I am trying to use vuex's store to make some API calls but after installing vuex, importing store to my files and following other stack overflow answers, like making sure vuex is installed, if i am exporting my store file with " Vuex.Store" and etc but my loadCalls function is still not working.
This is the error i get:
this.$store.loadCalls is not a function
Here is my function and how i am trying to call it, it is declared in my ACTIONS section of my store.js file.
loadCalls() {
axios
.get("/some/calls")
.then(res => {
console.log(res)
});
},
I try using it in my beforeMount() when my component loads:
beforeMount(){
this.$store.loadCalls();
}
What am i doing wrong here?
If you defined an action like this:
actions: {
loadCalls() {
// ...
}
}
Then you would call it like this:
this.$store.dispatch('loadCalls');
Actions aren't exposed directly, you call them using dispatch.
https://vuex.vuejs.org/guide/actions.html#dispatching-actions
Related
I am trying to add a mixin in Magento 2 for the checkout/payment page shipping info section.
There is an existing section in vendor/magento/module-checkout/view/frontend/web/template/shipping-information/address-renderer/default.html as follows:
<each args="data: address().customAttributes, as: 'element'">
<text args="$parent.getCustomAttributeLabel(element)"/>
<br/>
</each>
I want to create a myNewFunction() and call it from here. So, I have temporarily added if="$parent.myNewFunction(element)" to it, like this:
<each args="data: address().customAttributes, as: 'element'">
<text if="$parent.myNewFunction(element)" args="$parent.getCustomAttributeLabel(element)"/>
<br/>
</each>
That pre-existing function getCustomAttributeLabel is defined in vendor/magento/module-checkout/view/frontend/web/js/view/shipping-information/address-renderer/default.js.
This is where I need to add my myNewFunction() at. I don't want to override that entire file and duplicate it into my theme, so I am trying to add the function to it via mixin.
To do this, I have stubbed out a module: app/code/MyCompany.
In this module, I have created:
app/code/MyCompany/Checkout/view/frontend/requirejs-config.js
with this code:
var config = {
config: {
mixins: {
'Magento_Checkout/js/view/shipping-information/address-renderer/default': {
'MyCompany_Checkout/js/view/shipping-information/address-renderer/default-mixin': true
}
}
}
};
Then I created the mixin itself in:
app/code/MyCompany/Checkout/view/frontend/web/js/view/shipping-information/address-renderer/default-mixin.js
with this code:
define([
'uiComponent',
'underscore',
'Magento_Customer/js/customer-data'
], function (Component, _, customerData) {
'use strict';
return function (target) {
return target.extend({
myNewFunction: function (element) {
console.log(element);
return false;
}
});
}
});
I currently have deploy mode set to "development" in Magento. Nonetheless, I have tried removing all the var/* files, generating static content again, and clearing the cache, for good measure.
No matter what, upon loading the checkout/payment page, I keep getting this JS error in the console:
$parent.myNewFunction is not a function
What am I doing wrong here?
I suspected the module needs to have a register.php? Or the module is not loading? Yet, I have seen plenty of other examples such as this guide, this Magento mixin stackoverflow question, and this example on how to add shipping.js functionality via mixin, none of which mention doing anything more with the module other than declaring the requirejs-config.js and the mixin JS file itself.
Just found a way to override that function using 'mixins'.
On requirejs-config.js file I had to add:
config: {
mixins: {
'Magento_Checkout/js/view/shipping': {
'Mynamespace_Mymodule/js/view/shipping': true
}
}
}
I have a NetSuite SuiteScript file (2.0) in which I want to include a small library of utilities I've built. I can do that fine, and access the functions in the included library. But I can't access the constants I've defined in that library - I have to re-declare them in the main file.
