I have this Interface property:
/**
* If enabled the log output will be printed locally in console.
* The log call line will not be overwritten unless {#link ILoggerConfig.useLoggerProcessors} is true
*/
printToConsole?: boolean;
In the generated docs it makes ILoggerConfig.useLoggerProcessors a clickable link but vscode intellisense doesn't :
The link part does not disturb me but vscode intellisense keeps the verbose {#link ILoggerConfig.useLoggerProcessors} part and when more than 2 other properties/classes/methods are referenced it is hard to read.
Can I make vscode parse the comments? I have searched for a tsdoc extension but have found none.
This is a bug as of VS Code 1.31. The following issues are tracking it:
https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/16498
https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/29617
Markdown links in JSDocs are already supported (but only to urls, not to symbols).
Related
When you run doxygen, you often get a lot of:
warning: some-thing-or-another is not documented.
For some items, you just want to fill in the documentation; but other are too trivial to document, or I just want listing without documentation.
Now, you could suppress these warnings with ///#cond and ///#endcond, but then the some-thing-or-another will be yanked out of the documentation, which is not what I wanted.
So, how can I make doxygen not warn me about certain items, while keeping the item in the documentaiton with no additional explanatory text?
A bit diving into the trick box.
Doxygen does have a command \noop but this is filtered out so it is not seen as documentation.
There are a number of non printing characters like and so defining something like:
/// \file
/** the documented fie
*/
void fie(void);
void fie1(void);
/** */
void fie2(void);
Will result in a warning for fie1 but not for fie and fie2.
The disadvantage is that doxygen thinks that fie2 is documented and thus creates a detailed section for it.
To overcome the "detailed section" problem one would like to have a command that says the function is documented but doesn't show anything and does not emit warnings about missing things, such a function is currently not present in doxygen.
I am working on this project : https://sbl.inria.fr/doc, where the documentation is done with doxygen.
We were used to define the id of our sections with the symbol "-" to separate the words, for example :
\section sec-intro Introduction
However, it looks like the convention has changed since doxygen 1.8.15-git and only alpha-numerical characters are accepted, breaking almost all the pages in our documentation.
Unfortunately, we have a large number of pages, and before reviewing the whole documentation, I wanted to know if there is anything that I am missing, like a doxygen option to turn ON / OFF
[edit]
Here is a minimal example that does not work for me, with doxygen 1.8.15-git:
/**
\mainpage My Main Page
Abstract
\section home-intro Introduction
Intro
*/
//! Documented class test
class test{
};
I just create the configuration file and then run doxygen on the directory containing my .hpp file (so that there is no need to specify the path to my header) :
doxygen -g; doxygen
The main page on the output html contains "Abstract", but not the section, and there is a warning in the doxygen log :
test.hpp:6: warning: Invalid section id `home'; ignoring section
[edit 2]
It worked with doxygen 1.8.14. I cloned the project from the git repository, so I had the latest version. Using the tag version for the 1.8.14, it works fine. I changed the title.
I found the cause of the problem, it is a regression on:
Bug 740046 - Negative sign in -Foo::Bar ruins hyperlink in generated output
The github issue causing the problem is https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/5677 and the pull request https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/704.
The issue has been fixed in the proposed patch: https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/6388
Short version:
If I wanted to develop a completely new jsDoc template from scratch, what would I have to read to understand what jsDoc does, what interface my template must provide and what data I get to work with?
Long version:
I've been using jsDoc for a while now and have come across some tags that I would like to add and overview pages that I would like to have generated out of my documentation. Up to now I solved all my "user problems" with usejsdoc.org. I even managed to add a new jsdoc plugin that adds some tags. However, I can't find any developer documentation on how to create templates for jsdoc. I use ink-docstrap so I clicked my way through the template-folder (publish.js, /tmpl, etc.) and somehow got the idea of how everything works. But its very very time consuming.
What should I read to become a jsDoc template pro?
These instructions are the closest I could find:
To create or use your own template:
Create a folder with the same name as your template (for example, mycooltemplate).
Within the template folder, create a file named publish.js. This file must be a CommonJS module that exports a method named publish.
For example:
/** #module publish */
/**
* Generate documentation output.
*
* #param {TAFFY} data - A TaffyDB collection representing
* all the symbols documented in your code.
* #param {object} opts - An object with options information.
