I have a jsonb object as follows, where I need to add or remove items from the nested array:
{
"GROUP_ONE": [
"FIRST_ITEM",
"SECOND_ITEM"
],
"GROUP_TWO": [
"FIRST_ITEM",
"SECOND_ITEM"
]
}
An update function passes:
x_id (table)
x_group (jsonb top level)
x_item (item to add or remove items from the nested arrays)
x_is_add (add or remove).
The group may or may not exist.
Is this code optimal or is there a better way to use jsonb functions to achieve this?
update table set list = (
case
when not x_is_add then jsonb_set(list, '{' || x_group || '}', (list->x_group) - x_item)
when x_is_add and list->x_group is null then list || jsonb_build_object(x_group, array[x_item])
when x_is_add and not list->x_group ? x_item then jsonb_set(list, '{' || x_group || '}', list->x_group || jsonb_build_array(x_item))
end)
where id = x_id
I need to make changes to an SP which has a bunch of complex XML functions and what not
Declare ResultCsr2 Cursor For
WITH
MDI_BOM_COMP(PROD_ID,SITE_ID, xml ) AS (
SELECT TC401F.T41PID,TC401F.T41SID,
XMLSERIALIZE(
XMLAGG(
XMLELEMENT( NAME "MDI_BOM_COMP",
XMLFOREST(
trim(TC401F.T41CTY) AS COMPONENT_TYPE,
TC401F.T41LNO AS COMP_NUM,
trim(TC401F.T41CTO) AS CTRY_OF_ORIGIN,
trim(TC401F.T41DSC) AS DESCRIPTION,
TC401F.T41EFR AS EFFECTIVE_FROM,
TC401F.T41EFT AS EFFECTIVE_TO,
trim(TC401F.T41MID) AS MANUFACTURER_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41MOC) AS MANUFACTURER_ORG_CODE,
trim(TC401F.T41CNO) AS PROD_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41POC) AS PROD_ORG_CODE,
TC401F.T41QPR AS QTY_PER,
trim(TC401F.T41SBI) AS SUB_BOM_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41SBO) AS SUB_BOM_ORG_CODE, --ADB01
trim(TC401F.T41VID) AS SUPPLIER_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41SOC) AS SUPPLIER_ORG_CODE,
TC401F.T41UCT AS UNIT_COST
)
)
) AS CLOB(1M)
)
FROM TC401F TC401F
GROUP BY T41PID,T41SID
)
SELECT
RowNum, '<BOM_INBOUND>' ||
XMLSERIALIZE (
XMLELEMENT(NAME "INTEGRATION_MESSAGE_CONTROL",
XMLFOREST(
'FULL_UPDATE' as ACTION,
'POLARIS' as COMPANY_CODE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40OCD) as ORG_CODE,
'5' as PRIORITY,
'INBOUND_ENTITY_INTEGRATION' as MESSAGE_TYPE,
'POLARIS_INTEGRATION' as USERID,
'TA' as RECEIVER,
HEX(Generate_Unique()) as SOURCE_SYSTEM_TOKEN
),
XMLELEMENT(NAME "BUS_KEY",
XMLFOREST(
TRIM(TC400F.T40BID) as BOM_ID,
TRIM(TC400F.T40OCD) as ORG_CODE
)
)
) AS VARCHAR(1000)
)
|| '<MDI_BOM>' ||
XMLSERIALIZE (
XMLFOREST(
TRIM(TC400F.T40ATP) AS ASSEMBLY_TYPE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40BID) AS BOM_ID,
TRIM(TC400F.T40CCD) AS CURRENCY_CODE,
TC400F.T40DPC AS DIRECT_PROCESSING_COST,
TC400F.T40EFD AS EFFECTIVE_FROM,
TC400F.T40EFT AS EFFECTIVE_TO,
TRIM(TC400F.T40MID) AS MANUFACTURER_ID,
TRIM(TC400F.T40MOC) AS MANUFACTURER_ORG_CODE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40OCD) AS ORG_CODE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40PRF) AS PROD_FAMILY,
TRIM(TC400F.T40PID) AS PROD_ID,
TRIM(TC400F.T40POC) AS PROD_ORG_CODE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40ISA) AS IS_ACTIVE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40VID) AS SUPPLIER_ID,
TRIM(TC400F.T40SOC) AS SUPPLIER_ORG_CODE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40PSF) AS PROD_SUB_FAMILY,
