Expose pod's tomcat port - kubernetes

I have the bare metall kubernetes pod running tomcat application on port 8085. If it would be common server, the app would be accessible via http://<server-ip>:8085/app. My goal is to expose the tomcat on Kubernetes node's address and the same port as used in tomcat.
I am able to expose and access app using Node Port service - but it is inconvenient that port is always different.
I tried to setup traefik ingress:
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: test-tag2
spec:
rules:
- host: kubernetes.example.com #in my conf I use node's domain name
http:
paths:
- path: /test
backend:
serviceName: test-tag2
servicePort: 8085
And I can see result in Traefik's dashboard, but still if I navigate to http://kubernetes.example.com/test/app I get nothing.
I've tried a bunch of ways to configure that and still no luck.
Is it actually possible to expose my pod in this way?

Did you try specifying a nodePort value in the service yaml? If specified, kubernetes will create service on the specified NodePort. If the nodePort is not available , kubernetes doesn't create the service.
Refer to this answer for more details:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/43944385/1237402

Related

Kubernetes expose a service on a port over tls

I have my application https://myapp.com deployed on K8S, with an nginx ingress controller. HTTPS is resolved at nginx.
Now there is a need to expose one service on a specific port for example https://myapp.com:8888. Idea is to keep https://myapp.com secured inside the private network and expose only port number 8888 to the internet for integration.
Is there a way all traffic can be handled by the ingress controller, including tls termination, and it can also expose 8888 port and map it to a service?
Or
I need another nginx terminating tls and exposed on nodeport? I am not sure if I can access services like https://myapp.com:<node_port> with https.
Is using multiple ingress controllers an option?
What is the best practice to do this in Kubernetes?
Use sidecar proxy pattern to add HTTPS support to the application running inside the pod.
Refer the below diagram as a reference
Run nginx as a sidecar proxy container fronting the application container inside the same pod. Access the application through port 8888 on nginx proxy. nginx would route the traffic to the application.
Find below the post showing how it can be implemented
https://vorozhko.net/kubernetes-sidecar-pattern-nginx-ssl-proxy-for-nodejs
It is not a best practices to expose custom port over internet.
Instead, create a sub-domain (i.e https://custom.myapp.com) which point to internal service in port 8888.
Then to create separate nginx ingress (not ingress controller) which point to that "https://custom.myapp.com" sub domain
Example manifest file as follow:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: ingress-myapp-service
namespace: abc
rules:
- host: custom.myapp.com
http:
paths:
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: myapp-service
port:
number: 8888
Hope this helps.
So you have service foo on some port, which you want to have available on your internal network. Then service bar, which runs on port 8888 in that same pod.
It's as simple as setting up two services to that pod, with different spec.ports[].targetPort values. My example assumes a svc foo pointing at port 80, and svc bar pointing at port 8888 on the pod.
Take care that generally, the ingress controller only services HTTP and HTTPS connections on ports 80 and 443. That is a network setting generally defined for the nodes that are running the ingress controller. TCP/UDP are not serviced out-of-the-box by the ingress controller
My advice is to use something like this, and use path to expose the required service.
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: ingress-wildcard-host
spec:
rules:
- host: "myapp.com"
http:
paths:
- pathType: Prefix
path: "/"
backend:
service:
name: foo
port:
number: 80
- pathType: Prefix
path: "/bar"
backend:
service:
name: bar
port:
number: 80
If you would want to further secure your network, you should probably take a look at networkpolicies. They allow configuration of granular access to pods and services. You can, for example, only allow external ingress to that pod to port 8888.

