I want to include Array of objects in api/doc view. But I am unable to get that.
From the code below:
#SWG\Schema(
#SWG\Property(property="project-name", type="string"),
#SWG\Property(property="project-detail", type="array",
#SWG\Items(type="object",
#SWG\Property(property="name", type="string", ),
#SWG\Property(property="category", type="string",),
),
#SWG\Items(type="object",
#SWG\Property(property="new_name", type="string", ),
#SWG\Property(property="new_category", type="string",),
),
),
),
I get the output:
{
"project-name": "string",
"project-detail": [
{
"name": "string",
"category": "string"
}
]
}
But I want below one:
{
"project-name": "string",
"project-detail": [
{
"name": "string",
"category": "string"
},
{
"new_name": "string",
"new_category": "string"
},
]
}
Please help me out for this.
You can only display one object on the array of objects. Because Swagger has been created to explain what you have to give to the API and what is returned (not required).
When you're looking an array and an object inside, of course you're understanding this isn't an array with 1 object.
Hope it helps !
Lord'
Modify your project detail property by adding example ex.
example="{
{
"name": "String",
"category": "String"
},
{
"name": "String",
"category": "String"
}
}"
Related
I have the following output from a web activity .
{
"value": [
{
"id": "/subscriptions/xy_csv",
"name": "xy_csv",
"type": "Microsoft.code",
"etag": "6200",
"properties": {
"folder": {
"name": "samplecodes"
},
"content": {
"query": "select * from table 1",
"metadata": {
"language": "sql"
},
"currentConnection": {
"databaseName": "demo",
"poolName": "Built-in"
},
"resultLimit": 5000
},
"type": "SqlQuery"
}
},
{
"id": "/subscriptions/ab_csv",
"name": "ab_csv",
"type": "Microsoft.code",
"etag": "6200",
"properties": {
"folder": {
"name": "livecode"
},
"content": {
"query": "select * from table 2",
"metadata": {
"language": "sql"
},
"currentConnection": {
"databaseName": "demo",
"poolName": "Built-in"
},
"resultLimit": 5000
},
"type": "SqlQuery"
}
}
]
I would like to create filter activity after the web activity just to filter out items that are saved under the folder name "livecode".
On the filter activity item field I have -#activity('Web1').output.value
On the condition field I have -- #startswith(item().properties.folder.name,'livecode')
The web activity is successful but the filter activity is failed with this error.
{
"errorCode": "InvalidTemplate",
"message": "The execution of template action 'FilterFilter1' failed: The evaluation of 'query' action 'where' expression '#startswith(item().properties.folder.name,'sql')' failed: 'The expression 'startswith(item().properties.folder.name,'sql')' cannot be evaluated because property 'folder' doesn't exist, available properties are 'content, type'.",
"failureType": "UserError",
"target": "Filter1",
"details": ""
}
it feels like I am going wrong on how i have written the Condition Dynamic Content filter to navigate to properties.folder.name. I am not sure what is missing in my condition. Can anyone help? thanks Much appreciated.
The error is because of the web activity output's properties object might not contain the folder sometimes.
I have taken the following json and got the same error:
{
"value":[
{
"id":"/subscriptions/xy_csv",
"name":"xy_csv",
"type":"Microsoft.code",
"etag":"6200",
"properties":{
"content":{
"query":"select * from table 1",
"metadata":{
"language":"sql"
},
"currentConnection":{
"databaseName":"demo",
"poolName":"Built-in"
},
"resultLimit":5000
},
"type":"SqlQuery"
}
},
{
"id":"/subscriptions/ab_csv",
"name":"ab_csv",
"type":"Microsoft.code",
"etag":"6200",
"properties":{
"folder":{
"name":"livecode"
},
"content":{
"query":"select * from table 2",
"metadata":{
"language":"sql"
},
"currentConnection":{
"databaseName":"demo",
"poolName":"Built-in"
},
"resultLimit":5000
},
"type":"SqlQuery"
}
}
]
}
So, you have to modify the filter condition to check whether it contains a folder key or not using the following dynamic content. I have taken your web activity output as a parameter value and took out folder key from properties object:
#startswith(if(contains(item().properties,'folder'),item().properties.folder.name,''),'livecode')
When I debug the pipeline, we get desired result:
I have the below mappings for a Copy activity in ADF:
"translator": {
"type": "TabularTranslator",
"mappings": [
{
"source": {
"path": "$['id']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "TicketID"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['summary']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "TicketSummary"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['status']['name']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "TicketStatus"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['company']['identifier']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "CustomerAccountNumber"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['company']['name']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "CustomerName"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['customFields'][74]['value']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "Landlord"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['customFields'][75]['value']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "Building"
}
}
],
"collectionReference": "",
"mapComplexValuesToString": false
}
The challenge I need to overcome is that the array indexes of the custom fields of the last two sources might change. So I've created an Azure Function which calculates the correct array index. However I can't work out how to use the Azure Function output value in the source path string - I have tried to refer to it using an expression like #activity('Get Building Field Index').output but as it's expecting a JSON path, this doesn't work and produces an error:
JSON path $['customFields'][#activity('Get Building Field Index').outputS]['value'] is invalid.
Is there a different way to achieve what I am trying to do?
Thanks in advance
I have a slightly similar scenario that you might be able to work with.
