I would imagine this is too big and too specific for a normal StackOverflow question, so I can understand if there isn't any possible help. However I will try and show what is the issue I am facing. Also I am new to Perl and I know you shouldn't declare all variables at the start, I'm just trying to see if I can get this implemented first.
I have a Perl script:
use 5.010;
use Math::Trig ':radial';
use Math::Trig;
use List::Util qw(max min);
#Input parameters:
#The ouput filename:
$outfile = 'Tree.scad';
#The coordinates of the points that is to be supported.
$min_X=0;
$max_X=60;
$min_Y=0;
$max_Y=60;
$distance=10;
#The minimum angle from horizontal your printer can make, in degrees
$min_angle= 40;
#Ignore the next line, it is not an input parameter.
($X_ref,$Y_ref)=grid($min_X,$max_X,$min_Y,$max_Y,$distance);#X=#$X_ref;#Y=#{$Y_ref};
for $i (0..$#X){
$Z[$i]=20;#The function that defined the height of each point. This setting wil give you a flat roof. For a more advanced tree, try:
#$Z[$i]=-0.01*$X[$i]**2+0.2*$Y[$i]-0.005*$Y[$i]**2+20;
}
#End of input parameters.
$min_radian = deg2rad($min_angle);
$b = tan($min_radian);
#Z=map{$_/$b}#Z;
open $output, '>', $outfile or die "error writing to '$outfile'";
print $output "width=2;\n";
print $output "sphere_radius=0;\n";
print $output "base_plate_size=10;\n\n";
while ($#X>0){
($I,$J)=find_min_dist(\#X,\#Y,\#Z);
($X_branch,$Y_branch,$Z_branch)=find_branch($X[$I],$Y[$I],$Z[$I],$X[$J],$Y[$J],$Z[$J]);
#X_list=($X_branch,$X[$I],$X[$J]);
#Y_list=($Y_branch,$Y[$I],$Y[$J]);
#Z_list=($Z_branch,$Z[$I],$Z[$J]);
for $j (0..$#Y_list){
if (abs($X_list[$j]) < 0.001){
$X_list[$j]=0;
}
if (abs($Y_list[$j]) < 0.001){
$Y_list[$j]=0;
}
if (abs($Z_list[$j]) < 0.001){
$Z_list[$J]=0;
}
}
branch(\#X_list,\#Y_list,\#Z_list);
splice(#X,$I,1,$X_branch);
splice(#X,$J,1);
splice(#Y,$I,1,$Y_branch);
splice(#Y,$J,1);
splice(#Z,$I,1,$Z_branch);
splice(#Z,$J,1);
}
print $output 'if(base_plate_size>0){';
print $output "\n translate([$X[0],$Y[0],$Z[0]*$b])\n";
print $output "cube([base_plate_size,base_plate_size,1],center=true);}";
sub grid{
my $d=$_[4];
#X_values=$_[0]/$d..$_[1]/$d;
#X_values=map{$_*$d} #X_values;
#Y_values=$_[2]/$d..$_[3]/$d;
#Y_values=map{$_*$d} #Y_values;
for $i (0..$#X_values){
#Y=(#Y,#Y_values);
for $j (0..$#Y_values){
$X[$i*($#Y_values+1)+$j]= $X_values[$i];
}
}
return (\#X,\#Y);
}
sub branch{
my #X=#{ $_[0] };
my #Y=#{ $_[1] };
my #Z=#{ $_[2] };
#Z=map{$_*$b}#Z;
for $i (1..$#X){
($rho, $theta, $phi) = cartesian_to_spherical($X[$i]-$X[0],$Y[$i]-$Y[0],$Z[$i]-$Z[0]);
$phi = rad2deg($phi);
if (abs($phi)<0.001){$phi=0;}
$theta = rad2deg($theta)+90;
if (abs($theta)<0.001){$theta=0;}
if (abs($rho)>0.001){
print $output "translate([$X[0],$Y[0],$Z[0]])\n";
print $output "rotate([0,0,$theta])\n";
print $output "rotate([$phi,0,0])\n";
print $output "translate([-width/2,-width/2,0])";
print $output "cube([width,width,$rho]);\n";
print $output 'if (sphere_radius>0){';
print $output "\n translate([$X[$i],$Y[$i],$Z[$i]])\n";
print $output "sphere(sphere_radius,center=1);}\n";}
}
}
sub find_min_dist{
my #X=#{ $_[0] };
my #Y=#{ $_[1] };
my #Z=#{ $_[2] };
my $min_dist=($X[0]-$X[1])**2+($Y[0]-$Y[1])**2+($Z[0]-$Z[1])**2;
my $max_Z=$Z[0];
my $I=0;
my $J=1;
for $i (1..$#Z){
if ($Z[$i]>=$max_Z){
$max_Z=$Z[$i];
$I=$i;}
}
for $j (0..$#X){
if ($j!=$I){
$dist=(($X[$I]-$X[$j])**2+($Y[$I]-$Y[$j])**2+($Z[$I]-$Z[$j])**2);
if ($min_dist>$dist){
$min_dist=$dist;
$J=$j;
}}}
return ($I,$J);
}
sub find_branch{
my $X1=$_[0];
my $Y1=$_[1];
my $Z1=$_[2];
my $X2=$_[3];
my $Y2=$_[4];
my $Z2=$_[5];
$rXY=sqrt(($X1-$X2)**2+($Y1-$Y2)**2);
if (abs($Z1-$Z2) < $rXY) {
$Z_branch=($Z1+$Z2-$rXY)/2;
$a=($Z1-$Z_branch)/$rXY;
$X_branch=(1-$a)*$X1+$a*$X2;
$Y_branch=(1-$a)*$Y1+$a*$Y2;
}
elsif ($Z1 < $Z2) {
$X_branch=$X1;
$Y_branch=$Y1;
$Z_branch=$Z1;
}
else {
$X_branch=$X2;
$Y_branch=$Y2;
$Z_branch=$Z2;
}
return ($X_branch,$Y_branch,$Z_branch);
}
Which produces a scad file and outputs it as this:
I thought it would be good to implement this method in a slicing program, Slic3r. Now what I have done is attempted to still keep it separate since I would like to show at least this structure in the program and decide whether or not it is possible to do.
