Suppose, I have following tables
product_prices
product|price|date
-------+-----+----------
apple |10 |2014-03-01
-------+-----+----------
apple |20 |2014-05-02
-------+-----+----------
egg |2 |2014-03-03
-------+-----+----------
egg |4 |2015-10-12
purchases:
user|product|date
----+-------+----------
John|apple |2014-03-02
----+-------+----------
John|apple |2014-06-03
----+-------+----------
John|egg |2014-08-13
----+-------+----------
John|egg |2016-08-13
What I need is table similar to this:
name|product|purchase date |price date|price
----+-------+--------------+----------+-----
John|apple |2014-03-02 |2014-03-01|10
----+-------+--------------+----------+-----
John|apple |2014-06-03 |2014-05-02|20
----+-------+--------------+----------+-----
John|egg |2014-08-13 |2014-08-13|2
----+-------+--------------+----------+-----
John|egg |2016-08-13 |2015-10-12|4
Or "what is the price for product at this day". Where price is calculated based on date from products table.
On real DB I tried to use something similar to:
SELECT name, product, pu.date, pp.date, pp.price
FROM purchases AS pu
LEFT JOIN product_prices AS pp
ON pu.date = (
SELECT date
FROM product_prices
ORDER BY date DESC LIMIT 1);
But I keep either getting only left part of table (with (null) instead of product dates and prices) or many rows with all the combinations of prices and dates.
I would suggest changing product_prices table to use a daterange column instead (or at least a start_date and an end_date).
You can use an exclusion constraint to make sure you never have overlapping ranges for one product and an insert trigger that "closes" the "current" prices and creates a new unbounded range for the newly inserted price.
A daterange can efficiently be indexed and with that in place the query gets as easy as:
SELECT name, product, pu.date, pp.valid_during, pp.price
FROM purchases AS pu
LEFT JOIN product_prices AS pp ON pu.date <# pp.valid_during
(assuming the range column is named valid_during)
The exclusion constraint would only work however if the product was an integer (not a varchar) - but I guess your real product_purchases table uses a foreign key to some product table anyway (which is an integer).
The new table definitions could look something like this:
create table purchase_prices
(
product_id integer not null references products,
price numeric(16,4) not null,
valid_during daterange not null
);
And the constraint that prevents overlapping ranges:
alter table purchase_prices
add constraint check_price_range
exclude using gist (product_id with =, valid_during with &&);
The constraint needs the btree_gist extension.
As always improving query speed comes with a price and in this case it's the higher maintenance costs for the GiST index. You would need to run some tests to see if the easier (and most probably much faster) query outweighs the slower insert performance on purchase_prices.
Look at your scalar sub-query very closely. It is not correlated back to the outer query. In other words, it will return the same result every time: the latest date in the product_prices table. Period. Think about the query out of context:
SELECT date
FROM product_prices
ORDER BY date DESC LIMIT 1
There are two problems with it:
It will return 2015-10-12 for every row in the join and ultimately, nothing was purchased on that date, hence, null.
Your approximation of closest is that the dates are equal. Unless you have a product_prices row for every product for every single date, you'll always have misses. "Closest" implies distance and ranking.
WITH close_prices_by_purchase AS (
SELECT
p.user,
p.product,
p.date pp.date,
pp.price,
row_number() over (partition by pp.product, order by pp.date desc) as distance -- calculate distance between purchase date and price date
FROM purchases AS p
INNER JOIN product_prices AS pp on pp.product = p.product
WHERE pp.date < p.date
)
SELECT user as name, product, pu.date as purchase_date, pp.date as price_date, price
FROM close_prices_by_purchase AS cpbp
WHERE distance = 1; -- shortest distance
You can try something like this, although I am sure there's a better way:
with diffs as (
select
a.*,
b."date" as bdate,
b.price,
b."date" - a."date" as diffdays,
row_number() over (
partition by "user", a."product", a."date"
order by "user", a."product", a."date", b."date" - a."date" desc
) as sr
from purchases a
inner join product_prices b on a.product = b.product
where b."date" - a."date" < 1
)
select
"user" as "name",
product,
"date" as "purchase date",
bdate as "price date",
price
from diffs
where sr = 1
Example: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/dwQ9EXmp1SdpNpxyV1wc6M/0
Explanation
I attempted to join both tables and find the difference between dates of purchase and price, and ranked them by closest date prior to the purchase. Rank of 1 will go to the closest date. Then, data with rank of 1 was extracted.
