I use spring data jpa with native query
I have already some query like this
How to use native query none parameter.
String q="SELECT t1.blockNumber-1 FROM someTAble t1 LEFT JOIN someTAble t2 ON t2.blockNumber = t1.blockNumber-1 WHERE t2.blockNumber IS NULL AND t1.blockNumber> 0 ORDER BY t1.blockNumber";
#Query(value = q,nativeQuery = true)
List<Entity> findByBlockNumberIs();
they are occur errors Column 'sequence' not found.
That query means are when i insert some Contiguous data int value then i find missing data.
But
this query working
SELECT *,t1.blockNumber-1 FROM someTAble t1 LEFT JOIN someTAble t2 ON t2.blockNumber = t1.blockNumber-1 WHERE t2.blockNumber IS NULL AND t1.blockNumber> 0 ORDER BY t1.blockNumber
The difference between the two queries is whether there is a '*' or not
how to change simple to my query.
How to i changed error
OR How to use spring data jpa predicate
QEntity qBe1= QEntity .blockEntity;
QEntity qBe2= QEntity .blockEntity;
build.and(qBe2.blockNumber.eq(be.getBlockNumber()-1))
.and(qBe2.blockNumber.isNull().and(qBe1.blockNumber.gt(0)));
is predicate can use left join?
well...
use this.
List<Integer> findByBlockNumber()
Related
How to write this query in JPA?
select sol.ID_UNICA, sol.version
from uexdfr01.SOLUTION sol
join
(select solution4_.ID_UNICA, max(solution4_.version) as maxVersion
from uexdfr01.ORDER order3_
inner join uexdfr01.SOLUTION solution4_ on order3_.ID_SOLUTION=solution4_.ID_SOLUTION
where solution4_.ID_UNICA in (130,139,143,129,126,128,141,121,124,131)group by solution4_.ID_UNICA) as groupedtt
on sol.ID_UNICA = groupedtt.ID_UNICA
AND sol.version = groupedtt.maxVersion*
If you are not sure about db relationships use createNativeQuery and pass your query inside parenthesis.
Query selectRecords = getEntityManager().createNativeQuery(sqlQuery.toString());
Returned values are type of Objects so make sure to assign them in List as following way..
List<Object[]> data= selectRecords.getResultList();
I'm trying create a SELECT with GROUP BY in Firebird but I can't have any success. How could I do this ?
Exception
Can't format message 13:896 -- message file C:\firebird.msg not found.
Dynamic SQL Error.
SQL error code = -104.
Invalid expression in the select list (not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause).
(49,765 sec)
trying
SELECT FA_DATA, FA_CODALUNO, FA_MATERIA, FA_TURMA, FA_QTDFALTA,
ALU_CODIGO, ALU_NOME,
M_CODIGO, M_DESCRICAO,
FT_CODIGO, FT_ANOLETIVO, FT_TURMA
FROM FALTAS Falta
INNER JOIN ALUNOS Aluno ON (Falta.FA_CODALUNO = Aluno.ALU_CODIGO)
INNER JOIN MATERIAS Materia ON (Falta.FA_MATERIA = Materia.M_CODIGO)
INNER JOIN FORMACAOTURMAS Turma ON (Falta.FA_TURMA = Turma.FT_CODIGO)
WHERE (Falta.FA_CODALUNO = 238) AND (Turma.FT_ANOLETIVO = 2015)
GROUP BY Materia.M_CODIGO
Simple use of group by in firebird,group by all columns
select * from T1 t
where t.id in
(SELECT t.id FROM T1 t
INNER JOIN T2 j ON j.id = t.jid
WHERE t.id = 1
GROUP BY t.id)
Using GROUP BY doesn't make sense in your example code. It is only useful when using aggregate functions (+ some other minor uses). In any case, Firebird requires you to specify all columns from the SELECT column list except those with aggregate functions in the GROUP BY clause.
Note that this is more restrictive than the SQL standard, which allows you to leave out functionally dependent columns (ie if you specify a primary key or unique key, you don't need to specify the other columns of that table).
You don't specify why you want to group (because it doesn't make much sense to do it with this query). Maybe instead you want to ORDER BY, or you want the first row for each M_CODIGO.
I'm trying to join a table that might have multiple entries for the given id and aggregate the rows corresponding to this id in an array. This looks as follows in the SQL query:
SELECT * from data
LEFT JOIN (select id, array_agg(row(foo, bar)) AS foo_bar_data from foo_bar_table group by id) AS temp using(id)
This works as intended, but I'm having trouble reading out the result in JDBC.
