refman.rtf fails to use equation from '*.md' in doxygen - doxygen

I use '.md' to generate '(index).html' and '(refman*).rtf' documentation with doxygen 1.8.14.
The mathematical equation in '*.md' gives a correct equation in html output but not in the file 'refman.rtf'. The other theoretical parts like paragraph and other stuff work well between *.md and rtf output.
I guess *.rtf is not recognizing the equation part of the *.md document.
Does the RTF generation through doxygen read the *.md files?
Do I need to change any tag to make *.md work with rtf output?

Not only for markdown but also for "normal" doxygen input formulas do not work.
From the documentation:
Doxygen allows you to put LATEX formulas in the output (this works
only for the HTML and LATEX output, not for the RTF nor for the man
page output).
A workaround workflow, at the moment for non inline formulas, is to do something like:
Create an image with the formula e.g in a dummy doxygen run where one does not use MATHJAX, this will result in an image with a name like: 'form_0.png'.
In the code one has to place an if construct like:
\if rtf_run
\image rtf form_0.png
\else
\f... with the formula
\endif
One now has to run doxygen twice:
once for the output without rtf, i.e. without setting rtf_run in ENABLED_SECTIONS
once for rtf output by setting rtf_run in ENABLED_SECTIONS
EDIT June 5, 2018: I've just pushed a proposed patch to github pull request 756. Here the formulas are rendered as png images and included in the RTF documentation.
EDIT: 2018/06/10: The push request has been integrated in the master version on github.

Related

Using Pandoc to read Docx, to capture contents of a docx textbox

When I use Pandoc to read a docx file, it ignores textboxes.They do not seem to be copied to the intermediary format.
How can I make pandoc read the textbox into the intermediary format, so that I can write a filter to include it in the output?
I'm the maintainer of the docx reader in pandoc. I don't think it currently deals with text boxes -- and I'm not sure there's an elegant way to represent them in pandoc's intermediate format. But if you post an issue on pandoc's github issue tracker, along with a sample docx file, I'll take a look and see if it's possible to add it to the reader.

asciidoc: is there a way to create an anchor that will be visible in libreoffice writer?

Tl;dr;
What is the correct way to create an anchor in docbook? and is there a way that will make the anchor visible in writer?
Background
I am trying to split up documentation that was previously in single open office documents into smaller asciidoc documents which are both included in the main open office document and also converted to either or both of html & pdf.
I have this mostly working. I use asciidoctor to create html. asciidoctor-pdf to create pdf and a combination of asciidoctor and pandoc to create .odt files. I also tried the python implementation of asciidoc but found the interface less useable.
Round tripping between asciidoc and odt is obviously not possible. This is sort of a fusion where the master document is word processed but pieces of content that can be produced independently (think man pages - in fact that is one of several use cases) are included.
asciidoc to html:
asciidoctor -b html5 foo.adoc -o foo.html
asciidoc to pdf:
asciidoctor-pdf -b pdf foo.adoc -o foo.pdf
asciidoc to odt
asciidoctor -b docbook foo.adoc -o foo.docbook
pandoc --base-header-level=3 -V date:"" -V title:"" -f docbook foo.docbook -o foo.odt
With pandoc I have to nullify the date and title and set the header-level as desired for the section to be inserted as an extra complication.
I insert the resulting .odt into the main document using insert section inside open office.
Note that the main document is not a master document as I could not find a way of creating a master document without also automatically splitting the file on h1 boundaries.
I have two main problems to resolve with this set-up. I would like to add headings in the asciidoc document as cross references and also create entries for them in the alphabetical index (actually the first heading would be suffcient). Is there a way to do this?
Index markers in asciidoc do not result in entries in .odt file being created.
I am able to cross reference content in the inserted section using "insert reference/heading" and referencing the uniquely named header. However, whenever I use "update all" these cross references are invalidated. They are shown as "Error: Reference source not found".
[On a separate note I would also like a way to find broken cross references automatically]
I am currently using libreoffice - Version: 4.3.7.2
I am not adverse to switching version or flavours (i.e. apache) if one behaves better than the other.
I'm not sure if the answer is in the asciidoc or docbook parts of the chain. I would accept an answer which inserts a index entry at the start of the inserted section (top of the .adoc/docbook file) automatically.
I am also open to changing my toolchain to something that will work.
For example I tried the asciidoc-odt backend and fell foul of https://github.com/dagwieers/asciidoc-odf/issues/47 which does not inspire confidence.
Using asciidoc-odt I avoid the need to create an intermediate docbook file. However, I still can't get the anchor to appear.
I can get a macro to create an anchor but at present I haven't figured out how to run the macro from the command line.
To create an anchor in DocBook, make an inline anchor in the .adoc file. For example, giving this to asciidoctor:
[[X1]]Section1
---------------
produced this:
<title>
<anchor xml:id="X1" xreflabel="[X1]"/>
Section1
</title>
Conversely, putting this on separate lines did not create an anchor tag in my test:
[[X1]]
Section 1
Now for some bad news. From the Pandoc User's Guide:
Internal links are currently supported for HTML formats (including HTML slide shows and EPUB), LaTeX, and ConTeXt.
I interpret this to mean that currently, Pandoc does not create internal links in Writer. When I tried it, the link was ignored.
Note: It looks like I did not answer all of your questions. If you want to ask more about LibreOffice cross references and headings (the big bold paragraph towards the end of the question), maybe you could make a separate question just for that part.

