On https://github.com/red/red/tree/master/bridges it says not implemented, will it be ?
Please read the official news before raising such questions (or rather consider to use Gitter community chat).
Android bridge is currently developed in a private branch and will go public in 0.7.1 release.
.NET bridge in the master branch is a PoC; there are Mono bridge and .NET bindings available from community members, but official CLR support, as far as I know, is not planned in the near future, and will likely take a high priority in post-1.0 roadmap.
Related
I am using the latest unity SDK 2.12.0 and Unity 2017.4.
My unity project is available here:
https://github.com/jignesh015/Watson_trial
Please note that you will need an IBM Apikey to access the API functionality.
I followed the following video tutorial for setting up the SDK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K62R9Jnxag
While running the ExampleStreaming sample as shown in the video, I'm getting the following log:
[SpeechToText.SendStart()][DEBUG] SendStart() with the following params: {"action":"start","content-type":"audio/l16;rate=22050;channels=1;","inactivity_timeout":-1,"interim_results":true,"max_alternatives":0,"profanity_filter":false,"smart_formatting":true,"speaker_labels":false,"timestamps":true,"word_confidence":true
[SpeechToText.OnListenClosed()][DEBUG] OnListenClosed(), State = DISCONNECTED
[SpeechToText.KeepAlive()][DEBUG] KeepAlive exited.
I have thoroughly searched for this issue. Seems like many people have faced a similar issue, but none of the posts have a satisfactory solution. Can anyone help me with this?
This has to do with the move to TLS 1.2. Only Unity 2018.2 and above support TLS 1.2 using .NET 4.x equivalent Scripting Runtime Version. https://github.com/watson-developer-cloud/unity-sdk#streaming-outside-of-us-south-region
Since you are using Unity 2017.4 you will need to create your Speech to Text instance in US South (Dallas). This is the only region that still supports TLS 1.0.
Alternatively, you can update to Unity 2018.2 or above and switch to Scripting Runtime Version .NET 4.x equivalent.
I'm developing an Eclipse plugin and i've run into this problem several times already.
I always keep my Target Platform updated for the latest (stable) Eclipse release so that i test my code against all the recent updates, fixes etc.
However, this may (and have) result in accidental breakage of backward compatibility of my plugin, e.g. when i accidentally use new API that did not exist in the Eclipse version i aim to support.
Or, more sneaky example, in 4.6 Eclipse moved to Java 8 and some interface methods got default implementations. Now when i implement these interfaces my IDE doesn't automatically generate empty implementations for those methods and no error is generated. If i install and run this code against a previous Eclipse version these methods will throw AbstractMethodError since no implementation has been provided.
So my question is: is there a tool to further restrict API my Target Platform provides to some earlier Eclipse API version?
Is API Baseline an appropriate tool for this? Because i couldn't get it to work like this. (It allowed even non-baseline method calls not to mention the more complex default-methods example.)
You can use multiple target platforms, switching between them doesn't take long. For testing Stack Overflow questions I have one Eclipse install with 10 target platforms.
So have a target platform for the oldest release you want to support as well as your current release target platform and check the code runs against that.
It is particularly important to test with the actual Target Platform if you want to support Eclipse 3 releases as the were large changes going from Eclipse 3 to 4.
I have been thoroughly confused by CodePlex and the TFS services it offers or doesn't offer. I am going to soon begin working on on open source project with a few friends using Visual Studio 2010 Professional. Because VS is so nicely tied in with TFS, we would prefer to use TFS.
However, we do not have the money to purchase TFS ourselves, so we were looking at CodePlex as an alternative. Does CodePlex offer free TFS hosting? I believed it did, until I came across this which led me to believe it only offers part of the TFS feature set.
(This is my first experience with version/source control, so please be light on the terminology.)
CodePlex offers free TFS hosting with a feature set aimed at hosting open-source projects. Its version control offerings are complete, but Team Foundation Server is a platform with many feature areas, so let's look at those:
Version Control: CodePlex supports the entire feature set of TFS Version Control. In fact, CodePlex pioneered some version control tools for TFS like their SVNBridge.
Work Item Tracking: Team Foundation Server allows for a customizable work item tracking template and ships several out-of-the box to suit development processes ranging from CMMI to Agile. CodePlex, however, provides a single work item tracking template that is suitable for open source projects and does not allow customization.
Continuous Integration: CodePlex does not support automated builds at this time. You can set up your own continuous integration builds against a CodePlex endpoint for source code, though.
Document Repository: There is no SharePoint document repository available in CodePlex.
Reports: SQL Reporting Services are not available in CodePlex.
I would argue that for a small open-source project, none of these are deal-breakers. For a very large project, however, some or all of these features may be desirable, though.
If you want to use TFS and you are looking for a cost-effective solution for a small project, you may also want to look into Team Foundation Service, which is currently free while it is in its preview state. (Future pricing has not yet been announced.)
I'm new to version control and reading about some of the ones available out there. I noticed the term SCC-Compliant (used with clearcase), and the definition from wikipedia is:
SCC compliant as applied to revision control software, means that a
program uses a particular interface defined by Microsoft for Visual
SourceSafe.[1] The SCC denotes Source Code Control
Is this concept of SCC-compliance huge or not that meaningful? Do most version control systems have it?
Regarding ClearCase, as mentioned in this IBM technote:
The SCC API is an interface specification, defined by Microsoft® that defines hooks for a number of common source control operations.
An application (typically an "integrated" development environment (IDE) of any kind) can provide source control functions without implementing the functions itself.
If an SCC compliant code control system is installed, the application dispatches code control operations to the source control tool (e.g. Visual Studio > ClearCase).
That being said:
if you are new to version control, try and stay away from ClearCase: it isn't the more practical one by far ;)
IBM Jazz protocol is a much more recent standard, that other SCM tools can use to integrate into other environments.
So while the concept of tool integration is important, the SCC concept is quite old, and limited to version control.
As opposed to Application Hub communication protocol, for integrating any two applications together, like Jazz.
I have been playing around with the new StateMachine workflow that has been added to Windows Workflow as part of Platform Update 1 (see also). I now want to look at installing what I've created and therefore need to make sure my bootstrapper is up-to-date. In the future, I will be moving to WIX but right now, for the purposes of prototyping, I'm just using a regular Setup and Deployment project and its bootstrap support.
The list of standard pre-requisites does not include the PU1 as an option. Therefore, how can I add support for it?
Update
I found this answer on StackOverflow regarding custom prerequisites, which led me to this article on MSDN, which led me to creating my own pre-requisite. However, I got a new error about mismatched framework requirements. I suspect I need to pick apart the multi-targeting support and the existing .NET framework prerequisite package to see how to make a new prerequisite that will work correctly.
I've had a stab at creating my own bootstrapper packages for this. The results are here to download. Note that these are entirely untested and provided as-is - use at your own risk. However, feedback is welcome. Hopefully Microsoft will provide an official solution.
See How to detect if the .NET Framework Platform Update 1 is installed
is the Microsoft .NET Framework 4 Platform Update 1 - Runtime Update (KB2478063) what you are looking for? See here for the download.