I am reading the android platform-build docs with gnu makefile(Android.mk) from https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/+/master/core/build-system.html.
Now I met an issue I didn't find a related template example?
<h3><a name="templates"/>How to add another component to the build - Android.mk templates</h3>
<p>You have a new library, a new app, or a new executable. For each of the
common types of modules, there is a corresponding file in the templates
directory. It will usually be enough to copy one of these, and fill in your
own values. Some of the more esoteric values are not included in the
templates, but are instead just documented here, as is the documentation
on using custom tools to generate files.</p>
<p>Mostly, you can just look for the TODO comments in the templates and do
what it says. Please remember to delete the TODO comments when you're done
to keep the files clean. The templates have minimal documentation in them,
because they're going to be copied, and when that gets stale, the copies just
won't get updated. So read on...</p>
<h4>Apps</h4>
<p>Use the <code>templates/apps</code> file.</p>
<p>This template is pretty self-explanitory. See the variables below for more
details.</p>
As sections mentioned above I assume there are somethings named 'templates' directory for
a library, apps ... But I couldn't find that in android source tree.
Could anyone enlighten me?
The examples are not located in a templates subfolder, but in the same directory as build-system.html:
binary.mk, shared_library.mk, java_library.mk, and many more.
Note: Android is switching from the Makefile-based build system to Soong. You might want to consider switching, too.
Related
I'm thinking about developing an Excel add-in as described here.
Would that be possible with Svelte - and do you know of any guides/help if yes?
I have looked through the video here, and I'm about worried about the usage of webpack.
Well... let's break it down
Is it possible?
Short answer: yes
Long answer: the documentation clearly states that Excel add-in still uses jQuery for logic manipulations. If your question was about Angular or react it would probably be a hard NO since those frameworks use an engine that should be included as part of solution. This kind of dependencies when dealing with plugins development are pretty hard to implement and maintain as a function of time so it's better to use very lightweight, non-core dependencies instead. Since you are asking about svelte - it is "compiled" into a bundle that contains pure code (based on your app logic). So - as long as your app rely on the load event sequence described in the docs - you are good to go.
Do you really need Webpack?
Short answer: no
Long answer: svelte can be deployed using rollup instead - which is more suitable for micro-applications (such as yours). So, if you feel that webpack (somehow) is blocking your work pipeline - just use svelete default configuration with rollup and you are ready to go
Your workflow
Create a very simple svelte app (my suggestion - try to take the example in the docs and implement it using svelte)
Test it locally (just verify it works)
Build it (you should ended up with 3 files - 1 html file in public directory and 2 other files in public/build directory - 1 js file and 1 css file (both called bundle)
Here's the tricky part - the html file does nothing - just loading the css and js files. In your case - you don't really need it
Change the bundle.css file to Home.css file
Change the bundle.js file to Home.js file and put your app inside the add-in main function
'use strict';
(function () {
Office.onReady(function() {
// Office is ready
YOUR SVELTE APP CODE SHOULD BE PLACED HERE
});
})();
Pack your add-in and test it
Technical notes
If Excel blocks the creation of new elements (using dynamic injection) - this approach will NOT work (since your entire app is generated by your js file)
Please refer to this article for more information about packing your app
Try to make your app as lightweight and small-size as possible just to avoid the risk of exceeding the limits allowed for add-ins
I'm looking to create a vue-cli 3.x plugin that generates extra files in the project when invoked and templates these based on configuration info entered by the user.
It's rather easy to collect this information from user prompts but it'd be much nicer if users could put this info into some sort of configuration file and have the plugin read it from there.
I understand vue-cli now uses a vue.config.js file on the project level and ~/.vuerc on a more global (preset) level. However, it doesn't look like my generator function would have access to either one of those files.
"The entire preset" should be passed as the third argument to the function when invoking the plugin with module.exports = (api, options, rootOptions) => {} in ./generator/index.js, rootOptions is undefined.
Sililarly, the use of vue.config.js is discussed in the documentation when talking about service plugins, but there's no mention how to use it in a generator function.
Am I missing something obvious here or is there really no officially sanctioned way to do this? Nothing stops me from reading vue.config.js in my function, but this feels hacky. And I wouldn't even know how to find out which preset was used to create the project.
So your problem is that you can't find ~/.vuerc?
I had the same issue and I found the solution here.
