I have this class need to be proxied
public class A {
private static final Logger b = LoggerFactory.createLogger(A.class)
public void doSth() {
b.debug("something to log)"
}
}
So i want to wrap logger b to do some dynamic config before and after log is executed.
why i need to do it:
i need to change appender config base on dynamic property (different per request
logger is used many places in project
they're generated by #Slf4j(lombok) so i can not wrap it manually like: Logger b = LoggerFactoryProxy.createLogger(A.class)
Can anyone know how to define pointcut to match this inline generated code?
I'm using spring aop
Thanks
Related
I'm using spring-integration bundled with spring-batch and got stuck trying to write integration tests to test the whole flow, not just single config.
I've created Embedded Sftp Server for this tests and trying to send message to sftpInboundChannel - the message is sent, but nothing happens, but when i send this message to the next channel (after sftpInboundChannel) it goes ok. Also i'm not able to load test source properties, even though i'm using #TestPropertySource annotation.
This are my class annotations
#TestPropertySource(properties = {
//here goes all the properties
})
#EnableConfigurationProperties
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#Import({TestConfig.class, SessionConfig.class})
#ActiveProfiles("it")
#SpringIntegrationTest
#EnableIntegration
#SpringBootTest
#DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.BEFORE_EACH_TEST_METHOD)
This is my class body
#Autowired
private PollableChannel sftpInboundChannel;
#Autowired
private SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> defaultSftpSessionFactory;
#Autowired
private EmbeddedSftpServer server;
#Test
public void shouldDoSmth() {
RemoteFileTemplate<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> template;
try {
template = new RemoteFileTemplate<>(defaultSftpSessionFactory);
SftpTestUtils.moveToRemoteFolder(template);
final List<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> movedFiles = SftpTestUtils.listFilesFromDirectory("folder/subfolder", template);
log.info("Moved file {}", movedFiles.size());
final MessageBuilder<String> messageBuilder = MessageBuilder.withPayload("Sample.txt") // path to file
.setHeader("file_Path", "Sample.txt")
boolean wasSent = this.sftpInboundChannel.send(messageBuilder.build());
log.info("Was sent to sftpInboundChannel channel {}", wasSent);
log.info("message {}", messageBuilder.build());
} finally {
SftpTestUtils.cleanUp();
}
}
To the case of not read the property file one solution is add in your Test class something like this:
#BeforeClass
public static void beforeClass() {
System.setProperty("propertyfile", "nameOfFile.properties");
}
A second way is to create a xml (or class) config where you add the tag:
<context:property-placeholder
location="nameOfFile.properties"
ignore-resource-not-found="true" system-properties-mode="OVERRIDE" />
and your file will be localized.
The property file should be inside of resources folder.
I am migrating from org.apache.felix.scr annotations to org.osgi.service.component annotations. I have a set of Components that inherit from a common abstract class. In the felix case, I can use a #Component annotation with the option componentAbstract=true on the super class, and then use #Reference annotation in the super class. I cannot find how to migrate this to osgi annotations.
Is it possible to use Component annotations in a super class of a Component? And if so, what is then the appropriate way to handle the properties and metatype generation?
So, what I am looking for, is something like this
/* No component definition should be generated for the parent, as it is
abstract and cannot be instantiated */
#Component(property="parent.property=parentValue")
public abstract class Parent {
#Reference
protected Service aService;
protected activate(Map<String,Object> props) {
System.out.println("I have my parent property: "+props.get("parent.property"));
#Override
public abstract void doSomething();
}
/* For this class, the proper Component definition should be generated, also
including the information coming from the annotations in the parent */
#Component(property="child.property=childValue")
public class Child extends Parent {
#Activate
public activate(Map<String,Object> props) {
super.activate(props);
System.out.println("I have my child property: "+props.get("child.property"));
}
public void doSomething() {
aService.doSomething();
}
}
By default BND will not process DS annotations in parent classes. You can change that with -dsannotations-options: inherit but please see http://enroute.osgi.org/faq/ds-inheritance.html why you shouldn't!