GKE Ingres and GCE Load balancer : Always get 404

I try to deploy 2 applications (behind 2 separates Deployments objects). I have 1 Service per Deployment, with type NodePort.
application1_service.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: application1-service
namespace: default
spec:
ports:
- port: 80
protocol: TCP
targetPort: 80
selector:
run: application1
type: NodePort
application2_service.yaml is the exact same (except for name and run)
I use an Ingress to make the 2 services available,
ingress.yaml
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: my-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.global-static-ip-name: "my-static-ip"
networking.gke.io/managed-certificates: "my-certificate"
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: "gce"
spec:
rules:
- host: "my.host.com"
http:
paths:
- path: /*
backend:
serviceName: application1-service
servicePort: 80
- path: /application2/*
backend:
serviceName: application2-service
servicePort: 80
I also create a ManagedCertificate object, to be able to handle HTTPS requests.
managed_certificate.yaml
apiVersion: networking.gke.io/v1beta1
kind: ManagedCertificate
metadata:
name: my-certificate
spec:
domains:
- my.host.com
The weird thing here is that curl https://my.host.com/ works fine and I can access my service, but when I try curl https://my.host.com/application2/, I keep getting 404 Not Found.
Why is the root working and not the other ?
Additional info:
The ManagedCertificate is valid and works fine with /.
application1 and application2 are the exact same app and if I swap them in the ingress, the output is the same.
Thanks for your help !
EDIT:
Here is the 404 I get when I try to access application2
Don't know if it can help but here is also the part of the Ingress access logs showing the 404
i think you can't use the same port for 2 different applications because this port is used on every node to route to one app.
From docs:
NodePort: Exposes the Service on each Node's IP at a static port (the NodePort). A ClusterIP Service, to which the NodePort Service routes, is automatically created. You'll be able to contact the NodePort Service, from outside the cluster, by requesting :.
So in your case one app is already using port 80, you could try to use a different one for application 2
I have replicated the problem without a domain and managed a
Certificate. For me it's working fine using the Load Balancer IP
address.
(ingress-316204)$ curl http://<LB IP address>/v2/
Hello, world!
Version: 2.0.0
Hostname: web2-XXX
(ingress-316204)$ curl http://<LB IP address>/
Hello, world!
Version: 1.0.0
Hostname: web-XXX
Ingress configuration seems to be correct as per doc. Check if curl https://LB IP address/application2/ is working or not, if it's working then there might be some issue with the host name.
Check if you have updated the host file (/etc/hosts) with line LB IP
address my.host.com.
Check if host, path and backend are configured correctly in Load
Balancer configuration.
If still having the problem then check Port,Nodeport and Targetport configured correctly or else share the output of ‘kubectl describe ing my-ingress’ for further investigation.
Answering my own question:
After searching for days, I ultimately found the reason of the problem.
Everything was fine with the cluster and the configs, my problem was from my Flask API.
All the URLs was like this one:
#app.route("/my_function")
So it was working fine on root path with my.host.com/my_function, but when I was typing my.host.com/application1/my_function it wasn't working...
I just changed my app to
#app.route("/application1/my_function")
Everything works fine now :) Hope it will help !