Slic3r Original Code: https://github.com/slic3r/Slic3r/blob/21eb603cc16946b14e77d3c10cbee2f1163503c6/lib/Slic3r/Print/SupportMaterial.pm
Modified Slic3r Code: https://pastebin.com/aHzXT4RW
So the comparison is, I removed the generate_pillar_supports and added my grid subroutine. I assumed I would just have to call it since this script is separate to how it's generated compared to the other support structures on:
So replaced this:
my $shape = [];
if ($self->object_config->support_material_pattern eq 'pillars') {
$self->generate_pillars_shape($contact, $support_z, $shape);
}
With this:
my $shape = [];
if ($self->object_config->support_material_pattern eq 'pillars') {
$self->grid($min_X,$max_X,$min_Y,$max_Y,$distance);
}
However unfortunately, I have not been able to get a nice structure to form but rather this:
As I said, I know this is a large question and I'm not diving into the entire Slic3ing program so it might be even harder to understand. However just from a brief look, would anyone know what the issue is? Am I calling the subroutine wrong, does the script only work to produce a scad file, etc. All I would need is just to see if this is able to show or not. Thanks.
sub grid does not appear to be a method, but you are calling it as one
$self->grid($min_X,$max_X,$min_Y,$max_Y,$distance);
This syntax actually sends $self as the first argument, so that call is equivalent to the function call
grid($self,$min_X,$max_X,$min_Y,$max_Y,$distance);
What you probably want is to just say
grid($min_X,$max_X,$min_Y,$max_Y,$distance);
(You also really want to say
use strict;
use warnings;
at the top of every script)
Related
So I've done some googling and other site, my console is filled with all these warnings. Just a bit unsure how to fix this method overall. Likewise I hope my code isn't vague since I'm not too sure if the code here is enough. Regardless here is the issue. I have been trying to integrate a Perl script within my module for a while. The script itself works but not in the module. The error message for when I try to run it is this method:
sub generate_pillars_shape{
my $d=$_[4];
#X_values=$_[0]/$d..$_[1]/$d;
#X_values=map{$_*$d} #X_values;
#Y_values=$_[2]/$d..$_[3]/$d;
#Y_values=map{$_*$d} #Y_values;
for $i (0..$#X_values){
#Y=(#Y,#Y_values);
for $j (0..$#Y_values){
$X[$i*($#Y_values+1)+$j]= $X_values[$i];
}
}
return (\#X,\#Y);
}
The entire code consists of this:
use 5.010;
use Math::Trig ':radial';
use Math::Trig;
use List::Util qw(max min);
my $min_X=0;
my $max_X=60;
my $min_Y=0;
my $max_Y=60;
my $distance=10;
my #X_values;
my #Y_values;
my $i;
my $j;
#The minimum angle from horizontl your printer can make, in degrees
my $min_angle= 30;
#Ignore the next line, it is not an input parame
my #Z;
my ($X_ref,$Y_ref)= generate_pillars_shape($min_X,$max_X,$min_Y,$max_Y,$distance);my #X=#$X_ref;my #Y=#{$Y_ref};
for my $i (0..$#X){
$Z[$i]=20;#The function that defined the height of each point. This setting wil give you a flat roof. For a more advanced tree, try:
#$Z[$i]=-0.01*$X[$i]**2+0.2*$Y[$i]-0.005*$Y[$i]**2+20;
}
#End of input parameters.