This is a great place to use date ranges! We know the start date of the price range and we can use a window function to get the next date. At that point, it's really easy to figure out the price on any day.
with price_ranges as
(select product,
price,
date as price_date,
daterange(date, lead(date, 1)
OVER (partition by product order by date), '[)'
) as valid_price_range from product_prices
)
select "user" as name,
purchases.product,
purchases.date,
price_date,
price
from purchases
join price_ranges on purchases.product = price_ranges.product
and purchases.date <# price_ranges.valid_price_range
order by purchases.date;
Related
I'm relatively new to PostgreSQL and I'm working with window functions.
I have 2 relations: company and employee. Employee contains an information about the salary. I just wanna to get a rating of employees by their salary in ascending order.
This is my query.
SELECT company.name,
e.last_name,
e.salary,
rank() OVER (ORDER BY e.salary nulls first )
FROM company
LEFT JOIN employee e ON e.company_id = company.id
order by company.name;
So
result is:
You can see that fourth and eighth rows have null-value salary. But first row with not null salary value is sixth - Kulakov got the third rank, but I need him to have the second rank.
I think it's possible not to count not null values.
What is the right way to do this?
Full disclosure: I've seen 1 variation of this question for mySQL, and the PostgreSQL answer didn't satisfy me.
I have 2 tables: Reviews & businesses. In the Reviews table, the only 3 relevant columns for the purpose of this question are 'business_id', 'date' (yyyy-mm-dd), and stars (1-5), and the primary key is (review_id). In the businesses table, the relevant columns are 'business_id', 'year', and 'month'.' The 'year' and 'month' columns are there because there is another column in the business table called 'review_count', which represents the number of reviews a business received on each month of each year. Because of this, the composite primary key of this table is (business_id, year, month).
Essentially, I am trying to create a column in the business table with the average rating (represented by stars) a business received on each month of each year it was open.
The following query gives me the exact result I want:
SELECT round(CAST(AVG(stars) AS NUMERIC), 2)
FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses
WHERE business_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT(business_id)
FROM trending_businesses_v2)
GROUP BY business_id, EXTRACT("year" FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses.date), EXTRACT('month' FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses.date);
This code returns the column and all the correct values that I want to insert into my business table.
However, when I try to actually update the table, I get an error saying more than one row was returned by the subquery used as an expression. This is the code I'm trying to update with:
UPDATE trending_businesses_v2
SET avg_monthly_rating = (SELECT round(CAST(AVG(stars) AS NUMERIC), 2)
FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses
WHERE business_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT(business_id)
FROM trending_businesses_v2)
GROUP BY business_id, EXTRACT("year" FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses.date), EXTRACT('month' FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses.date);
I've tried a number of other solutions as well, including using joins, but keep getting a similar error.
UPDATE: Still No Answer but getting Closer:
Still can't quite figure out where I'm going wrong here. I also don't understand why I have to groupby 'rtb.date' here if I'm only extracting values from it (returned error if I didn't).
