I have 3 arrays. For example :
let status = [1,2,3];
let name = ['Andrey','Vasya','Petia'];
let age = [23,45,54];
Also I have array of ids for each user which I want to update .
let id_list = [2323,3434,3434]
I want to send postgres request by which I update this data in this way by one request :
UPDATE users SET status = '1' , name = 'Andrey', age = '23' WHERE id ='2323'
UPDATE users SET status = '2' , name = 'Vasya', age = '45' WHERE id ='3434'
etc .
All data I want to update in one request
First of all you must unnest your array:
WITH sample (id, name, status, age) AS (
SELECT
*
FROM
--Using unnest function
unnest(
ARRAY[2323, 3434, 3434],
ARRAY['Andrey','Vasya','Petia'],
ARRAY[1,2,3],
ARRAY[23,45,54]
)
)
--And then proceed to your update
UPDATE
users
SET status = s.status , name = s.name, age = s.age
FROM sample s
WHERE users.id = s.id;
More info about unnest function here.
Related
I would like to ask if it is possible to select again from a result set if a column contains a specific value?
For example, from the below query I want to select it as subquery and check if that subquery's first column contains both 2 and 3 result. Otherwise, no values should be return.
select e.evaluator_id, ROUND(avg(cast(e.rating_score as int))::numeric,1)::varchar, c.q_category_name
from tms.t_evaluation e
inner join tms.m_q_category c
on e.nendo=c.nendo
and e.q_category_id = c.q_category_id
and c.delete_flg = '0'
inner join tms.m_q_subcategory qs
on e.q_category_id = qs.q_category_id
and e.q_subcategory_id = qs.q_subcategory_id
and c.nendo = qs.nendo
and qs.delete_flg = '0'
where e.nendo = '2018'
and e.empl_id = 'empl05'
and e.delete_flg = '0'
and e.evaluator_id in ('2' , '3')
group by e.empl_id, e.nendo, e.q_category_id,
c.q_category_name, e.evaluator_id, e.history_no
Result contains both 2 and 3 in first column. Is this possible?
select e.evaluator_id, ROUND(avg(cast(e.rating_score as int))::numeric,1)::varchar, c.q_category_name
from tms.t_evaluation e
inner join tms.m_q_category c
on e.nendo=c.nendo
and e.q_category_id = c.q_category_id
and c.delete_flg = '0'
inner join tms.m_q_subcategory qs
on e.q_category_id = qs.q_category_id
and e.q_subcategory_id = qs.q_subcategory_id
and c.nendo = qs.nendo
and qs.delete_flg = '0'
where e.nendo = '2018'
and e.empl_id = 'empl05'
and e.delete_flg = '0'
and e.evaluator_id in (select case when evaluator_id=2 or evaluator_id=3 then evaluator_id else null from t_evaluation order by evaluator_id asc)
group by e.empl_id, e.nendo, e.q_category_id,
c.q_category_name, e.evaluator_id, e.history_no
I have query that gives me the documentid
select documentid from tbldocumentbyclient
where tbldocumentbyclient.isactive = true
and applicationid = '000116'
result:
Another query that give me the following result
SELECT documentcategory,documentcategoryid, string_agg(documentid::text, ',') as documentid
FROM tbldocumentmaster
where accounttype = 1 and usertype= 'INDIVIDUAL'
group by documentcategory,documentcategoryid
order by documentcategoryid;
result :
[![enter image description here][2]][2]
Now,Can someone please suggest me how to get CategoryName that is not associated with any documentid
For Above case my result should be following.
DP Proof - 134 not available in first result
Address Proof Permanent - row 4.. not a single id available in documenid result
Here this are the documentcategory that is not associate with any document id
I think a simple join between your two tables should do the trick. The logic here is if a document category from tbldocumentmaster really has no document IDs which match to anything in the tbldocumentbyclient table then the join should filter it off, leaving behind those categories which do match.
SELECT t1.documentcategory
FROM tbldocumentmaster t1
LEFT JOIN tbldocumentbyclient t2
ON t1.documentid = t2.documentid
WHERE t2.isactive = true AND
t2.applicationid = '000116' AND
t1.accounttype = 1 AND
t1.usertype = 'INDIVIDUAL' AND
t2.documentid IS NULL
try this:
SELECT distinct documentcategory,documentcategoryid
FROM tbldocumentmaster m
LEFT OUTER JOIN tbldocumentbyclient d on d.documentid = m.documentid
where accounttype = 1 and usertype= 'INDIVIDUAL'
and m.documentid is null
and applicationid = '000116'
group by documentcategory,documentcategoryid
order by documentcategoryid;
I have not tested but you can try this query:
SELECT documentcategory,documentcategoryid, string_agg(documentid::text, ',') as documentid
FROM tbldocumentmaster
where accounttype = 1 and usertype= 'INDIVIDUAL' and documentid not in (select documentid from tbldocumentbyclient where tbldocumentbyclient.isactive = true and applicationid = '000116')
group by documentcategory,documentcategoryid
order by documentcategoryid;
I have been trying to figure out this for a couple of days know but I can't come up with a query that gives me the correct results. The essence of the task is that I am trying to retrieve all the nodes of a graph that have children with attributes that satisfy multiple constraints. The issue I have is that a node may have multiple linked nodes and when I try to apply criteria to restrict which nodes must be returned by the query the criteria need to be imposed against sets of nodes instead of individual nodes.