Include *prewritten* documentation in Doxygen

To distinguish this question from Doxygen: Adding a custom link under the "Related Pages" section which has an accepted answer that is not a real answer to the question, I specifically add prewritten to the question.
What I want:
Write one document tex file (without preamble, since this file will be \input-ed into a full document)
Import the document into Doxygen's HTML output.
Using Doxygen to produce tex file will probably not work, since it does too much layout work [This holds for its HTML output too like empty table rows 2015]. If Doxygen takes some other input that can easily be transformed into LaTeX, that will do.
You can easily add an already existing Latex file to your doxygen documentation using \latexonly\input{yourfile}\endlatexonly.
I would assume you put it e.g. under a doxygen \page.

how can I display knitR markdown in a pandoc rendered pdf

I wish to show the knitR code in the final PDF together with its execution result.
I did not find yet a working way to fence "tripple-backticks"{r}..."tripple-backticks" blocks in the knitR code and see them as-is in the final PDF.
The backticks get interpreted whatever I do.
This is for tutorial purpose so that people see how to write knitR markdown. The use of html "pre" tags around the block of code leads to removal of the code.
for instance I wish to see this example fully first and then the result thereof
adding 4 spaces before each line like here does not work in RStudio and knit HTML fails
```{r test-haskell, engine='haskell', engine.path='ghc', cache=TRUE}
[x | x <- [1..10], odd x]
```
follow-up addition
I include here some RStudio Rmd code that leads to unexpected PDF content
in the pdf, the pre-code block simply disappeared.
The only fix I found is to invent a fake tag 'rmd' to fence the pieces of markdown I wish to keep as-is. I suspect this is a pandoc issue rather than knitr, unless there is a better way to fence code in knitr. The code I wish to keep can be any of bash, perl, R, or any other manguage used to process the data in the knitr tutorial.
my pandoc command was:
pandoc --variable=geometry:'top=1.5cm, bottom=1.5cm, left=2cm,
right=1cm' --variable=papersize:'a4paper' --number-sections
--table-of-contents --template=default.latex --highlight-style tango testrmd.md -o testrmd.pdf
Can it come from the template I used (default.latex)? It is the only template I found that meets my needs for vignette-like output. Same about 'tango' which is the only coloring scheme that shows some light background in code blocks.
As you see from the screenshots above I am a new-bee here (both in markdown and latex). Thanks for any help

How to show math equations in general github's markdown(not github's blog)

