I am getting error "Error HTTP Error 500.34 - ANCM Mixed Hosting Models Not Supported" after adding
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.1</TargetFramework>
<AspNetCoreHostingModel>OutOfProcess</AspNetCoreHostingModel>
</PropertyGroup>
to my application.config.host, I was trying to resolve HTTP Error 500.35 - ANCM Multiple Hosting models not supported by adding above code snippet to application.config.host. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
This issu occured because you may have different hosting model on you web apps under the same server where you have hosted your all web apps ,so you need to change hosting model for all ur web apps to be outofprocess by adding below line
<AspNetCoreHostingModel>OutOfProcess</AspNetCoreHostingModel>
I got the same error when I changed target SDK to .Net Core 3.1.
My solution was remove hostingModel="inprocess" from aspNetCore tag in file web.config.
Sure it can be made cleaner, but at least the app works.
Hope it may help someone.
<aspNetCore processPath="dotnet" arguments=".\XXXXXXX.dll" stdoutLogEnabled="false" stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout" hostingModel="inprocess"/>
I got it resolved.
I was loking for my applicationhost.config file in the .vs folder, to start i was unble to find .vs folder in my project folder. I manually typed C:\Users\v-wauddi\Desktop\Dutch Treat\DutchTreat.vs\DutchTreat\config\applicationhost.config and i was able to get applicationhost.config, I saw an unusual entry, I fixed it by commenting that unsual entry which can be seen in the below code.
<site name="DutchTreat" id="2">
<application path="/" applicationPool="DutchTreat AppPool">
<virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="C:\Users\v-
wauddi\Desktop\Dutch Treat\DutchTreat\DutchTreat" />
</application>
//commented out section
<!--<application path="/App" applicationPool="App AppPool">
<virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="C:\Users\v-
wauddi\Desktop\Dutch Treat\DutchTreat\DutchTreat" />
</application>-->
<bindings>
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:8888:localhost" />
</bindings>
</site>
I was going mad due to this issue from last 30-40 minutes. At last I deleted the .vs folder and reopened the project.
It works like charm.
Steps:
Open your solution folder.
exit project and close visual studio.
delete the vs folder, it might be hidden, so you need to enable
hidden items as shown below :
At last reopen project, it will take some extra seconds to reconstruct the files in .vs folder.
Related
I am using Google Chrome canary Version 54.0.2830.0. Typescript files are there but those are not loading the code to debug.
Posting an answer here so that it may help others.
I was using visual studio Web API project and project settings were not allowing client the access to static files. Due to which chrome was unable to load the Typescript files and map files.
To solve this, i had to add the following line in my web.config file to allow state contents.
<system.webServer>
<staticContent>
<mimeMap fileExtension=".ts" mimeType="application/x-typescript" />
</staticContent>
</system.webServer>
I have a file_B.jsp that is quite happily referenced to in the web.xml file
<action name="File_B" helper-class="name.of.helper.fileHelper">
<result name="default" web-page="/path/to/jsp/directory/file_B.jsp" screen-name="File B" screen-id="file_b" />
</action>
And it is safely within C:\Users\myDirectory\workspace\webusr\WebContent\WEB-INF\conf\sub\directory
[Trust me - there are several dozens of other jsp files mapped out this way :-) ]
But come runtime the browser throws up a 404.
I checked in the directories under Catalina and there is no file_B_jsp.java nor file_B_jsp.class.
Now, I know the mistake I made. I did a copy/pasta from file_A.jsp (80% of the code and structure is the same).
I did a simple test and had eclipse make a NewFile.jsp and changed web.xml to
<action name="File_B" helper-class="name.of.helper.fileHelper">
<result name="default" web-page="/path/to/jsp/directory/NewFile.jsp" screen-name="File B" screen-id="file_b" />
and sure enough the browser could find it. And there were a NewFile_jsp.java and NewFile_jsp.class inside Catalina
So I copied the code from the file_B.jsp. Deleted the file_B.jsp, had eclipse make a new file_B.jsp and pasted the code back in. Put web.xml back to pointing to the file_B.jsp. Stopped the server. Cleaned it and started it again.
But still the browser says 404, as there is still no file_B_jsp.java nor file_B_jsp.class.
I absolutely need to have file_B.jsp named "file_B.jsp". The whole system is based on this naming convention (decades old legacy at an electrical power company)
What file inside of eclipse needs to be manually edited? Or can I just make a new Tomcat server on the development machine?
