I know there are similar questions, but none with this exact error, so I'm hoping there is a different answer.
I'm getting the error:
[feedname] The V2 feed at 'http://domain.tld/NuGetServer/nuget/Search()?$filter=IsLatestVersion&searchTerm=''&targetFramework='net46'&includePrerelease=false&$skip=0&$top=26&semVerLevel=2.0.0' returned an unexpected status code '503 Service Unavailable'.
I recieve this failure in the Package Manager UI in Visual Studio (2017 Professional), as well as the Console in VS. I have tried clearing the NuGet caches, TFS caches, checking (and modifying, as appropriate) proxy settings for NuGet (AppData\Local), proxy settings for TFS, Internet Options proxy settings, with apparently no change in results. I also tried accessing the feed in VS 2010, and it doesn't work there as well.
Why could this be happening? It seems like a proxy-related issue, but I've tried everything that other questions mention, and to no avail.
One clue might be the following: When I access the feed URL via a browser, I get the following back:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xml:base="http://domain.tld/NuGetServer/nuget/" xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title type="text">Search</title>
<id>http://domain.tld/NuGetServer/nuget/Search</id>
<updated>2018-06-25T21:31:57Z</updated>
<author>
<name />
</author>
<link rel="self" title="Search" href="Search" />
</feed>
This is what I get when excluding the Search parameters:
<service xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2007/app" xml:base="http://domain.tld/NuGetServer/nuget/">
<workspace>
<atom:title>Default</atom:title>
<collection href="Packages">
<atom:title>Packages</atom:title>
</collection>
</workspace>
</service>
The NuGet server was configured incorrectly. I'm not exactly sure what the issue was, but once the server was re-configured to be have the default settings, and the URL in Visual Studio matched the server-configured URL, the issue was resolved.
Related
I am getting error "Error HTTP Error 500.34 - ANCM Mixed Hosting Models Not Supported" after adding
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.1</TargetFramework>
<AspNetCoreHostingModel>OutOfProcess</AspNetCoreHostingModel>
</PropertyGroup>
to my application.config.host, I was trying to resolve HTTP Error 500.35 - ANCM Multiple Hosting models not supported by adding above code snippet to application.config.host. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
This issu occured because you may have different hosting model on you web apps under the same server where you have hosted your all web apps ,so you need to change hosting model for all ur web apps to be outofprocess by adding below line
<AspNetCoreHostingModel>OutOfProcess</AspNetCoreHostingModel>
I got the same error when I changed target SDK to .Net Core 3.1.
My solution was remove hostingModel="inprocess" from aspNetCore tag in file web.config.
Sure it can be made cleaner, but at least the app works.
Hope it may help someone.
<aspNetCore processPath="dotnet" arguments=".\XXXXXXX.dll" stdoutLogEnabled="false" stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout" hostingModel="inprocess"/>
I got it resolved.
I was loking for my applicationhost.config file in the .vs folder, to start i was unble to find .vs folder in my project folder. I manually typed C:\Users\v-wauddi\Desktop\Dutch Treat\DutchTreat.vs\DutchTreat\config\applicationhost.config and i was able to get applicationhost.config, I saw an unusual entry, I fixed it by commenting that unsual entry which can be seen in the below code.
<site name="DutchTreat" id="2">
<application path="/" applicationPool="DutchTreat AppPool">
<virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="C:\Users\v-
wauddi\Desktop\Dutch Treat\DutchTreat\DutchTreat" />
</application>
//commented out section
<!--<application path="/App" applicationPool="App AppPool">
<virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="C:\Users\v-
wauddi\Desktop\Dutch Treat\DutchTreat\DutchTreat" />
</application>-->
<bindings>
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:8888:localhost" />
</bindings>
</site>
I was going mad due to this issue from last 30-40 minutes. At last I deleted the .vs folder and reopened the project.
It works like charm.