my $min_radian = deg2rad($min_angle);
my $b = tan($min_radian);
#Z=map{$_/$b} #Z;
while ($#X>0){
my ($I,$J)=find_min_dist(\#X,\#Y,\#Z);
my ($X_branch,$Y_branch,$Z_branch)=find_branch($X[$I],$Y[$I],$Z[$I],$X[$J],$Y[$J],$Z[$J]);
my #X_list= ($X_branch,$X[$I],$X[$J]);
my #Y_list= ($Y_branch,$Y[$I],$Y[$J]);
my #Z_list= ($Z_branch,$Z[$I],$Z[$J]);
for my $j (0..$#Y_list){
if (abs($X_list[my $j]) < 0.001){
$X_list[$j]=0;
}
if (abs($Y_list[my $j]) < 0.001){
$Y_list[$j]=0;
}
if (abs($Z_list[my $j]) < 0.001){
$Z_list[$J]=0;
}
}
branch (\#X_list,\#Y_list,\#Z_list);
splice (#X,$I,1,$X_branch);
splice (#X,$J,1);
splice (#Y,$I,1,$Y_branch);
splice (#Y,$J,1);
splice (#Z,$I,1,$Z_branch);
splice (#Z,$J,1);
}
sub generate_pillars_shape{
my $d=$_[4];
#X_values=$_[0]/$d..$_[1]/$d;
#X_values=map{$_*$d} #X_values;
#Y_values=$_[2]/$d..$_[3]/$d;
#Y_values=map{$_*$d} #Y_values;
for $i (0..$#X_values){
#Y=(#Y,#Y_values);
for $j (0..$#Y_values){
$X[$i*($#Y_values+1)+$j]= $X_values[$i];
}
}
return (\#X,\#Y);
}
sub branch{
my #X=#{ $_[0] };
my #Y=#{ $_[1] };
my #Z=#{ $_[2] };
#Z=map{$_*$b}#Z;
for my $i (1..$#X){
my ($rho, $theta, $phi) = cartesian_to_spherical($X[$i]-$X[0],$Y[$i]-$Y[0],$Z[$i]-$Z[0]);
$phi = rad2deg($phi);
if (abs($phi)<0.001){$phi=0;}
$theta = rad2deg($theta)+90;
if (abs($theta)<0.001){$theta=0;}
if (abs($rho)>0.001){}
}
}
sub find_min_dist{
my #X=#{ $_[0] };
my #Y=#{ $_[1] };
my #Z=#{ $_[2] };
my $min_dist=($X[0]-$X[1])**2+($Y[0]-$Y[1])**2+($Z[0]-$Z[1])**2;
my $max_Z=$Z[0];
my $I=0;
my $J=1;
for my $i (1..$#Z){
if ($Z[$i]>=$max_Z){
$max_Z=$Z[$i];
my $I=$i;}
}
for my $j (0..$#X){
if ($j!=$I){
my $dist=(($X[$I]-$X[$j])**2+($Y[$I]-$Y[$j])**2+($Z[$I]-$Z[$j])**2);
if ($min_dist>$dist){
$min_dist=$dist;
my $J=$j;
}}}
return ($I,$J);
}
sub find_branch{
my $X1=$_[0];
my $Y1=$_[1];
my $Z1=$_[2];
my $X2=$_[3];
my $Y2=$_[4];
my $Z2=$_[5];
my $rXY=sqrt(($X1-$X2)**2+($Y1-$Y2)**2);
if (abs($Z1-$Z2) < $rXY) {
my $Z_branch=($Z1+$Z2-$rXY)/2;
my $a=($Z1-$Z_branch)/$rXY;
my $X_branch=(1-$a)*$X1+$a*$X2;
my $Y_branch=(1-$a)*$Y1+$a*$Y2;
}
elsif ($Z1 < $Z2) {
my $X_branch=$X1;
my $Y_branch=$Y1;
my $Z_branch=$Z1;
}
else {
my $X_branch=$X2;
my $Y_branch=$Y2;
my $Z_branch=$Z2;
}
return my($X_branch,$Y_branch,$Z_branch);
}
I hope that explains the general situation, any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
I can't reproduce your error. However, there are a lot of errors in your code, so let me go through them, and hopefully this will help you find your actual mistake.
First, variables should be defined in the smallest possible scope: if a variable is used only within a function, it should be defined within this function. If a variable is used only in a for loop, it should be defined within this loop. In that spirit, you should remove
my $i;
my $j;
at the begining of your code. Also, keep in mind that my declares a lexical variable visible only in the current scope (ie. you can use it only in the current block). For instance,
else {
my $X_branch=$X2;
my $Y_branch=$Y2;
my $Z_branch=$Z2;
}
declares 3 variables that don't exist after the else block.
Second, my declares a new variable, and should therefore be used only once per variable. If you write
my $x = 5;
return my $x;
The first line declares a variable $x, and set it to 5. The second line declares a new variable $x (thus shadowing the old one), whose value is undef, and returns it. What you want to write instead is:
my $x = 5;
return $x;
Now let me go through your code to point out a few mistakes/improvements:
$X_list[my $j] should be $X_list[$j] (as per the beginning of this answer).