UPDATE trending_businesses_v2 tb
SET avg_monthly_rating = t.val
FROM (SELECT business_id, EXTRACT("year" FROM rtb.date) AS year, EXTRACT('month' FROM rtb.date) AS month, round(CAST(AVG(stars) AS NUMERIC), 2) as val
FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses rtb
WHERE business_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT(business_id)
FROM trending_businesses_v2
)
GROUP BY business_id, year, month, rtb.date
) t
WHERE t.business_id = tb.business_id AND
t.year = tb.year AND t.month = tb.month;
You need to match the rows, presumably using a business id and date. Something like this:
UPDATE trending_businesses_v2 tb
SET avg_monthly_rating = t.val
FROM (SELECT business_id, date_trunc('month', rtb.date) as yyyymm, round(CAST(AVG(stars) AS NUMERIC), 2) as val
FROM reviews_for_trending_businesses rtb
WHERE business_id IN (SELECT DISTINCT(business_id)
FROM trending_businesses_v2
)
GROUP BY business_id, date_trunc('month', rtb.date)
) t
WHERE t.business_id = tb.business_id AND
t.yyyymm = tb.?;
I have a Table that I am using to pull order details in SSRS that has when the price of a product number was changed. It has Data Changed and Updated Cost.
I am pairing up two different tables to create a report that is the cost of the package at the time of the order. Here is how I am pulling my data:
SELECT
WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ItemNo AS [ActPkgCostHist ItemNo]
,WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ActPkgCostDate
,WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ActPkgCost
,ORDER.OrderHist.OrderNo
,ORDER.OrderHist.ItemNo AS [OrderHist ItemNo]
,ORDER.OrderHist.DispenseDt
FROM
WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist
INNER JOIN ORDER.OrderHist
ON WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ItemNo = ORDER.OrderHist.ItemNo
Catalog=ShippedOrders
ActPkgCostHist Table has What the cost of an Item was and what date the cost was changed.
OrderHist Table has the complete details of the order except the ActPkgCost at the time of the purchase.
I am attempting to create a table that Has order number, the date of the order and the package cost at the time of the order.
The ROW_NUMBER function is very useful for cases like this.
SELECT WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ItemNo AS [ActPkgCostHist ItemNo]
,WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ActPkgCostDate
,WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist.ActPkgCost
,ORDER.OrderHist.OrderNo
,ORDER.OrderHist.ItemNo AS [OrderHist ItemNo]
,ORDER.OrderHist.DispenseDt
FROM ORDER.OrderHist
INNER JOIN (
SELECT ItemNo, ActPkgCostDate, ActPkgCost
, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY ItemNo ORDER BY ActPkgCostDate DESC) as RN
FROM WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist
--if there are future dated changes, limit ActPkgCostDate to be <= the current date
) ActPkgCostHist on ActPkgCostHist.ItemNo = OrderHist.ItemNo
WHERE RN = 1
What this subquery does is group the cost history by ItemNo. Then for each one, it ranks the changes by recency with the most recent change being 1. Then in the main query you filter it to just rows with a 1.
For each item in each order you have to find the latest cost date and use it when joining with the cost table
SELECT C.ItemNo AS [ActPkgCostHist ItemNo],
C.ActPkgCostDate,
C.ActPkgCost,
O.OrderNo,
O.ItemNo AS [OrderHist ItemNo],
O.DispenseDt
FROM WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist AS C
-- JOIN order detail with cost table in order to define the cost date per item/order
INNER JOIN (SELECT Max(CH.ActPkgCostDate) AS ItemCostDate,
OH.OrderNo,
OH.ItemNo,
OH.DispenseDt
FROM WAREHOUSE.ActPkgCostHist AS CH
INNER JOIN ORDER.OrderHist AS OH
ON CH.ItemNo = OH.ItemNo
-- Get the latest cost date only from dates before order date
WHERE CH.ActPkgCostDate <= OH.DispenseDt
GROUP BY OH.OrderNo,
OH.ItemNo,
OH.DispenseDt) AS O
ON C.ItemNo = O.ItemNo
AND C.ActPkgCostDate = O.ItemCostDate
Just have a standard orders table:
order_id
order_date
customer_id
order_total
Trying to write a query that generates a column that shows the days since the last purchase, for each customer. If the customer had no prior orders, the value would be zero.
