When subscribing to Calendar Channel, https://developers.google.com/google-apps/calendar/v3/push, should I expect to get a push notification for each new event created?
In testing, if I create 21 events (each at 2 second intervals), I get about 7 notifications.
It's hard to tell from the docs if I should be getting a notification for each event created, or if I should use the notification to do a sync?
What are you guys doing for your apps?
Google Calendar watches only make sense when you're also using the sync token feature. They are basically instructions to do another sync, which will bring in 1 or more event changes. The reason you got less than 21 messages is because Google rate limits the messages (in your case to what looks like every ~3 seconds... my experience is closer to 10s).
The callout about not being 100% reliable is actually a bit of a different concern than the "only 7" callbacks issue. Until yesterday, my experience was that watches were 99.9% reliable in terms of delivering a notification within a few seconds of a change. But for the 0.1%, you'll want to have some sort of fallback force sync... could be once an hour, could be upon login, etc.
I've noticed similar. Scroll down to the very bottom of that page you linked:
Notifications are not 100% reliable. Expect a small percentage of messages to get dropped under normal working conditions. Make sure to handle these missing messages gracefully, so that the application still syncs even if no push messages are received.
If you've called watch on the calendar to register/create a notification channel, I'm assuming they're doing some throttling/bucketing to push out notifications at a coarse-grained level. Testing this out myself but I believe the original intention of asking for incremental changes via setting timeMin equal to a previously requested syncTime still holds true:
https://developers.googleblog.com/2013/07/google-calendar-api-push-notifications.html
Related
For the google actions that i am developing some responses are complex and take more than 5 seconds to process.
Could someone please suggest how can this be handled.
Generally i would consider using loading dots and then replacing that message with the result but i don't see any Google Action API for it. Also is there any endpoint to which we could async send back the result later ?
Thanks
PS: I am using Conversation API.
We don't really have a good way to handle this right now, but we have a couple of approaches that sorta work based on your needs.
Notifications are currently available for the Assistant on smartphones, and they're coming for speakers. In some cases, it might make sense to say that you're working on the problem and you'll send a notification when you have it, and then resume the conversation from the notification.
Another approach is to use the Media Response to play a bit of "hold music". At the end of the segment of music, your webhook will get a notice that the music has completed. If you have the result available, you can report it at that time.
In my conversation dialogflow, I would like to add some progress messages like hang in with me, I'm looking up for that data or similar in the conversation. Is there any guidance or best practice to do this?
Unfortunately, there is no good way to do this at this time. If your webhook takes longer than about 5 seconds, Dialogflow will return one of the default responses it is set with. If you're not using Dialogflow, the Action SDK will say your webhook isn't responding and will close the conversation.
There is currently no way to send a reply, and then send another reply without the user saying something first.
One workaround might be to have the default response be something like "I'm looking that information up. Ask me again in a few seconds." When your lookup finally completes, cache the information so when/if the user asks the question again, you can return it more quickly.
Depending how long it takes, you may also wish to register a dynamic reprompt. This will send an event to your webhook if the user doesn't say anything. In a situation like this, they may say nothing for a few seconds, but that may be long enough for you to have computed the reply. So after a few seconds of silence you can suddenly announce "I've figured it out, the answer you were looking for is..." or something similar. This has some limitations - you can only reprompt twice like this before Google sends you a final reprompt and closes the conversation.
Although the platform does support notifications, these are still in developer preview and don't work with all devices. They also don't quite continue the conversation (it doesn't just start talking) - they just send a notification to a phone that there is a message and that they can restart the conversation. Depending on your use case, this may be useful combined with the above.
Update
The Media Response includes a feature that we can take advantage of to handle this. Similar to the dynamic reprompt method above, you'll get a call automatically when the media you're playing ends. So you can play a short "hold music" and your webhook will be called when it is finished. You can then either give the result or say you're still working on it and play more hold music.