Still in find_branch, you have an issue with the scope of the variables you defined (see the beginning of my answer). You should have something like:
my ($X_branch, $Y_branch, $Z_branch);
if (abs($Z1-$Z2) < $rXY) {
$Z_branch=($Z1+$Z2-$rXY)/2;
my $a=($Z1-$Z_branch)/$rXY;
$X_branch=(1-$a)*$X1+$a*$X2;
$Y_branch=(1-$a)*$Y1+$a*$Y2;
}
elsif ($Z1 < $Z2) {
$X_branch=$X1;
$Y_branch=$Y1;
$Z_branch=$Z1;
}
else {
$X_branch=$X2;
$Y_branch=$Y2;
$Z_branch=$Z2;
}
return ($X_branch,$Y_branch,$Z_branch);
This two corrections should silence every warnings. However, I suspect there are more things going wrong in your code.
In find_min_dist, you should not write my $I = $i and my $J = $j but rather $I = $i and $J = $j (still the same scoping issue).
Your sub branch doesn't do anything: you compute some $rho, $theta and $phi, but you don't return them (and you don't modify the arguments either).
In generate_pillars_shape, #X_values, #Y_values, #X, #Y should all be locally declared with my. Also, you can initialize #X_values with #X_values = grep { $_ % $d == 0 } $_[0] .. $_[1] (same for #Y_values), which I find more readable that what you wrote.
You should put your code in functions or code blocks ({ ... }) to use proper scoping: while it can make sense to have $min_X, $max_X, $min_Y, $max_Y,and $distance as global variables, you definitely don't want to have $min_radian or $b defined everywhere in your file.
Don't use $a or $b (they are special variables, used by sort; you don't want to mess with them (see this question for instance)).
Additionally, just for clarity, in your sub find_branch, you can be a bit more compact to retrieve the arguments:
my ($X1, $Y1, $Z1, $X2, $Y2, $Z2) = #_;
I'm fairly convinced that there are other issues with your code. Please tell us what you are trying to do and what each function is supposed to do if you want more help.
I'm a beginner and confused about what's happening inside this Perl subroutine.
I'm using only global variables to simplify things, but it's still not working.
I'm simply trying to print a file's read, write and executable attributes using the file test operators with IF statements.
Can anyone point out the problem for me?
Louie
sub getfileattributes {
if (-r $file) {
$attributes[0] = "readable";
} else { $attributes[0] = "not readable"; }
if (-w _) {
$attributes[1] = "writable";
} else { $attributes[1] = "not writable"; }
if (-x _) {
$attributes[2] = "executable";
} else { $attributes[2] = "not executable"; }
}
my #attributes;
my $file;
foreach $file (#ARGV) {
&getfileattributes;
printf "The file $file is %s, %s and %s\n", #attributes;
}
Using global variables is usually quite bad and points to a design error. In this case, the error seems to be that you don't know how to pass arguments to a sub.
Here is the pattern in Perl:
sub I_take_arguments {
# all my arguments are in #_ array
my ($firstarg, $secondarg, #rest) = #_;
say "1st argument: $firstarg";
say "2nd argument: " .($firstarg+1). " (incremented)";
say "The rest is: [#rest]";
}
Subs are invoked like
I_take_arguments(1, 2, "three", 4);
(Do not invoke them as &nameOfTheSub, this makes use of very special behaviour you don't usually want.)
This would print
1st argument: 1
2nd argument: 3
The rest is: [three 4]
Subroutines can return values, either with the return statement or as the value of the last statement that is executed. These subs are equivalent:
sub foo {return "return value"}
sub bar {"return value"}
I would write your getfileattributes as
sub getFileAttributes {
my ($name) = #_;
return
-r $name ? "readable" : "not readable",
-w $name ? "writable" : "not writable",
-x $name ? "executable" : "not executable";
}
What is happening here? I take an argument $name and then return a list of values. The return keyword could be omitted. The return takes a list of values and does not require parens, so I leave them out. The TEST ? TRUE-STATEMENT : FALSE-STATEMENT operator is known from other languages.
Then, in your loop, the sub would be invoked like
for my $filename (#ARGV) {
my ($r, $w, $x) = getFileAttributes($filename);
say "The file $filename is $r, $w and $x";
}
or
foreach my $file (#ARGV) {
my #attributes = getFileAttributes($file);
printf "The file $file is %s, %s and %s\n", #attributes;
}
Notes:
say is like print, but adds a newline at the end. To use it, you have to have a Perl > 5.10 and you should use 5.010 or whatever version or use feature qw(say).
always use strict; use warnings; unless you know better for sure.
Often, you can write programs without assigning to a variable twice (Single assignment form). This can make reasoning about control flow much easier. This is why global variables (but not global constants) are bad.
You are not actually using global varaibles. My scopes the variables them local to the main routine, so when you call the subroutine, $file and #attributes are scoped to the subroutine, not to the main routine.
Change my to our for $file and #attributes to make the variables global and available to the subroutine.
You can check this for yourself by using the -d argument for perl to run it in the debugger and check the values of the items.