CASE TRIM(TC400F.T40PML)
WHEN '' THEN TRIM(TC400F.T40PML)
ELSE TRIM(TC400F.T40PML) || '~' || TRIM(TC403F.T43MDD)
END AS PROD_MODEL
) AS VARCHAR(3000)
)
|| IFNULL(MBC.xml, '') ||
XMLSERIALIZE (
XMLFOREST(
XMLFOREST(
TRIM(TC400F.T40CCD) AS CURRENCY_CODE,
TC400F.T40PRI AS PRICE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40PTY) AS PRICE_TYPE
) AS MDI_BOM_PRICE,
XMLFOREST(
TRIM(TC400F.T40CCD) AS CURRENCY_CODE,
TRIM(TC400F.T40PRI) AS PRICE,
'TRANSACTION_VALUE' AS PRICE_TYPE
) AS MDI_BOM_PRICE,
XMLFOREST(
TRIM(TC400F.T40INA) AS INCLUDE_IN_AVERAGING
) AS MDI_BOM_IMPL_BOM_PROD_FAMILY_AUTOMOBILES
) AS VARCHAR(3000)
)
|| '</MDI_BOM>' ||
'</BOM_INBOUND>' XML
FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
ORDER BY T40STS
,T40SID
,T40BID
) AS RowNum
,t.*
FROM TC400F t
) TC400F
LEFT OUTER JOIN MDI_BOM_COMP MBC
ON TC400F.T40SID = MBC.SITE_ID
AND TC400F.T40PID = MBC.PROD_ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN TC403F TC403F
ON TC400F.T40PML <> ''
AND TC400F.T40PML = TC403F.T43MDL
WHERE TC400F.T40STS = '10'
AND TC400F.RowNUM BETWEEN
(P_STARTROW + (P_PAGENOS - 1) * P_NBROFRCDS)
AND (P_STARTROW + (P_PAGENOS - 1) * P_NBROFRCDS +
P_NBROFRCDS - 1);
Given above is a cursor declaration in the SP code which I am struggling to understand. The very first WITH itself seems to be mysterious. I have used it along with temporary table names but this is the first time, Im seeing something of this sort which seems to be an SP or UDF? Can someone please guide me on how to understand and make sense out of all this?
Adding further to the question, the actual requirement here is to arrange the data in the XML such a way that that those records which have TC401F.T41SBI field populated should appear in the beginning of the XML output..
This field is being selected as below in the code:
trim(TC401F.T41SBI) AS SUB_BOM_ID. If this field is non-blank, this should appear first in the XML and any records with this field value Blank should appear only after. What would be the best approach to do this? Using ORDER BY in any way does not really seem to help as the XML is actually created through some functions and ordering by does not affect how the items are arranged within the XML. One approach I could think of was using a where clause where TC401F.T41SBI <> '' first then append those records where TC401F.T41SBI = ''
Best I can do is help with the CTE.
WITH
MDI_BOM_COMP(PROD_ID,SITE_ID, xml ) AS (
SELECT TC401F.T41PID,TC401F.T41SID,
This just generates a table named MDI_BOM_COMP with three columns named PROD_ID, SITE_ID, and XML. The table will have one record for each PROD_ID, SITE_ID, and the contents of XML will be an XML snippet with all the components for that product and site.
Now the XML part can be a bit confusing, but if we break it down into it's scalar and aggregate components, we can make it a bit more understandable.
First ignore the grouping. so the CTE retrieves each row in TC401F. XMLELEMENT and XMLFORREST are scalar functions. XMLELEMENT creates a single XML element The tag is the first parameter, and the content of the element is the second in the above example. XMLFORREST is like a bunch of XMLELEMENTs concatenated together.
