How to run cdap datafusion pipelines sequentially - google-cloud-data-fusion

I have a scenario where i have 5 pipelines which i want to run sequentially one after other. Is there any way to do this. I tried reading the documentation but it wasn't clear.
Thanks in advance!

Please take a look at the blog post here -
Cloud Data Fusion does support chaining multiple pipelines together using event based trigger. Please take a look at blogpost here https://medium.com/cdapio/event-based-triggers-for-cdap-pipelines-6f1c4b20adc3 which will walk you through an example use case for how to achieve that.
Thanks and Regards,
Sagar

Related

Sort test cases by number of related bugs on Azure DevOps

On Azure DevOps, I have a set of test cases and every test case has a number of related bugs (from 0 to you better not know :p). The link type here is "Tests".
I would like to sort the test cases by number of related bugs, to make an estimation of the most buggy parts of the software.
I've tried but I only found the option "Number of links" ("Nombre de liens associés" in French).
Thanks in advance.
EDIT: we use Azure DevOps Server, not Azure DevOps Service. Thus, unfortunately I can't follow the steps here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/boards/queries/linking-attachments?view=azure-devops#list-items-based-on-linked-dependents
Sort test cases by number of related bugs on Azure DevOps
For this issue , I am afraid it is currently unachievable in azure devops. Currently, there is no feature of sorting by related work items in azure devops.
Running the following query in the azure devops server, you can get all test cases containing related bugs , but you cannot sort these test cases.
Apart from the negative answer, I think what you want is a good idea! So I post a feature request here in DC forum. Anyone interested in this can vote for it and track it. You could vote that suggestion ticket and share your comment there,The product team would provide the updates if they view it.
You can do that only through customization:
Add a new field like Bugs Count or Active Bugs count. Add and manage fields for an inherited process
Create custom app to fill that field with real count of bugs through REST API. Wiql - Query By Wiql, Work Items - Update
Then you can use a column setting to edit the sort order of your query result.

SendGrid handling multiple environments

Couldn't find any info on that: does anyone know if SendGrid supports anyhow multiple environments?
I'm talking specifically about webhooks and seems that you can have only one webhook at a time where it would be nice to have separate for dev, stage and production environment while having one template base.
I finally found https://postmarkapp.com/ - so far the only one really supporting multiple environments independently.

Servicenow adding multiple choice into a workflow

I am developing a workflow and at one point the workflow can go into 3 directions. Let's call them A, B and C. But unfortunately I don't have the info in SNOW so, a person needs to choose the direction of the flow.
What would be the best way to integrate some kind of mc question into a workflow?
It's the first time for me to create a complex workflow, so I have no Idea. I thought about adding an event where the user has to select something. But is this the right approach ?
Any help is upvoted, thank you in advance
Configure this in Additional Properties while creating a Workflow.
You can change the sub-flows based on these conditions defined.
Read more here

Is there a way to obtain details on triggers in Google Scripts?

Basically I am aiming to make an easier interface for managing time based triggers that control Google Scripts So far I have not found anything that would allow me to get details on the current triggers, specifically trigger times. There seem to only be a handful of methods supporting trigger management currently.
Documentation:
Class Trigger
Thanks for any suggestions or pointers!
The Apps Script documentation also contains Managing Triggers Programmatically, which is a very promising title.
However, this sums it up:
The only way to programmatically modify an existing trigger is to delete it and then create a new one.
Sometimes we find undocumented APIs by playing with auto-completion, but there don't seem to be any for Triggers at this time.
I tried this little gem, hoping to get logs full of trigger information:
var triggers = ScriptApp.getProjectTriggers();
for (var i in triggers) {
Logger.log(Utilities.jsonStringify(triggers[i]));
}
All I got was "Trigger" repeated ad nauseum. So no help there, the Trigger object is locked down.
I'm surprised that there's no request in the Issue Tracker against the Triggers Component to add APIs to get this additional information, or to support more programmability. You should add one, and report it here so others can star it (cast their vote).
Per #Mogsdad 's suggestion I have submitted a feature request via the Issue Tracker
. Please go and cast your vote for this issue and add any other suggestions for the request. The issue is fairly broad and there may be a lot of detailed information that could be useful if the right API is created. So please add comments in the issue tracker if there are parts you feel need to be addressed in an expansion of the current Trigger API.

Task distribution for graph based data

I am learning to program distributed computing system. And the system I need to work on would require to perform computation on graph data (social network data) in parallel environment.
After searching on the internet, I come down to the issue regarding to the task distribution. It seems that many of such kind systems are designed by worker requesting task from master e.g. volunteer computing [1] or hadoop map/reduce transmit heartbeat.
My question is - is there any task distribution/ assignment is designed with the style in that the master would proactive assign task to slaves? What issues may need to pay attention to when programming such mechanism?
I think I may be wrong in some concepts that I am not aware of. So I appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks for advice.
[1]. boinc.berkeley.edu/heien_09.pdf
No, you're exactly right -- the master-wokrer pattern is well established. For a certain flavour of it, take a look here for a message-queue based system, or look it up on wikipedia.
Tim,
Thanks for providing that link. Although it talks about Microsoft solution, the information in the article is very useful, which serves as good keywords for me to search further information.
Thanks again for your help!