So I have something like this:
fork.pl
for $str (#files)
{
my($command) = "perl command.pl ".$str;
exec( $command );
}
command.pl
$file=$ARGV[0].".csv";
#code that counts rows here
print $rowcount;
So as the end result I have 10 files launched which count how many rows are in each csv file.
I do not need help editting this code, it works (this is just a compressed version). I need help figuring out how to take the output ($rowcount) of ten files and combine it into one for further processing.
I keep some utility code around for just this purpose... this is tweaked slightly to your question and including a synchronized global counting method.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use threads;
use Thread::Queue;
my #workers;
my $num_threads = 10;
my $queue = new Thread::Queue;
my $total_ines = 0;
for (0..$num_threads-1) {
$workers[$_] = new threads(\&worker);
}
while ($_ = shift #ARGV) {
$queue->enqueue($_);
}
sub worker() {
while ($file = $queue->dequeue) {
#line counting code here
global_counter($lines_counted);
}
}
sub global_counter() :locked {
#add to the number of lines counted
$total_lines += shift
}
for (0..$num_threads-1) { $queue->enqueue(undef); }
for (0..$num_threads-1) { $workers[$_]->join; }
print $total_lines;
This kind of communication is solved using pipes (let me write a simple example):
# -- fork.pl -------------------------
for (1..3) {
open my $PIPE, "perl command.pl |";
print "catch: $_\n" while(<$PIPE>);
close $PIPE;
}
# -- command.pl ----------------------
print rand(1);
It prints (random numbers):
catch: 0.58929443359375
catch: 0.1290283203125
catch: 0.907012939453125
You need to look either at threads or Interprocess communication with e.g. sockets or shared memory when using fork.
Compressed but won't work. I'm assuming that in fork.pl, you fork before exec'ing? Backticks capture the output of the called process, namely your prints:
fork.pl
for $str (#files)
{
my($command) = "perl command.pl ".$str;
print `$command`;
}
But rather than forking and launching processes, wouldn't it be smarter to turn the second file into a module?
package MyCommand;
use Exporter;
our #EXPORT = qw( command );
sub command {
my $file = $_[0] . '.csv';
...
return $rowcount;
}
1;
fork.pl:
use MyCommand;
...
my #rowcounts;
for my $str (#files) {
push #rowcounts, command($str);
}
A bit of self-promotion, but I just posted this in your other thread, which seems relevant enough: How to run in parallel two child command from a parent one?
Accumulate pipes from children:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $files = qw/one.csv two.csv three.csv/;
my $command = "perl command.pl";
my #pipes;
foreach (#files) {
my $fd;
open $fd, "-|", "$command $_" and push #pipes, $fd;
};
my $sum = 0;
foreach my $pp (#pipes) {
$sum += $_ if defined ($_=<$pp>);
};
print $sum;
Then you can just read them one by one (as in example), or use IO::Select to read data as it appears in each pipe.
A hash table in addition to array is also good if you want to know which data comes from which source.
EDIT:
I will try a better explication this time, this is the exact code from my script (sorry for all them coments, they are a result of your sugestions, and apear in the video below).
#use warnings;
#use Data::Dumper;
open(my $tmp_file, ">>", "/tmp/some_bad.log") or die "Can not open log file: $!\n";
#if( $id_client != "")
#allowed_locations = ();
#print $tmp_file "Before the if: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([\#allowed_locations, $id_client]) . "";
if( $id_client )
{
# print $tmp_file "Start the if: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([\#allowed_locations, $id_client]) . "";
# my $q = "select distinct id_location from locations inner join address using (id_db5_address) inner join zona_rural_detaliat using (id_city) where id_client=$id_client";
# my $st = &sql_special_transaction($sql_local_host, $sql_local_database, $sql_local_root, $sql_local_root_password, $q);
# print $tmp_file "Before the while loop: ref(st)='". ref($st) . "\n";
# while((my $id)=$st->fetchrow())
# {
# print $tmp_file "Row the while loop: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([$id]) . "";
# my $id = 12121212;
# push(#allowed_locations, $id);
# }
# print $tmp_file "After the while loop: ref(st)='". ref($st) . "\n";
# my($a) = 1;
#} else {
# my($a) = 0;
}
#print $tmp_file "After the if: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([\#allowed_locations, $id_client]) . "";
close($tmp_file) or die "Can not close file: $!\n";
#&html_error(#allowed_locations);
First off all, somebody said that I should try to run it in command line, the script works fine in command line (no warnings, It was uncommented then), but when triyng to load in via apache in the browser it fails, please see this video where I captured the script behavior, what I tried to show in the video:
I have opened 2 tabs the first doesn't define the variable $id_client, the second defines the variable $id_client that is read from GET: ?id_client=36124 => $id_client = 36124; , both of them include the library in the video "locallib.pl"
When running the script with all the
new code commented the page loads
when uncoment the line that defines
the #allowed_locations = (); the
script fails
leave this definition and uncoment
the if block, and the definition of
my $a; in the if block; Now the script works fine when $id_client is
defined, but fails when $id_client
is not defined
Uncoment the else block and the
definition of my $a; in the else
block. Now the script works fine
with or without $id_client
now comment all the my $a;
definisions and comment the else
block, the script fails
but if I'm using open() to open
a file before the IF, and
close() to close it after the if it does't fail even if the IF block
is empty and event if there is no
else block
I have replicated all the steps when running the script in the command line, and the script worked after each step.