The solution is to use the command line
vue config
to see .vuerc, and then use
vue config --delete presets.yourPresetName
to delete your preset.
As well, if you can't type in your preset name in the terminal because it contains a space or an apostrophe, you can use
vue config --edit
to open .vuerc with a text editor and just edit it there
anybody knows how to check if a js/css file is already included with typoscript?
Example
[Template_A.ts]
page.includeJS {
jsfile = fileadmin/Template/js/jquery-1.10.2.min.js
}
now if i got an extension with the same include e.g.
[Extension_A.ts]
page.includeJS {
jsfile = fileadmin/Template/js/jquery-1.10.2.min.js
}
Is there a way to prevent this kind of double code injection? Maybe i got another Template e.g. Template_B.ts where jquery is not included - than the Extension_A.ts has to include jquery by itself.
Kinldy
You can use the same key inside includeJS such it just gets overridden if you include the file twice.
Other than that you should put jQuery into includeJSlibs, such that it is loaded before the other JS files.
Other than that, the TS should be unique for each page. Therefore you always to make sure anyway that all resources are included in-order.
You should not include JS libs with the automatic extension TS setups. Use your documentation to tell the integrator what needs to be included and what not.
The various and independent inclusion of scripts by plugins and templates is one of the tricky points in TYPO3. As far as I know, this point cannot be managed at one single point.
There is a plugin "t3jquery" that offers to build, compress and share a common jQuery library. It also has a service to analyze other plugins for their dependencies. But this doesn't solve the problem in general, as many plugins don't check for libraries already loaded.
The most stable way is to remove all plugin's references to libraries manually in your TypoSkript. This gives you some simple additional TypoSkript lines. I use lines like these:
plugin.tx_imagecycle_pi1.file.jQueryLibrary >
plugin.tx_imagecycle_pi1.jQueryLibrary >
plugin.tx_multicontent_pi1.file.jQueryLibrary >
plugin.tx_multicontent_pi1.jQueryLibrary >
# Fluid
page.headerData.998 >
You can find the matching TypoSkript descriptors by searching for the library name in the TypoSkript browser or by greping in the plugin's source code. You will also need this if you wish to add libraries as part of content that was get by AJAX, thus separating the libs from the page content.
Here's a tut (in German): http://jweiland.net/typo3/typoscript/javascript-manuell-entfernen-oder-einbinden.html
Futher possibilities you can check:
Some plugins are written in good structure and offer to keep back their Javascript in the settings.
Some script inclusions may come rather from the static template but from a plugin, so don't forget to have a look there.
I have created two separate add ons. One for getting input from the user and storing in simple-storage. In the other one the actual add on function. Both work fine. But when i merge these both main add on code in to a single main code they didn't work. So i wonder whether there can be two js files in "main" add on directory and is communication possible between them?I need one of the js in main directory to be able to access the simple-storage of the other js in the same main directory.
I'm really not sure what your overall goal is, please provide an example for a more specific answer. If you're using the Add-on SDK, only code in main.js will be run, but you can use commonJS modules to implement various features and use require to import them into main.js.
Please see the docs for more information on how the Add-on SDK works:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/SDK
I developed a application with Zend Framework and now I want to be able to place the app in an subdirectory of a Documentroot.
e.g. http://www.example.com/myapp/
I read quite a lot of Docu how this could work, but all in all these solutions don´t fit my needs. Is there a trivial way to do the subdir thing, without adding the concrete path to any file which generates the pages.
There are some examples in the net, where a basePath is set in the application enviroment and so there is a method call bevor each "form" creation which prepends the path before the link.
$form->setAction($this->_request->getBaseUrl() . $this->_helper->url('sign'));
This was from: http://johnmee.com/2008/11/zend-framework-quickstart-tutorial-deploy-to-a-subdirectory-instead-of-web-root/
But this is only works for small examples, I have tons of forms, tons of views and tons of scripts. I can´t belive this (lets call it hack :) ) is the only solution to do this.
Any ideas?
You don't have to do anything special. See my tutorial at http://akrabat.com/Zend-framework-tutorial which is developed entirely within a sub-directory.
As they say on the web page:
I’m told this last issue has been
lodged has a defect and not necessary
from releases “1.7″ and beyond. The
helper->url will henceforth prepend
the baseUrl to its result.
So you should be fine. Do you actually use the $form->setAction() method on every form already? Because if you use it in combination with the url helper, the baseUrl will already be included.