I want to import a maven project from GitHub into intellij which in of itself I know how to do however, the project this time was created initially also as an eclipse project and I want to be able to work on it in idea while my team members work on it in eclipse without causing conflicts due to differing project file structures. How can this be done?
When checking it out in Intellij it does ask me if I want to create a project from it and select yes but next, it asks whether to create the project from the existing sources vs from external model. From the external model option it allows me to pick eclipse or maven but not both. Do I just create from existing sources? Which is my best option to do this without screwing it up for the others when I commit and push my changes?
I understand that the easy answer might be: "just use eclipse" however, I think the answer on how to properly do this could be useful later. Not only me but also for others who want to work with the IDE they are most familiar and productive with and not mess with the workflow.
Any help would be appreciated
When importing an Eclipse project into IntelliJ, you have the option to:
Create module files near .classpath files
Keep project and module files in
The idea is to keep your *.iml file concurrently with your Eclipse .project/.classpath (and you can keep them in sync).
That way, you can open the project in both IDE.
Related
All!
In our project team, people use either IntelliJ or Eclipse IDE depending on what they are comfortable with. Eacf of the IDEs have their own settings files. For instance, IntelliJ uses .idea and .iml and Eclipse uses .project, .settings, .classpath! While some other stack overflow thread says it's not needed to check in any of these files from either IDEs if you are using Maven, I'm unsure why that's the case. None of the threads say why using Maven does not warrant (some of) the settings, .project, .classpath be checked in?
Can someone help me understand 2 things
1) Why don't we need these files to be checked in when using Maven?
2) If we must check in (Assuming Maven is not used), how do we ensure that either IDEs work okay when checking out from source control and what to check in to ensure cross compatibility.
Thanks!
1) These files are not needed because bothe IDEs can import maven projects using the pom.xml file. So the pom.xml file is your single source of project description for both IDEs.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.m2e
https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/maven-support.html#maven_import_project_start
2) You see it right, it's hard to ensure cross-compatibility if you use only the native project files of the IDEs. Among many other things that's why it's encouraged to separate the build chain (Maven, Gradle, etc.) from the IDE. Also continuous integration systems can be configured more easily if a unified build tool is used so it's kind of a best practice to use one and keep it independent from the IDE.
In case you don't want to switch to maven now, check in the Eclipse .project and .classpath files, Intellij is able to understand them.
I am trying to get started with Eclipse SCADA and import the projects from their git repository.
I have cloned the following projects:
org.eclipse.scada.external
org.eclipse.scada.utils
org.eclipse.scada.base
org.eclipse.scada.protocols
org.eclipse.scada.core
org.eclipse.scada.releng
For each project I did mvn verify in the parent folder and imported the projects in Eclipse. I also changed target platform. However, I still seem to have problems with their dependencies.
Any help would really be appreciated.
Actually the Eclipse SCADA java projects are not developed with "Maven first". So you should disregard maven completely while in the IDE. The maven build is basically only used to build the project unattended.
The issue with the target platform is more complex. We were a bit sloppy in providing a always working target platform (and it is actually difficult to keep them up to date, since the versions of the bundles are fix).
I made a target platform file for the current version, you can find it here: https://gist.github.com/CptMauli/ec6eda37734f0108510f
To make it work properly please download a classic eclipse put it somewhere and create an environment variable ECLIPSE_432_HOME which points to it. Alternatively you can just change the first entry in the target file and point it directly to it.
The reason behind it is, if you would use your own eclipse installation, it is possible that bundles installed there conflict with bundles provided in the target platform or from your workspace. This is actually mostly not even a problem when compiling, but as soon as you start a client or a server, Eclipse will complain about duplicated bundles.
If you have any more questions please go to our mailing list: https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/scada-dev
or our google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/openscada
or write to me directly at juergen dot rose at ibh-systems dot com
Should I put .classpath, .project files and .settings files on SCM when working with Maven project with m2eclipse plugin? Theoretically every developer can grab the sources and import maven projects.
Due to your experience is it better to do this that way or to put Eclipse files to SCM too? Some developers are using InteliJ so I don't want the projects to be Eclipse specific. It seems that the .project file may change according to the set of installed plugins, e.g. change buildCommand from org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder to org.eclipse.wst.common.project.facet.core.builder etc.
Please share your knowledge and experience.
In my experience, you should not include .classpath, .project or .settings. All the information needed to re-import the project is in the pom file, so long as you use "import existing maven projects".