I know it sounds like something that cannot be the behavior of the script, but please watch the video (2 minutes), maybe you will notice something that I'm doing wrong there.
Using perl version:
[root#db]# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.6 built for i386-linux-thread-mult
Somebody asked if I don't have a test server, answer: NO, my company has a production server that has multiple purposes, not only the web interface, and I cannot risk to update the kernel or the perl version, and cannot risk instaling any debuger, as the company owners say: "If it works, leave it alone", and for them the solution with my ($a); is perfect beacause it works, I'm asking here just for me, to learn more about perl, and to understand what is going wrong and what can I do better next time.
Thank you.
P.S. hope this new approach will restore some of my -1 :)
EDIT:
I had success starting the error logging, and found this in the error log after each step that resulted in a failure I got this messages:
[Thu Jul 15 14:29:19 2010] [error] locallib.pl did not return a true value at /var/www/html/rdsdb4/cgi-bin/clients/quicksearch.cgi line 2.
[Thu Jul 15 14:29:19 2010] [error] Premature end of script headers: quicksearch.cgi
What I found is that this code is at the end of the main code in the locallib.pl after this there are sub definitions, and locallib.pl is a library not a program file, so it's last statement must returns true. , a simple 1; statement at the end of the library ensures that (I put it after sub definitions to ensure that noobody writes code in the main after the 1;) and the problem was fixed.
Don't know why in CLI it had no problem ...
Maybe I will get a lot of down votes now ( be gentle :) ) , but what can I do ...and I hope that some newbies will read this and learn something from my mistake.
Thank you all for your help.
You need to explicitly check for definedness.
If you want to enter the loop when $client is defined,
use if ( defined $client ).
If you want to enter the loop when $client is defined and a valid integer,
use if ( defined $client && $client =~ /^-?\d+$/ ).
I assume it's an integer from the context, if it can be a float, the regex needs to be enhanced - there's a standard Perl library containing pre-canned regexes, including ones to match floats. If you require a non-negative int, drop -? from regex's start.
If you want to enter the loop when $client is defined and a non-zero (and assuming it shouldn't ever be an empty string),
use if ( $client ).
If you want to enter the loop when $client is defined and a valid non-zero int,
use if ( $client && $client =~ /^-?\d+$/ ).
Your #ids is "undef" when if condition is false, which may break the code later on if it relies on #ids being an array. Since you didn't actually specify how the script breaks without an else, this is the most likely cause.
Please see if this version works (use whichever "if" condition from above you need, I picked the last one as it appears to match the closest witrh the original code's intent - only enter for non-zero integers):
UPDATED CODE WITH DEBUGGING
use Data::Dumper;
open(my $tmp_file, ">", "/tmp/some_bad.log") or die "Can not open log file: $!\n";
#ids = (); # Do this first so #ids is always an array, even for non-client!
print $tmp_file "Before the if: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([\#ids, $client]) . "\n";
if ( $client && $client =~ /^-?\d+$/ ) # First expression catches undef and zero
{
print $tmp_file "Start the if: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([\#ids, $client]) . "\n";
my $st = &sql_query("select id from table where client=$client");
print $tmp_file "Before the while loop: ref(st)='". ref($st) . "'\n";
while(my $row = $st->fetchrow())
{
print $tmp_file "Row the while loop: ". Data::Dumper->Dump([row]) . "'\n";
push(#ids, $row->[0]);
}
print $tmp_file "After the while loop: ref(st)='". ref($st) . "'\n";
# No need to undef since both variables are lexically in this block only
}
print $tmp_file "After the if\n";
close($tmp_file) or die "Can not close file: $!\n";
when checking against a string, == and != should be respectively 'eq' or 'ne'
if( $client != "" )
should be
if( $client ne "" )
Otherwise you don't get what you're expecting to get.
Always begin your script with :
use warnings;
use strict;
these will give you usefull informations.
Then you could write :
my #ids;
if (defined $client) {
#ids = (); # not necessary if you run this part only once
my $st = sql_query("select id from table where client=$client");
while( my ($id) = $st->fetchrow ) {
push #ids, $id;
}
} else {
warn '$client not defined';
}
if (#ids) { # Your query returned something
# do stuff with #ids
} else {
warn "client '$client' does not exist in database";
}
Note: this answer was deleted because I consider that this is not a real question. I am undeleting it to save other people repeating this.
Instead of
if( $client != "" )
try
if ($client)
Also, Perl debugging is easier if you
use warnings;
use strict;
What I found is that this code is at the end of the main code in the locallib.pl after this there are sub definitions, and locallib.pl is a library not a program file, so it's last statement must returns true, a simple 1; statement at the end of the library ensures that (put it after sub definitions to ensure that noobody writes code in the main after the 1;) and the problem was fixed.