After investigating, I've found mathjax can do this. But when I write some example in my markdown file, it doesn't show the correct equations:
I have added this in the head of markdown file:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js?config=default"></script>
And type the mathjax statement:
\(E=mc^2\),$$x_{1,2} = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2b}.$$
But github shows nothing for the math symbols! Please help me, thanks!
Tell me how to show math symbols in github markdown pages.
But github show nothing for the math symbols! please help me, thanks!
GitHub markdown parsing is performed by the SunDown (ex libUpSkirt) library.
The motto of the library is "Standards compliant, fast, secure markdown processing library in C". The important word being "secure" there, considering your question :).
Indeed, allowing javascript to be executed would be a bit off of the MarkDown standard text-to-HTML contract.
Moreover, everything that looks like a HTML tag is either escaped or stripped out.
Tell me how to show math symbols in general github markdown.
Your best bet would be to find a website similar to yuml.me which can generate on-the-fly images from by parsing the provided URL querystring.
Update
I've found some sites providing users with such service: codedogs.com (no longer seems to support embedding) or iTex2Img.
You may want to try them out. Of course, others may exist and some Google-fu will help you find them.
given the following markdown syntax
![equation](http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=1%2Bsin%28mc%5E2%29&bc=White&fc=Black&im=jpg&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=)
it will display the following image
Note: In order for the image to be properly displayed, you'll have to ensure the querystring part of the url is percent encoded. You can easily find online tools to help you with that task, such as www.url-encode-decode.com
Markdown supports inline HTML. Inline HTML can be used for both quick and simple inline equations and, with and external tool, more complex rendering.
Quick and Simple Inline
For quick and simple inline items use HTML ampersand entity codes. An example that combines this idea with subscript text in markdown is: hθ(x) = θo x + θ1x, the code for which follows.
h<sub>θ</sub>(x) = θ<sub>o</sub> x + θ<sub>1</sub>x
HTML ampersand entity codes for common math symbols can be found here. Codes for Greek letters here. An extensive list html entity codes to Unicode characters can be found here.
While this approach has limitations it works in practically all markdown and does not require any external libraries.
Complex Scalable Inline Rendering with LaTeX and Codecogs
If your needs are greater use an external LaTeX renderer like CodeCogs. Create an equation with CodeCogs editor. Choose svg for rendering and HTML for the embed code. Svg renders well on resize. HTML allows LaTeX to be easily read when you are looking at the source. Copy the embed code from the bottom of the page and paste it into your markdown.
<img src="https://latex.codecogs.com/svg.latex?\Large&space;x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}" title="\Large x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}" />
Expressed in markdown becomes
![\Large x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}](https://latex.codecogs.com/svg.latex?\Large&space;x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a})
This combines this answer and this answer.
GitHub support only somtimes worked using the above raw html syntax for readable LaTeX for me. If the above does not work for you another option is to instead choose URL Encoded rendering and use that output to manually create a link like:
![\Large x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}](https://latex.codecogs.com/svg.latex?x%3D%5Cfrac%7B-b%5Cpm%5Csqrt%7Bb%5E2-4ac%7D%7D%7B2a%7D)
This manually incorporates LaTex in the alt image text and uses an encoded URL for rendering on GitHub.
Multi-line Rendering
If you need multi-line rendering check out this answer.
It ’s 2020 now, let me summarize the progress of the mathematical formula rendering support of source code repository hosts.
GitHub & Bitbucket
GitHub and Bitbucket still do not support the rendering of mathematical formulas, whether it is the default delimiters or other.
Bitbucket Cloud / BCLOUD-11192 -- Add LaTeX Support in MarkDown Documents (BB-12552)
GitHub / markup -- Rendering math equations
GitHub / markup -- Support latex
GitHub Community Forum -- [FEATURE REQUEST] LaTeX Math in Markdown
talk.commonmark.org -- Can math formula added to the markdown
GitHub has hardly made any substantial progress in recent years.
GitLab
GitLab is already supported, but not the most common way. It uses its own delimiter.
This math is inline $`a^2+b^2=c^2`$.
This is on a separate line
```math