XMLSERIALIZE(
XMLAGG(
XMLELEMENT( NAME "MDI_BOM_COMP",
XMLFOREST(
trim(TC401F.T41CTY) AS COMPONENT_TYPE,
TC401F.T41LNO AS COMP_NUM,
trim(TC401F.T41CTO) AS CTRY_OF_ORIGIN,
trim(TC401F.T41DSC) AS DESCRIPTION,
TC401F.T41EFR AS EFFECTIVE_FROM,
TC401F.T41EFT AS EFFECTIVE_TO,
trim(TC401F.T41MID) AS MANUFACTURER_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41MOC) AS MANUFACTURER_ORG_CODE,
trim(TC401F.T41CNO) AS PROD_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41POC) AS PROD_ORG_CODE,
TC401F.T41QPR AS QTY_PER,
trim(TC401F.T41SBI) AS SUB_BOM_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41SBO) AS SUB_BOM_ORG_CODE, --ADB01
trim(TC401F.T41VID) AS SUPPLIER_ID,
trim(TC401F.T41SOC) AS SUPPLIER_ORG_CODE,
TC401F.T41UCT AS UNIT_COST
)
)
) AS CLOB(1M)
So in the example, for each row in the table, XMLFORREST creates a list of XML elements, one for each of COMPONENT_TYPE, COMP_NUM, CTRY_OF_ORIGIN, etc. These elements form the content of another XML element MDI_BOM_COMP which is created by XMLELEMENT.
Now for each row in the table we have selected PROD_ID, SITE_ID, and created some XML. Next we group by PROD_ID, and SITE_ID. The aggregation function XMLAGG will collect all the XML for each PROD_ID and SITE_ID, and concatenate it together.
Finally XMLSERIALIZE will convert the internal XML representation to the string format we all know and love ;)
I think I found the answer for my requirement. I had to add an order by field name after XMLELEMENT function
I have a table with an integer column. It has 12 records numbered 1000 to 1012. Remember, these are ints.
This query returns, as expected, 12 results:
select count(*) from proposals where qd_number::text like '%10%'
as does this:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "proposals" WHERE (lower(first_name) LIKE '%10%' OR qd_number::text LIKE '%10%' )
but this query returns 2 records:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "proposals" WHERE (lower(first_name) || ' ' || qd_number::text LIKE '%10%' )
which implies using || in concatenated where expressions is not equivalent to using OR. Is that correct or am I missing something else here?
You probably have nulls in first_name. For these records (lower(first_name) || ' ' || qd_number::text results in null, so you don't find the numbers any longer.
using || in concatenated where expressions is not equivalent to using ORIs that correct or am I missing something else here?
That is correct.
|| is the string concatenation operator in SQL, not the OR operator.
I've result set from query select * from personal."phoneNumbers" like this
prefix
pref |number
-----|--------
"12 "|"4589524"
"077"|"7090701"
"050"|"2561024"
But I want to return data like
(12) 4589524;(077) 7090701; (050) 2561024
How to do this with postgresql ?
You can use the string operators and functions to construct a single phone number in the format that you want:
'(' || btrim(pref) || ') ' || number
This, obviously, yields a string for each record that you process. You can then use the aggregation function string_agg() to string (no pun intended) the extended phone numbers from all the records together into one, with the appropriate separator between phone numbers:
SELECT string_agg('(' || btrim(pref) || ') ' || number, '; ') AS pref_number
FROM personal."phoneNumbers"
I am trying to simplify this query as it is going to be dynmaically generated by PHP and I would like to reduce the processing overhead (the real query will be much longer but the structure will be the same!).
SELECT title, type_name, ts_rank_cd(ARRAY[0.1,0.2,0.4,1.0],
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(title,'')), 'A')
||
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(type_name,'')), 'B')
,
to_tsquery('search & query'))
FROM TestView WHERE
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(title,'')), 'D')
||
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(type_name,'')), 'B')
##
to_tsquery('search & query');
I am looking to try to reduce the need to specify the tsquery and tsvector twice by defining something like an alias so that it does not have to be specified twice. Something like this (which fails, I am not sure if it is even close to correct!)
SELECT title, type_name, ts_rank_cd(ARRAY[0.1,0.2,0.4,1.0],
searchvector
,
searchquery
FROM TestView WHERE
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(title,'')), 'D')
||
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(type_name,'')), 'B') AS searchvector
##
to_tsquery('search & query') AS searchquery;
Is this possible or am I just stuck with generating it all twice.
For context 'TestView' is a view generated from a number of tables.
Any help much appreciated!
SELECT title,
type_name,
ts_rank_cd(ARRAY[0.1,0.2,0.4,1.0],weight,query)
FROM (
SELECT title,
type_name,
setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(title,'')), 'A')
||setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(type_name,'')), 'B') as weight,
to_tsquery('search & query') as query
FROM TestView
) t
WHERE weight ## query