I am new to FastLane. And I'm trying to build our app. I did successfully able to export the IPA file of our app but I'm not sure which branch FastLane used to build the app. Would it use the Master branch? or would it use the branch I'm currently on (if I open the SourceTree and select a branch)?
I searched over the SO but I didn't found any information that could answer my question.
This all depends on how exactly you set up fastlane and your lanes of course, but by default fastlane and build_ios_app/build_app/gym work on the local checkout on your hard drive (so what you currently have checked out via git/Sorucetree).
You can also of course make fastlane check out a specific branch in your lane in your Fastfile by calling the appropriate action - pretty much anything is possible.
Related
I'm very new to GitHub Actions/CI/CD, and I want to know whether it is possible to automate the following scenario:
I have a local script that makes use of some APIs to download some files onto my local machine. My current status is that: I have to run the script every day to check whether the content of these files is updated or not. If some of those files got updated then I need to add those changes into a new branch and push it to a repository as a PR.
My trying: My idea is that since it's possible to compare the hash of the downloaded files to know whether any of those got updated. The next thing to do is to make this into an event to trigger some action?
If it's possible could you share some resources/tutorials about how to do it?
I tested something similar on GitHub to understand how the CI/CD GitHub actions works.
the script is based on an SQLite DataBase which is updated automatically each time (automatic git push). And it uses Github Secrets to store encrypted Tokens/Passwords.
You can find my scheduler in the follow link: https://github.com/noweh/project-marvel-memories/blob/master/.github/workflows/run-schedule.yml.
you can find more information directly in the github documentation.
Here for the Github actions: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/events-that-trigger-workflows.
And here for the Github encrypted secrets: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/encrypted-secrets#creating-encrypted-secrets-for-an-environment
I'm trying to fix up a broken Travis CI build script on a repo I was added to as a contributor. Everything works fine in the actual build, but trying to upload the build results to GitHub is broken.
The .travis.yml file contains an OAuth token which it puts into the Environment, and at the end it runs a script that retrieves this environment variable and uses it to upload the build output to GitHub. This is failing with a 401 Unauthorized error, which means the token is probably no longer valid.
I didn't write this up, and the way this works kind of bugs me. I'm not comfortable having authentication information in the repo, publicly accessible to the world, so it's just as well that this token is expired. But as I look things over, I don't see any better way to do this.
I need to do one of two things, either have the Travis build machine upload the build result to GitHub, or download the build result from Travis and upload it myself. Unfortunately, neither one seems to be a good option. No matter where I look on Travis CI's Web interface, I can't find any download link to retrieve the build results, which seems to rule out the second option. As for the first option, it doesn't appear that there's any way to perform the upload without the build machine having authentication information from the repository.
I can't be the first person to notice how problematic this is. I figure it has to be solved somehow; I'm just not sure how to fix it. Does anyone know how to resolve this?
I'm using Visual Studio Team Services to build my project which is stored in GitHub (here). The master branch contains multiple projects which make up the solution. Amongst those are a WebAPI project and a Cordova project. I need to build those using two separate build definitions in VSTS.
Previously I had set-up my build definition and used the branch filters to filter on what had been pushed to the repo. For instance:
master/src/API
This worked, but it doesn't any more. It seems as if the underlying code has changed. A filter of 'master' still works and I understand how this feature is probably meant to filter specifically on branches and maybe not on folders within the branch?
It's not a huge problem, but at this time all of my builds will trigger with every check-in, even if nothing changed in the meantime for that source code. So I'm not wondering what a good solution for this issue would be:
Put every project in it's own branch. Seems like a workaround
Some other filter option or maybe another syntax or something?
Leave it as it and don't worry about the extra builds (but that itches, you know...)
Anyone running a similar set-up?
Path filters is not supported for VSTS GitHub CI Build, it is available for Git CI Build on VSTS. You can vote this user voice: https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/330519-team-services/suggestions/15140571-enable-continuous-integration-path-filters-for-git
The workaround is as you said that put every project in its own branch.
