I'd like to use EA to generate Requirement elements programatically. I need to use the same sequence numbering (REQ00000xy), as with the GUI when pressing "Auto" button in "Add Element ..." dialog in order to keep´consistent numbering for Requirement elements created either from GUI or from API.
Selecting the last used sequence number from already existing Requierement elements won't help, as it don't move the sequence number up and next Requirement created from GUI .
Is there a way to get (and properly use) the sequence number via EA API or EA SQL?
The table you're looking for is t_trxtypes. This contains something like (EA's output)
Description;NumericWeight;Notes;TRX;TRX_ID;Style;
Autocount;1,00;prefix=bla;suffix=x;active=1;active_a=0;counter=126;;Class;1; ;
You're interested in the column Notes which holds as CSV list like
prefix=bla;suffix=x;active=1;active_a=0;counter=126;
This is a test setting for a class which currently has the number 126. So the next created class would be named bla126x and the entry would change to
prefix=bla;suffix=x;active=1;active_a=0;counter=127;
Just keep the columne t_trxtypes.notes in synch with your creations.
Note EA does not (seem to) allow direct DB access. However, it has a proven back door:
Repository.Execute("UPDATE t_trxtypes SET Notes='prefix=bla;suffix=x;active=1;active_a=0;counter=127;' WHERE TRX_ID=<your id>")
will do the update (replace <your id> with the appropriate key). Though Execute is undocumented it works ever since and for sure Sparx will not limit it as nowadays everyone relies on it.
As a side note: This counter is not safe. There are lots of ways (the easiest is a simple rename) to break it. You'd need some script/add-in to have regular checks your numbering is still consistent. If you rely on requirement numbering you better use an external system like, I dare to say, DOORS.
Finally, RTFM....
For elements, where sequence is defined, if you use empty name in set =AddNew() function, EA generates the sequence upon .Update(). Not earlier. So if you plan to use the generated sequence and add some description, you need to create the element with empty name first, then Update() it and after that append your description to the content of the Name field.
As easy as this.
Related
In FileMaker Pro, when using number field, the user can choose to use a thousand separator or not. For example, if I have a database with a field for the price of an item, the user can either enter 1,000 or 1000.
I am using my database to generate an XML file that needs to be uploaded. The thing is, that my XML scheme dictates that only a value of 1000 is allowed and not 1,000. Therefore, I want to either automatically remove the comma, or (my preference in this case) alert the user when trying to enter a value with a thousand separator.
What I tried is the following.
For the field, I am setting Validation options. For example:
Require Strict data type: Numeric Only
Validated by calculation: Position ( Self ; ","; 1 ; 1 ) = 0
Validated by calculation: Self = Substitue ( Self, ",", "")
Auto-enter calculation: Filter( Self ; "0123456789." )
Unfortunately, none of these work. As the field is defined as a number (and I want to keep it like this, as I am also performing calculations based on this number), the Position function and the Substitute function apparently ignore the thousand separator!
EDIT:
Note that I am generating my XML by concatenating a string, for example:
"<Products><Product><Name>" & Name & "</Name><Price>" & Price & "</Price></Product></Product>"
The reason is that what I am exporting is dependent on the values in my database. Therefore, I am not using the [File][Export records...] function.
Auto-enter calculation will work, but you need to uncheck the box "Do not replace existing value of field" (which is checked by default).
I'd suggest using the calculation GetAsNumber(self) as the auto-enter calc. If it should only contain integers, wrap that in a call to Int()
I am using my database to generate an XML file that needs to be uploaded. The thing is, that my XML scheme dictates that only a value of 1000 is allowed and not 1,000.
If this is only a problem when you export, why not handle it when exporting?
If you are exporting as XML using XSLT, you can add an instruction to
your stylesheet to remove the comma from all number fields;
Alternatively, you can export from a layout where the field is
formatted to display without the comma and select the Apply current's layout data formatting to exported data option when
exporting.
Added:
Perhaps I should have clarified. I am not using the export function to generate the XML as there is some logic involved in how the XML should be formatted (dependent on the data that I want to export). What I do instead is that I make a string where I combine XML-tags and actual values from the database.
IMHO, you're making a mistake by not taking advantage of the built-in XML/XSLT export option. Any imaginable logic can be implemented this way, without burdening your solution with the fragile task of creating a valid XML.
In any case, if you're using the field in a calculation, you can replace all references to it with:
GetAsNumber (YourField )
to get an unformatted, numeric-only, value.
Your question puzzles me. As far as I know, FileMaker does not store the thousands separator, but rather offers it only as a display option.