2021-02-23 UPDATE: It seems like the page mentioned above is no longer available. I don't know if it was moved elsewhere or simply removed but its content (in Markdown format) is still available on GitHub: https://github.com/osgi/osgi.enroute.site/blob/pre-R7/_faq/ds-inheritance.md
I'm currently working on a simple GWT project. One of the things I'd like to do is that when the page loads I can dynamically populate the contents of a ListBox based on certain criteria. I actually don't see any handlers for a ListBox to handle the initial render event but I see change handlers.
How does one populate a ListBox contents with data from the server side on pageload with GWT?
Right now I have a class that implements EntryPoint that has a
final ListBox fooList = new ListBox();
I also have a set of beans but I also have a class implementing RemoteService. Since I can't seem to get direct calls to my user defined packages directly in the EntryPoint (which makes sense) how do I populate that ListBox with server side content on initial page load? Right now I'm using a List but I figure if I cant get that to work I can get a DB call to work...
I've tried things in the EntryPoint like:
for (String name : FOOS) {
fooList.addItem(name, name);
}
However FOOS would derive from a server side data and the EntryPoint is supposed to be largerly limited to what can compile to JS! I can't get user defined classes to be recognized on that side as that string is the result of a set of user defined classes.
I also tried creating a method in the class implementing RemoteService that returns a ListBox. This also didn't compile when I tried to call this method. Perhaps I don't fully understand how to call methods in a RemoteService service implementing class.
I've searched a lot and I can't find anything that clearly explains the fundamentals on this. My background is much more ASP.NET and JSPs so perhaps I'm missing something.
I'm using GWT 2.6 is that is relevant.
The usual procedure is the following:
Create a bean class for the data you want to transmit between client and server. Let's call it MyBean.
Place MyBean in the shared package of your project.
This class has to implement either Serializable or IsSerializable, otherwise GWT will complain that it doesn't know how to transmit it.
Create your RemoteService that contains the method you want to use to transmit MyBean from/to the server.
Once you get your data on the client using an AsyncCallback and your RemoteService, fill the ListBox using your beans, e.g. by calling MyBean#getName() or MyBean#toString().
Success!
I based my example on the GWT sample project ( I named it example), just replace the classes and it should work :
public class Example implements EntryPoint {
/**
* Create a remote service proxy to talk to the server-side Greeting
* service.
*/
private final GreetingServiceAsync greetingService = GWT
.create(GreetingService.class);
/**
* This is the entry point method.
*/
public void onModuleLoad() {
final ListBox listBox = new ListBox();
RootPanel.get("sendButtonContainer").add(listBox);
greetingService.getSomeEntries(new AsyncCallback<String[]>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(String[] result) {
for (int i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
listBox.addItem(result[i]);
}
}
#Override
public void onFailure(Throwable caught) {
}
});
}
}
This is our EntryPoint, it creates a listbox and calls the server with a AsyncCallback to get some dynamic data. If the call is successfull (onSuccess), the data is written into the listbox.
The GreetingService interface define the synchronous methods, it is implemented in the GreetingServiceImpl class :
#RemoteServiceRelativePath("greet")
public interface GreetingService extends RemoteService {
String[] getSomeEntries() ;
}
The asynchronous counterpart is the GreetingServiceAsync interface, we used it before to call the server :
public interface GreetingServiceAsync {
void getSomeEntries(AsyncCallback<String[]> callback) ;
}
The GreetingServiceImpl class is located on the server. Here you could call for example a database:
#SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class GreetingServiceImpl extends RemoteServiceServlet implements
GreetingService {
#Override
public String[] getSomeEntries() {
String[] entries = { "Entry 1","Entry 2","Entry 3" };
return entries;
}
}
Now if you want to use some Bean/Pojo between the server and client, replace the String[] in each class/interface with the object name, put the class in the shared package and consider that it implements Serializable/IsSerializable.