Here's the main file:
define(['N/record', 'N/search', './utils.js'],
function (record, search, utils) {
function pageInit(scriptContext) {
isUserAdmin = isCurrentUserAdmin(contextRecord);
if (isUserAdmin) {
alert('Administrator Role ID is ' + ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE);
// Do something for Admin users
}
return;
}
return {
pageInit: pageInit
};
});
You can see I include the file ./utils.js in it. Here's utils.js:
const ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE = 11;
function isCurrentUserAdmin(currentRecord) {
return ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE == nlapiGetRole();
}
That's the entire file - nothing else.
In the main file, the call to the function isCurrentUserAdmin works fine. It correctly tells me whether the current user is an admin. Note that I don't have to preface the call to isCurrentUserAdmin with utils. (utils.isCurrentUserAdmin doesn't work - it gives me the error JS_EXCEPTION TypeError utils is undefined). But when the code gets to the line that uses ADMINSTRATOR_ROLE, I get the error JS_EXCEPTION ReferenceError ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE is not defined. BTW, if I put the constant definition of ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE in the main file instead of utils.js, I get the same error when utils.js tries to use it. The only way I can get it to work is if I have the line defining the constant in both files.
Why does the inclusion work for the function, but not the constant? Am I including the library wrongly? I thought I'd have to use it as utils.isCurrentUserAdmin rather than just isCurrentUserAdmin, but to my surprise that's not the case, as I say above.
If you have utils.js like below, you can use utils.ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE and utils.isCurrentUserAdmin() in your main file.
/**
*#NApiVersion 2.0
*/
define ([],
function() {
const ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE = 11;
function isCurrentUserAdmin() {
// check here
}
return {
ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE: ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE,
isCurrentUserAdmin: isCurrentUserAdmin
};
});
Try
define(['N/record', 'N/search', 'SuiteScripts/utils']
You need to make sure any member you need to access in another module needs to be exported in the source module using the return statement
Is there a way with Kuzzle, to make two plugins communicate with each other?
Let's say a plugin A wants to call a method of a plugin B at boot time, or even runtime for some use cases. How can I do that ?
For now, there is no way to retrieve a particular plugin instance from another plugin. Plugins manager isn't reachable at plugin initialization, but in some way via a Kuzzle request (not the proper way of doing it)
function (request) {
const kSymbol = Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(request.context.user)[0];
request.context.user[kSymbol].pluginsManager.MyPlugin.someMethod(...args);
...
}
The idea behind this question would be to do something like this, when initializing the plugin
function init (customConfig, context) {
const { pluginsManager } = context;
const result = pluginsManager.MyPlugin.someMethod(...args);
// make something with the result ?
// For later use of plugins manager perhaps ?
this.context = context
}
Looks like Kuzzle Pipes would be the right thing to do it, cause they are synchronous and chainable, but pipes don't return anything when triggering an event
function init (customConfig, context) {
const result = context.accessors.trigger('someEvent', {
someAttribute: 'someValue'
});
console.log(result) // undefined
}
Thanks for your help !
full disclosure: I work for Kuzzle
Even if accessing the pluginManager like this may work at this time, we may change the internal implementation without warning since it's not documented so your plugin may not work in next version of Kuzzle.
The easiest way to use a feature from another plugin is exposing a new API method through a custom controller and then call it with the query method of the embedded SDK.
For example if your plugin name is notifier-plugin in the manifest:
this.controllers = {
email: {
send: request => { /* send email */ }
}
};
Then you can call it in another plugin like this:
await this.context.accessors.sdk.query({
controller: 'notifier-plugin/email',
action: 'send'
});
Please note that you can't make API calls in the plugin init method.
If you need to make API calls when Kuzzle start, then you can add a hook/pipe on the core:kuzzleStart event.
this.hooks = {
'core:kuzzleStart': () => this.context.accessors.sdk.query({
controller: 'notifier-plugin/email',
action: 'send'
});
};
Finally I noticed that you can't use pipes returns like in your example but I have proposed a feature to allow plugin developers to use the pipe chain return.
It will be available in the next version of Kuzzle.