That's also why those functions can't find it.
Are you sure you are exporting the raw data and not a "formatted as layout" variant?
I would like to select a customer from the select box by start typing its phone number.
How can I do that?
I have seen some are using name_search method.But still i am confused how to use it in both front end and back end.
Or is there any other solution for this.
Override the name_search method of your model and the domain you want on the args variable. Take a look at addons/account/account.py around line 595 args += [('type', '=', type)] for a concrete implementation. Make sure that you return the appropriate data structure as documented in the method's docstring at openerp/models.py.
For Auto complete in odoo. It provides suggestion only in case of using Many2one field in any module.
If you want to show suggestion and autocomplete. Create a model to store the mobile numbers and then use that particular model as foreign key in existing model.
That will do for you.
I need to automatically generate a 12 character value for my Business Key. Without any user interaction.
8 character -> Today Date (yyyymmdd or ddmmyyyy).
+
4 character -> Sequential Number (0001,0002,0003).
The Sequential Number must reset on each new day.
Is it possible to do this in Microsoft Access 2010+ without any coding involved?
Since you are using Access 2010+ the best way to accomplish your goal would be to use a Before Change data macro like this
To create the Before Change macro, click the "Before Change" button on the "Table" tab of the ribbon when the table is open in Datasheet View:
For more details on Data Macros see
Create a data macro
Good question, thanks for the challenge!
After some search, it seems it's possible to do that.
You can prefix the AutoNuber value by processing like the explanation available here: http://www.databasedev.co.uk/add_prefix.html
You can try to specify in the format of the field a format(now(),"ddmmyyyy").
Check this page for more informations, another user seems to have the same problem and got a solution: http://bytes.com/topic/access/answers/695188-custom-made-autonumber-show-todays-date
Hope it's helping you!
I need to add a few fields to a Word 2010 DOTX template which are to be populated automatically with custom content at "run time" when the document is opened in a C# program using Word Interop services. I don't see any way to assign a unique name to "Ask" or "Fill-In" fields when adding them to the template via the QuickParts ribbon-menu option.
When I iterate the document.Fields collection in the C# program, I must know which field I'm referencing, so it can be assigned the correct value.
It seems things have changed between previous versions of Word and Word 2010. So, if you answer please make sure your answer applies to 2010. Don't assume that what used to work in previous versions works in 2010. Much appreciated, since I rarely work with Word and feel like a dolt when trying to figure out the ribbon menuing in 2010.
You are correct in that fields don't necessarily have a built-in way to uniquely distinguish themselves from other field instances (other than its index in the Fields collection). However, you can use the Field.Type property to test for wdFieldAsk or wdFieldFillIn . If this is not narrow enough to ID then you will need to parse your own unique identifier from the Field.Code. For example, you can construct your FILLIN field as:
{ FILLIN "Hello, World!" MYIDENTIFER }
when you iterate through your document.Fields collection just have a test for the identifier being in the string. EDIT: example:
For Each fld In ActiveDocument.Fields
If InStr("CARMODEL", fld.Code) <> 0 Then
''this is the carmodel field
End If
Next
Another alternative - seek your specific field with a Find.Text for "^d MYIDENTIFIER" (where ^d is expression for 'field code')
Let me know if this helps and expand on your question if any gaps.
I have the following Problem, given this XML Datastructure:
<level1>
<level2ElementTypeA></level2ElementTypeA>
<level2ElementTypeB>
<level3ElementTypeA>String1Ineed<level3ElementTypeB>
</level2ElementTypeB>
...
<level2ElementTypeC>
<level3ElementTypeB attribute1>
<level4ElementTypeA>String2Ineed<level4ElementTypeA>
<level3ElementTypeB>
<level2ElementTypeC>
...
<level2ElementTypeD></level2ElementTypeD>
</level1>
<level1>...</level1>
I need to create an Entity which contain: String1Ineed and String2Ineed.
So every time I came across a level3ElementTypeB with a certain value in attribute1, I have my String2Ineed. The ugly part is how to obtain String1Ineed, which is located in the first element of type level2ElementTypeB above the current level2ElementTypeC.
My 'imperative' solution looks like that that I always keep an variable with the last value of String1Ineed and if I hit criteria for String2Ineed, I simply use that. If we look at this from a plain collection processing point of view. How would you model the backtracking logic between String1Ineed and String2Ineed? Using the State Monad?
Isn't this what XPATH is for? You can find String2Ineed and then change the axis to search back for String1Ineed.