Let me explain the problem in more detail through an example. Here is a sample schema of companies and locations. Each company can have multiple locations.
create class company extends V;
create property company.name STRING;
create class location extends V;
create property location.name STRING;
create property location.type INTEGER;
create property location.inactive STRING;
Let me now create a couple of records to illustrate the problem I have.
create vertex company set name = 'Company1';
create vertex location set name = 'Location1', type = 5;
create vertex location set name = 'Location2', type = 7;
create edge from (select from company where name = 'Company1') to (select from location where name in ['Location1', 'Location2']);
create vertex company set name = 'Company2';
create vertex location set name = 'Location3', type = 6;
create vertex location set name = 'Location4', type = 5, inactive = 'Y';
create edge from (select from company where name = 'Company2') to (select from location where name in ['Location3','Location4']);
I want to retrieve all companies that either don't have a location of type 5 or have a location of type 5 that is inactive (inactive = 'Y'). The query that I tried initially is shown below. It doesn't work because the $loc.type is evaluated against a collection of values instead of a individual record so the is null is not applied against the individual field 'inactive' of each location record but against the collection of values of the field 'inactive' for each parent record. I tried sub-queries, the set function, append and so on but I can't get it to work.
select from company let loc = out() where $loc.type not contains 5 or ($loc.type contains 5 and $loc.type is null)
You can try with this query:
select expand($c)
let $a = ( select expand(out) from E where out.#class = "company" and in.#class="location" and in.type = 5 and in.inactive = "Y" ),
$b = ( select from company where 5 not in out("E").type ),
$c = unionAll($a,$b)
UPDATE
I have created this graph
You can use this query
select expand($f)
let $a = ( select from E where out.#class = "company" and in.#class="location" ),
$b = ( select expand(out) from $a where in.type = 5 and in.inactive = "Y"),
$c = ( select expand(out) from $a where in.type = 5 and in.inactive is null),
$d = difference($b,$c),
$e = ( select from company where 5 not in out("E").type ),
$f = unionAll($d,$e)
Hope it helps.
Try this query:
select expand($d) from company
let $a=(select from company where out().type <> 5 and name contains $parent.current.name),
$b=(select from company where out().type contains 5 and name=$parent.current.name),
$c=(select from company where out().inactive contains "Y" and name=$parent.current.name),
$d=unionall($a,intersect($b,$c))
Hope it helps,
Regards,
Michela
im working on procedure which should transfer number of items (value #p_count) from old store to new store
SET #countOnOldStore = (SELECT "count" FROM ProductStore WHERE StoreId = #p_oldStoreId AND ProductId = #p_productID)
SET #countOnNewStore = (SELECT "count" FROM ProductStore WHERE StoreId = #p_newStoreID AND ProductId = #p_productID)
SET #ShiftedCount = #countOnOldStore - #p_count
SET #newStoreAfterShift = #countOnNewStore + #p_count
IF #ShiftedCount > 0
BEGIN
DELETE FROM ProductStore WHERE storeId = #p_oldStoreId and productID = #p_productID
INSERT INTO ProductStore (storeId,productId,"count") VALUES (#p_oldStoreId,#p_productID,#ShiftedCount)
DELETE FROM ProductStore WHERE storeId = #p_newStoreID and productID = #p_productID
INSERT INTO ProductStore (storeId,productId,"count") VALUES (#p_newStoreID,#p_productID,#newStoreAfterShift)
END
ELSE
PRINT 'ERROR'
well ... second insert is not working. I cant figure it out. It says
Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'count', table 'dbo.ProductStore'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
Can anyone see problem and explain it to me ? Its school project
It looks like your entire query should just be:
UPDATE ProductStore
SET [count] = [count] + CASE
WHEN storeId = #p_NewStoreID THEN #p_Count
ELSE -#p_Count END
WHERE
productID = #p_ProductID and
storeID in (#p_NewStoreID,#p_OldStoreID)
If either value in the following is NULL, the total will be NULL:
SET #newStoreAfterShift = #countOnNewStore + #p_count
Check both values (#countOnNewStore, #p_count) for NULL.
Looks like you are not assigning any value to #p_count, so it is NULL and so are #ShiftedCount and #newStoreAfterShift.
Table1 :
userid name address
1 venkat srinagr
2 venkatesh sainagar
Table2:
id userid lat lon
1 1 14.000 15.000
2 2 14.3526 15.3698
by passing "venkat" as parameter then need to pull all matching records and his userid,name,lat,lon.
in above table1 "venkat" contains in both rows then need to pull 2 records.how to get userid,name,lat,lon for all matching rows..
for sigle record i am able to get.but there are multiple rows how to get please tell me....
var result = from p in cxt.Table2
where p.Table1.Name.Contains(name)
select new
{
p.Users.User_Id,p.Users.Name,p.Latitude,p.Longitude
};
Im sure someone will say this is not the most effective way but this is how i would do it.
string InputString = "venkat";
var tab =(from a in db.tablea
from b in db.tableb
where a.userid == b.userid && a.name == InputString
select new
{
UserID = a.userid,
Username = a.name,
Latitude = b.lat,
Longditude = b.lon
}).FirstOrDefault();
FirstOrDefault() is only if you want to force only one output or null,
if you want a collection of some sort, then just remove it.