mail, so exception may raise if async-mail features is used on constructing mail. Hence to use async-mail in this workaround should use sendAsynchronousMail method.
I want to link to a method that has the following signature:
public SomeResponse getSomeObjects(#RequestParam(value = "foo", defaultValue = "bar") Foo fooValue)
Now I want the link to look like this:
http://myhost/api/someobjects
I tried using methodOn from Spring HATEOAS's ControllerLinkBuilder as seen below:
discoverResponse.add(linkTo(methodOn(SomeController.class).getSomeObjects(null)).withRel("someobjects"))
But it doesn't lead to the desired link because a ?foo is added at its end. How can I achieve the above objective?
Since backward compatibility is such an issue for you, you could always manually construct your Link objects like so:
discoverResponse.add(new Link(baseUri() + "/someobjects", "someobjects"));
The other option would be to fork Spring HATEOAS on GitHub, build the project yourself, and change the way defaults are handled in ControllerLinkBuilder. I don't really know how you'd expect an out-of-context Link builder to be able to differentiate between whether it should advertise an optional parameter. In the HATEOAS world, if the parameter isn't included, the client doesn't know about it. So why even have the optional parameter?
I know there are 7 years gone now, but I had a similar problem today which lead me here. In spring hateoas 1.1.0 the behavior is slightly different, instead it will generate URI-Templates by default for non-required #RequestParams:
http://myhost/api/someobjects{?foo}
If you don't want them in your link, you can just expand it
Map<String, Object> parameters = new HashMap<>();
parameters.put("foo", null);
link = link.expand(parameters);
It will result in the desired URL
http://myhost/api/someobjects
When using ZFDebug, is it possible to add custom messages to the 'Log' tab?
So you could use something like:
$this->log('Error: Couldn't find the user');
Has anyone managed to achieve this?
I have never used ZFDebug before and wasn't aware of it. Your post piqued my interest, so I installed it and have been trying to achieve what you want to do. I will probably add it to my dev toolbox as I use ZF a lot.
You can achieve what you want by using the mark() method of ZFDebug_Controller_Plugin_Debug_Plugin_Log which takes two arguments. The first is the message you want to send and the second is a boolean which, when set to true (default is false), will send your message to the 'log' tab.
The following code worked for me:-
$debug = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance()
->getPlugin('ZFDebug_Controller_Plugin_Debug');
$logger = $debug->getPlugin('log');
$logger->mark('Logging a message now', true);
Or to use your example (with the syntax error fixed :) )
$logger->mark("Error: Couldn't find the user", true);
As you can see this produced the desired output:-
Not quite as simple as you wanted, I know, but it's close and you could always wrap it in a function.
I have been sitting with a problem for quite a while now and I just can't seem to find what I'm missing.
I have written a custom trace listener component for Enterprise Library 5.0 for the Logging application block which works but the configured ILogFormatter just won't resolve and so I always end up with the basic string text when it gets handled by my component.
I saw in the enterprise library source code that they use the "Container.ResolvedIfNotNull()" method. It doesn't seem to work for me. I need it to write out a custom formatted string for my component to use. You know, not just the message but the timestamp, machinename, threadId, etc.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Thanks in advance.
Like I've mentioned on this site: http://entlib.codeplex.com/discussions/261749
When you create your CreationExpression in the TraceListener data class make sure you have a flat constructor definition. To put it in other words, don't return:
() => new MyTraceListener(new TraceListenerConfig(..., Container.ResolvedIfNotNull<ILogFormatter>(), ...));
just have it in the constructor of the MyTraceListener:
() => new MyTraceListener(..., Container.ResolvedIfNotNull<ILogFormatter>(), ...);