If you put all those local ones, you are likely to end up having SCM changes for irrelevant things, such as different order of entries, local modifications someone made to their project preferences, etc...
As per my experience , it is safe to check-in .project file as it defines the nature and other properties which is useful for developers who will be creating new workspace. Many times, custom facets needs to be added via Eclipse and you may want to share it with other members of your team provided all others use the same IDE for example RAD.
They won't have to go through the pain of again setting and changing project nature, so it might help. Even we had to share our .settings folder in most cases because ppl were facing issues with workspace setup. So all depends on the need and it might help.
One situation in which it is very convenient to have Eclipse project files under version control is when you have Java code automatically generated by plugins. Eclipse removes missing source directories from its configuration before code generators run.
UPDATE
With recent Eclipse releases (I'd say since Juno, certainly since Mars) this is no longer the case.
Over the years the m2e plugin was greatly improved and nowadays there is really no need to store project settings in your SCM, as these settings are properly recreated from the project POM. This has the added benefit of allowing the use of different Eclipse releases with the same project.
When I commit a web appliction to source control should I also include the .project & .classpath files ? I don't think it should make any difference either way as other users who use the project should have the same project settings ?
This is the sort of question that gets people bent out of shape in a debate that never ends. You basically have two camps:
Only put source code into the source control system. Each developer chooses their own IDE and manages their own project configuration. Setting up your IDE after getting source code from the repository will be tricky. If one dev changes project dependencies, they have to explicitly communicate that so that all other devs update their project configurations. There are some tools that try to address this problem, like a Maven plugin that will attempt to generate Eclipse project metadata from pom.xml, but all have their limitations. Groups that go this way favor the purity of not restricting developer choice in IDE over the convenience of having Eclipse projects across the team that just work.
Standardize on Eclipse. Put all Eclipse project metadata into source control. This includes .project, .classpath and the entire contents of .settings. Basically, the only thing that you don't want in your source control repository is content marked as derived in Eclipse. You can check that in right-click->properties. Taking this approach ensures that developers can get started coding immediately after getting the project from source control. No additional configuration required. Also, when one dev changes project configuration, the rest of the team will see the same change on next sync.
Choose the approach that makes the most sense for your team.
For ClearCase, including the .project and .classpath can make a difference when you are using the IBM ClearCase plugin for Eclipse.
That plugin will work better if it can rely on those (versioned) files being there, right next to the sources (as opposed as being in the Eclipse workspace, which doesn't necessarily contains said sources).
In general, nothing generated should go into repository. Those files are generally generated by IDE or maven. However, sometimes you may need to click a button or execute a command to get those generated.
i would include them.
The .project file have plugin info (e.g. maven, ant, pdt, wst, aspectj, findbug..). It is essential if it is not a plain java project.
.classpath contain the classpath. it is needed if you use jar files.
I would say that all files - including .project and .classpath - should go to source control, to ensure that everyone in the team has the exact same setup.
I'm working on an open-source cross-platform C++ project that supports Make and Xcode builds. I'd like to add an Eclipse project as well, but there seems to be no double-clickable way to import a project into Eclipse. Consequently, my "project" consists of fact that I have .project and .cproject files checked into the repository.
torc/
trunk/
eclipse/
??
sandbox/
.project
.cproject
...
src/
.project
.cproject
...
xcode/
torc.xcodeproj/
...
...
Suppose somebody downloads the code but doesn't use Xcode. They can build the code with Make, but many people will probably want to peruse the code structure and sources, and Eclipse would provide a great way to do that.
Unfortunately, the user may not be familiar with Eclipse or how to import projects, and I'd like to make things easier for them, not harder. I was hoping to provide something double-clickable or draggable that would get them started with minimal grief. Can anybody suggest a good way to do this? Or is there an alternate approach that would feel natural to current or prospective Eclipse users?
I am aware of this approach, using org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core.headlessbuild, but that seems to work primarily with never versions of Eclipse and CDT.
I have an answer, but it's not very pretty.
You could create a workspace directory for your project in your repository and check it in with the project already added to the workspace. Then, you could create a script which launches Eclipse and tells it to use the workspace directory in the repository. (For example, eclipse -data ./eclipse/workspace.) You should make sure the workspace has been cleaned first because a workspace that has been built can contain quite a lot of extra metadata.
That said, this is not a great solution. Experienced Eclipse users will probably not want to use your workspace because preferences are stored in the workspace, and besides, if they see a .project and .classpath file, they're already going to know how to import it into their own workspace. People unfamiliar with Eclipse are likely not to have Eclipse installed at all.