The conclusion:
I have learned that every time you write a library or modify one, ensure that it's last statment returns true;
Oh my... Try this as an example instead...
# Move the logic into a subroutine
# Forward definition so perl knows func exists
sub getClientIds($);
# Call subroutine to find id's - defined later.
my #ids_from_database = &getClientIds("Joe Smith");
# If sub returned an empty list () then variable will be false.
# Otherwise, print each ID we found.
if (#ids_from_database) {
foreach my $i (#ids_from_database) {
print "Found ID $i \n";
}
} else {
print "Found nothing! \n";
}
# This is the end of the "main" code - now we define the logic.
# Here's the real work
sub getClientIds($) {
my $client = shift #_; # assign first parameter to var $client
my #ids = (); # what we will return
# ensure we weren't called with &getClientIds("") or something...
if (not $client) {
print "I really need you to give me a parameter...\n";
return #ids;
}
# I'm assuming the query is string based, so probably need to put it
# inside \"quotes\"
my $st = &sql_query("select id from table where client=\"$client\"");
# Did sql_query() fail?
if (not $st) {
print "Oops someone made a problem in the SQL...\n";
return #ids;
}
my #result;
# Returns a list, so putting it in a list and then pulling the first element
# in two steps instead of one.
while (#result = $st->fetchrow()) {
push #ids, $result[0];
}
# Always a good idea to clean up once you're done.
$st->finish();
return #ids;
}
To your specific questions:
If you want to test if $client is defined, you want "if ( eval { defined $client; } )", but that's almost certainly NOT what you're looking for! It's far easier to ensure $client has some definition early in the program (e.g. $client = "";). Also note Kaklon's answer about the difference between ne and !=
if (X) { stuff } else { } is not valid perl. You could do: if (X) { stuff } else { 1; } but that's kind of begging the question, because the real issue is the test of the variable, not an else clause.
Sorry, no clue on that - I think the problem's elsewhere.
I also echo Kinopiko in recommending you add "use strict;" at the start of your program. That means that any $variable #that %you use has to be pre-defined as "my $varable; my #that; my %you;" It may seem like more work, but it's less work than trying to deal with undefined versus defined variables in code. It's a good habit to get into.
Note that my variables only live within the squiggliez in which they are defined (there's implicit squiggliez around the whole file:
my $x = 1;
if ($x == 1)
{
my $x = 2;
print "$x \n"; # prints 2. This is NOT the same $x as was set to 1 above.
}
print "$x \n"; # prints 1, because the $x in the squiggliez is gone.
I'm an experienced developer, but not in Perl. I usually learn Perl to hack a script, then I forget it again until the next time. Hence I'm looking for advice from the pros.
This time around I'm building a series of data analysis scripts. Grossly simplified, the program structure is like this:
01 my $config_var = 999;
03 my $result_var = 0;
05 foreach my $file (#files) {
06 open(my $fh, $file);
07 while (<$fh>) {
08 &analyzeLine($_);
09 }
10 }
12 print "$result_var\n";
14 sub analyzeLine ($) {
15 my $line = shift(#_);
16 $result_var = $result_var + calculatedStuff;
17 }
In real life, there are up to about half a dozen different config_vars and result_vars.
These scripts differ mostly in the values assigned to the config_vars. The main loop will be the same in every case, and analyzeLine() will be mostly the same but could have some small variations.
I can accomplish my purpose by making N copies of this code, with small changes here and there; but that grossly violates all kinds of rules of good design. Ideally, I would like to write a series of scripts containing only a set of config var initializations, followed by
do theCommonStuff;
Note that config_var (and its siblings) must be available to the common code, as must result_var and its lookalikes, upon which analyzeLine() does some calculations.
Should I pack my "common" code into a module? Create a class? Use global variables?
While not exactly code golf, I'm looking for a simple, compact solution that will allow me to DRY and write code only for the differences. I think I would rather not drive the code off a huge table containing all the configs, and certainly not adapt it to use a database.
Looking forward to your suggestions, and thanks!
Update
Since people asked, here's the real analyzeLine:
# Update stats with time and call data in one line.
sub processLine ($) {
my $line = shift(#_);
return unless $line =~ m/$log_match/;
# print "$1 $2\n";
my ($minute, $function) = ($1, $2);
$startMinute = $minute if not $startMinute;
$endMinute = $minute;
if ($minute eq $currentMinute) {
$minuteCount = $minuteCount + 1;
} else {
if ($minuteCount > $topMinuteCount) {
$topMinute = $currentMinute;
$topMinuteCount = $minuteCount;
printf ("%40s %s : %d\n", '', $topMinute, $topMinuteCount);
}
$totalMinutes = $totalMinutes + 1;
$totalCount = $totalCount + $minuteCount;
$currentMinute = $minute;
$minuteCount = 1;
}
}
Since these variables are largely interdependent, I think a functional solution with separate calculations won't be practical. I apologize for misleading people.