I have tried something like this:
WITH user_data AS (
SELECT customer_id, order_total, order_date::DATE,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY order_date::DATE DESC
)
AS order_count
FROM transactions
WHERE STATUS = 100 AND order_total > 0
)
SELECT * FROM user_data WHERE order_count < 3;
Which I could feed into tableau, then use some table calculations to wrangle the data, but I really would like to understand the SQL approach. My approach also only analyzes the most recent 2 transactions, which is a drawback.
Thanks
You should use lag() function:
select *,
lag(order_date) over (partition by customer_id order by order_date)
as prior_order_date
from transactions
order by order_id
To have the number of days since last order, just subtract the prior order date from the current order date:
select *,
order_date- lag(order_date) over (partition by customer_id order by order_date)
as days_since_last_order
from transactions
order by order_id
The query selects null if there is no prior order. You can use coalesce() to change it to zero.
You indicated that you need to calculate number of days since the last purchase.
..Trying to write a query that generates a column that shows the days
since the last purchase
So, basically you need get a difference between now and last purchase date for each client. Query can be the following:
-- test DDL
CREATE TABLE orders (
order_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
order_date DATE,
customer_id INTEGER,
order_total INTEGER
);
INSERT INTO orders(order_date, customer_id, order_total) VALUES
('01-01-2015'::DATE,1,2),
('01-02-2015'::DATE,1,3),
('02-01-2015'::DATE,2,4),
('02-02-2015'::DATE,2,5),
('03-01-2015'::DATE,3,6),
('03-02-2015'::DATE,3,7);
WITH orderdata AS (
SELECT customer_id,order_total,order_date,
(now()::DATE - max(order_date) OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id)) as days_since_purchase
FROM orders
WHERE order_total > 0
)
SELECT DISTINCT customer_id ,days_since_purchase FROM orderdata ORDER BY customer_id;
Given this table:
SELECT * FROM CommodityPricing order by dateField
"SILVER";60.45;"2002-01-01"
"GOLD";130.45;"2002-01-01"
"COPPER";96.45;"2002-01-01"
"SILVER";70.45;"2003-01-01"
"GOLD";140.45;"2003-01-01"
"COPPER";99.45;"2003-01-01"
"GOLD";150.45;"2004-01-01"
"MERCURY";60;"2004-01-01"
"SILVER";80.45;"2004-01-01"
As of 2004, COPPER was dropped and mercury introduced.
How can I get the value of (array_agg(value order by date desc) ) [1] as NULL for COPPER?
select commodity,(array_agg(value order by date desc) ) --[1]
from CommodityPricing
group by commodity
"COPPER";"{99.45,96.45}"
"GOLD";"{150.45,140.45,130.45}"
"MERCURY";"{60}"
"SILVER";"{80.45,70.45,60.45}"
SQL Fiddle
select
commodity,
array_agg(
case when commodity = 'COPPER' then null else price end
order by date desc
)
from CommodityPricing
group by commodity
;
To "pad" missing rows with NULL values in the resulting array, build your query on full grid of rows and LEFT JOIN actual values to the grid.
Given this table definition:
CREATE TEMP TABLE price (
commodity text
, value numeric
, ts timestamp -- using ts instead of the inappropriate name date
);
I use generate_series() to get a list of timestamps representing the years and CROSS JOIN to a unique list of all commodities (SELECT DISTINCT ...).
SELECT commodity, (array_agg(value ORDER BY ts DESC)) AS years
FROM generate_series ('2002-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamp
, '2004-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamp
, '1y') t(ts)
CROSS JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT commodity FROM price) c(commodity)
LEFT JOIN price p USING (ts, commodity)
GROUP BY commodity;
Result:
COPPER {NULL,99.45,96.45}
GOLD {150.45,140.45,130.45}
MERCURY {60,NULL,NULL}
SILVER {80.45,70.45,60.45}
SQL Fiddle.
I cast the array to text in the fiddle, because the display sucks and would swallow NULL values otherwise.