Using rxjava2 (2.1.8) Observable.interval to invoke a RESTful API every 13 minutes. Its working fine if the app is running in the foreground and not working when the app is in the background. I am unable to post the entire code code due to restrictions.
Observable.interval(13, TimeUnit.Milliseconds)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(...
Really appreciate your suggestions
For long running operation your code should be executed in a Service. There are though some limitations, introduced with Android 8, that you may want to check.
However, you can schedule your task using an AmarmManager or a better alternative: [JobScheduler][2]. With the JobScheduler you can also define the criteria that need to be met for executing your tasks.
NOTE:
.interval(13, TimeUnit.Milliseconds) means one item emitted every 13 milliseconds, not minutes!
Related
I'm trying to call a function when my macOS application is in any state, including terminated. Here is what i'm trying to accomplish:
Schedule a function (much like DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter()) to run daily at a given time (let's say 9AM). I would like to add a feature to my application that allows a user to pick a time of day, and have an Alamofire POST request run at that time every day.
I have tried using a Runloop, and more recently Grand Central Dispatch:
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(wallDeadline: DispatchWallTime.now() + .seconds(60)) {
//Alamofire
}
I can easily accomplish this while the application is running with a timer, but have yet to find a way to accomplish this in the background, with the app running.
This may be pretty heavy to implement (i.e. not straightforward), but if you want a task to run even if your app is terminated, you might need to consider writing your own LaunchAgent.
The trick here would be for the agent to be able to interact with your application (retrieving or sending shared information).
I have read that "Protractor can automatically execute the next step in your test the moment the webpage finishes pending tasks, so you don’t have to worry about waiting"
But, I had to implement waiting(s) or sleeps in my test script to make them all PASS.
Can anyone help to understand this waiting.
Read At :http://www.protractortest.org/#/
Automatic Waiting:
You no longer need to add waits and sleeps to your test. Protractor can automatically execute the next step in your test the moment the webpage finishes pending tasks, so you don’t have to worry about waiting for your test and webpage to sync.
Right, I find this description as confusing as you. I think it describes the ideal world with no network delays and timeouts, no animations and layout issues.
The description originates from the following:
Protractor runs an extra command before performing any action on the
browser to ensure that the application being tested has stabilized.
This extra command is an async script which asks Angular to respond when the application is done with all timeouts and asynchronous requests, and ready for the test to resume.
Now, what does that "application is ready" statement mean? It basically means that, there are no pending requests, promises and "macro tasks" inside the Angular running application (source for angular testability).
From what I understand, this helps to cover most of the timing and waiting issues, but, if there is a pending JS code executed outside of Angular, or if there are any pending animations or other UI-related changes - this may potentially have an effect on your test stability - for instance, an element might not be yet visible or clickable, an input may not yet get enabled etc.
And, this does not actually contribute to the feedback from the end-to-end tests being stable and helpful - for example, in our project we often find ourselves adding browser.wait()s here and there to tackle occasionally failing tests. Also, here is a set of things that helped us to tackle this flakiness:
Protractor flakiness
I have a WCF Windows Workflow (4.5) Workflow Service hosted under IIS and using AppFabric 1.1. The workflow instances are long-running (up to about a week), but much of the time is spent in Delay activities.
This seemed to work fine at first, but when running multiple instances of the workflow at the same time (2+ instances causes this), some of them just never wake up once they've unloaded from memory during the Delay step. When I look at the logs, the errors I find all look like this:
System.OperationCanceledException: The execution of InstancePersistenceCommands has been canceled because the InstanceHandle was freed.
at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Activities.Dispatcher.DurableInstanceManager.WaitAndHandleStoreEventsCallback(IAsyncResult result)
Unfortunately, I'm not finding any useful information on that error message.
The SuspensionExceptionName and SuspensionReason fields in the AppFabric Persisted Instances Table show System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. But this doesn't happen inside my workflow, only outside.
Additional Info:
I'm running the activity as a Fire & Forget (receive activity, no send)
My workflow calls into other WCF services to fetch data.
I am running this on Server 2012 R2, IIS 8 (not azure)
Workflow Persistence is working. I can reset IIS, reboot... its just when I run 2 instances that it has problems.
I'm definitely not hitting any kind of throttling limits. While the workflow deals with a few MB of data, this issue happens at 2+ instances.
Any idea what might be happening here?
Edit:
I realized I found more information on how the issue operates and never added it to the question. When the delay issue happens, it operates a lot like a static variable getting written by 2 threads.
Here's a visualization:
WF1 Start ---->Do Stuff--->Sleep------------*1----->Cancelled Exception at some point
------WF 2 Start---->Do Stuff------->Sleep->Wake up---------*2------>More Stuff---->End Successfully
*1 - When WF Instance 1 Should Wake up (Same time as WF 2 wakes)
*2 - When WF Instance 2 Should have woken up (Seems to be ignored)
Before anyone asks... I got rid of every static variable, method, class in my code. Nothing is static anymore.