ResultSet rs = st.executeQuery(...)
Array a = rs.getArray("foo_bar_data")
// Now I want to iterate over the array, reading the values foo and bar of each item.
My efforts so far always ended in a Method org.postgresql.jdbc4.Jdbc4Array.getArrayImpl(long,int,Map) is not yet implemented. exception. How can I iterate over a, retrieving the values foo and bar?
Edit: I should possibly also mention, that foo and bar don't have the same type.
Postgres JDBC driver does not support anything except basic types (numbers, date/timestamp, string) as JDBC array. You can call array_agg twice and get two arrays on each row:
try (Connection db = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/postgres", "postgres", "postgres");
ResultSet rs = db.createStatement().executeQuery("select array_agg(i), array_agg(s) from (select 1 i, 'a' s union select 2 i, 'b' s) t")) {
rs.next();
System.out.println(Arrays.toString((Object[]) rs.getArray(1).getArray()));
System.out.println(Arrays.toString((Object[]) rs.getArray(2).getArray()));
}
I'm attempting to outer join a table with an inline table valued function in my LINQ query, but I get a query compilation error at runtime:
"The query attempted to call 'OuterApply' over a nested query, but 'OuterApply' did not have the appropriate keys."
My linq statement looks like this:
var testQuery = (from accountBase in ViewContext.AccountBases
join advisorConcatRaw in ViewContext.UFN_AccountAdvisorsConcatenated_Get()
on accountBase.AccountId equals advisorConcatRaw.AccountId into advisorConcatOuter
from advisorConcat in advisorConcatOuter.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
accountBase.AccountId,
advisorConcat.Advisors
}).ToList();
The function definition is as follows:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.UFN_AccountAdvisorsConcatenated_Get()
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
SELECT AP.AccountId,
LEFT(AP.Advisors, LEN(AP.Advisors) - 1) AS Advisors
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
AP.AccountId,
( SELECT AP2.PropertyValue + ', '
FROM dbo.AccountProperty AP2 WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE AP2.AccountId = AP.AccountId
AND AP2.AccountPropertyTypeId = 1 -- Advisor
FOR XML PATH('')) AS Advisors
FROM dbo.AccountProperty AP WITH (NOLOCK)) AP;
I can successfully perform the join directly in sql as follows:
SELECT ab.accountid,
advisorConcat.Advisors
FROM accountbase ab
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Ufn_accountadvisorsconcatenated_get() advisorConcat
ON ab.accountid = advisorConcat.accountid
Does anyone have a working example of left outer joining an inline TVF to a table in LINQ to entities - or is this a known defect, etc? Many thanks.
Entity Framework needs to know what the primary key columns of the TVF results are to do a left join. Basically you need to create a fake table which has same schema as your TVF results and update TVF in model browser to return the new created table type instead of default complex type. You could refer to this answer to get more details.
I am trying to create an Entity SQL that is a union of two sub-queries.
(SELECT VALUE DISTINCT ROW(e.ColumnA, e.ColumnB, 1 AS Rank) FROM Context.Entity AS E WHERE ...)
UNION ALL
(SELECT VALUE DISTINCT ROW(e.ColumnA, e.ColumnB, 2 AS Rank) FROM Context.Entity AS E WHERE ...)
ORDER BY *??* LIMIT 50
I have tried:
ORDER BY Rank
and
ORDER BY e.Rank
but I keep getting:
System.Data.EntitySqlException: The query syntax is not valid. Near keyword 'ORDER'
Edit:
This is Entity Framework. In C#, the query is executed using:
var esql = "...";
ObjectParameter parameter0 = new ObjectParameter("p0", value1);
ObjectParameter parameter1 = new ObjectParameter("p1", value2);
ObjectQuery<DbDataRecord> query = context.CreateQuery<DbDataRecord>(esql, parameter0, parameter1);
var queryResults = query.Execute(MergeOption.NoTracking);
There is only a small portion of my application where I have to resort to using Entity SQL. Generally, the main use case is when I need to do: "WHERE Column LIKE 'A % value % with % multiple % wildcards'".
I do not think it is a problem with the Rank column. I do think it is how I am trying to apply an order by to two different esql statements joined by union all. Could someone suggest:
How to apply a ORDER BY to this kind of UNION/UNION ALL statment
How to order by the non-entity column expression.
Thanks.