Two comments: First, don't post line numbers as they make it more difficult than necessary to copy, paste and edit. Second, don't use &func() to invoke a sub. See perldoc perlsub:
A subroutine may be called using an explicit & prefix. The & is optional in modern Perl, ... Not only does the & form make the argument list optional, it also disables any prototype checking on arguments you do provide.
In short, using & can be surprising unless you know what you are doing and why you are doing it.
Also, don't use prototypes in Perl. They are not the same as prototypes in other languages and, again, can have very surprising effects unless you know what you are doing.
Do not forget to check the return value of system calls such as open. Use autodie with modern perls.
For your specific problem, collect all configuration variables in a hash. Pass that hash to analyzeLine.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings; use strict;
use autodie;
my %config = (
frobnicate => 'yes',
machinate => 'no',
);
my $result;
$result += analyze_file(\%config, $_) for #ARGV;
print "Result = $result\n";
sub analyze_file {
my ($config, $file) = #_;
my $result;
open my $fh, '<', $file;
while ( my $line = <$fh> ) {
$result += analyze_line($config, $line);
}
close $fh;
return $result;
}
sub analyze_line {
my ($line) = #_;
return length $line;
}
Of course, you will note that $config is being passed all over the place, which means you might want to turn this in to a OO solution:
#!/usr/bin/perl
package My::Analyzer;
use strict; use warnings;
use base 'Class::Accessor::Faster';
__PACKAGE__->follow_best_practice;
__PACKAGE__->mk_accessors( qw( analyzer frobnicate machinate ) );
sub analyze_file {
my $self = shift;
my ($file) = #_;
my $result;
open my $fh, '<', $file;
while ( my $line = <$fh> ) {
$result += $self->analyze_line($line);
}
close $fh;
return $result;
}
sub analyze_line {
my $self = shift;
my ($line) = #_;
return $self->get_analyzer->($line);
}
package main;
use warnings; use strict;
use autodie;
my $x = My::Analyzer->new;
$x->set_analyzer(sub {
my $length; $length += length $_ for #_; return $length;
});
$x->set_frobnicate('yes');
$x->set_machinate('no');
my $result;
$result += $x->analyze_file($_) for #ARGV;
print "Result = $result\n";
Go ahead and create a class hierarchy. Your task is an ideal playground for OOP style of programming.
Here's an example:
package Common;
sub new{
my $class=shift;
my $this=bless{},$class;
$this->init();
return $this;
}
sub init{}
sub theCommonStuff(){
my $this=shift;
for(1..10){ $this->analyzeLine($_); }
}
sub analyzeLine(){
my($this,$line)=#_;
$this->{'result'}.=$line;
}
package Special1;
our #ISA=qw/Common/;
sub init{
my $this=shift;
$this->{'sep'}=','; # special param: separator
}
sub analyzeLine(){ # modified logic
my($this,$line)=#_;
$this->{'result'}.=$line.$this->{'sep'};
}
package main;
my $c = new Common;
my $s = new Special1;
$c->theCommonStuff;
$s->theCommonStuff;
print $c->{'result'}."\n";
print $s->{'result'}."\n";
If all the common code is in one function, a function taking your config variables as parameters, and returning the result variables (either as return values, or as in/out parameters), will do. Otherwise, making a class ("package") is a good idea, too.
sub common_func {
my ($config, $result) = #_;
# ...
$result->{foo} += do_stuff($config->{bar});
# ...
}
Note in the above that both the config and result are hashes (actually, references thereto). You can use any other data structure that you feel will suit your goal.
Some thoughts:
If there are several $result_vars, I would recommend creating a separate subroutine for calculating each one.
If a subroutine relies on information outside that function, it should be passed in as a parameter to that subroutine, rather than relying on global state.
Alternatively wrap the whole thing in a class, with $result_var as an attribute of the class.
Practically speaking, there are a couple ways you could implement this:
(1) Have your &analyzeLine function return calculatedStuff, and add it to &result_var in a loop outside the function:
$result_var = 0;
foreach my $file (#files) {
open(my $fh, $file);
while (<$fh>) {
$result_var += analyzeLine($_);
}
}
}
sub analyzeLine ($) {
my $line = shift(#_);
return calculatedStuff;
}
(2) Pass $result_var into analyzeLine explicitly, and return the changed $result_var.
$result_var = 0;
foreach my $file (#files) {
open(my $fh, $file);
while (<$fh>) {
$result_var = addLineToResult($result_var, $_);
}
}
}
sub addLineToResult ($$) {
my $running_total = shift(#_);
my $line = shift(#_);
return $running_total + calculatedStuff;
}
The important part is that if you separate out functions for each of your several $result_vars, you'll be more readily able to write clean code. Don't worry about optimizing yet. That can come later, when your code has proven itself slow. The improved design will make optimization easier when the time comes.
why not create a function and using $config_var and $result_var as parameters?