It seems some inside eclipse was misaligned. Either building a new server or running yet another clean or switching out of the workspace and switching back into the workspace got eclipse to start compiling the file_B_jsp.java and file_B_jsp.class inside of Catalina.
I have an existing VS2012 web application that has been running fine until I added in the latest AjaxControlToolkit (7.0123). Initially, I found that the installation broke the behaviour of the UpdatePanel - whereas before I could refresh a page after an asynchronous post-back without repeating the operation I found that after installation the refresh would repeat the previous operation (I guess the post-back was no longer asynchronous).
I then noticed that, at some time in the past, I had commented out a number of the default JavaScript files that are added to a new ASP.NET Web Forms Application so I tried adding them back in. This resulted in an exception:
'MsAjaxBundle' is not a valid script name. The name must end in
'.js'.
I then tried replacing the default <asp:ScriptManager .../> with <ajaxControlToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager .../> this resulted in a new exception
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web' or one of its
dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
For sanity, I then created a fresh ASP.NET Web Forms Application (VS2012, Update 2) and ran it. No errors. Using "nuget", I then added the AjaxControlToolkit v7.0123 (the latest release). Ran the application again and I get the original exception again:
'MsAjaxBundle' is not a valid script name. The name must end in
'.js'.
Once again, I replaced <asp:ScriptManager .../> with <ajaxControlToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager .../> and once again this results in
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web' or one of its
dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
Can anybody shed any light on what else I need to do to resolve this? I can find no documentation to say anything needs to be changed manually when adding the toolkit.
Thanks,
Answer found at http://stephenwalther.com/archive/2012/09/20/september-2012-release-of-the-ajax-control-toolkit.aspx (always just after posting the question huh)
Replacing <asp:ScriptManager .../> with <ajaxControlToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager .../> is correct
Need to remove reference to MsAjaxBundle
Need to remove Assembly="System.Web" from script references
This fixes the exceptions (both in the new project and the original).
It does not however resolve the problem with the UpdatePanel no longer posting back asynchronously. I will raise this as a new question.
If you are using the April 2013 Release of the Ajax Control Toolkit see Stephen Walther's latest blog post:
http://stephenwalther.com/archive/2013/04/30/april-2013-release-of-the-ajax-control-toolkit.aspx
I was missing the new web.config settings that allow the AjaxFileUpload control to work in the new release
<configuration>
<system.web>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
<httpRuntime targetFramework="4.5" maxRequestLength="42949672" />
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="AjaxFileUploadHandler.axd" type="AjaxControlToolkit.AjaxFileUploadHandler, AjaxControlToolkit"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/>
<handlers>
<add name="AjaxFileUploadHandler" verb="*" path="AjaxFileUploadHandler.axd" type="AjaxControlToolkit.AjaxFileUploadHandler, AjaxControlToolkit"/>
</handlers>
<security>
<requestFiltering>
<requestLimits maxAllowedContentLength="4294967295"/>
</requestFiltering>
</security>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
When you see this "'MsAjaxBundle' is not a valid script name. The name must end in '.js'."
The Best thing you can do is:
Go to the site Master (Double click on it )
Search for "MsAjaxBundle" or " "
Comment this line eg. <%----%>
Save or compile your program and then run it
Thank God is working by now
I get the following error:
Recycling (Waiting for role to start... Sites are being deployed.
[2012-12-17T05:30:10Z])
Running One or more role instance is unhealthy. 1 Instance: 1
Unhealthy
i was actually trying to convert my web application to a cloud applicaton.
here is what i did:
i added a cloud project to my solutions,
i added a webrole which linked to my web app
i created an sql azure database and copied my whole structure and also the data to the db
i inserted the connection string in my webconfig and tried to run it on emulation, this worked fine
then tried to deploy it by creating a cloud service, running the builder to create the packages and uploading the packages in "staging" mode. this is where i got the errors.
i tried to create an empty cloud app and add a default webrole and load this to the cloud, this worked fine. so i figured, maybe i have something wrong in my settings of my webrole.