There is an open source project (https://github.com/firebase/firebase-jobdispatcher-android), which I would like to get built using travis/circleci or another cloud ci. However, those CI's don't allow you to get to repos that are not yours.
I didn't try, but I have a hunch that I won't be able to get a webhook setup as well to get notified when those repos 'master' branch is updated.
Why not fork ? Because then I somehow need to manually\use cron server to get my forked repo updated! It loses the point of having open source repo builds...
Why do I want to build it continually? Because they do not upload their .aar output to mavencetral or jcenter and I don't want to put the .aars in my project and get it updated all the time - bloats the repo...
In any case, I don't get it - there's an open source project, the repo exists and open to everyone, pulling the data and getting webhooks doesn't compromise that repo in any way why isn't this possible ????
If I'm mistaken and web hook is possible, how can I set up a build that will end up in uploading to mavencentral (probably gradle plugin, I have an account and be happy to have a public copy there)?
(I thought of micro service, free of course of some kind + docker based ci which I can pull and build whatever, I don't mind if a build will take time).
The project that I am working on is a jQuery plugin. I have managed to get Travis CI to build a test project using Gulp/NodeJS successfully. Now I am trying to work out what workflow to use to bump the version number.
In TeamCity and MyGet there is a setting in the CI server to form a version number pattern that auto increments on each build, which can be used by the build script to update versions in the deployment files and to label the Git repo. However, in the free version of Travis CI, there doesn't seem to be an option for versioning at all.
I have read several articles on continuous deployment with Travis CI, here, here, and here, but none of them even broach the topic of versioning. Obviously, the version needs to be changed for the release. So what am I missing here?
Another problem I noted when going through the documentation is that it mentioned that Travis CI is not able to update the GitHub repository. Doesn't that basically mean it won't be able to create a Git tag?
If there is no way to version from Travis CI, then what is the typical workflow for the release process for such a plugin? Is the versioning always done manually? If so, how could there be "continuous deployment"?
Before it starts running the instructions in your .travis.yml file, Travis will set a bunch of environment variables (in the VM that is building your project) with various bits of information about your build, such as what branch is being built and so on.
You probably want one of these:
TRAVIS_BUILD_NUMBER: The number of the current build (for example, “4”).
TRAVIS_JOB_NUMBER: The number of the current job (for example, “4.1”).
But it's going to be very difficult to do anything sensible if you don't have control of the repository, because you'll need to upload a .travis.yml file into the root of your source code folder, otherwise Travis won't know what to do.
Use bumped for release versioning. When you're satisfied with the changes in master, run:
bumped release <major|minor|patch>
After you push the changes, either directly or through a release PR, you can check for the presence of new tags in Travis CI and publish the package to the registry automatically.
If you consider that every PR must end up to your enduser without thinking of the impact of such changes, then your version numbers have no meaning.
You don't give your user a way to know if it is a major change that break compatibility or a bug fix. You don't allow him to get update without worrying about backward compatibility.
Currently, the commit id is your version number.
If you want to give meaning to your version numbers then you have to think of the impact of your pull requests on the enduser (http://semver.org/). You have to choose a version number for a specific PR or a group of PR.
So basically, since you have to 'think' of a certain version number for a specific version that you want to deliver, you can't automate this process.
Release/tag creation is the way to go : )
You can accomplish this by setting up a script that would create a ~/.netrc file to access the repository. In this file you can specify something like:
machine https://github.com/xxx/yyy.git
login <blah>
And instead of putting in your credentials, you can pass an github access token. You can use the travis encrypt to register it in the .travis.yml file, and export the variable for your script's use. From there in your script, you can issue regular git commands such as:
git add <some file>
git commit -m "This is $TRAVIS_BUILD_NUMBER"
git push origin <branch>