Exposing simple application in gcloud with Kubernetes

I have a simple app which I am following from a basic tutorial :
https://medium.com/#bhargavshah2011/hello-world-on-kubernetes-cluster-6bec6f4b1bfd
I create a cluster hello-world2-cluster
I "connect" to the cluster using :
gcloud container clusters get-credentials hello-world2-cluster --zone us-central1-c --project strange-vortex-286312
I perform a git clone of the "hellow world" project, which is basically some kind of snake game :
$ git clone https://github.com/skynet86/hello-world-k8s.git
$ cd hello-world-k8s/
Next I run "create" on the YAML:
kubectl create -f hello-world.yaml
Deplyments and services are created as expected :
Fine! ALl good!
But.... now what????
What do I do now?
I want to access this app from the outside world. Where is the URL where I can access the application?
How can I get my friend Bob in Timbuktu to call some kind of URL (no need for DNS) to access my application?
I know the answer has something to do with LoadBalancer nodes and Ingress, but there seems to be no proper documentation out there on how to do this for a simple hello world app.
GKE hello-world with Ingress Official Example: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/load-balance-ingress
The ingress controller is built-in in GKE, you just need a kind: Ingress object that points to your Service. Addressing your question:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: hello-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: "gce"
spec:
rules:
- http:
paths:
- path: /*
backend:
serviceName: hello-world
servicePort: 80
Once deployed, query kubectl get ingress hello-ingress -oyaml to find out the resulting load-balancer's IP in the status: field.
If you don't want to set up a DNS and/or an ingress, you can simply do it with what you already have using the node external ip.
It seems that you already have the deployement and the NodePort service is mapped to port 30081.
So, below are the remaining steps to make it work with what you have :
Get your node IP :
kubectl get nodes -o wide
Now that you have your node external IP, you need to allow tcp traffic to this port
gcloud compute firewall-rules create allow-tcp-30081 --allow tcp:30081
That's it ! You can just tell you're friend Bob that the service should be accessible at node-ip:30081
You can have a look at this page to see the other possibilities depending on your service type.
Also, when you use a NodePort the port is mapped to all the nodes of your cluster, so you can use any IP. No need to look for the node where your replicas is deployed.
If you don't want to use Ingress or anything. You can expose your deployment as LoadBalancer then using external IP your friend bob can access application. So to use
kubectl expose deployment hello-world-deployment --name=hello-world-deployment --type=LoadBalancer --port 80 --target-port 80
This will take around 1 minute to assign an external IP address to the service.
to get external IP use
kubectl get services
Get the External IP address in-front of your service and open your browser and enter the IP address that you copied.
Done !! This is the easiest and simplest way to get start with !!
You can expose your Kubernetes services to the internet with an Ingress.
GKE allows you to use different kinds of Ingress (nginx based, and so on) but, by default, it will expose your service through the Cloud Load Balancing service.
As indicated by #MaxLobur, you can configure this default Ingress applying a configuration file similar to this:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: hello-world-ingress
spec:
backend:
serviceName: hello-world
servicePort: 80
Or, equivalently, if you want to prepare your Ingress for various backend services and configure it based on rules:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: hello-world-ingress
spec:
rules:
- http:
paths:
- path: /*
backend:
serviceName: hello-world
servicePort: 80
This Ingress will be assigned an external IP address.
You can find which with the following command:
kubectl get ingress hello-world-ingress
This command will output something similar to the following:
NAME HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
hello-world-ingress * 203.0.113.12 80 2m
But, if you give this IP address to your friend Bob in Timbuktu, he will call you back soon telling you that he cannot access the application...
Now seriously: this external IP address assigned by GCP is temporary, an ephemeral one subject to change.
If you need a deterministic, fixed IP address for your application, you need to configure a static IP for your Ingress.
This will also allow you to configure, if necessary, a DNS record and SSL certificates for your application.
In GCP, the first step in this process is reserving a static IP address. You can configure it in the GCP console, or by issuing the following gcloud command:
gcloud compute addresses create hello-world-static-ip --global
This IP should be later assigned to your Ingress by modifying its configuration file:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: hello-world-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.global-static-ip-name: "hello-world-static-ip"
spec:
backend:
serviceName: hello-world
servicePort: 80
This static IP approach only adds value because as long as it is associated with a Google Cloud network resource, you will not be charged for it.
All this process is documented in this GCP documentation page.

Why is there an ADDRESS for the ingress-service? What's the use of that ADDRESS?

I deploy my cluster on GKE with an Ingress Controller
I use Helm to install the following:
Installed Ingress Controller
Deployed Load Balancer Service (Create a Load Balancer on GCP as well)
I also deployed the Ingress Object (Config as below)
Then I observed the following status ...
The Ingress Controller is exposed (By Load Balancer Service) with two endpoints: 35.197.XX.XX:80, 35.197.XX.XX:443
These two endpoints are exposed by the Cloud load balancer.
I have no problem with it.
However, when I execute kubectl get ing ingress-service -o wide, it prints out the following info.
NAME HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
ingress-service k8s.XX.com.tw 34.87.XX.XX 80, 443 5h50m
I really don't under the use of the IP under the ADDRESS column.
I can also see that Google add some extra info to the end of my Ingress config file about load balancer IP for me.
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
....(ommitted)
spec:
rules:
- host: k8s.XX.com.tw
http:
paths:
- backend:
serviceName: client-cluster-ip-service
servicePort: 3000
path: /?(.*)
- backend:
serviceName: server-cluster-ip-service
servicePort: 5000
path: /api/?(.*)
tls:
- hosts:
- k8s.XX.com.tw
secretName: XX-com-tw
status:
loadBalancer:
ingress:
- ip: 34.87.XX.XX
According to Google's doc, this (34.87.XX.XX) looks like an external IP, but I can't access it with http://34.87.XX.XX
My question is that since we already have an external IP (35.197.XX.XX) to receive the traffic, why do we need this ADDRESS for the ingress-service?
If it's an internal or external IP ADDRESS?
What is this ADDRESS bound to?
What exactly is this ADDRESS used for?
Can anyone shed some light? Thanks a lot!
If you simply go take a look at the documentation you will have your answer.
What is an ingress ressource: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/ingress/#what-is-ingress
So following the doc:
Ingress exposes HTTP and HTTPS routes from outside the cluster to services within the cluster. Traffic routing is controlled by rules defined on the Ingress resource.
To be more precise on cloud provider, the ingress will create a load-balancer to expose the service to the internet. The cocumentation on the subject specific to gke: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/tutorials/http-balancer
That explains why you have an external ip for the ingress.
What you should do now:
If you don't want to expose HTTP or/and HTTPS ports just delete the ingress ressource, you don't use it so it's pretty much useless.
If you are using HTTP/HTTPS ressources, change your service type to nodePort and leave the management of the load balancer to the ingress.
My opinion is that, as you are deploying the ingress-controller, you should select the second option and leave the management of the load-balancer to it. For the ingress of the ingress-controller, don't define rules just the backend to the nodePort service, the rules should be defined in specific ingress for each app and be managed by the ingress-controller.

