I'm migrating my Google Action from v1 => v2 using an express app, and in the past, I've been able to get url params & initialize my action map like this:
// INITIALIZE EXPRESS APPLICATION & ENDPOINTS
app.use(bodyParser.json({strict: false}));
// POST [TYPE] [PLATFORM] [PUBLISHER] PARAMS => PASS TO FULFILLMENT
app.post('/:platform/:type/:publisher', function(req, res) {
debugRequest(req);
console.log(`SENDING TO ${TYPE} => ${PLATFORM} => ${PUBLISHER} FULFILLMENT`);
fulfillment.fulfillment(req, res);
});
```
With v2, instead of using a .post route with express, I just need to use .use e.g. express().use(bodyParser.json(), app). However, I don't understand how to get the body params (req/res) using this method [still kind of a node newbie] from body parser.
I need the full URL path (type, platform, publisher) from the request in order to fulfill some app logic later on, within various intents.
If someone has a more built out express / v2 Dialogflow example, that'd be very helpful. I have all this working with v1, but times are a changing!
You should be able to get this data now with the new Framework Metadata feature added in 2.2.0. See this GitHub comment for more details.
An object containing framework metadata is now present as the 2nd parameter in the middleware function.
Now you can do something like:
app.middleware((conv, framework) => {
if (framework.express) {
conv.expressParams = framework.express.request.expressParams;
}
});
app.intent('some intent', conv => {
conv.ask(`Params sent was ${JSON.stringify(conv.expressParams)}`);
});
From a similar question in this GitHub issue:
You can retrieve the raw JSON data from conv.request for the core Actions on Google data and conv.body for the entire JSON body.
Related
I am creating a chatbot using DialogFlow. Here, I am trying to get response from the API, which has been created by my development team (using python). They provided the API URL and requested to fetch data from it according to the users query. I have created a function in the inline editor and pasted the given API URL.
Below is the API format they have created,
{
“data”: [{
“pincode”: “”,
“location_formatted_address”: “”,
“user_id”: “”,
“department_name”: “Education”,
“locality”: “”,
“status”: “Select_Status”
}]
}
Here, when a user gives a department name, it must respond the user with locality of that specific department.
In the Inline editor, I have applied the following logic to fetch the locality,
function getDatafromApI(agent){
const name = agent.parameters.name;
return getAPIData().then(res => {
res.data.map(issues => {
if(issues.department_name === name)
agent.add(`${name}. ${issues.locality}`);
intentMap.set('Fetch API', APIData);
In the above code, "name" is the parameter given in the intent section.
But, I am not getting any response. Any help?
The inline editor uses Firebase. You will have to upgrade to Firebase "Blaze" OR "Flame" plan as the "Spark"(free) plan does not allow external api calls.
However if you have already upgraded Firebase plan and still seeing this error, you can see the execution logs by clicking "view execution logs" link at bottom of Dialogflow fulfillment window.
I have created a new url/route in my app where I need to write a web-service. I need to write a service that deletes user according to the parameters passed in the service. For now, anyone should be able to call that service (will make it secure at later stage). App is built on meteor.
My url is : loaclhost:3000/deleteUser. Now one should be able to call my delete user function defined on this page and pass json structure data as an argument to it. If the data is valid, then the user should be deleted.
Using simple:rest package
Meteor.publish("delUser", function (a, b) {
UserDetails.remove({}); //delete user according to data received
}, {
url: "/testing/delUser", //url where third party will call the function
getArgsFromRequest: function (request) {
// Let's say we want this function to accept a form-encoded request
// with fields named `a` and `b`.
console.log('received : ' + JSON.stringify(request.body) );
var content = request.body;
// Since form enconding doesn't distinguish numbers and strings, we need
// to parse it manually
return [content.a, content.b];
}
})
How to access the function, delUser from a thrid party? I also need to add authentication at a later stage.
