I have a Single Line Text field type from a customized Work item Type that for some reason is cutting off long URL's. I am wondering if there is a character limitation. Does anyone know?
I am wondering if there is a character limitation. Does anyone know?
The answer is Yes.
The default String fields take a max of 255 characters. You could use PlainText Text field type instead of the default String field, which supports entry of a text string that can contain more than 255 Unicode characters.
You can check the document FIELD (Definition) element reference for some more details:
Hope this helps.
Is there any documentation on the limitations on zookeeper node names? I can't find anything in official documentation regarding it. In particular, I want to know:
What characters are allowed?
Can I use any character from UTF-8 (like japanese characters)?
What is the maximum limit of characters/bytes (if any) for node name?
For 1, 2: Any unicode character can be used in a path subject to the following constraints:
The null character (\u0000) cannot be part of a path name. (This causes problems with the C binding.)
The following characters can't be used because they don't display well, or render in confusing ways: \u0001 - \u001F and \u007F - \u009F.
The following characters are not allowed: \ud800 - uF8FF, \uFFF0 - uFFFF.
The . character can be used as part of another name, but . and .. cannot alone be used to indicate a node along a path, because ZooKeeper doesn't use relative paths. The following would be invalid: /a/b/./c or /a/b/../c.
The token zookeeper is reserved.
PS: The source code: PathUtils.validatePath()
For 3: In fact, there is no limit on the length of name in ZK itself, but is is recommended not using too large name (e.g., ZK store entire data in memory for efficiency)
We just added Swiftlint to our project and we want to follow all the rules but I'm not sure what's meant by 'type_body_length' warning. I'm not a native english speaker so I find it a bit confusing.
There is a rule for file length aswell so how do they differ? What falls under this definition?
type_body_length violation means that the class has too many lines in it. I dont think it counts extensions, comments or whitespace
Type name should only contain alphanumeric characters, start with an uppercase character and span between 3 and 40 characters in length.
The rules documentation linked here and above also gives examples of what would and wouldn't be accepted (Triggering & Non Triggering). - Edit suggested by #GoodSp33d, thanks
What patterns are valid in kubernetes for the names of containers and ports?
I had underscores in the names of ports and containers and got an error. Replacing the underscores with hyphens worked.
Container names and port names must conform to the RFC 1123 definition of a DNS label.
Names must be no longer than 63 characters, must start and end with a lowercase letter or number, and may contain lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens.
Expressed as a regular expression:
[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?
Here's the applicable code in GitHub for checking container names, checking port names, and defining acceptable names.
Just to have a quick reference this answer isn't valid for the port.name validation and why errors are popping up with longer than 15 char names the latest k8s specs: The container[0].port[0].name must be 15 characters or less as seen by the latest port.name validation code.
I have a regular express. It work to port name.
Expressed as a regular expression:
^(?!^[0-9]*$)^([a-z0-9]([a-z0-9]|-(?!-)){0,14}(?<!-)$)
How many characters are allowed to be in the subject line of Internet email?
I had a scan of The RFC for email but could not see specifically how long it was allowed to be.
I have a colleague that wants to programmatically validate for it.
If there is no formal limit, what is a good length in practice to suggest?
See RFC 2822, section 2.1.1 to start.
There are two limits that this
standard places on the number of
characters in a line. Each line of
characters MUST be no more than 998
characters, and SHOULD be no more than
78 characters, excluding the CRLF.
As the RFC states later, you can work around this limit (not that you should) by folding the subject over multiple lines.
Each header field is logically a
single line of characters comprising
the field name, the colon, and the
field body. For convenience however,
and to deal with the 998/78 character
limitations per line, the field body
portion of a header field can be split
into a multiple line representation;
this is called "folding". The general
rule is that wherever this standard
allows for folding white space (not
simply WSP characters), a CRLF may be
inserted before any WSP. For
example, the header field:
Subject: This is a test
can be represented as:
Subject: This
is a test
The recommendation for no more than 78 characters in the subject header sounds reasonable. No one wants to scroll to see the entire subject line, and something important might get cut off on the right.