I am trying to do something very simple. I have a com.mypackage.Logger logger class whose instantiation statement I would like to "insert" into every single class like so: private static Logger LOG = new Logger(Class.class). Then, I would like to log every single entry and exit instance for every single function in my project. Here is my aspect:
public aspect LoggingAspect pertypewithin(*) {
private static Logger LOG;
pointcut classes(): within(com.mypackage..*) && !within(com.mypackage.Logger) && !within(com.mypackage.LoggingAspect);
pointcut functions(): classes() && (execution(* *(..)) || execution(new(..)));
before(): staticinitialization(*) && classes() {
LOG = new Logger(thisJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature().getDeclaringType());
}
before() : functions() {
LOG.trace("ENTER " + thisJoinPoint.getSignature().toLongString());
}
after() returning(#SuppressWarnings("unused") Object ret) : functions() {
LOG.trace("EXIT " + thisJoinPoint.getSignature().toLongString());
}
Almost everything works properly. I am getting correct enter and exist log statements exactly as expected. The problem is that the logging class that is associated with each log entry is incorrect. I am using log4j, and each log entry is formatted like so:
[TRACE] (date and time stamp) (logging class name) (thread name) (some logging statement)
The problem is that the logging class used in Logger instantiation does not match the correct one that is indicated by thisJoinPoint.getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName().
I know that I am not doing something right with respect to the static Logger variable, so please help me. thank you for your time!!!
It's simple
Your LOG attribute is defined as private static. Static means that's a class attribute, not instance attribute.
This is clearly contradicting the instanciation model of your aspect, which is pertypewithin (one instance of aspect created for each type).
Try to remove the static modifier.
By the way, defining pertypewithin()* is quite large, you can restrict down the matching with pertypewithin(classes())
For the logging stuff, I've done some experimentations with AspectJ using instanciation model & inter-type declarations. I would advise the implementation using inter-type declaration because it is more memory-saving:
Logger injection with perthis
Logger injection with inter-type declaration
I want to do something like this:
#Stateless
#Path("/sensors/{sensorid}/version")
#Consumes({MediaType.APPLICATION_XML, MediaType.TEXT_XML})
#Produces({MediaType.APPLICATION_XML, MediaType.TEXT_XML})
public class SensorVersionRestView extends VersionRestView{
#PathParam("sensorid")
private String sensorid;
#GET
#Path("count")
// so the complete path is i.e.
// domain.com/rs/sensors/111211/version/count
public void getCount() {
// do something with the sensorId....
}
}
But the only thing I get is null on runtime (I use Glassfish v3 with Jersey). The compiler and eclipse never mentions a problem with the #PathParam at the member class variable.
What's wrong with my construct?
The main problem is, why I doesn't want to use the whole path on each method in this class, that there exists another class which handles some rest operations on the sensor layer (deomain.com/rs/sensors/count i.e.)
I believe you need to change it to this:
#Stateless
#Path("/sensors/{sensorid}/version")
public class SensorVersionRestView extends VersionRestView {
#GET
#Path("count")
#Consumes({MediaType.APPLICATION_XML, MediaType.TEXT_XML})
#Produces({MediaType.APPLICATION_XML, MediaType.TEXT_XML})
// domain.com/rs/sensors/111211/version/count
public void getCount(#PathParam("sensorid") String sensorid) {
// do something with the sensorId....
}
}
Because injection occurs at object
creation time, use of this annotation
on resource class fields and bean
properties is only supported for the
default per-request resource class
lifecycle. Resource classes using
other lifecycles should only use this
annotation on resource method
parameters. - JSR-311 Javadocs
You should be able to annotate fields with #PathParam as long as the resource class lifecyle is per-request. By default the life-cycle of root resource classes is per-request.
EDIT: I don't think you can achieve this using EJBs. If you remove the #Stateless annotation, it should work.