Personnally, I use this :
simple:rest
simple:json-routes
simple:rest-accounts-password
I find it easier to implement.
even iron:router comes with server side routes where you can build your own functions and api calls.
http://iron-meteor.github.io/iron-router/#restful-routes
Sample (Server side code) :
Router.map(function () {
this.route("api", {path: "/api/:paramsYouNeed",
where: "server",
action: function(){
this.response.writeHead(200, {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'
});
if (this.request.method == 'POST') {
var response;
//do whatever you want to do
this.response.end(response);
}
}
});
The other user can call this by making a http.post request to the above url (http:www.a****a.com/api/params)
The easiest way to do this is use the restivus package.
https://atmospherejs.com/nimble/restivus
Restivus makes building REST APIs in Meteor 0.9.0+ easier than ever
before! The package is inspired by RestStop2 and Collection API, and
is built on top of Simple JSON Routes to provide:
A simple interface for creating REST APIs
Easy setup of CRUD endpoints for Mongo Collections
User authentication via the API
Optional login and logout endpoints
Access to this.user in authenticated endpoints
Custom authentication if needed
Role permissions for limiting access to specific endpoints
Works alongside the alanning:roles package - Meteor's accepted role permission package
Question: How do I create a subpanel record through the SugarCRM rest api endpoint for accounts?
Steps taken so far:
I've added a new package called, "transactionHistory" with a module named, "InvoiceHistory" using the SugarCRM studio.
I added a One to Many relationship to the Accounts module using studio.
I'm using NetSuite to push new invoices to the new module's record via the subpanel "create" option. Here's the code I'm using:
function createSugarTransaction(transaction, token) {
var url = 'https://crm.techsoft3d.com/rest/v10/Accounts/' + transaction.customer;
var headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"OAuth-Token": token
};
var now = (new Date()).toISOString();
var body = {transactionHistory_InvoiceHistory:
{
create: [{
name: transaction.docId,
transaction_date_c: transaction.date,
invoice_status_c: transaction.status,
due_date_c: transaction.duedate,
total_amount_c: transaction.total,
amount_due_c: transaction.remaining,
start_date_c: transaction.startdate,
end_date_c: transaction.enddate
}]
}
};
var response = nlapiRequestURL(url, JSON.stringify(body), headers, 'PUT');
return response;
}
The transaction object has been validated and the json object within the create: [] array has matching sugar fields (key) with the corresponding transaction object values.
When making the API call to sugar I'm successfully authenticated and have access to the custom module and accounts - so no problem there. However, when the call is returned to response it's showing the following error:
{"error":"no_method","error_message":"Could not find a route with 1 elements"}
I'm unsure of what else is needed in order for the record to be created. According to sugar's help documentation and developer community this should work. I'm using the basic information provided by sugarcrm support portal:
http://support.sugarcrm.com/Documentation/Sugar_Developer/Sugar_Developer_Guide_7.6/API/Web_Services/Examples/v10/module_POST/
According to other blog posts within the developer community, it should be as simple as adding the subpanel name, followed by an array of fields under the "create" object... similar to this:
var requestBody = { package_module:create[{name:value}]};
My initial thinking of what's wrong is:
1. my package_module name isn't correct, but I'm unable to find it anywhere within the applicaiton or help documentation.
2. the request body isn't formatted properly, even though it's structure was copied from this article https://developer.sugarcrm.com/2014/02/28/sugarcrm-cookbook2/
Any help would be appreciated.
try the createRelatedRecord api endpoint
type {sugarurl}/rest/v10/help to see a list of endpoints to look through, most of which have documentation and examples
https://crm.techsoft3d.com/rest/v10/help
your API url should have the name of the link (relationship) you want, in addition to the values in the POST payload
https://crm.techsoft3d.com/rest/v10/Accounts/{transaction.customer}/link/accounts_transactionhistory (or whatever your link's name is)
per the documentation for this endpoint, you just specify the field values in the payload
{
"first_name":"Bill",
"last_name":"Edwards"
}
For the past 3 years we have used HTML/Js only with Firebase but now we are using Unity as well.
The current Unity/Firebase only works on Android/iOS when deployed and 99% of our work is on the windows store.
I've actually got a pretty decent Unity/Firebase codebase going but it requires me to use a full App Secret.
All the other libraries expose a method to login with Email/Password but the REST API only allows the use of a token or your app secret that it then states is ill advised to put into your client; I guess the thinking is if you're using a different library that you'll have your own auth/user method which we don't...
Now, I've pulled apart the web version and got this:
https://auth.firebase.com/v2/<myfirebase>/auth/password?&email=dennis%40<mysite>&password=<mypassword>v=js-2.2.9&transport=json&suppress_status_codes=true
So there IS an endpoint that I can send stuff to and I've tested it inside unity with good results.
