I am trying to get a field with a rich text but it is striping all the html in the search query. Is there a way to get the html rather than the rich text?
https://{domain}.sharepoint.com/_api/search/query?querytext=%27claim%27&selectproperties=%27Title,Question,Answer%27
<d:Key>Answer</d:Key>
<d:Value xml:space="preserve"> See THIS Form . </d:Value>
Answer is the Rich text field with a link in it, When I do a GET (_api/web/lists/getbytitle), it comes back with a link in that field.
Basically, I want to avoid having to call search then call a GET to replace the values.
I solved this by looking through the search properties and using the ID in the path to use a GET List
_api/web/lists/getbytitle('title')/items('1')
then replacing the column in search with the rich text with the one from the GET.
I only need 3 results or so, so this was not a problem for me.
It looks like in the search query, doesnt give back any html tags for the rich text column.
Related
I am trying to create documents inside a LotusNotes Database by using the COM API. So far everything is working, except for the rendering of the RichText.
The RichText is created by converting a MarkDown document to RichText using Pandoc. Afterwards, I create a new RichTextItem.
In PowerShell it looks like this:
# A LotusNotes document
$Document = $Database.CreateDocument()
# Add a Body field as type RichText
$RTI = $Document.CreateRichTextItem("Body")
# Append the RichText to the field
$RTI.AppendText("THE_CONVERTED_MARKDOWN_COMES_HERE")
$Document.Save($true, $true)
But when I view the document, I only see the raw unformatted RichText in the body field. How can I render the text?
That's what AppendText does. It takes whatever you give it and renders it as plain text.
I am not familiar with Pandoc and have no idea what format is coming out of your conversion from MarkDown, but if it is HTML then you probably need to be using NotesMIMEEntity and other classes related to it. Otherwise, investigating a third party product like the MIDAS Rich Text API from Genii Software may be your best course of action.
I write word add-in in JS using this API: https://dev.office.com/reference/add-ins/word/word-add-ins-reference-overview
When I use function body.getHtml() I get almost everything , but some style is missing ,for example table of content is not with style, and when I use body.insertHtml() all style of table of content is not exist.
I success to get all style with body.getOoxml() function but it's very very long when I compare it to the html and this is bug problem for me .
What could I do?
Thank you
The issue here is that when you create a TOC what really happens in the doc is that we insert a special type of content control wrapping the TOC and we don't roundtrip it in docx-html conversions. In fact, if you save your TOCed document as HTML you will see that the style is lost in the resulting html. FWIW the links on the resulting HTML are functional.
That said, your only option as of now is to go OOXML.
thx,
Juan.
is it possible to insert a content control into a Word document, then, get some sort of handle or context to the content control, and then insert HTML into it?
Essentially, the scenario that I am trying to create with the Office JavaScript API is to, upon the user's request, insert a rich text content control, and then populate it with HTML.
I am able to insert the content control from the JavaScript API using the approach suggested at http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/appsforoffice/thread/8c4809c7-743c-4388-aef0-bc6a6855c882. It requires a coercionType of ooxml. However, the content that I wish to populate with the ooxml is HTML based. So when I try to insert a content control with the following ooxml:
...Boiler ooxml to create content control...
<w:r><w:t><h1>Test header</h1><h2>Test subheader</h2><p>Test paragraph text</p></w:t></w:r>
The insert attempt fails. I'm assuming that's because you can't mix ooxml and html when inserting this into the document with a coercionType of ooxml.
Since this ooxml approach is the only way you can insert a content control, how can I then set the content control with HTML text? I have looked over the Document object help content at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/fp142295.aspx, but I'm unsure how I can do this still, or if it's feasible.
Thanks
though I have not tried this with JS - it should be possible nontheless.
Try adding a altChunk Element, it can contain other open xml or html. I have used it a few times with success.
a few links on the issue:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2008/12/08/the-easy-way-to-assemble-multiple-word-documents.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericwhite/archive/2008/10/27/how-to-use-altchunk-for-document-assembly.aspx
U should however try to use "strict"-xml - otherwise the above might not be possible.
I just found this example (sry it's german, but there should be an english version somewhere as well). In which coercionType is used like this:
Office.context.document.setSelectedDataAsync(
booksToRead,
{ coercionType: Office.CoercionType.Html },
function (result) {
// Access the results, if necessary.
});
This might do the trick as well.
I have a textareaField in Silverstripe Backend in Edit Page View... The text to insert contains linebreaks. If I save the Page the text shows correctly with linebreaks in the textareaField. The linebreaks are for sure saved correctly to the database. But how do I display the text correctly in the frontend? It´s always outputted without linebreaks in a single line.
I tried already $Text.RAW, $Text.XML,... nothing works.
Thanks for the help,
Kind regards,
Florian
Assuming that you are using 3.0 this is a bug. You can see it here http://open.silverstripe.org/ticket/7596
A work around is to write your own function calling nl2br on your text field.
Here is an example:
public function NiceDescription () {
return (nl2br (Convert::raw2xml ($this->Description), true));
}
You can replace "Description" with the name of your text property.
Then in your template file if you need to display the description field you will call the function:
$NiceDescription
to visually render the newlines in html, you need to convert them to <BR> tags.
see http://php.net/manual/de/function.nl2br.php
I have a custom object known as "Companies".I have created a lookup field in a Visual Force page which gives me the list of companies name from the custom object " Companies".I have written a code which makes this lookup field auto-complete like what you have seen in the image attached.(First pic)
The problem: I don't know how to make the lookup field (which takes the list of companies name from custom object" Companies" in "Opportunities" standard object) auto-complete as done in the visual force page. Basically want the field highlighted in yellow in the second picture to auto-complete or give relevant suggestion when I type the first few characters.
Any help on this matter would be appreciated. Thank you
Have you tied enabling Auto Complete for your custom object the search page?
Click Your Name | Setup | Customize | Search | Search Settings.
Check the Lookup Auto-completion check box for your object.
This will give you auto-complete options for recently used items.
http://help.salesforce.com/help/doc/en/search_lookupdialog.htm#auto_complete
You will not be able to embed this customization into a standard page layout like you're using for the Opportunity object in your second screenshot. If that auto-complete is a must-have, then you really only have two options:
Replace the entire Opportunity page layout with a custom VF page
Write a VF component with just the Company lookup field in it and embed it into your Opportunity page layout (this will have to be in its own section, which probably won't look as nice)
This is what you want - http://tapp.ly/autocomplete/
Autocomplete Lookups for Salesforce enables any Salesforce Lookup field to support autocomplete suggestions. Autocomplete Lookups helps your users enter lookup fields reducing data entry tasks and error rates.
Salesforce records suggested as you start typing
Search All fields (Standard Salesforce Lookups only let you search by the Name field)
Results can show any field (E.g. Case Subject rather than Case Number)