a^2+b^2=c^2
```
GitLab Flavored Markdown -- Math
Who supports the universal delimiters?
A Markdown parser used by Hugo
Other ways to render
Use web api to render according to A hack for showing LaTeX formulas in GitHub markdown, you can even write jupyter notebook.
readme2tex
It is officially supported since May 2022:
Render mathematical expressions in Markdown
You can now use LaTeX style syntax to render math expressions within Markdown inline (using $ delimiters) or in blocks (using $$ delimiters).
Writing expressions as blocks
To add math as a multiline block displayed separately from surrounding text, start a new line and delimit the expression with two dollar symbols $$.
**The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality**
$$\left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k \right)^2 \leq \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2 \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right)$$
Writing inline expressions
To include a math expression inline with your text, delimit the expression with a dollar symbol $.
This sentence uses `$` delimiters to show math inline: $\sqrt{3x-1}+(1+x)^2$
GitHub's math rendering capability uses MathJax; an open source, JavaScript-based display engine.
MathJax supports a wide range of LaTeX macros and a number of useful accessibility extensions.
For more information, see the MathJax documentation and the MathJax Accessibility Extensions documentation.
Some users have previously used a workaround to generate images of mathematical expressions through API requests.
Images generated this way will remain viewable, but this technique will no longer work.
Going forward, expressions should be written directly in Markdown using LaTeX syntax as described above.
For more information about authoring content with advanced formatting, see Working with advanced formatting in the GitHub documentation.
This is still beta, and criticised.
See "Math on GitHub: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" from Nico Schlömer.
The syntax introduces:
Competing Markdown and math renderer
A math block hard to interpret
As noted by brc-dd in the comments:
June 2022:
Fenced block syntax for mathematical expressions
Users can now delineate mathematical expressions using ```math fenced code block syntax in addition to the already supported delimiters.
Two dollar sign $$ delimiters are not required if this method is used.
**Here is some math!**
```math
\sqrt{3}
.```
becomes:
Read more about working with advanced formatting.
Another possibility is to rely on GitHub's own notebook renderer. This even works right here in SO.
To render x_{1,2} = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2b} use the following HTML img tag:
<img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math=x_{1,2} = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2b}">
Live Demo:
What's great about this approach is that you can edit your formula directly in Markdown and the preview will update accordingly.
You can try it out by editing this answer. (Just throw away your edits if they don't add to the answer ;))
Source: https://gist.github.com/a-rodin/fef3f543412d6e1ec5b6cf55bf197d7b
One other work-around is to use jupyter notebooks and use the markdown mode in cells to render equations.
Basic stuff seems to work perfectly, like centered equations
\begin{equation}
...
\end{equation}
or inline equations
$ \sum_{\forall i}{x_i^{2}} $
Although, one of the functions that I really wanted did not render at all in github was \mbox{}, which was a bummer. But, all in all this has been the most successful way of rendering equations on github.
If just wanted to show math in the browser for yourself, you could try the Chrome extension GitHub with MathJax. It's quite convenient.
While GitHub won't interpret the MathJax formulas, you can automatically generate a new Markdown document with the formulae replaced by images.
I suggest you look at the GitHub app TeXify:
GitHub App that looks in your pushes for files with extension *.tex.md and renders it's TeX expressions as SVG images
How it works (from the source repository):
Whenever you push TeXify will run and seach for *.tex.md files in your last commit. For each one of those it'll run readme2tex which will take LaTeX expressions enclosed between dollar signs, convert it to plain SVG images, and then save the output into a .md extension file (That means that a file named README.tex.md will be processed and the output will be saved as README.md). After that, the output file and the new SVG images are then commited and pushed back to your repo.
I use the below mentioned process to convert equations to markdown. This works very well for me. Its very simple!!
Let's say, I want to represent matrix multiplication equation
Step 1:
Get the script for your formulae from here - https://csrgxtu.github.io/2015/03/20/Writing-Mathematic-Fomulars-in-Markdown/