Obviously the URL isn't guaranteed to stay working but I'm wondering if there is any reason NOT to use this?
Also, Why not just expose this endpoint in the official REST API?
As I understand it, that URL will continue to work for your Legacy Firebase project. You will have to do the same sort of reverse engineering if you want to update to the new Firebase 3.0 API. However, if you are still using a legacy Firebase project -- I encourage you to take a look at this. It has not been updated to work with Firebase 3.0 -- so I needed to do something similar to what you did to allow login to the new API.
I was able to do this with the new API using C# as follows (where FirebaseManager is a Singleton I wrote for Global variables and functions to write and read from/to the DB :
Hashtable loginData = new Hashtable();
loginData.Add ("email", <EMAIL-GOES-HERE>);
loginData.Add ("password", <PASSWORD-GOES-HERE>);
loginData.Add ("returnSecureToken", true);
UnityHTTP.Request loginRequest = new UnityHTTP.Request ("post",
"https://www.googleapis.com/identitytoolkit/v3/relyingparty/verifyPassword?key="
+ <YOUR-PROJECT-API-KEY-GOES-HERE>, loginData);
loginRequest.Send ((request) => {
Hashtable jsonResponse = (Hashtable)JSON.JsonDecode(request.response.Text);
if (jsonResponse == null) {
DisplayErrorMessage("Error logging in. Server returned null or malformed response");
}
FirebaseManager.Instance.idToken = (string)jsonResponse["idToken"]; // This is your auth token
FirebaseManager.Instance.uid = (string)jsonResponse["localId"]; // this is your "uid"
});
// I have a list of users in my db keyed by the "uid" -- I access them like this
UnityHTTP.Request fullnameRequest = new UnityHTTP.Request ("get",
<YOUR-DATABASE-ROOT-URL-HERE>
+ "/users/" + FirebaseManager.Instance.uid + ".json?auth=" + FirebaseManager.Instance.idToken);
fullnameRequest.Send ((request) => {
Debug.Log(request.response.Text);
Hashtable jsonResponse = (Hashtable)JSON.JsonDecode(request.response.Text);
if (jsonResponse == null) {
DisplayErrorMessage("Error getting user info. Server returned null or malformed response");
}
FirebaseManager.Instance.fullname = (string)jsonResponse["fullname"];
FirebaseManager.Instance.groupId = (string)jsonResponse["group"]; // just storing this in memory
});
So I don't think there is any harm in using the URL, just make sure you budget time for more work when things change.
I have been trying to set up a sample AngularJS app with webMethods Integration Server on the backend. Using $resource, I can easily pull normal JSON files and manipulate the data within the file. However, the goal is that I want to create services in webMethods Designer and call them from AngularJS using $resource to display the data in my app. The problem is that from AngularJS I cannot extract the data I need from the service that I'm creating in Designer. In Designer I can use (in WMPublic) documentToJSONString, and output something like:
jsonString {"id":"1", "name":"Dan", "quantity":"3"}
But I cannot extract the data because this is not a pure JSON string. Does anyone know how to (1) extract the JSON string output data using AnularJS or (2) output a JSON document from Designer? I am calling a REST service; something to the effect of
http://localhost:2222/rest/Get/getOrderData
from my services.js file in AngularJS.
Here is my services.js file:
/* Services */
var orderServices = angular.module('orderServices', ['ngResource']);
orderServices.factory('Order', ['$resource',
function($resource){
return $resource('http://localhost:2222/rest/REST/getOrderData', {}, {
query: {method:'GET', isArray:true}
});
}]);
Then, in my app, I want to use an ng-repeat to call things like {{order.id}}, {{order.name}} etc. Is anyone good with webMethods and Angular or done this before?
To force the response that you want, I would have used the service
pub.flow:setResponse mapping the jsonString to it's string parameter and probably hardcoded (eww!) the contentType parameter to 'application/json'
You may also need to use the service pub.flow:setResponseCode to set the response code.
They would be the last services in getOrderData
I would have invoked it using the below (where namespace is the folder structure in designer)
http://localhost:2222/invoke/namespace:getOrderData
The above applies to Integration Server V8 and it looks like you're using V9 since some of the services that you mention didn't exist in V8. This would also apply to a normal flow service, not a specific REST one (assuming they exist in V9).