How to send data from a container within a Pod, to a container within a separate Pod - within the same cluster?

I have a React frontend and a node.js backend. Each are in separate containers within separate Pods within the same cluster in k8's.
I want to send data between them without having to use IP addresses. I know Kubernetes has a feature that lets you talk between pods inside the same cluster, and i think its related to the selector label defined within the Service files created.
I have created a ClusterIp service for my React app and another ClusterIp for my server. I have created an ingress file for my application. I know my ingress works as i can access my UI, and i can hit my health check endpoint of my server - so i know they are exposed to the outside world correctly. My problem is how to communicate internally within k8's
Within the my react app i have tried to write
axios.post("/api/test", {
value: "TestValue"
});
But the endpoint within my server of api/test never gets hit with this.
Backend Server Cluster IP - - - - 
 
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: server-model-cluster-ip-service
spec:
type: ClusterIP
selector:
component: server-model
ports:
- port: 8050
targetPort: 8050
React UI Cluster IP - - - -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: react-ui-cluster-ip-service
spec:
type: ClusterIP
selector:
component: react-ui
ports:
- port: 3000
targetPort: 3000 
Ingress File - - - - -
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: ingress-service
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target: /$1
spec:
rules:
- http:
paths:
- path: /api/?(.*)
backend:
serviceName: react-ui-cluster-ip-service
servicePort: 8050
- path: /server/?(.*)
backend:
serviceName: server-model-cluster-ip-service
servicePort: 8050
I understand the Label selector is what maps my React Cluster IP to the Deployment for my UI and similar for my Server Cluster IP to my Deployment for server. I thin i am right in saying i can use the selector somehow to send axis/http requests to other pods like..
axios.post("/PODNAME/api/test", {
value: "TestValue"
});
Could anyone tell me if i am completely wrong or missing something obvious please :)
Here in this part of ingress service name react-ui-cluster-ip-service is there which is running on port 3000 as you mention in service spec file.
But in you are you are sending traffic to proper service name but the port is wrong one.
- path: /api/?(.*)
backend:
serviceName: react-ui-cluster-ip-service
servicePort: 8050
I think due to this you are not able to send request to /api/?
From your service spec file you can also remove type:clusterIP and you can use an only service name to resolve the services inside kubernetes cluster.
answer for your question title: containers with pod can talk on localhost while container within separtate pod can talk over the service name there no need add the service type as clusterIP & Nodeport
I have few concerns here.
As #Harsh Manvar mentioned in his answer, Kubernetes represents mechanism of discovering internal services which guarantees intercommunication between Pods within the same cluster either by IP address or relevant DNS name of service.Therefore you might be able to reach your backend server from particular frontend Pod without involving Ingress, as Ingress controller stays as an edge router and exposes HTTP and HTTPS network traffic from outside the cluster to the corresponded Kubernetes services.
You also used rewrite expression enclosed to your specific path based routing rules within Ingress object. In that scenario the rewrite seems to be resulted in the following way: server-model-cluster-ip-service/api/test rewrites to server-model-cluster-ip-service/test URI and this should be final path placeholder for you backend service. In fact that you are invoking axios.post("server-model-cluster-ip-service/api/test", { value: "TestValue" }) request from React UI Pod might not hit the target backend service.
I just gave some points to consider how to proceed with further troubleshooting, at least you can log into the frontend Pod and check the connectivity to the target backend service accordingly.