Steps:
Open your solution folder.
exit project and close visual studio.
delete the vs folder, it might be hidden, so you need to enable
hidden items as shown below :
At last reopen project, it will take some extra seconds to reconstruct the files in .vs folder.
I am not totally sure, if this question is in the right forum here, but as it is about a development environment and deploying developments I think it is save to ask.
I have a plugin for the IBM Notes client that I need to install silently in the background.
I used "CustomizeAddon.exe" to create a package and created an install.addon.xml with the following content:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ibm-portal-composite>
<domain-object name="com.ibm.rcp.installmanifest">
<object-data>
<install>
<installfeature id="Jabber4Notes" required="true">
<requirements>
<feature id="com.endava.jabber4notes.feature"
version="2.11.8.298" match="compatible"
shared="true" mergeaction="add"
url="jar:${installer.root}/updateSite.zip!/" />
<feature id="com.endava.jabber4notes.IMPFragmentFeature"
version="2.11.8.298" match="compatible"
shared="true" mergeaction="add"
url="jar:${installer.root}/updateSite.zip!/" />
</requirements>
</installfeature>
</install>
</object-data>
</domain-object>
</ibm-portal-composite>
But although I use the parameter shared="true" the plugin always installs to the workspace directory instead of the feature- directory.
How can I change this behaviour?
Make sure to have write permissions on the shared site.
If that's not the problem try to use colocation affinity to specify that the deployment site should be the same of another plugin; com.ibm.rcp.site.anchor.shared.feature is always installed on the shared site so you could add this:
colocation-affinity="com.ibm.rcp.site.anchor.shared.feature"
Here you can find more information regarding this topic: LINK
I am using Google Chrome canary Version 54.0.2830.0. Typescript files are there but those are not loading the code to debug.
Posting an answer here so that it may help others.
I was using visual studio Web API project and project settings were not allowing client the access to static files. Due to which chrome was unable to load the Typescript files and map files.
To solve this, i had to add the following line in my web.config file to allow state contents.
<system.webServer>
<staticContent>
<mimeMap fileExtension=".ts" mimeType="application/x-typescript" />
</staticContent>
</system.webServer>
I have an existing VS2012 web application that has been running fine until I added in the latest AjaxControlToolkit (7.0123). Initially, I found that the installation broke the behaviour of the UpdatePanel - whereas before I could refresh a page after an asynchronous post-back without repeating the operation I found that after installation the refresh would repeat the previous operation (I guess the post-back was no longer asynchronous).
I then noticed that, at some time in the past, I had commented out a number of the default JavaScript files that are added to a new ASP.NET Web Forms Application so I tried adding them back in. This resulted in an exception:
'MsAjaxBundle' is not a valid script name. The name must end in
'.js'.
I then tried replacing the default <asp:ScriptManager .../> with <ajaxControlToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager .../> this resulted in a new exception
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web' or one of its
dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
For sanity, I then created a fresh ASP.NET Web Forms Application (VS2012, Update 2) and ran it. No errors. Using "nuget", I then added the AjaxControlToolkit v7.0123 (the latest release). Ran the application again and I get the original exception again:
'MsAjaxBundle' is not a valid script name. The name must end in
'.js'.
Once again, I replaced <asp:ScriptManager .../> with <ajaxControlToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager .../> and once again this results in
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web' or one of its
dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
Can anybody shed any light on what else I need to do to resolve this? I can find no documentation to say anything needs to be changed manually when adding the toolkit.
Thanks,
Answer found at http://stephenwalther.com/archive/2012/09/20/september-2012-release-of-the-ajax-control-toolkit.aspx (always just after posting the question huh)
Replacing <asp:ScriptManager .../> with <ajaxControlToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager .../> is correct
Need to remove reference to MsAjaxBundle
Need to remove Assembly="System.Web" from script references
This fixes the exceptions (both in the new project and the original).
It does not however resolve the problem with the UpdatePanel no longer posting back asynchronously. I will raise this as a new question.