I've been struggling with similar issues for quite a while. I use WFW4 and I find similar errors when a workflow instance is in a long delay.
I don't know what the cause of the problem is, but I have a work around that you might find helpful.
In my case, the errors I get are from Workflow Management Service and say:
Failed to invoke service management endpoint at 'net.pipe://.svc' to activate service '/Alerts/Workflows/.xamlx'. Exception: 'Access is denied.'
These errors start happening sometime between 6 and 30 hours after the instance goes into a long delay.
I have found that if I create a new instance of the workflow when the first instance is in delay and the errors are happening, then Workflow Management Service is able to resume interacting with the first sleeping instance.
So, I made a new workflow whose sole purpose is to periodically launch and then kill instances of the workflow that contains the long delay.
It actually gets a bit more complicated to make this work. I wanted this new workflow to also go to sleep between times when it creates and kills a new instance of the first workflow. But this going to sleep causes the instance of the new workflow to suffer the same problem as the first workflow. So, I modified the new workflow so it does the following:
-- delay for some rather short period, such as 30 minutes
-- create an instance of the first workflow
-- wait a minute
-- kill the just-created instance of the first workflow
-- create a new instance of this new error-preventing workflow
-- terminate
Since having done this, I no longer get the Access is Denied error from Workflow Management Service!
Hope this helps
Turns out my first answer was not correct, but I believe this answer is right, and solves the issue ChrisG is having.
My workaround did not actually work. Took a while for the problem to resurface. 29 hours to be precise - the default time it takes for an app pool to recycle.
So for me, the solution was to make my app pool not recycle. When an app pool recycles while a workflow instance is in a delay activity, the workflowManagementService is not able to wake up the instance and throws Access is Denied errors. If you create a new instance of the workflow after the app pool has recycled, the first instance will pick up where it left off, but sometimes still has problems, which is what I believe is happening to ChrisG.
ChrisG, looking at your visualization, is it possible that an appPool is recycling during the time wf1 is sleeping? I believe that is the cause the exception. If you then launch a new wf instance after *2 has passed (and if an app pool recycle happened prior to *1), that will wake up both wf1 and wf2, but wf1 won't work properly (at least in my experience)
Also, this happens after iisresets and server reboots. To handle those, you need to use IIS7 which allows the web application (as well as the web site) which is hosting the xamlx files to autostart after an iisreset or server reboot. This option is not available in IIS6. See http://www.postseek.com/meta/991815402b369e71ce925cde47ac907d for details
Hope this helps!
We have a main ruleflow which calls 8 more rule flows (Rule1.rf to Rule8.rf) through an AND splitter. One of the rule flows - say Rules4.rf - is fired sometimes and not fired sometimes.
This is for an online application and we use jBoss. When the server is started, everything works fine. After many hours, for some requests, Rules4.rf is not fired at all and for others, its fired properly.
We even posted the same request again and again and the issue happens some times only. There is no difference in the logs between the success & failure requests, except for the logs from the Rules4.rf which missing in failued requests.
We are using drools 5.1 and java 6.
Please help me. This is creating a very big issue.
It is very difficult to figure out what might be going on without being able to look at the actual code and log. Could you by any chance create a JIRA and attach the process and if possible (a part of) an audit log that shows the issue?
Kris
I have a web application that I am adding workflow functionality to using Windows Workflow Foundation. I have based my solution around K. Scott Allen's Orders Workflow example on OdeToCode. At the start I didn't realise the significance of the caveat "if you use Delay activities with and configure active timers for the manual scheduling service, these events will happen on a background thread that is not associated with an HTTP request". I now need to use Delay activities and it doesn't work as is with his solution architecture. Has anyone come across this and found a good solution to this? The example is linked to from a lot of places but I haven't seen anyone else come across this issue and it seems like a bit of a show stopper to me.
Edit: The problem is that the results from the workflow are returned to the the web application via HttpContext. I am using the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers and this works fine for most situations because workflow events are fired from the web app and HttpContext still exists when the workflow results are returned and the web app can continue processing. When a delay activity is used processing happens on a background thread and when it tries to return results to the web app, there is no valid HttpContext (because there has been no Http Request), so further processing fails. That is, the webapp is trying to process the workflow results but there has been no http request.
I think I need to do all post Delay activity processing within the workflow rather than handing off to the web app.
Cheers.
You didn't describe the problem you are having. But maybe this is of some help.
You can use the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers and the workflow will continue on another thread. Normally this is fine because your HTTP request has already finished and it doesn't really matter.
If however you need full control the workflow runtime will let you get a handle on all loaded workflows using the GetLoadedWorkflows() function. This will return acollection of WorkflowInstance objects. usign these you can can call the GetWorkflowNextTimerExpiration() to check which is expired. If one is you can manually resume it. In this case you want to use the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers=false so you can control the last thread as well. However in most cases using useActiveTimers=true works perfectly well.