I checked the difference between both and i noticed that in both solutions diagnostics was enabled but the storage account was empty in my own solution, so i inserted "UseDevelopmentStorage=true" here. this didn't change anything tho. I also saw a difference in the "packages.config"
default role had:
<package id="Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ConfigurationManager" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net40" />
<package id="System.Web.Providers" version="1.1" targetFramework="net40" />
<package id="System.Web.Providers.Core" version="1.0" targetFramework="net40" />
<package id="WindowsAzure.Storage" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net40" />
mine had:
<package id="Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ConfigurationManager" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net35" />
<package id="WindowsAzure.Storage" version="1.7.0.0" targetFramework="net35" />
i tried changing in this and uploading, didn't do anything
I am not using a worker role, i have only 1 running instance (same as default)
my application uses some authentication in global.asax where it tries to read from User.Identity.Name and compare with a user in the database (this user is inserted in the sql azure db). At first I thought this would maybe be the cause of the problem, but even if i comment out this code the application will not run on the cloud.
VM size is small, trust level = Full trust
I also saw some differences in the settings where i had remote access parameters. I tried removing all these just to exclude issues
i read something about settings references to "copy local is true", but im not sure if this will do any difference.
Any ideas because I don't really know what to do anymore
EDIT:
I modified all the references to "copy local is true" and i disabled to diagnostics just to be sure there's nothing wrong with it.
but now i get the error:
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Funny thing is, in my webconfig this is already set... And I can only find 1 webconfig.
I'm not quite sure what I'm doing wrong
"Keep recycling" almost always means that there are some exception occurred when your application was started. You might not be able to see any errors or exceptions in through the Diagnostics Montor since your exception might be occurred before you configured and started the diagnostics.
I recommend you enable the IntelliTrace option when deployment. It's very easy to do if you are using Visual Studio. Then you can retrieve the IntelliTrace result through Visual Studio and figure out what exception occurred. I strongly considered there are some references missed on azure that you need to set Copy Local = true. But you need IntelliTrace to find them.
The problem was that I had some referenced projects that had an app.config file with a string to a local database
I have some Crystal Reports (V10) in an application (.NET 1.1) I inherited that is deployed in four "identical" environments. In three of the environments, they are working fine. In the fourth, the chart graphics are not visible in the web viewer. They are visible if you export the reports.
The IT guys swear everything is exactly the same in all four environments and have kicked the problem back to me to solve. I'm not sure how I'm going to do that since I can't get to the servers to check anything for myself. But I don't see how this can NOT be an environment issue.
It seems to me that Crystal has the necessary permissions to write the file and to retrieve it to render the export versions of the report, but the ASP WP can't access the graphic file when the page is rendered.
Thanks for any suggestions you might have to help me!
RESOLUTION
From the IT guys: "We had to change the “Execute Permissions” on the CrystalReportsViewer10 folder within IIS from “Scripts only” to “Scripts and executables”. All of the other sites have only “Scripts Only” and they’re fine."
I could resolve this issue in dev enviroment adding next keys (handlers) to web.config:
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<add name="CrystalImageHandler.aspx_GET" verb="GET" path="CrystalImageHandler.aspx" type="CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalImageHandler, CrystalDecisions.Web, Version=13.0.2000.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304" preCondition="integratedMode"/>
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="GET" path="CrystalImageHandler.aspx" type="CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalImageHandler, CrystalDecisions.Web, Version=13.0.2000.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
There needs to be an IIS virtual directory called something like "CrystalReportViewers115". I think that the exact name changes between versions. This needs to be visible to your ASP.NET user. Start looking at the environments that work and see if they have this virtual directory installed, and compare it to the one on the failing environment. As another check, you should be able to enter in the URL for the images into a browser and see them. To find out the URL, right click on the picture and select "Properties". For example:
http://localhost/crystalreportviewers/images/toolbar/export.gif
You should see the picture when you browse directly to the URL.
Go to Start->Programs->Microsoft Visualstudio 2008->Visual Studio Tools->Visual Studio 2008 Command Prompt
and type
aspnet_regiis -c
This will automatically copied the corresponding files...
Add the aspnet_client folder in the source folder of the site. Example:
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\myapplication\aspnet_client\system_web\4_0_30319\CrystalReportWebFormViewer4
I recently experienced this very issue: although my resolution was a little different:
I tried setting the handler in the web.config but that didn't fix it.
I tried setting scripts & executables in IIS but that didn't fix it.
Once I went into the C:\Program Files\Common Files\Crystal Decisions\2.5\crystalreportviewers10 folder and turned off custom errors I could see the error was coming from an access denied issue on C:\Windows\Temp\
The solution was then to not and handlers or alter IIS to run scripts and executables, it was to allow the Network Service to read permission on C:\Windows\Temp\
EDIT:
Think I've found another solution which doesn't require permission changes... just set a virtual directory for aspnet_client; the level at which you select this will very much depend on your IIS layout.