In Mendeley Desktop, I can view all papers in a particular folder. Also I can filter my references according to tags and also check which tags belong to a particular reference.
But is there any possibility to check which folders belong to a specific reference? Basically going the opposite direction in the folder-reference association?
Related
I do apologize if similar question already put, but I haven't found one.
I would like to change the default project description file name (called README.md) to be a custom name (let's say XXX.md) and I wonder if it is possible to be the XXX.md the initial readme file for the project (typical situation: you open the project Code page and you will see the content of XXX.md down at bottom).
I would like to verify if this approach possible in general, but I am mainly interested in Github and Bitbucket services. I briefly checked project settings and I cannot find there such customization. Is it even possible?
GitHub, at least, doesn't provide the ability to do this. It is possible to use a different format (e.g., README.asciidoc or README.rst), but the root file must be called README.
Note that you can include other text markup documents like this and they'll be rendered if they're visited, it's just that they won't appear at the bottom of the file listing like a README will.
I have what seems like a simple question, but I haven't been able to find the answer here.
I have a SharePoint 2010 library with multiple folders. For some documents (e.g. a spreadsheet), I want to keep one copy in one folder, and have a link to it in some of the other folders. My two document types are "document" and "link to document". The modified date for the "link to document" is the date the original link was created (which will never change), and does not reflect when the linked spreadsheet is updated (which will happen on a daily basis.) This may confuse users who go to the link--they might think the data is old.
How can I show the date the document changed in my links to that document?
You can update the list item using a workflow. On a list item change, the workflow can look up the corresponding linked documents and then update the modified date on that list item.
The SharePoint SO site is also another good place to look for tips on SharePoint workflows. Just make sure the workflow doesn't get triggered again when the item get updated.
I found a much easier solution. I'm using the "Manage Copies" functionality to post updated copies to the folders where I was previously putting links. This should fix the problem with my "Modified" dates showing the time the link was created. Now I will have copies of my "one version of the truth" published to my other locations, with the correct "Modified" date. So easy!
I'm building a mobile app that is a port from a web-app and I'm trying to create the skeleton.
I have an admin center with a lot of different views that share one thing in common, they show all registers, create, update and delete. For example, I have one section for users where the first page shows all users, then there is a button to create and one for update that sends to different views.
The project skeleton would be something like this:
/users
users.html // show all users
users_create.html // creates user
users_update.html // update specific user
users_detail.html // show specific user
/posts
posts.html
posts_create.html
posts_update.html
posts_detail.html
/communities
communities.html
communities_create.html
communities_update.html
communities_detail.html
.... much more the same for other sections
My question is, what would be the best approach to build this with ionic? to have all this folders or just one common folder and resolve everything (number of fields, name of fields, etc) by passing a param to the route?
I ask you sorry if I didn't explain it very well but I hope you catch the idea of what I'm trying to say.
Thanks!
From the awesome book MEAN Web Development by Amos Haviv you can learn that there are basically two folder structures you can opt for:
Horizontal folder structure
A horizontal project structure is based on the division of folders and files by their functional role rather than by the feature they implement, which means that all the application files are placed inside a main application folder that contains an MVC folder structure. As you can see, the horizontal folder structure is very useful for small projects where the number of features is limited, and so files can be conveniently placed inside folders that represent their general roles.
Vertical folder structure
A vertical project structure is based on the division of folders and files by the feature they implement, which means each feature has its own autonomous folder that contains an MVC folder structure.
So, in your case, what I would actually do is go with the Vertical folder structure (since you said the app is (is going to be) big, where you would (in your case) have a users folder where you would then have folders controllers, views, model (in case you're using it) and all the appropriate files inside it. You can view the folder structure in action if you take a look at the project mean.js from the same author as the book.
I used the PowerCenter Metadata Exchange to query.
There is a view REP_ALL_SOURCES who can provides a list of the latest version of sources defined in each folder of a repository.
But when i used this view, i find that it shows the sources deleted too. I did't find the field who can filter the object deleted. so for REP_ALL_MAPPINGS, REP_LOAD_SESSIONS are the same.
who can please tell me how to show the object only exist?