My example: I wanted to represent Z(i,j)=X(i,k) * Y(k, j); k=1 to n into a summation formulae.
Referencing the website, the script needed was => Z_i_j=\sum_{k=1}^{10} X_i_k * Y_k_j
Step 2:
Use URL encoder - https://www.urlencoder.org/ to convert the script to a valid url
My example:
Step 3:
Use this website to generate the image by copy-pasting the output from Step 2 in the "eq" request parameter - http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=<b><i>paste-output-here</i></b>&bc=White&fc=Black&im=jpg&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=
- My example:
http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=Z_i_j=\sum_{k=1}^{10}%20X_i_k%20*%20Y_k_j&bc=White&fc=Black&im=jpg&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=
Step 4:
Reference image using markdown syntax - ![alt text](enter url here)
- Copy this in your markdown and you are good to go:
![Z(i,j)=X(i,k) * Y(k, j); k=1 to n](http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=Z_i_j%3D%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7B10%7D%20X_i_k%20%2A%20Y_k_j&bc=White&fc=Black&im=jpg&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=)
Image below is the output of markdown. Hurray!!
I just released a little Chrome extension, xhub, that lets you use LaTeX math (and more) in GitHub pages.
Pros:
You don't have to set up anything in your repo, just use math in your Markdown (sytax from GitLab):
Some display math:
```math
e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0
```
and some inline math, $`a^2 + b^2 = c^2`$.
It works on light and dark backgrounds alike.
You can copy-and-paste the math
Cons:
You have to install a browser extension once.
There is good solution for your problem - use TeXify github plugin (mentioned by Tom Hale answer - but I developed his answer in given link below) - more details about this github plugin and explanation why this is good approach you can find in that answer.
I used the following in the head of mark down file
<script type="text/javascript" async
src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/MathJax.js?
config=TeX-MML-AM_CHTML"
</script>
Then typed the following mathjax statement
$$x_{1,2} = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2b}.$$
It worked for me
A "quick and dirty" solution is to maintain a standard .md file using standard TeX equations, e.g. _README.md.
When you are satisfied, pass the entire file through Pandoc to convert from standard Markdown to Markdown (Github flavour), and copy the output to README.md.
You can do this online for a quick turnaround, or install/configure Pandoc locally.
Mathcha is a sophisticated mathematics editor, but it can be used to render individual equations and save them as pure html, which you can then add to your documents as inline html OR you can save as SVG and insert as an image. https://www.mathcha.io/
You can embed your LaTeX in an image URL rendered by render.githubusercontent.com such as this one:
<img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math={x + y}">
which will render like this:
Which you'll notice is missing the + sign. To fix that you can URL encode the plus sigh as %2b or URL encode the entire equation, which will render like so:
Unfortunately this will always render in black, so you'll want to use this GitHub specific trick to render white text for users using dark mode and black text to users using light mode, by including the equation once with the #gh-light-mode-only and again with the LaTeX comand \color{white} and the #gh-dark-mode-only tag:
<img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math={x - y}#gh-light-mode-only">
<img src="https://render.githubusercontent.com/render/math?math={\color{white}x - y}#gh-dark-mode-only">
which will display this to light mode users:
and display this to dark mode users:
Now since May 2022, Github accept LATEX directly into Markdown, the only thing to do is to put the LATEX code inside $$$$ on your markdown
One more thing, you can colorize the math using the {\color{nameColor}text} on markdown
$${\color{red}\sum\limits_{\color{lightblue}i=0}^{\color{orange}n} {\color{pink}i}} = \frac{\color{pink}n!}{\color{lightblue}k!(n-k)!}$$
Example in a picture:
$$\sum\limits_{i=0}^n i^2$$ create the sum:
Regarding tex→image conversion, the tool LaTeXiT produces much higher quality output. I believe it is standard in most TeX distributions but you can certainly find it online if you don't already have it. All you need to do is put it in the TeX, drag the image to your desktop, then drag from your desktop to an image hosting site (I use imgur).
TeXify is no longer working. Check my repo readme2tex-action on how to create Github actions.
Add action.yml file to your repo at .github/workflows/action.yml.
Change branch main name if it is necessary.