First, I have a JSON file that is emitted that I then access with Synapse/ADF with Lookup.
I next have a For each activity that runs a copy data activity.
The for each activity receives my Lookup and makes my JSON usable, by setting the following in the For each's Settings like so:
#activity('Lookup').output.firstRow.childItems
My JSON roughly looks as follows:
{"childItems": [
{"subpath": "path/to/folder",
"filename": "filename.parquet",
"subfolder": "subfolder",
"outfolder": "subfolder",
"origin": "A"}]}
So this means in my copy data activity within the for each activity, I can access the parameters of my JSON like so:
#item()['subpath']
#item()['filename']
#item()['folder']
.. etc
Edit:
Adding some screen caps of the parameterization:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/aHpWk.png
I'm using graphQL to query a MongoDB database in React, using Strapi as my CMS. I'm using Apollo to handle the GraphQL queries. I'm able to get my objects by passing an ID argument, but I want to be able to pass different arguments like a name.
This works:
{
course(id: "5eb4821d20c80654609a2e0c") {
name
description
modules {
title
}
}
}
This doesn't work, giving the error "Unknown argument \"name\" on field \"course\" of type \"Query\"
{
course(name: "course1") {
name
description
modules {
title
}
}
}
From what I've read, I need to define a custom query, but I'm not sure how to do this.
The model for Course looks like this currently:
"kind": "collectionType",
"collectionName": "courses",
"info": {
"name": "Course"
},
"options": {
"increments": true,
"timestamps": true
},
"attributes": {
"name": {
"type": "string",
"unique": true
},
"description": {
"type": "richtext"
},
"banner": {
"collection": "file",
"via": "related",
"allowedTypes": [
"images",
"files",
"videos"
],
"plugin": "upload",
"required": false
},
"published": {
"type": "date"
},
"modules": {
"collection": "module"
},
"title": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
and the
Any help would be appreciated.
Referring to Strapi GraphQL Query API
You can use where with the query courses to filter your fields. You will get a list of courses instead of one course
This should work:
{
courses(where: { name: "course1" }) {
name
description
modules {
title
}
}
}
I have a json document I'm trying to validate with this form:
...
"products": [{
"prop1": "foo",
"prop2": "bar"
}, {
"prop3": "hello",
"prop4": "world"
},
...
There are multiple different forms an object may take. My schema looks like this:
...
"definitions": {
"products": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/Product" },
"Product": {
"type": "object",
"oneOf": [
{ "$ref": "#/definitions/Product_Type1" },
{ "$ref": "#/definitions/Product_Type2" },
...
]
},
"Product_Type1": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"prop1": { "type": "string" },
"prop2": { "type": "string" }
},
"Product_Type2": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"prop3": { "type": "string" },
"prop4": { "type": "string" }
}
...
On top of this, certain properties of the individual product array objects may be indirected via further usage of anyOf or oneOf.
I'm running into issues in VSCode using the built-in schema validation where it throws errors for every item in the products array that don't match Product_Type1.
So it seems the validator latches onto that first oneOf it found and won't validate against any of the other types.
I didn't find any limitations to the oneOf mechanism on jsonschema.org. And there is no mention of it being used in the page specifically dealing with arrays here: https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/array.html
Is what I'm attempting possible?
Your general approach is fine. Let's take a slightly simpler example to illustrate what's going wrong.
Given this schema
{
"oneOf": [
{ "properties": { "foo": { "type": "integer" } } },
{ "properties": { "bar": { "type": "integer" } } }
]
}
And this instance
{ "foo": 42 }
At first glance, this looks like it matches /oneOf/0 and not oneOf/1. It actually matches both schemas, which violates the one-and-only-one constraint imposed by oneOf and the oneOf fails.
Remember that every keyword in JSON Schema is a constraint. Anything that is not explicitly excluded by the schema is allowed. There is nothing in the /oneOf/1 schema that says a "foo" property is not allowed. Nor does is say that "foo" is required. It only says that if the instance has a keyword "foo", then it must be an integer.
To fix this, you will need required and maybe additionalProperties depending on the situation. I show here how you would use additionalProperties, but I recommend you don't use it unless you need to because is does have some problematic properties.
{
"oneOf": [
{
"properties": { "foo": { "type": "integer" } },
"required": ["foo"],
"additionalProperties": false
},
{
"properties": { "bar": { "type": "integer" } },
"required": ["bar"],
"additionalProperties": false
}
]
}
I need to write the JSON Schema based on the specification defined by http://json-schema.org/. But I'm struggling for the required/mandatory property validation. Below is the JSON schema that I have written where all the 3 properties are mandatory but In my case either one should be mandatory. How to do this?.
{
"id": "http://example.com/searchShops-schema#",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#",
"title": "searchShops Service",
"description": "",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"city":{
"type": "string"
},
"address":{
"type": "string"
},
"zipCode":{
"type": "integer"
}
},
"required": ["city", "address", "zipCode"]
}
If your goal is to tell that "I want at least one member to exist" then use minProperties:
{
"type": "object",
"etc": "etc",
"minProperties": 1
}
Note also that you can use "dependencies" to great effect if you also want additional constraints to exist when this or that member is present.
{
...
"anyOf": [
{ "required": ["city"] },
{ "required": ["address"] },
{ "required": ["zipcode"] },
]
}
Or use "oneOf" if exactly one property should be present