RFC2322 states that the subject header "has no length restriction"
but to produce long headers but you need to split it across multiple lines, a process called "folding".
subject is defined as "unstructured" in RFC 5322
here's some quotes ([...] indicate stuff i omitted)
3.6.5. Informational Fields
The informational fields are all optional. The "Subject:" and
"Comments:" fields are unstructured fields as defined in section
2.2.1, [...]
2.2.1. Unstructured Header Field Bodies
Some field bodies in this specification are defined simply as
"unstructured" (which is specified in section 3.2.5 as any printable
US-ASCII characters plus white space characters) with no further
restrictions. These are referred to as unstructured field bodies.
Semantically, unstructured field bodies are simply to be treated as a
single line of characters with no further processing (except for
"folding" and "unfolding" as described in section 2.2.3).
2.2.3 [...] An unfolded header field has no length restriction and
therefore may be indeterminately long.
after some test: If you send an email to an outlook client, and the subject is >77 chars, and it needs to use "=?ISO" inside the subject (in my case because of accents) then OutLook will "cut" the subject in the middle of it and mesh it all that comes after, including body text, attaches, etc... all a mesh!
I have several examples like this one:
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Actas de la obra N=BA.20100154 (Expediente N=BA.20100182) "NUEVA RED FERROVIARIA.=
TRAMO=20BEASAIN=20OESTE(Pedido=20PC10/00123-125),=20BEASAIN".?=
To:
As you see, in the subject line it cutted on char 78 with a "=" followed by 2 or 3 line feeds, then continued with the rest of the subject baddly.
It was reported to me from several customers who all where using OutLook, other email clients deal with those subjects ok.
If you have no ISO on it, it doesn't hurt, but if you add it to your subject to be nice to RFC, then you get this surprise from OutLook. Bit if you don't add the ISOs, then iPhone email will not understand it(and attach files with names using such characters will not work on iPhones).
Limits in the context of Unicode multi-byte character capabilities
While RFC5322 defines a limit of 1000 (998 + CRLF) characters, it does so in the context of headers limited to ASCII characters only.
RFC 6532 explains how to handle multi-byte Unicode characters.
Section 3.4 ( Effects on Line Length Limits ) states:
Section 2.1.1 of [RFC5322] limits lines to 998 characters and
recommends that the lines be restricted to only 78 characters. This
specification changes the former limit to 998 octets. (Note that, in
ASCII, octets and characters are effectively the same, but this is
not true in UTF-8.) The 78-character limit remains defined in terms
of characters, not octets, since it is intended to address display
width issues, not line-length issues.
So for example, because you are limited to 998 octets, you can't have 998 smiley faces in your subject line as each emoji of this type is 4 octets.
Using PHP to demonstrate:
Run php -a for an interactive terminal.
// Multi-byte string length:
var_export(mb_strlen("\u{0001F602}",'UTF-8'));
// 1
// ASCII string length:
var_export(strlen("\u{0001F602}"));
// 4
// ASCII substring of four octet character:
var_export(substr("\u{0001F602}",0,4));
// '😂'
// ASCI substring of four octet character truncated to 3 octets, mutating character:
var_export(substr("\u{0001F602}",0,3));
// 'â–’'
I don't believe that there is a formal limit here, and I'm pretty sure there isn't any hard limit specified in the RFC either, as you found.
I think that some pretty common limitations for subject lines in general (not just e-mail) are:
80 Characters
128 Characters
256 Characters
Obviously, you want to come up with something that is reasonable. If you're writing an e-mail client, you may want to go with something like 256 characters, and obviously test thoroughly against big commercial servers out there to make sure they serve your mail correctly.
Hope this helps!
What's important is which mechanism you are using the send the email. Most modern libraries (i.e. System.Net.Mail) will hide the folding from you. You just put a very long email subject line in without (CR,LF,HTAB). If you start trying to do your own folding all bets are off. It will start reporting errors. So if you are having this issue just filter out the CR,LF,HTAB and let the library do the work for you. You can usually also set the encoding text type as a separate field. No need for iso encoding in the subject line.