*/
exports.publish = function(data, opts) {
// do stuff here to generate your output files
};
To invoke JSDoc 3 with your own template, use the -t command line option, and specify the path to your template folder:
./jsdoc mycode.js -t /path/to/mycooltemplate
Failing that, you can read the source code!
I am running into a similar difficulty with lack of documentation. There is a GitHub issue that has been open for 7 years on this: Provide docs that explain how templates work.
The only example I've found so far of a custom template that doesn't look like just a modified version of the default is Ramda's documentation. It looks like they use a completely custom publish.js script that uses handlebars.js instead of underscore.js templates, constructs a non-hierarchical nav, pulls info from #sig and #category tags, and uses links to github for 'view source' instead of rendering its own html pages for source code.
Some of their code will be difficult to understand unless you are familiar with Ramda and functional programming (they use Ramda itself in their version of publish.js) but dumping out the values of data and docs during execution should help provide insight into what is going on.
It is helpful as well that their template is a single file so you don't have to jump between a lot of partial template files to follow how the doc is constructed.
I've just published my own new jsdoc theme. What I did is I simply copied the default template: https://github.com/jsdoc3/jsdoc/tree/master/templates/default, and worked on that.
I also managed to add grunt with the following features:
* transcompile + minify js files
* parse sass styles and minify them
* refresh the docs when you change something
You can see how it works here: https://github.com/SoftwareBrothers/better-docs
you can customize one of existing templates (default, haruki or silent):
go into node_modules/jsdoc/template and grab on of them into your app directory outside node_modules.
feel free to rename the dir ex: jsdoc-template.
open jsdoc-template update/customize the content as you want. ex: open publish.js find Home and replace My Js App.
update jsdoc.json by adding:
"opts": {
"template": "jsdoc-template"
}
another option to use one of those templates too: jsdoc3 template list examples
Followup to my previous comment about Ramda's JSDoc template. I've since created a customized version of it and published it on GitHub at https://github.com/eluv-io/elv-ramdoc
This is tailored for my company's projects, but it may be helpful as another learning tool. It adds a 'Show private' checkbox, updates Bootstrap to v5.13, replaces Handlebars with Pug, adds JSDoc comments to the publish.js script itself, and supports setting an environment variable to dump data to console during doc generation.
after building a web app, I tried out the jsdoc-toolkit. In a config file I added my index.html to the list of source files and also used the x-parameter to make the toolkit aware of the html file.
java -jar jsrun.jar app\run.js -t=templates\jsdoc -x=html,js -c=conf\my.conf
While the doc is generated without any errors, it still ignores any jsdoc annotation I made within the index file.
And when I check the generated doc, the index.html file is listed as source file.
Very simple documentations such as
/**
* testing the doc
* #constructor
*/
function Test(){
}
are simply ignored
Probably because its embedded in tags.
Do you have any idea how to force jsdoc to use this code as well?
Cheers,
zbug
In eclipse, when I want to document a function (in java or javascript source) I can just type /**, then hit enter, and I get a comment like this
/**
*
* Fluctuates all variables to more compatibly foo all the bars
*
* #PARAM {int} foo
*/
function flucvar (foo) {
}
When hitting enter inside the comment, eclipse automatically adds extra * at the beginning of each line.
Now I'm just getting into my textmate groove, and finding myself missing this little bit of functionality. Is there an equivilent bundle or command or something that would allow me to produce similar comments in textmate?
You need to create two snippets (I have them in the Source bundle).
First create a snippet for inserting JavaDoc comments. The snippet contains the following:
/**
* $0
*/
I have the snippet Activation set to Tab Trigger, using /** as the activation string. Every time I write /** and press Tab, I get a JavaDoc comment block. You can also use a keyboard shortcut if you like.
The second snippet is for continuing existing JavaDoc comments. The snippet contents are:
* $0
Note that there is an empty line before the * $0 line. Set Activation to Key Equivalent and the trigger key to return key. Set the Scope Selector string to comment.documentation.
Now if your language bundle supports the comment.documentation scope (like all of the included bundles seem to do), you should have working shortcuts for JavaDoc comments.
I took a look at TextMate's Java bundle, and I didn't see anything about inserting JavaDoc comments. However, it shouldn't be that hard to add such a feature to your Java bundle. It would likely be a Snippet, which you can read about in Chapter 7 of the TextMate manual (accessed from Help -> TextMate Help).
thanks for that answer. I just found this post on the macromates site
http://blog.macromates.com/2006/customization-screencast/
this appears to have a video/mailing list post that explains precisely how to do this.