I'm trying to get the semantic object and semantic action of my deployed SAPUI5 application. I tried looking into ushell services - URLParsing and LaunchPage but it does not seem to return my semantic objects and actions.
Have anybody tried this?
This worked for me so far:
sap.ui.require([ // modules lazily instead of accessing them with global names.
"sap/ushell/library", // Consider adding `"sap.ushell": { lazy: true }` to dependencies in manifest.json
"sap/ui/core/routing/HashChanger",
], async (sapUshellLib, HashChanger) => {
const fullHash = new HashChanger().getHash(); // returns e.g. "masterDetail-display?sap-ui-theme=sap_fiori_3&/product/HT-1000"
const urlParsing = await sapUshellLib.Container.getServiceAsync("URLParsing");
urlParsing.parseShellHash(fullHash); /** returns e.g. {
action: "display",
appSpecificRoute: "&/product/HT-1000",
contextRaw: undefined,
params: { "sap-ui-theme": "sap_fiori_3" },
semanticObject: "masterDetail"
} **/
});
You can always just use
window.location.hash
Which you can parse yourself pretty easily. If you really want launchpad code, you can often find it here:
sap.ushell.services.AppConfiguration.getCurrentApplication().sShellHash
I've noticed it's not always set though when you're looking at an embedded component
A simplistic way to do this would be:
var oHashObject = new sap.ui.core.routing.HashChanger();
oHashObject.getHash();
//this will return the semantic object and action alongwith the routing params
I would like to retrieve the id of a newly created record using javascript when I click on save button and just before redirecting page.
Do you have any idea please ?
Thank you !
One way to do this in Sugar 7 would be by overriding the CreateView.
Here an example of a CustomCreateView that outputs the new id in an alert-message after a new Account was successfully created, but before Sugar gets to react to the created record.
custom/modules/Accounts/clients/base/views/create/create.js:
({
extendsFrom: 'CreateView',
// This initialize function override does nothing except log to console,
// so that you can see that your custom view has been loaded.
// You can remove this function entirely. Sugar will default to CreateView's initialize then.
initialize: function(options) {
this._super('initialize', [options]);
console.log('Custom create view initialized.');
},
// saveModel is the function used to save the new record, let's override it.
// Parameters 'success' and 'error' are functions/callbacks.
// (based on clients/base/views/create/create.js)
saveModel: function(success, error) {
// Let's inject our own code into the success callback.
var custom_success = function() {
// Execute our custom code and forward all callback arguments, in case you want to use them.
this.customCodeOnCreate(arguments)
// Execute the original callback (which will show the message and redirect etc.)
success(arguments);
};
// Make sure that the "this" variable will be set to _this_ view when our custom function is called via callback.
custom_success = _.bind(custom_success , this);
// Let's call the original saveModel with our custom callback.
this._super('saveModel', [custom_success, error]);
},
// our custom code
customCodeOnCreate: function() {
console.log('customCodeOnCreate() called with these arguments:', arguments);
// Retrieve the id of the model.
var new_id = this.model.get('id');
// do something with id
if (!_.isEmpty(new_id)) {
alert('new id: ' + new_id);
}
}
})
I tested this with the Accounts module of Sugar 7.7.2.1, but it should be possible to implement this for all other sidecar modules within Sugar.
However, this will not work for modules in backward-compatibility mode (those with #bwc in their URL).
Note: If the module in question already has its own Base<ModuleName>CreateView, you probably should extend from <ModuleName>CreateView (no Base) instead of from the default CreateView.
Be aware that this code has a small chance of breaking during Sugar upgrades, e.g. if the default CreateView code receives changes in the saveModel function definition.
Also, if you want to do some further reading on extending views, there is an SugarCRM dev blog post about this topic: https://developer.sugarcrm.com/2014/05/28/extending-view-javascript-in-sugarcrm-7/
I resolved this by using logic hook (after save), for your information, I am using Sugar 6.5 no matter the version of suitecrm.
Thank you !