Best wishes,
Zhixin
Sweet..I bought myself a 1TB portable harddrives this week. Don't you just love how much data you could store on one of these disks? The fact that I could store my bluray rips on to my portable harddisk and that my lg lcd tv can do HD rips right from the drive - that's amazing practicality right there! However, life it seems, is never so simple. I have 100s of movies unorganized in one huge folder, which is exactly what I needed to annoy myself while browsing the same on my tv to play a single movie. That got me thinking...
What if I had an automated way to organize movies into folders such that my folder-browsing-on-a-lcd-tv-or-a-comp would make my life a little easy?
I started thinking about this... I browsed a little in this context and I realized that if only I could "tag my movies somehow and create folders on-the-fly based on tags using hardlinks", I would have addressed my problem. I googled a bit to find software that works in the above fashion, only to find none.
A few more days of serious thought (as you know by now.. I think a lot.. and I guess this question is starting to sound like a blog rant/post of sorts...), in the interest of humanity, I thought I should come up with a generic way to address this: What if someone wanted to organize photos... organize music.. organize software?!
Turned my grey cells off for a while and here is an approach I came up with to solving my what-if scenario.
Tag / Group tag individual files (rely on a slick GUI to do it fast and do it good) - Adobe Flex/Eclipse RCP to do this?
Create hardlinks to each of the tagged files.
The first point is self-explanatory. The second (coz I am talking windows here), refers to making use of mklink.exe.
Consider a scenario where I have 2 movie files: I have a movie file "Transformers.avi" tagged as "english, action, bluray, sci-fi, imdb-top-50, must-watch-with-kids" and another movie file "The Specialist.avi" tagged as "english, bluray, thriller, adult". Here are a few of the possible locations I want to see my Transformers to be found:
[root directory]->all-tags->english
[root directory]->all-tags->bluray
[root directory]->all-tags->english->all-tags->bluray
[root directory]->all-tags->bluray->all-tags->action
[root direcotry]->all-tags->english->all-tags->action->bluray->all-tags->imdb-top-50
Given that windows has a limit of 1024 hardlinks to a single file, I probably would be allowed 7 unique tags per file. Each sub-folder will have an "all-tags" folder. Having it named "all-tags" makes it more accessible when order by name.
I believe this approach when automated to let you configure tags you want and where the hardlinks are created for you, helps you organize stuff effectively.
I don't know if there are better things out there. I would like your inputs on this approach and other possible ideas. I would like to gather inputs here and release something to sourceforge for everyone to use in a couple of weeks. I am sure, I can count on your positive response as always.
I believe hardlinks are not a good approach. Reason? A standalone player won't play them, and I wouldn't like a program who's made for tagging to tell me to stop making so many tags because of a Windows limitation on hardlinks (remembering each tag will increment the number of links exponentially).
Plus, "help" is not a good tag.
And I've had an idea once that I'm still planning to make some day to sort my own files - put the files in a big storage each below a GUID foldername (filename untouched) and store metadata in a sqlite database to be used by a smart file browser.
I was considering doing something similar to this with music for detecting duplicate songs and auto-organize funcationality.
For your application, I wouldn't recommend using any shell programs through Java. Exception handling becomes difficult, and your application becomes bound by the shell interface and implementation (i.e. windows versions or installations affect your application behavior).
I would use a database with a few tables: Files, Tags, and an association table.
The Files table would list the physical location of each file, the filename, and a unique identifier. This way, you can maintain information about each file without having to modify it for every tag association.
The Tags table would list each tag, and any metadata you want to store for each tag.
A third table, maybe 'FileTags' would store the assocation between tags and files. When adding tags to the stack, you would add a statement to the WHERE clause, and the list of files with all of the tags would be returned. This structure would also allow open your codebase up to other designs, such as include/exclude (autocomplete with X buttons), or possibly search.
If implemented in Java, your app would be platform independent, and would allow a very large number of tags and files. You can then use the system default application for opening the media file, and the user can make the selection in their native OS.
Reiser4?
...
(I mean nevermind Hans, but the tech...)
[disclaimer: Not a hacker. I know nothing of programming/coding, never mind filesystems & databases. I can barely code decent HTML even, if at all. Hey y'all! :D]
[footnote: does plain HTML5 work here? Too lazy to close my tags hehe :p]