If you are using the April 2013 Release of the Ajax Control Toolkit see Stephen Walther's latest blog post:
http://stephenwalther.com/archive/2013/04/30/april-2013-release-of-the-ajax-control-toolkit.aspx
I was missing the new web.config settings that allow the AjaxFileUpload control to work in the new release
<configuration>
<system.web>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
<httpRuntime targetFramework="4.5" maxRequestLength="42949672" />
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="AjaxFileUploadHandler.axd" type="AjaxControlToolkit.AjaxFileUploadHandler, AjaxControlToolkit"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/>
<handlers>
<add name="AjaxFileUploadHandler" verb="*" path="AjaxFileUploadHandler.axd" type="AjaxControlToolkit.AjaxFileUploadHandler, AjaxControlToolkit"/>
</handlers>
<security>
<requestFiltering>
<requestLimits maxAllowedContentLength="4294967295"/>
</requestFiltering>
</security>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
When you see this "'MsAjaxBundle' is not a valid script name. The name must end in '.js'."
The Best thing you can do is:
Go to the site Master (Double click on it )
Search for "MsAjaxBundle" or " "
Comment this line eg. <%----%>
Save or compile your program and then run it
Thank God is working by now
I get the following error:
Recycling (Waiting for role to start... Sites are being deployed.
[2012-12-17T05:30:10Z])
Running One or more role instance is unhealthy. 1 Instance: 1
Unhealthy
i was actually trying to convert my web application to a cloud applicaton.
here is what i did:
i added a cloud project to my solutions,
i added a webrole which linked to my web app
i created an sql azure database and copied my whole structure and also the data to the db
i inserted the connection string in my webconfig and tried to run it on emulation, this worked fine
then tried to deploy it by creating a cloud service, running the builder to create the packages and uploading the packages in "staging" mode. this is where i got the errors.
i tried to create an empty cloud app and add a default webrole and load this to the cloud, this worked fine. so i figured, maybe i have something wrong in my settings of my webrole.
I checked the difference between both and i noticed that in both solutions diagnostics was enabled but the storage account was empty in my own solution, so i inserted "UseDevelopmentStorage=true" here. this didn't change anything tho. I also saw a difference in the "packages.config"
default role had:
<package id="Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ConfigurationManager" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net40" />
<package id="System.Web.Providers" version="1.1" targetFramework="net40" />
<package id="System.Web.Providers.Core" version="1.0" targetFramework="net40" />
<package id="WindowsAzure.Storage" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net40" />
mine had:
<package id="Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ConfigurationManager" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net35" />
<package id="WindowsAzure.Storage" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net35" />
i tried changing in this and uploading, didn't do anything
I am not using a worker role, i have only 1 running instance (same as default)
my application uses some authentication in global.asax where it tries to read from User.Identity.Name and compare with a user in the database (this user is inserted in the sql azure db). At first I thought this would maybe be the cause of the problem, but even if i comment out this code the application will not run on the cloud.
VM size is small, trust level = Full trust
I also saw some differences in the settings where i had remote access parameters. I tried removing all these just to exclude issues
i read something about settings references to "copy local is true", but im not sure if this will do any difference.
Any ideas because I don't really know what to do anymore
EDIT:
I modified all the references to "copy local is true" and i disabled to diagnostics just to be sure there's nothing wrong with it.
but now i get the error:
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Funny thing is, in my webconfig this is already set... And I can only find 1 webconfig.
I'm not quite sure what I'm doing wrong
"Keep recycling" almost always means that there are some exception occurred when your application was started. You might not be able to see any errors or exceptions in through the Diagnostics Montor since your exception might be occurred before you configured and started the diagnostics.
I recommend you enable the IntelliTrace option when deployment. It's very easy to do if you are using Visual Studio. Then you can retrieve the IntelliTrace result through Visual Studio and figure out what exception occurred. I strongly considered there are some references missed on azure that you need to set Copy Local = true. But you need IntelliTrace to find them.
The problem was that I had some referenced projects that had an app.config file with a string to a local database