I created a local notification with Swift 3. The problem is that I want to change the body of local notification.
For example:
- There are 15 left issues.
20 minutes later:
- There are 10 left issues.
Can anybody help me, please?
After research I can almost confirm that it is not possible to update the repeated notification without app being foreground.
When you schedule a repeated push notification, the title and body is already set. In order to change the tile and body we will need to catch notification. However, according to this answer, notification service extension only works for remote notification but not local notification.
SO... How to achieve this using work arounds?
I can think 2 ways to do this.
Schedule approx 60 notification manually and preset the title and body. However, in your case, it is still not possible because you will never know how many issues left after 20 mins?? If you can pre-calculate, then you can use this solution. The disadvantage for this is it can only schedule for 64 local notifications and each time when push a local notification it creates a new delivered notification stay in the system which will spam user's notification center.
The second way is to use Notification Content Extension. NOTE: You can still not modify the title and body for the notification delivered. However, you can create a custom screen when user force touch the notification bar. Maybe the subtitle can be something like force touch to see how many issues left and implement a custom screen to show the number of issues when user force touch on it.
I am still experiment on this. There's one more option that I want to suggest is you can always do a remote push notification if issue number changes, which might be a better user experience in your case instead of pushing a repeated one every 20 mins.
Useful Reference
Here is a tutorial I found useful for Notification Content Extension.
To understand more, here is a link to WWDC of introducing notification service extension and notification content extension.
I believe you can use Notification Content Extension. You kinda have much more freedom since you are working with a view controller. I would use that!
My program needs to react to the user not taking any action on a GNotification.
More specificially, a piece of data is written to the database only if the user does not press the "undo" button on the notification sent after the data's creation. My target deployment scenario does have notifications enabled and a real timeout value.
To be precise: Moving the notification "away" / deleting it should also count as such a timeout.
1) Is there a built-in way to 'listen' to notification timeouts?
2) If not, how could I still implement similar behavior?
I would use the D-Bus org.freedesktop.Notifications interface. Although it is still a draft specification, it does appear stable. My experience accessing the D-Bus interface using Vala has been that it is easier to use and gives the full feature set of the specification. GNotification doesn't seem to be as feature complete.
From the draft specification you will see there is an expire_timeout argument of the org.freedesktop.Notifications.Notify method. That should fit your time out requirement, although I've not used it personally. There is also a org.freedesktop.Notifications.NotificationClosed signal that will allow your program to be notified when the notification is closed, including because of a time out or if it was dismissed by the user.
This post about the screen lock re-design for GNOME Shell 3.10 might give some indication of what notifications are capable of. The post includes some screenshots of notifications appearing in the lock screen.
i want to send a notification each day at the same time with different information. I got no problem with showing the alert when i want to. The problem is what to show. First i tried to schedule one alert every day with different information in them, but that seems really inefficient. Then i tried with
-(void)application(UIApplication*)app didReceiveLocalNotification:(UILocalNotification *)Notif{}
but found out that it runs when the application is running in foreground only.
Is there any way to provide an array or something like it with the alert and tell the alert to get its body from the array with different index for different days?
Or should i do it with some notification that can run when the app is in background mode and the alert show and make a new alert?
All information must be provided when you schedule a local notification, so no, a notification's body cannot be sourced from an array as you described. If users are likely to open your app often and you know notification content in advance, perhaps you could ensure that x notifications are always scheduled (could be achieved by inspecting UIApplication's scheduledLocalNotifications).
This solution isn't ideal though, as it relies on users opening your app on a (somewhat) regular basis. I think push notifications are probably your best bet, but that requires access to a server, etc.
Yeah push could prob be the solution. But i dont have a server for that. The users will most likeley not open it any more after they have opened it the first time to activite the local-messages. So then this isnt really possible to do without push. when i tried a for-loop to schedule 250 days with different text each day it took about 2 minutes on iphone 4 so its not duable.